Sachin Tendulkar Slammed As India Legend's Stature Degraded: 'Sunil Gavaskar Poore Hindustan Ko Hila Dega'
The criticism over the renaming of India-England Test series continues with former pacer Karsan Ghavri slamming the administrators for removing legendary captain Tiger Pataudi's name from the trophy. The winner of the Test series between the two teams in England was traditionally presented with Pataudi Trophy. However, it was rechristened to Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy earlier this year resulting in backlash.
Ghavri has challenged to rename the Border-Gavaskar Trophy – played for the Test series between India and Australia – and then brace for the reaction from the legendary Sunil Gavaskar.
'That is very wrong. Number one, Pataudi Trophy has been going on for a long time. The Australia-West Indies series has always been called Frank Worrell Trophy. India-Australia Test series has always been called the Border-Gavaskar Trophy. Try changing the name of that and see what Gavaskar does. Wo poora Hindustan ko hila ke rakh dega (Gavaskar would've shaken the whole country). The BCCI should've put its foot down with the MCC and the ECB. Tiger's name should not be removed from the trophy," said Ghavri on Vicky Lalwani's YouTube channel.
What Tendulkar Said on Renaming
While acknowledging that it wasn't in his power to ensure that Pataudi Trophy wasn't retired, Tendulkar did reveal he spoke to the administrators that the legacy should continue in some manner.
'…I was determined to ensure that the (Pataudi) legacy was kept intact," Tendulkar told Revsportz. 'When I got to know, I called the (Pataudi) family and had a conversation. Thereafter, I spoke to Mr. Jay Shah (ICC chairman), the BCCI and the ECB, and mentioned to them that something had to be done to ensure the legacy stayed on."
'They heard my point of view, and thereafter we got on a second call where it was decided that the Pataudi name will be associated with the series, and the winning captain will be awarded the Pataudi Medal of Excellence. I have always respected my seniors, and did everything in my power to make sure that the Pataudi legacy continues to be associated with this series," he added.
Ghavri though says Tendulkar could have done more to ensure the trophy was not discontinued. 'Objection is different. In the first place, he (Tendulkar) should've put his foot down and should've said 'Don't use my name because Tiger Pataudi's name is already there. He's one of our legends. If you want to give medals, use our name and hand it to the winning team. Trophy's name should've remained the same'," he said.
'BCCI is everything. First of all, this question should've never been raised. You're degrading somebody of a great stature," he added.
view comments
First Published:
News cricket Sachin Tendulkar Slammed As India Legend's Stature Degraded: 'Sunil Gavaskar Poore Hindustan Ko Hila Dega'
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
AUS A vs IND A, 3rd unofficial ODI LIVE streaming info: Where to watch India women's tour of Australia?
India A faces Australia A in the third and final unofficial One-Day match on Sunday. The Indian side had secured the series win after winning back-to-back matches. Fine half-centuries from Yastika Bhatia, Radha Yadav and Tanuja Kanwar propelled it to a two-wicket victory over Australia in the second match. LIVE STREAMING INFO When is the Australia A women vs India A women 3rd unofficial One-day match? The Australia A women vs India A women 3rd unofficial One-day match will begin at 9:30 am local time on Sunday, August 17 (5 am IST on Sunday) at the Ian Healy Oval in Brisbane. Where to watch the Australia A women vs India A women 3rd unofficial One-day match LIVE? The Australia A women vs India A women 3rd unofficial One-day match will be streamed live on the Fancode platform.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Dewald Brevis breaks Virat Kohli's major record after breathtaking 50 vs Australia
South Africa's young batting sensation Dewald Brevis has broken Virat Kohli's record after his quickfire half-century against Australia in the third T20I in Cairns. Fresh from a 41-ball century in the second T20I, Brevis continued his rich form as he slammed a 22-ball 22-year-old played a sensational innings of 53 (26) as he clobbered one four and six sixes. During his innings, he also surpassed Virat Kohli to register most sixes in T20Is against Australia at their home. The India star had 12 sixes from 10 innings in the shortest format against Australia on their home soil. Brevis has now left him behind, having hit 14 maximums in just three his innings, the Proteas batter whacked Aaron Hardie for four successive sixes to send fans into a frenzy. Courtesy of his innings, South Africa posted a good score of 172/7 in their allotted 20 overs. In reply, Australia chased down the target on the penultimate ball of the match as Glenn Maxwell (62* off 36) took his team over the line in the thrilling run chase. Apart from him, captain Mitchell Marsh also scored a quickfire 54 off 37 balls with the help of three fours and five sixes as Australia won the three-match series by 2-1. Earlier in the 2nd T20I, Brevis scored a sensational 125* (56) with the help of 12 fours and eight sixes. Courtesy of his innings, South Africa posted a massive total of 218/7 after being put in to bat recorded the second-fastest century for South Africa in T20Is off 41 balls after David Miller, who achieved the feat in 35 balls. The swashbuckling batter also registered the highest score by a South Africa batter in T20Is, surpassing Faf du Plessis' 119 against West Indies back in 2015 in reply, Australia got bundled out for 165 in 17.4 overs as Corbin Bosch (3/20) and Kwena Maphaka (3/57) shared three wickets each, guiding South Africa to a series-levelling 53-run win. Brevis was deservedly adjudged Player of the Match for setting up South Africa's massive win. He finished as the leading run scorer of the series with 180 runs from three innings at an average of 90.- EndsMust Watch
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
BCCI Introduces Serious Injury Replacement Rule For 2025-26 Domestic Season After Rishabh Pant Injury
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has introduced a 'Serious Injury Replacement' clause in the playing conditions for multi-day games in the upcoming 2025/26 domestic season. The rule will allow for like-for-like replacements for players ruled out of a match due to a serious injury. The need for such a rule by the BCCI comes after some related happenings in the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy series. India wicketkeeper-batter Rishabh Pant fractured his right foot during the fourth Test in Manchester but still came out to bat in the first innings. In the fifth Test at The Oval, England's seam-bowling all-rounder Chris Woakes batted with his left arm in a sling after dislocating his shoulder while fielding on the opening day. As per a report in Cricbuzz, the match referee will be the final authority on the replacement rule after consulting a doctor on the extent and seriousness of the on-field injury. "If a player sustains a serious injury during the course of the relevant match, a Serious Injury Replacement may be permitted in the following circumstances. The serious injury must have been sustained during play and within the playing area described in the clause," said the report, citing the newly-introduced rule under a new sub-head 'Serious Injury Replacement' in the Playing Conditions. The report further said the latest playing conditions have been explained to the umpires in the ongoing umpires' seminar in Ahmedabad. 'The BCCI said no such replacement will be allowed in white-ball cricket - Syed Mushtaq Ali or Vijay Hazare tournaments. It's yet to be seen if the rule will be permitted in the next season of the Indian Premier League (IPL), but the rule will stick in the multi-day Under-19 tournament for the CK Nayudu Trophy,' it added. Full text of Serious Injury Replacement ruling 1.2.8.1 If a player sustains a serious injury during the course of the relevant match, a Serious Injury Replacement may be permitted in the following circumstances: 1.2.8.1.1 The serious injury must have been sustained during play and within the playing area described in clause 1.2.5.2 above. The injury must have occurred due to an external blow and result in a fracture / deep cut/dislocation, etc. The injury should render the player unavailable for the remainder of the match. 1.2.8.1.2 Onfield umpires shall be the final authority to decide on the extent of serious injury and allowability of Serious Injury Replacement. They may consult the BCCI Match Referee and/or the doctor available on the ground. 1.2.8.1.3 The Team Manager shall submit a Serious Injury Replacement Request to the BCCI Match Referee on a standard form, which shall: 1.2.8.1.3.1 Identify the player who has sustained the serious injury. 1.2.8.1.3.2 Specify the incident in which the serious injury was sustained, including the time at which it occurred. 1.2.8.1.3.3 confirm that the player has sustained a serious injury and will not be able to participate further in the match due to the injury; and 1.2.8.1.3.4 Identify the requested Serious Injury Replacement, who shall be a like-for-like replacement for the player who has sustained the serious injury. 1.2.8.1.3.5 In all circumstances, a serious injury replacement player shall be from nominated substitutes at the time of toss (For Col C K Nayudu Trophy from the time of nomination of players). Only in the case where the wicket-keeper is seriously injured and needs a replacement, then the Match Referee may allow a wicket-keeper from a player outside the nominated substitutes if there is no wicket-keeper in the nominated substitutes. 1.2.8.2 The Serious Injury Replacement Request must be submitted to the BCCI Match Referee as soon as possible after the incident specified in clause 1.2.8.1.3.2 if a Serious Injury Replacement is to be permitted. 1.2.8.3 The BCCI Match Referee should ordinarily approve a Serious Injury Replacement Request if the replacement is a like-for-like player whose inclusion will not excessively advantage his team for the remainder of the match. 1.2.8.4 In assessing whether the nominated Serious Injury Replacement should be considered a like-for-like player, the BCCI Match Referee should consider the likely role that the seriously injured player would have played during the remainder of the match, and the normal role that would be performed by the nominated Serious Injury Replacement. 1.2.8.5 If the BCCI Match Referee believes that the inclusion of the nominated Serious Injury Replacement, when performing their normal role, would excessively advantage their team, the BCCI Match Referee may impose such conditions upon the identity and involvement of the Serious Injury Replacement as he/she sees fit, in line with the overriding objective of facilitating a like-for-like replacement for the seriously injured player. For clarity, a Serious Injury Replacement will inherit all warnings, penalty time, and suspensions that were imposed on the replaced player. 1.2.8.6 The BCCI Match Referee may, in reviewing a Serious Injury Replacement Request made in accordance with clause 1.2.8.1.3, request any such further information as may be required in order to make the determination required under clauses 1.2.8.4 and 1.2.8.5. 1.2.8.7 The decision of the BCCI Match Referee in relation to any Serious Injury Replacement Request shall be final and neither team shall have any right of appeal. 1.2.8.8 Once the Serious Injury Replacement has been approved by the BCCI Match Referee, the replaced player shall take no further part in the match. 1.2.8.9 Both the Serious Injury Replacement and the replaced player shall be considered to have played in the match for records and statistical purposes.
