logo
Does high-potency cannabis impair mental health?

Does high-potency cannabis impair mental health?

Photographs by Sergiy Barchuk This article is part of The New Cannabis, a National Geographic exploration into the most critical questions raised by today's stronger, stranger, ever more accessible weed. Learn more.
Once upon a time, getting high from marijuana entailed smoking a joint, a pipe, or a bong. Those days are gone. Now there are numerous routes of consumption, some of which deliver a more potent buzz—but carry a risk of more serious side effects. In the latter category are dabbing and vaping, which are most prevalent among adults ages 18 to 24, according to a 2025 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
With vaping, cannabis oil or flower is heated to a temperature that releases cannabinoids as vapor to inhale. Some vaping devices can be loaded with dry herb or cannabis flower, while others are intended to be used with high-potency concentrates like oil or resin.
One reason it appeals to teens and young adults: 'Vaping is a discreet way to use cannabis in a public space—there's a convenience factor,' says Deepak Cyril D'Souza, professor of psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine and director of the Yale Center for the Science of Cannabis and Cannabinoids. 'One hit can deliver a lot, and get you high very quickly.'
With dabbing, by contrast, people inhale vapors from highly concentrated THC-based oils—such as wax (a gooey form of hash oil) or shatter (a solid, glasslike version)—that have been heated, often using a blowtorch and a modified bong or a water pipe called a dab rig. Dabbing isn't as discreet as vaping because 'with dabbing, you need paraphernalia,' D'Souza says.
Handheld dab pens are simpler alternatives—but some dab fans suggest dab pens can sacrifice flavor. Making such devices smaller, simpler, and cheaper is a major focus of the increasingly innovation-driven cannabis industry. From left to right: DISTILLATE VAPE CARTRIDGE Oil; THC potency as high as 95 percent. THCA SAND Concentrated tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA); converts to 75 to 90 percent THC when heated. INFUSED JOINTS Pre-rolled joints blended with or coated in a concentrate product; varied potency. CANNABIS TOPICALS Balms and creams applied to skin; nonintoxicating, typically low THC content. MARIJUANA FLOWER THC potency can reach nearly 35 percent; average closer to 15 percent.
Back in the 1960s, the THC concentration in cannabis was around 4 percent, D'Souza notes. Currently, it's around 18 percent, with some products made from cannabis bud at 35 percent. But 'concentrates that are vaped could have THC concentrations that are 65 to 95 percent. With that comes greater risk,' says D'Souza. THC concentrations in dabs can also range from 60 to 90 percent.
A major concern is that using cannabis with high THC concentrations could have harmful effects on mental health, especially with repeated or chronic use. This includes a risk of developing anxiety, depression, paranoia, hallucinations, or psychosis, says Akhil Anand, an addiction psychiatrist and clinical assistant professor at the Cleveland Clinic. These approaches are 'very dangerous. Patients are putting themselves at high risk for psychotic symptoms.'
'It's not the method per se that's risky. The main issue is that dabbing and vaping are associated with very high levels of THC,' adds D'Souza. 'We know that negative consequences of THC are dose-related. The more you're exposed to the higher concentrations of THC, the more likely there are to be negative consequences.'
Meanwhile, some of the mental health risks are especially high for teens. A study in a 2024 issue of the journal Psychological Medicine found that adolescents who used high-potency cannabis weekly had an 11 times greater risk of developing a psychotic disorder. Young adults over the age of 19 did not have an increased risk.
Part of the vulnerability is because teen brains are still developing and undergoing changes related to pruning, a process in which the brain eliminates unnecessary neurons and neural connections, D'Souza says. 'This process leads to maturation of the brain,' he explains. Regular use of high-potency THC can disrupt these physiological processes in the brain.
'In younger people, being exposed to these potent psychoactive substances can affect cognitive skills such as memory, concentration, attention, analytical thinking, and impulsivity,' Anand says. 'It's bad for everybody, but it's devastating in younger people because these effects can be permanent.'
Research has also found that people who experience cannabis-induced psychosis at any age have a 47 percent higher risk of developing schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
In addition to these mental health risks, there are potential consequences for physical health. Use of vaping concentrates can lead to 'popcorn lung' (aka bronchiolitis obliterans, a disease that affects small airways in the lungs), shortness of breath, a nagging or persistent cough, and wheezing, says Robert Welch, a pharmacist and director of the National Center for Cannabis Research and Education at the University of Mississippi. Over time, chronic irritation of lung tissue could increase the risk of long-term damage to the lungs. And dabbing can expose people to contaminants, including heavy metals, solvents, and pesticides. Among Gen Z consumers of legal cannabis—those born between 1997 and 2009—sales of vaping products exceed all other categories, including edibles and flower, according to the industry data firm Headset. Who's at risk for addiction?
With these high-potency forms of cannabis consumption, there's a greater risk of developing cannabis use disorder—'which boils down to a loss of control of cannabis use even though it interferes with your personal life, academic life, or professional life,' D'Souza says.
Generally, 'most people who are using these high levels of THC started at a lower level, with milder THC potency, and developed a high tolerance so they need more, more, more,' Anand says. 'People can develop an addiction where they need it or crave it.'
This is a greater concern with today's high-potency cannabis. 'We used to think the risk of cannabis use disorder was less than one in 10—that's because the cannabis used to be much weaker,' D'Souza says. 'In the current cannabis landscape, the rates of cannabis use disorder are closer to one in three. And the younger brain is much more likely to develop addiction because the brain undergoes its greatest changes in early to mid adolescence.'
In fact, research has found that teens are at significantly higher risk of developing cannabis use disorder within the first year after starting to use cannabis than adults are.
'There's this misconception that you can't get addicted to cannabis,' Welch says. 'That's just not true, especially with regular or high use' of today's high-potency cannabis.
Perhaps counterintuitively, concerns about high-potency pot have prompted calls for the federal government to remove cannabis from its most restrictive class of illicit drugs. Legal limits on THC content vary at state levels, and moving cannabis from the Drug Enforcement Administration's Schedule I to Schedule III would allow for federal regulations on potency. This reclassification was initiated in 2024, during the previous presidential administration, but it's now in limbo. A version of this story appears in the September 2025 issue of National Geographic magazine.
Set Design: Mat Cullen, Lalaland Artists
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Does This Side Effect Spell Doom for the GLP-1's?
Does This Side Effect Spell Doom for the GLP-1's?

Medscape

time27 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Does This Side Effect Spell Doom for the GLP-1's?

This transcript has been edited for clarity. Welcome to Impact Factor , your weekly dose of commentary on a new medical study. I'm Dr F. Perry Wilson from the Yale School of Medicine. About a year ago, I was talking to one of my friends about the slew of studies showing very broad benefits of the GLP-1 receptor agonists, such as semaglutide (Ozempic) and tirzepatide (Mounjaro). including weight loss and improved diabetes control. But studies also showed improved heart and kidney health, as well as lower overall mortality. Some analyses found reductions in problem drinking, smoking, and even compulsive shopping among people taking these drugs. I told my friend that I thought these drugs were complete game changers, fundamentally 'anticonsumption' agents that are the cure for society's primary ill of overconsumption. 'Yeah, but what about the side effects?' he said. I said, 'Sure, some gastrointestinal issues can come up, but usually it's not that bad.' Still, I demurred, 'It's early days; perhaps after 10 years on the drugs your eyes fall out or something.' This week's study doesn't suggest that GLP-1's cause your eyes to fall out exactly, but, as you'll see in a second, it's not that far off. We're talking about this study, ' Semaglutide or Tirzepatide and Optic Nerve and Visual Pathway Disorders in Type 2 Diabetes,' appearing in JAMA Network Open , which looks at eye problems in people taking the two most potent GLP-1 drugs. This was a huge retrospective cohort study using the TrinetX database, which contains electronic health record data on millions of patients across the United States. Researchers identified more than a million individuals with diabetes in the database who had no history of eye disease. They then identified when they were first prescribed Ozempic, Mounjaro, or a bunch of non-GLP-1 diabetes medications (such as insulin and metformin) which serve as controls here. They were on the lookout for conditions that some smaller studies had suggested might be associated with the weight-loss drugs: disorders of the optic nerve — in particular, a rather rare condition that can occur even outside diabetes, known as non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). This is a syndrome caused by a decline in blood supply to the optic nerve and is characterized by the sudden and painless loss of eyesight in one eye, which can lead to permanent blindness. It seems straightforward to ask which group — those who got the GLP-1 drugs or those who took other diabetes drugs — had more eye problems. But you probably suspect that these two groups weren't exactly comparable even before they started the drug. People who took weight-loss drugs were younger, more likely to be female, more likely to be on antihypertensive drugs, more likely to have a history of sleep apnea, and much more likely to have obesity. This is a classic apples-vs-oranges problem in observational research, one that was overcome, in this case, through a form of statistical wizardry called propensity score matching. In this process, each patient is assigned a likelihood of being prescribed the weight-loss drug, and then they are matched with someone with similar propensities. Thus, only one of each pair actually received the drug. Naturally, not everyone was matched; the apples and oranges that were just too appley or orangey were dropped from further analysis. After matching, the two groups were much more similar. Now that we have two similar groups — one of orangish apples and the other of appley oranges — we can compare the rates of NAION between them. Of 79,699 individuals started on either Ozempic or Mounjaro, 35 developed NAION within 2 years of follow-up. Of 79,699 started on non-GLP-1 diabetes drugs, 19 developed NAION over a similar duration of follow-up. That's 0.04% compared with 0.02%. There are a couple of ways to look at the data. On the relative scale, we see nearly a doubling of the risk for this eyesight-threatening disorder among people taking GLP-1 drugs. But on the absolute scale, any given individual's chance of actually getting this disorder is vanishingly small; the rate in the GLP-1 group was 462 per million individuals, compared with a baseline rate of about 238 per million individuals. Identifying rare risks like this is still important, especially for drugs that are as widely prescribed as the GLP-1's. Patients and providers need to have this in the back of their minds so that, if an unusual eye symptom does develop, everyone can react quickly. It's still not clear how these drugs could lead to NAION. It's true that the optic nerve has GLP-1 receptors on it, so this could be a direct drug effect. But the researchers suggest other possibilities as well, including the idea that sudden metabolic changes associated with weight loss or glucose effects from the drugs may change the microenvironment of the eye. I hate to fall back on 'more research is necessary,' but the truth is, more research is necessary to figure out how this works and, importantly, who is most at risk. I should remind you that this study shows us correlation, not causation. Even with propensity score matching, there will still be differences between the comparison groups that aren't fully accounted for. Beyond that, the very fact that people may be on alert for eye disorders among those taking GLP-1's may become something of a self-fulfilling prophecy in a study like this. If physicians are primed to think of a rare diagnosis like NAION when they see a patient on a GLP-1 drug, they might be more likely to make the diagnosis than they would if presented with exactly the same symptoms in someone not taking the drug. When the outcome is rare like this, minor biases can drive the results. So, I'm not ready to go back on my statement that these drugs are game changers. They clearly are. But we'd be naive to assume that there wouldn't be some risk. I'm encouraged that this particular risk is not nearly of a magnitude and frequency to counteract the obvious benefits of the drugs. In the end, this is one of those knowledge-is-power things. I don't think we'll see enthusiasm dampen for the GLP-1 drugs because of NAION, but it doesn't hurt for any of us — patients or providers — to be aware of it.

Chinese Authorities Mandating Blood Tests, Releasing Lab Mosquitoes to Fight Chikungunya Outbreak
Chinese Authorities Mandating Blood Tests, Releasing Lab Mosquitoes to Fight Chikungunya Outbreak

Epoch Times

time2 hours ago

  • Epoch Times

Chinese Authorities Mandating Blood Tests, Releasing Lab Mosquitoes to Fight Chikungunya Outbreak

As the chikungunya outbreak continues to spread in China, the prevention and control measures imposed by the Chinese communist regime have been causing increasing concerns among medical professionals and the Chinese public. Guangdong Province reported 1,387 new chikungunya cases in the past week (Aug. 3 to Aug. 9), according to a notice by the provincial Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. There have been no deaths from the virus reported so far, according to the Chinese agency. According to state media, as of July 29, the cumulative number of chikungunya cases in Foshan, Guangdong—where the first cases of the outbreak were reported on July 8—had exceeded 6,000. Because of the Chinese communist regime's record of censoring data it considers to be politically sensitive—as was seen with its cover-up of COVID-19 infections and related deaths in late 2019—the true number of known chikungunya fever infections could be higher. Chikungunya fever is a viral disease mainly transmitted to humans by mosquitoes. Its symptoms are similar to those of dengue fever. Patients usually experience fever, severe joint pain, muscle pain, headache, fatigue, and rash. There is no specific antiviral treatment for chikungunya. Deaths from the disease are rare but do occur, especially among vulnerable populations such as those with underlying health conditions. Globally, as of July 2025, chikungunya fever has resulted in 90 deaths across 16 impacted countries and territories. The outbreak in China started in the hardest-hit city, Foshan. Confirmed cases have since been detected in more than 10 cities in Guangdong Province, according to the Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The Macau Health Bureau reported a case of chikungunya fever on July 18. Hong Kong health authorities reported a case on Aug. 2. Both cases were identified as children who exhibited symptoms after returning from a trip to Foshan, according to the local health authorities. The chikungunya virus has also spread to northern China. The Beijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention issued a prevention reminder on July 22, warning of occasional cases allegedly imported to Beijing from abroad. However, Beijing officials have not released any data. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a Level 2 travel alert on Aug. 1 for China as the chikungunya virus outbreak continues its spread. Chinese doctors and residents told The Epoch Times that the chikungunya virus has spread to more places in China. A Chinese doctor whose work is related to disease prevention spoke to The Epoch Times on Aug. 10 on the condition of anonymity, out of safety concerns. The doctor said that chikungunya has spread to the megacity of Chongqing in southwest China, as well as Wuhan city in central China. A resident said in a video post on social media that chikungunya fever has spread to Hunan Province, adjacent to Guangdong, and that registration is required when purchasing any medications that treat fever. Foshan Municipal Market Supervision Bureau has introduced sales control of 47 medications for treating fever, rash, joint pain, and other symptoms caused by chikungunya in all retail pharmacies in the city, requiring registration for any sales, according to a notice it issued on Aug. 4. The Chinese regime has also imposed mandatory measures that have sparked fears of a return to the regime's draconian COVID-19 restrictions, such as mandatory self-paid quarantine and PCR testing. Local residents and medical professionals have especially expressed concerns about mandatory PCR testing of blood samples for the chikungunya virus, which the regime has been pushing in its public messaging. Mandatory Blood Draws Local residents in various locations around Guangdong Province posted on social media that mandatory blood tests are being implemented for PCR testing for chikungunya, which is different from the saliva tests for COVID-19. A patient said in a video post that after hospital staff drew three flasks of blood from him, he tested positive for chikungunya. He questioned why the hospital had to take three tubes for testing. The Chinese doctor, whose work is related to disease prevention, said that the chikungunya virus requires blood for PCR testing, as it is a blood-borne disease. 'Blood draws are also used for tertiary monitoring, and vaccine development requires the isolation of toxins from the blood, so a relatively large amount of blood needs to be drawn,' he said. A Guangzhou city resident posted on social media on Aug. 9 that Jiangnan Middle Street community office staff came to his home and demanded that the residents allow their blood to be drawn. He refused, and a group of staff repeatedly came back to demand it. Another resident in Guangdong revealed in a video post on Aug. 10 that his community office staff came at 10 p.m. to draw their blood for chikungunya PCR testing. Mainland Chinese media outlets reported that in the early morning hours of Aug. 4, community office officials in Guangdong's Zhanjiang City forcibly drew blood from two minors in the absence of their parents, sparking public outrage. 'Chinese government officials taking advantage of parents' absences to draw blood from children is a serious violation of medical ethics,' Sean Lin, assistant professor in the Biomedical Science Department at Feitian College and former U.S. Army microbiologist, told NTD, the sister media outlet of The Epoch Times, on Aug. 10. Based on the reports of such harsh actions, Lin suspects that the Chinese regime 'is concealing information about whether other pathogens are also present in this outbreak along with Chikungunya, as mosquitoes in Guangdong carry more than one infectious disease.' Lin said that the Chinese Communist Party's public health department should publish a research report as soon as possible, especially during the peak of the outbreak. 'It's easy to catch a lot of mosquitoes for research to see if there were other viruses circulating at the same time, which can spare ordinary people the pain of forced quarantine and blood tests,' he said. Mosquito Lab Breeding Program Sparks Concerns Chinese state media reported in early August that China's largest mosquito breeding facility in Huangpu District of Guangzhou city, Wolbaki, was running at full capacity and releasing 5 million specially treated male mosquitoes per week, in the hopes of them mating with the wild female mosquito population to produce unviable eggs in a population control technique known as Wolbachia transinfection—where the reproductive compatibility of male mosquitoes is altered by an infection with the common naturally occurring Wolbachia bacterium. Wolbaki's founder was the former director of the Joint Center of Vector Control for Tropical Diseases, another mosquito breeding facility, at Guangzhou's Sun Yat-sen University, in partnership with Michigan State University, where Xi is a professor of microbiology, genetics, and immunology. 'When the [infected] male mosquitoes carrying the Wolbachia bacterium mate with wild female mosquitoes that do not carry the bacteria, the eggs produced cannot develop normally due to cytoplasmic incompatibility and cannot hatch into mosquito larvae,' Gong Juntao, the head researcher at Guangdong's Wolbaki company that produces the mosquitoes, told Chinese media. However, the method has loopholes, as if infected lab females are not separated and instead released into the wild, they can continue to successfully breed and spread disease. The company claims to have developed an automated technology to efficiently separate male from female lab-bred mosquito pupae, with an error rate of less than 0.5 percent. But Lin said that given the huge number of mosquitoes released, an error rate of 0.5 percent 'means there are still about 25,000 female mosquitoes that can transmit diseases being released every week.' In May, Chinese media reported that China's biggest mosquito breeding facility in Huangpu District of Guangzhou, which it referred to as only the China mosquito research center, was running a pilot study to produce 30 million Wolbachia-infected male mosquitoes—sustained on sheep's blood—to release every month as part of the authorities' disease-prevention efforts targeting the mosquito-borne dengue, Zika, and chikungunya viruses. Two months later, China saw its biggest chikungunya outbreak on record. China's efforts to curb the reproduction of wild mosquitoes through mass-produced lab males infected with Wolbachia 'has failed two rounds,' the Chinese doctor told The Epoch Times. He predicted that in southern and north-central China, the number of mosquitoes carrying the chikungunya virus will rapidly increase before winter.

Man Who Fired Shots at CDC Expressed ‘Discontent' With COVID-19 Vaccines: Officials
Man Who Fired Shots at CDC Expressed ‘Discontent' With COVID-19 Vaccines: Officials

Epoch Times

time3 hours ago

  • Epoch Times

Man Who Fired Shots at CDC Expressed ‘Discontent' With COVID-19 Vaccines: Officials

The man who opened fire at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta on Aug. 8 had documents in his home outlining his opposition to the COVID-19 vaccines, officials said in an update on Aug. 12. 'A search warrant executed at the residence of the shooter revealed written documentation that expressed the shooter's discontent with the COVID-19 vaccinations,' Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) Director Chris Hosey told a briefing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store