
Himachal HC pulls up Sukhu govt over delay in appointing of RERA chief
The Himachal Pradesh high court (HC) on Friday pulled up the state government over delay in appointment of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) chief and asked it to issue notification for the post of chairman and other members by June 25. The court asked the state government that the notification for the posts of RERA chairman and its member must be issued by June 25, warning that the state's conduct appeared to be a deliberate attempt to stall justice. (File)
The court verbally announced a fine of ₹ 5 lakh on the government for the delay. The detailed order is awaited.
The directions were issued by the division bench of chief justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia and justice Ranjan Sharma during the resumed hearing of a public interest litigation (PIL) regarding delay in appointments of RERA chief and members.
The court asked the state government that the notification for the posts of RERA chairman and its member must be issued by June 25, warning that the state's conduct appeared to be a deliberate attempt to stall justice.
'The government is playing hide and seek—first citing the shifting of RERA headquarters to Dharamshala— and now delaying appointments under the pretext of procedural issues,' the bench said. The court also expressed regret that despite being asked on May 9 whether appointments had been notified, the government had failed to act decisively.
During Friday's proceedings, the government submitted that Vidur Mehta, an architect, has been appointed as a RERA member and the remaining appointments were 'under process'. Founding the explanations 'unsatisfactory', the court observed that repeated excuses reflected administrative apathy.
The PIL filed by Atul Sharma has sought quashing of extension given to Prabodh Saxena as chief secretary of the state government on the grounds that it was given in clear violation of the Central Services Rules and guidelines of Department of Personnel & Training (DoPT). Saxena was considered front-runner for the post of RERA chairperson which had fallen vacant in December last year after retirement of then chairperson Shrikant Baldi.
Saxena faces chargesheet in the infamous INX Media scam, in which then Union finance minister P Chidambaram and his son Karti are also named as accused.
The petitioner informed the court that the special judge, anti-corruption court, Rouse Avenue, New Delhi, had taken cognisance of the chargesheet on October 21, 2019. The CBI had also reaffirmed the pendency of the case through a letter dated January 23, 2025
The petition argued that vigilance clearance cannot be granted to an officer who is an accused in a corruption case under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
In May, HC had sought an affidavit from state government over 'specific reason that the state has withheld the recommendations of the selection committee'. 'Keeping in view the larger public interest, if the appointment has not been notified, affidavit be filed as to why it has not been done and what is the specific reason that the state has withheld the recommendations of the Selection Committee,' said the division Bench, comprising chief justice GS Sandhawalia and justice Ranjan Sharma on May 9, while directing the state government to file an affidavit.
The high court clarified that the matter concerning interim relief against Saxena's extension would be considered on June 25, when the petition comes up for hearing again.
Leader of opposition and former chief minister,Jai Ram Thakur, said, 'Even high court-recommended appointments are facing delays. RERA is being shifted to Dharamshala under suspicious circumstances.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Court order seeking FIR in EDC land fraud matter stayed
Panaji: The high court of Bombay at Goa stayed the order of a North Goa court directing the anti-corruption branch (ACB) of the directorate of vigilance to register a first information report (FIR) in connection with allegations of fraud related to land allotment at EDC, Patto. Initially, the trial court had directed the CBI to register the FIR but later assigned the task to the ACB. S Karpe, additional public prosecutor said that the order passed by the sessions court judge at Panaji in the criminal case did not take into consideration the consent as contemplated under Section 17(A) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as amended in 2018. According to the counsel, there was no reason given by the trial court for arriving at the conclusion that the FIR needs to be registered within 24 hours in accordance with the complaint. Subsequently, an application was filed for an extension of time, which was granted by the sessions court on June 19, extending the same by 48 hours. 'Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on July 11, 2025. Notice be issued by all the available modes of service. In the meantime, the effect and operation of the order dated June 9, 2025, shall be stayed till the next date,' Justice Nivedita Mehta observed. Activists had moved the court alleging that govt property was allotted to EDC to house certain offices, but they allegedly leased and sold land without obtaining permission from the govt, causing a loss of Rs 300 crore to the state exchequer. Even if permission was obtained, they ought to have deposited 50% of the amount with the govt or the EDC, which has not been done, the activists had alleged. 'In the present case, the FIR ought to have been registered. There is nothing exceptional in the present case that warrants a delay in the registration of an FIR on the ground of a preliminary inquiry. Even if there were exceptional circumstances in the case, any preliminary inquiry could not have, under any circumstances, exceeded two days,' the sessions court Judge Irshad Agha had stated. 'In the present case, the FIR ought to have been registered and a preliminary inquiry ought to have been carried out by the investigating agency. However, there is enough material to directly register the FIR,' the judge had said.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Gramin Bank recovery agent lands in vigilance net for accepting s 50k bribe
Chandigarh: The Punjab Vigilance Bureau (VB) has arrested Jatinder Pal Piplani, a recovery agent attached to the Punjab Gramin Bank, for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs 50,000. Disclosing the details, an official spokesperson of the state vigilance bureau said the arrest was made following a complaint lodged by a resident of Chheharta in Amritsar. He further said the complainant approached the vigilance bureau and informed them that the Punjab Gramin Bank declared his property a non-performing asset due to default in payment of a house loan. The recovery file was assigned to the accused recovery agent for the recovery of the pending loan amount. The accused threatened the complainant that he, along with a police party, would forcefully take possession of his house and demanded a bribe of Rs 2,00,000 on behalf of the bank manager for settling the case in his favour. The complainant added that the agent already took Rs 50,000 as a first instalment and was now pressurising him to pay the remaining amount of Rs 1,50,000 for the bank manager. The spokesperson further informed that after a preliminary verification of this complaint, the vigilance bureau team laid a trap during which the recovery agent was arrested red-handed while accepting Rs 50,000 as a second instalment of the bribe from the complainant in the presence of two official witnesses. In this regard, a case under the Prevention of Corruption Act has been registered against the aforementioned accused at the Vigilance Bureau police station, Amritsar Range. The accused will be produced in the competent court tomorrow, and the role of the bank manager will be verified during further investigation of this case, said the spokesperson.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Dr Ambedkar portrait to be installed in court halls
Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court notified that a portrait of Dr BR Ambedkar, the architect of the Constitution of India, would be installed in all court halls of the high court Benches in Bengaluru, Dharwad, and Kalaburagi, as well as in district court halls across the state. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Two circulars were issued in this regard on June 19, and necessary instructions were given for taking steps for the installation of the portraits. Following requests from the public, advocates and organisations, alongside a govt communication advocating the measure, on April 26, a full court of the HC passed a resolution to display Dr Ambedkar's photo prominently in all court halls.