‘Humanitarian city' in Gaza actually ethnic cleansing, former Israeli PM says
Mr Olmert stated that the proposal, briefed by Israel's defence minister, would trap two million displaced Palestinians, with no permission to leave, and is intended for deportation rather than protection.
He now believes Israel is committing war crimes in Gaza and the West Bank, attributing these actions to negligence and a disregard for civilian casualties.
The "humanitarian city" concept was reportedly discussed between Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump, with concerns it could hinder ongoing ceasefire negotiations.
Mr Olmert, who initially supported Israel's military actions after 7 October, is now advocating for a two-state solution and criticises extremist elements within the Israeli government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
Photos show the aftermath of a fatal fire at an assisted-living facility in Massachusetts
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US court blocks Trump administration from revoking Afghans' protected status
A US appeals court has for now blocked the Trump administration from removing the temporary protective status of thousands of Afghans in the United States, court documents showed on Monday. An administrative stay on the termination of temporary protected status for Afghans will remain until 21 July, the US court of appeals for the fourth circuit said in an order granting a request from immigration advocacy organization Casa. The group had filed a lawsuit against the US Department of Homeland Security to challenge the terminations of the temporary protected status for Afghans and Cameroonians announced by the Trump administration in April. Casa had filed for an emergency motion for a stay on Monday, when the protected status for Afghans was scheduled to be terminated. The protected status for Cameroonians is set to end on 4 August, according to the court document. The DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In April when the Trump administration terminated temporary deportation protections for thousands of Afghans and Cameroonians, the department had said conditions in Afghanistan and Cameroon no longer merited the protected status. The Trump administration has until 1159pm ET on Wednesday to respond. The US evacuated more than 82,000 Afghans from Afghanistan after Taliban's takeover in 2021, including more than 70,000 who entered the US with temporary 'parole', which allowed legal entry for a period of two years.
Daily Mirror
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump's MAGA mob fume over refusal to release Epstein files
The poll found that 67% of Trump voters in the 2024 election disagreed with the president's decision not to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein, compared to 58% of Kamala Harris voters American voters, particularly those in Donald Trump's MAGA base, are fuming over the president's apparent refusal to disclose the so-called Epstein files, as revealed by a recent survey. The uproar follows the Trump administration 's declaration to its followers that there isn't an Epstein list, despite previous campaign promises to unveil all involved parties. Notably, it's Trump's own backers who are most irked by his sudden U-turn, with a new Democracy Institute poll indicating that 67% of MAGA supporters who voted for him last November are at odds with his decision not to release the client list, in contrast to 58% of Kamala Harris voters who also disagree. First-time voters in 2024 appear to be particularly incensed by Trump's choice, with a staggering 71% opposing his decision. Among all Americans, the figure dips slightly to 63%, yet this still signifies a majority, according to the poll. The incumbent's latest actions seem to be taking a toll on his approval ratings, signalling that even Trump's staunchest advocates might have found a reason to withdraw their support from the contentious figurehead. Presently, data shows that 50% of Americans disapprove of President Trump's performance, reports the Mirror US. All this turmoil has emerged after the Justice Department and the FBI issued an unsigned memo last week, asserting that there is no alleged Epstein client list, contradicting Attorney General Pam Bondi's February statement that the list was "on her desk." The DOJ's decision has sparked controversy among Trump's supporters, with many viewing the Epstein case as a pivotal reason for backing Trump. FBI Director Kash Patel and his deputy Dan Bongino, before assuming their roles, had consistently spoken out about the list and the alleged "deep state" efforts to conceal it from the public eye. They also repeatedly insisted that Epstein did not take his own life. The DOJ memo confirmed that Epstein indeed died by suicide while detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in New York City in 2019. On Saturday, the president took to social media to voice his discontent over the split within his staunch "Make America Great Again" following regarding this issue, throwing his support behind Bondi. In his extensive post, he made no reference to Bongino. "What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?'" Trump penned. "They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening." Nevertheless, following an exhaustive months-long review of the evidence held by the government, the Justice Department concluded in Monday's memo that no further revelations would be appropriate or justified. The department highlighted that much of the information was sealed by a court order to safeguard victims, and only a small portion "would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial."
