Trump administration revokes guidance requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortions
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration announced on Tuesday that it would revoke guidance to the nation's hospitals that directed them to provide emergency abortions to women when they are necessary to stabilize their medical condition.
That guidance was issued to hospitals in 2022, weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court upended national abortion rights in the U.S. It was an effort by the Biden administration to preserve abortion access for extreme cases in which women were experiencing medical emergencies and needed an abortion to prevent organ loss or severe hemorrhaging, among other serious complications.
An Associated Press investigation last year found that, even with that guidance, dozens of pregnant women were being turned away from emergency rooms, including some who needed emergency abortions.
Biden argued that hospitals — including states with near-total bans — needed to provide emergency abortions under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. That law requires emergency rooms that receive Medicare dollars to provide an exam and stabilizing treatment for all patients. Nearly all emergency rooms in the U.S. rely on Medicare funds.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which investigates hospitals that are not in compliance, said in a statement on Tuesday that it was rescinding the Biden-era guidance. The agency, however, will continue to enforce the law, 'including for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy.'
But CMS added that it would also 'rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions.'
The Biden administration sued Idaho over its abortion law that initially only allowed abortions to save the life of the mother. The federal government had argued before the U.S. Supreme Court last year that Idaho's law was in conflict with the federal law, which requires stabilizing treatment that prevents a patient's condition from worsening.
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a procedural ruling in the case last year that left key questions unanswered about whether doctors in abortion ban states can terminate pregnancies when a woman is at risk of serious infection, organ loss or hemorrhage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
4 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump, Xi speak for first time since Inauguration Day
President Donald Trump said he spoke Thursday with China's leader, Xi Jinping, breaking the monthslong silence between the two leaders. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said that U.S. and Chinese leaders will meet again 'shortly.' U.S. representatives will include Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. The president described it as a 'very good phone call' and said that Xi invited him to visit China. This is the first call between the two world leaders since Trump's second term began. It comes at a key point for China-U.S. relations as the two countries try to deescalate a trade war Trump started this spring by levying 145 percent tariffs on China, which the Chinese retaliated against, halting trade between the two countries.
CNN
6 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump is increasingly hostile to China. He's playing with fire
Despite widespread concerns that the trade war is dragging down America's economy, President Donald Trump has notched quite a few wins on his economic belt in recent weeks. Inflation keeps falling. Jobs remain plentiful. And there's growing evidence the economy could be booming this quarter. That's why Trump's increasingly hostile rhetoric about China over the past week was particularly concerning ahead of his call Thursday with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Trump's economy is cookin' – for now. But the economic Jenga tower the Trump administration has constructed is precariously balanced on a host of economic caveats and unproven theories. Renewed trade tensions with the world's second-largest economy threatens to knock the tower to the ground. May 12 represented a major turning point for the global trade war. Delegates from China and the United States announced they would significantly roll back their historically high tariffs on one another. Markets were elated. Wall Street banks curtailed their recession forecasts. And moribund consumer confidence rebounded significantly. That's a significant change from April, when tensions ran so high that trade between the United States and China came to an effective halt. The 145% tariffs on most Chinese imported goods made the math impossible for American businesses to buy virtually anything from China, America's second-largest trading partner. No one wants to return to that. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, America's chief negotiator in the détente with China, said previous tariff levels were 'unsustainable.' That's why he said the countries put in place mechanisms to prevent a re-escalation. But Trump and his administration in recent weeks have grown increasingly hostile toward China, accusing the country of breaking the promises it made in mid-May. China has similarly said the United States has failed to live up to its obligations under the agreement. Trump and Xi held a long-awaited phone call Thursday, a person familiar with the matter said. The White House did not immediately confirm the call, which was also reported by Chinese state media. If the call fails to result in another de-escalation, tensions could boil over, and tariffs could rise again. So could recession forecasts. And the good vibes that have powered a rebound in sentiment and a massive market rally could disappear in a flash. Although virtually no economic reports are entirely good or bad, and with the obvious caveat that monthly economic data are inherently backward looking, US data have been surprisingly resilient lately. Annual consumer prices grew just 2.3% in April, according to the Consumer Price Index, and inflation that month fell to 2.1%, according to the separate Personal Consumption Expenditures price index. The PCE report is particularly noteworthy, because the Federal Reserve favors that report when it considers whether to change interest rates. Over time, the Fed targets 2% inflation, so America is, at long last, nearing that long-term target after a yearslong bout with historic price hikes. Trump, citing America's low inflation rate, has been bullying Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to cut interest rates to boost the economy – even summoning Powell to the White House last week to give him a talking to. As Powell has noted, economic data is looking strong. Jobs data, although weakening, has steadied in recent months. The unemployment rate is hovering at just over 4%, and employers have added a solid number of jobs each month. The number of available jobs in America unexpectedly increased in April, a potential indicator that the labor market remains robust. And a positive effect of trade tensions could at least temporarily benefit America's economy. Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of the economy, shifted into reverse in the first quarter as businesses stockpiled goods in anticipation of tariffs. This quarter, imports from foreign countries – particularly China – have fallen dramatically. In April, the US trade deficit shrank by its steepest monthly pace on records, which go back to 1992. That should give America a big, albeit momentary, boost. The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow tool currently predicts the US economy will grow at an adjusted annualized rate of 4.6% this quarter, a huge number that would more than make up for the -0.2% rate in the first quarter. But Trump's ramping up of restrictions and public scrutiny of China risks putting sugar in the gas tank just as the engine started humming again. Trump on Wednesday said in a Truth Social post that Chinese leader Xi Jinping was 'extremely hard to make a deal with.' Trade talks have stalled, Bessent said, apparently frustrating Trump. Last week, Trump posted on social media that China 'TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US.' Trump said that he made a 'fast deal' with China to 'save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation.' He added: 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' The Trump administration had expected China to lift restrictions on rare earth materials that are critical components for a wide range of electronics, but China has so far refused, causing intense displeasure inside the Trump administration and prompting a recent series of measures to be imposed on the country three administration officials told CNN last week. For example, the White House warned US companies against using AI chips made by China's national tech champion Huawei. It stopped US companies from selling to China software that is used to design semiconductors. And the US State Department announced it would 'aggressively revoke visas' for some Chinese students in America. China, in turn, has accused the United States of 'provoking new economic and trade frictions.' 'The United States has been unilaterally provoking new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' the Chinese Commerce Ministry said Sunday. Meanwhile, it's not like tariffs have completely evaporated. The United States maintains a 10% universal tariff on most goods coming into the country, and Trump just doubled tariffs on steel and aluminum this week. He has threatened higher tariffs on dozens of countries that are unable to reach trade deals with the administration over the course of the next month. And China and the United States, despite their de-escalation last month, maintain significant, double-digit tariffs on one another. Economists, Wall Street analysts, business leaders and consumers continue to sound the alarm bell about the trade war, worrying about a toxic combination of rising prices and slowing economic growth. Despite the recent spate of good economic news, some underlying data is raising concerns. A government report this week showed layoffs in April leapt higher by nearly 200,000 to 1.786 million, reversing a similarly sized drop seen in March. Initial unemployment claims rose to 247,000 last week, far more than estimated. And outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported Thursday that American employers announced 94,000 layoffs in May – down 12% from April but up 47% from last year. Layoff announcements have spiked 80% this year. Last week, a key economic report showed consumer spending rose just 0.2% in April, a weaker-than-anticipated reading and a significant retreat from March. And some consumer and business survey data remain incredibly weak. Consumer sentiment remained near historic lows reached in March despite recent trade deal announcements, according to the University of Michigan. And the Fed's beige book, a collection of business leaders' reactions to the economic environment, showed that companies across industries are remaining deeply uncertain about the economy – particularly because of the trade war. So good news could ultimately turn bad, even without escalating tensions with China. But a return to tit-for-tat tariffs and closed borders could make matters significantly worse.
CBS News
11 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trump's travel ban is set to begin Monday. Here's what to know.
What to know about President Trump's travel ban on nationals from 12 countries What to know about Trump's new travel ban What to know about Trump's new travel ban Washington — President Trump signed a proclamation late Wednesday barring travelers and immigrants from a dozen countries and restricting the entry of nationals from seven other nations. With the move, the White House cited concerns about national security. The president said the recent attack at a march supporting Israeli hostages in Boulder, Colorado, had "underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas." "We don't want them," Mr. Trump said. Here's what to know about the travel bans: Who does the ban apply to? With some exceptions, the proclamation bans the entry of foreigners from 12 countries who are seeking to come to the U.S. permanently as legal immigrants, as well as those with temporary visas, including tourists: Afghanistan Myanmar Chad The Republic of the Congo Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Haiti Iran Libya Somalia Sudan Yemen President Trump announced that the U.S. would bar entry to nationals from these 12 countries, with few exceptions, citing national security concerns. CBS News The proclamation also partially suspends the entry of travelers and immigrants from another seven countries. This restriction applies to legal immigrants seeking to move to the U.S. and certain temporary visa holders who hail from the following countries: Burundi Cuba Laos Sierra Leone Togo Turkmenistan Venezuela When does the ban take effect? The ban is set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. on Monday, June 9. Why were the countries selected? On the first day of his second administration, Mr. Trump directed officials to perform a security review of high-risk regions and make recommendations for where immigration and travel restrictions should be imposed. The president said the factors considered were "the largescale presence of terrorists, failure to cooperate on visa security, inability to verify travelers' identities, inadequate record keeping of criminal histories and persistently high rates of illegal visa overstays, and other things." "Very simply, we cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States," Mr. Trump said. The president cited the recent attack in Boulder, where an Egyptian national was charged, as part of the justification for the bans. Egypt is not among the countries on the White House's list. But the proclamation directed officials to assess the "adequacy" of Egypt's vetting policies "in light of recent events." Are there exceptions to the new travel ban? The president's decree contains certain exemptions, including for U.S. permanent residents and the spouses and children of U.S. citizens who have "clear and convincing evidence of identity and family relationship." The proclamation also outlines exemptions for Afghans who assisted American forces and have special visas; diplomats, athletes coming to the U.S. for the World Cup, the Olympics and other major sporting events; dual nationals with a passport from a country not listed in the president's decree; and for adoptions. Mr. Trump said the list could be revised if countries make "material improvements," and new countries could be added "as threats emerge around the world." Did Trump do this before? The president's actions follow a series of travel bans issued during his first administration that initially targeted predominantly Muslim countries. Like those orders, his latest proclamation could be subject to lawsuits, although the Supreme Court ultimately upheld the revised ban from his first term, which the White House noted in a fact sheet outlining his second-term bans. The president touted his first-term travel bans in his video statement released Wednesday. "In my first term, my powerful travel restrictions were one of our most successful policies, and they were a key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil," Mr. Trump said. In January 2017, Mr. Trump signed a travel ban restricting the entry of most citizens of Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. The ban sparked widespread outcry, creating chaos at airports and prompting legal challenges, as opponents argued the ban was discriminatory. Then in March 2017, Mr. Trump removed Iraq from the list and added Chad, Venezuela and North Korea. The president expanded the ban in 2020, adding immigration restrictions for nationals of Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Myanmar and Kyrgyzstan. Chad was later removed from the list. The third iteration of the president's first-term ban was upheld by the Supreme Court in the summer of 2018. At the time, conservative justices cited the president's broad authority to restrict the entry of foreigners on national security grounds. When President Joe Biden took office, he scrapped that ban.
