New household food waste collections delayed by two years
"I'm very frustrated about the wave of delays," said Tor Pingree, a Green city councillor in Worcester."At the moment all of our food waste… goes to the incinerator, it takes a lot of fuel to burn.""Honestly, it's surprising to me that we haven't been collecting our food waste for a long time, many councils across the country are already doing it… we're behind the curve on this one," she said.At present, all councils in Herefordshire and Worcestershire collect black waste bins and green recycling bins on alternate weeks. New food waste collections - with new bins or caddies - would run alongside this, taking material to an anaerobic digester to be turned into biogas.
"Food waste currently goes in your black bin… it amounts to 35% of that black bin," said Conservative councillor Emma Stokes, a district councillor in Wychavon."The idea is that by separating out, households will think more about what they're actually throwing away," she added.Yet, as Wychavon's executive board member for resources, Councillor Stokes said she had decided to delay the district's food waste collection service until April 2028.She said the move represented value for money for the taxpayer, and would prevent the council from breaching its current refuse collection contract."We've just asked the government to bear with us for two years to keep the contract in place," Stokes said."We haven't heard back from them."Because of the government's reorganisation of local government, all of Worcestershire's districts are due to be abolished on 1 April 2028.Stokes said she did not also want to tie in any successor local authority to a long-term waste contract.
Elsewhere in Worcestershire, Worcester City Council said its domestic food waste collection service would only be ready by Spring 2027.Bromsgrove, Redditch and Wyre Forest district councils said they were in discussions to form a joint food waste collection "as close as possible to the start of April 2026".The three local authorities said the start date was dependent the purchase of new vehicles and food waste caddies.Malvern Hills District Council said it would deliver the new service in-house, but said it was waiting for confirmation on revenue funding from the government.Meanwhile, Herefordshire Council said it was still aiming to have food waste collections in place, but was unable to confirm a start date until grant funding from the government is confirmed.
On the streets of Worcester, many welcomed the upcoming introduction of a new food bin, but some were sceptical how many residents would embrace them."I think having the option there is good for people," said Craig Betham."If the bin's not there then people aren't going to do it," he said."Some people might do it… some people probably won't do it," said Jade Churchill."For me, I tend to just want to save the food, so maybe I'll use it for the next day, just so it doesn't go to waste.""Other people might do it to start with… I don't think it will always be followed," she said."I've lived in several countries… I think other countries have better approaches," said Stephen Pain.A former resident of Denmark and Japan, he said England had been "backwards" in not taking the step sooner.
Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X, and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
No U-turn as thousands more to be hit with inheritance tax
There will be others who may be simply unaware of the government's plans that could impact their private and workplace pension savings as other policies aimed at balancing the nation's books and controlling our borders continue to dominate the domestic news coverage. When the reforms were announced in the Autumn Budget back in October, a technical consultation followed seeking views on the proposals for the reporting and payment of any inheritance tax on the pension component of an estate. The response to that consultation has now been published and, whilst there are some changes around the administrative responsibilities (personal representatives rather than pension scheme administrators will be responsible), the government has made it clear that it intends to implement its overarching inheritance tax policy, despite strong industry consensus pointing to simpler alternatives. There are to be no U-turns afforded to these pension reforms. It is somewhat ironic that, on one hand the Government is increasing the tax burden on pensions, but has also revived the Pensions Commission to tackle the barriers that stop pension saving. Their policy of taxing pensions on death is not conducive with encouraging people to save more into their pensions. The reality of what this all means is that, from April 2027, if the value of a person's estate, once unused pension funds are included, exceeds the nil-rate band (currently £325,000), then inheritance tax may apply on the excess. It is important to note that the usual spousal exemption will apply. There is no inheritance tax to pay on estates passed to, and gifts between, UK domiciled spouses and civil partners. The government estimates that, from the estates with inheritable pension wealth in 2027 to 2028 (and before assuming any behavioural change), around 1 in 4 people will be impacted. That translates to 38,500 estates having to pay more inheritance tax than previously, and 10,500 estates becoming liable for inheritance tax where this would not previously have been the case. For those affected, simplicity has now been replaced with complexity and a much higher tax bill. As things stand, it is a relatively simple affair of ensuring expression of wishes are up-to-date and, there is the peace of mind in knowing that no action is necessary for any pension leftover to be passed on without any inheritance tax implications, no matter when death occurred. These changes will mean that active decisions will be needed to attempt to balance an individual's own needs as well as leaving beneficiaries in the best position, if they have concerns around the inheritance tax impact. A further sting in the tail is that the existing income tax treatment on unused pensions on death will continue to apply, whereby the age at death will be a determining factor for the income tax treatment in the hands of the beneficiaries. Where death occurs before age 75, any lump sum or income withdrawal will be tax free. Where death occurs after age 75, any lump sum or income withdrawal will be taxed at the recipient's marginal rate. This presents the dim prospect of some unused pensions on death suffering both inheritance tax and income tax (where the nil-rate band is exceeded and death occurs after age 75). No doubt, for some, the changes will make them consider accelerating the drawings of their pension benefits to enable gifting. But here time is of the essence as generally a seven-year rule applies to gifts, as no inheritance tax is due where the transferor lives for seven years after giving the gift. However, death within seven years of giving a gift is subject to inheritance tax (gifts given in the three years before death are taxed at the 40% standard rate and gifts given three to seven years before death are taxed on a sliding scale, reducing the rate by 8% per year). Additionally, regular payments made from income (including pensions) can be considered and benefit from being exempt from inheritance tax provided they are part of an individual's normal expenditure and they are left with enough to maintain their normal standard of living. Spare a thought to what could be described as an extremely unfair situation should death occur before age 55, which is normal minimum pension age, and the earliest point pension benefits can normally be accessed. In such a situation, an individual would not get the benefit of their pension in their lifetime (so not have the opportunity for gifting) but potentially suffer inheritance tax. That does appear particularly harsh and does not suggest joined up pension policy thinking. Often the cost associated with professional advice is the focus, rather than the value the advice offers. This is perhaps one area where the value of advice and planning can be tangibly measured. But whether getting professional help or going it alone, for some it is no longer the case of 'wait and see'. Lee Halpin is head of technical services @sipp
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
British personnel ready to arrive in Ukraine once fighting on hold
Russian President Vladimir Putin has met his US counterpart Donald Trump in Anchorage, Alaska, where they discussed the conflict after more than three years of fighting in eastern Europe but failed to strike a deal. After talking for nearly three hours, they refused to answer questions from reporters, but both made statements, with Mr Trump saying 'some great progress' was made with 'many points' agreed to, and 'very few' remaining. The UK Government earlier this summer backed international efforts to set up a 'Multinational Force Ukraine', a military plan to bolster Ukraine's defences once the conflict eases, in a bid to ward off future Russian aggression. 'Planning has continued on an enduring basis to ensure that a force can deploy in the days following the cessation of hostilities,' an MoD spokesperson said. According to the Government, 'along with securing Ukraine's skies and supporting safer seas, the force is expected to regenerate land forces by providing logistics, armaments, and training expertise'. It 'will strengthen Ukraine's path to peace and stability by supporting the regeneration of Ukraine's own forces', the spokesperson added. Early designs for the Multinational Force Ukraine were originally drafted last month, after military chiefs met in Paris to agree a strategy and co-ordinate plans with the EU, Nato, the US and more than 200 planners. Russian forces invaded Ukraine in February 2022. On the day of negotiations, the Russians are killing as well. And that speaks volumes. Recently, weʼve discussed with the U.S. and Europeans what can truly work. Everyone needs a just end to the war. Ukraine is ready to work as productively as possible to bring the war to an end,… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 15, 2025 Moments before Mr Trump touched down in Anchorage, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on X that Saturday 'will start early for everyone in Europe' as leaders react to the Alaska summit. 'We continue co-ordinating with our partners in Europe,' Mr Zelensky said, and added: 'Russia must end the war that it itself started and has been dragging out for years. 'The killings must stop. A meeting of leaders is needed – at the very least, Ukraine, America, and the Russian side – and it is precisely in such a format that effective decisions are possible.' When he addressed the press, Mr Putin said he greeted Mr Trump on the tarmac as 'dear neighbour' and added: 'Our countries, though separated by the oceans, are close neighbours.' According to a translation carried by broadcasters, he claimed the 'situation in Ukraine has to do with fundamental threats to our security'. Stood next to Mr Putin in front of the words 'Pursuing Peace', Mr Trump said: 'We haven't quite got there but we've made some headway.' He stressed 'there's no deal until there's a deal' and added: 'I will call up Nato in a little while. 'I will call up the various people that I think are appropriate, and I'll of course call up President Zelensky and tell him about today's meeting.' Concluding their exchange, the US president said: 'We'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon. 'Thank you very much, Vladimir.' Mr Putin replied: 'Next time, in Moscow.' Mr Trump said: 'That's an interesting one. I'll get a little heat for that one. 'I could see it possibly happening.' Speaking to Fox News before boarding Air Force One to leave Alaska, Mr Trump said 'a lot of points were negotiated' in what he described as 'a very warm meeting'. He said European nations would have some involvement in any deal, but said the emphasis was on Mr Zelensky 'to get it done'. Mr Trump said he expected the Russian and Ukrainian leaders to meet, possibly with him involved. The Kremlin has previously said the two men would only meet when an agreement is ready to be signed. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov described the talks as 'very positive', according to Russian state news agency RIA Novosti. He said no questions were taken from journalists because Mr Putin and Mr Trump had made 'comprehensive statements'.
North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
British personnel ready to arrive in Ukraine once fighting on hold
Russian President Vladimir Putin has met his US counterpart Donald Trump in Anchorage, Alaska, where they discussed the conflict after more than three years of fighting in eastern Europe but failed to strike a deal. After talking for nearly three hours, they refused to answer questions from reporters, but both made statements, with Mr Trump saying 'some great progress' was made with 'many points' agreed to, and 'very few' remaining. The UK Government earlier this summer backed international efforts to set up a 'Multinational Force Ukraine', a military plan to bolster Ukraine's defences once the conflict eases, in a bid to ward off future Russian aggression. 'Planning has continued on an enduring basis to ensure that a force can deploy in the days following the cessation of hostilities,' an MoD spokesperson said. According to the Government, 'along with securing Ukraine's skies and supporting safer seas, the force is expected to regenerate land forces by providing logistics, armaments, and training expertise'. It 'will strengthen Ukraine's path to peace and stability by supporting the regeneration of Ukraine's own forces', the spokesperson added. Early designs for the Multinational Force Ukraine were originally drafted last month, after military chiefs met in Paris to agree a strategy and co-ordinate plans with the EU, Nato, the US and more than 200 planners. Russian forces invaded Ukraine in February 2022. On the day of negotiations, the Russians are killing as well. And that speaks volumes. Recently, weʼve discussed with the U.S. and Europeans what can truly work. Everyone needs a just end to the war. Ukraine is ready to work as productively as possible to bring the war to an end,… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 15, 2025 Moments before Mr Trump touched down in Anchorage, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on X that Saturday 'will start early for everyone in Europe' as leaders react to the Alaska summit. 'We continue co-ordinating with our partners in Europe,' Mr Zelensky said, and added: 'Russia must end the war that it itself started and has been dragging out for years. 'The killings must stop. A meeting of leaders is needed – at the very least, Ukraine, America, and the Russian side – and it is precisely in such a format that effective decisions are possible.' When he addressed the press, Mr Putin said he greeted Mr Trump on the tarmac as 'dear neighbour' and added: 'Our countries, though separated by the oceans, are close neighbours.' According to a translation carried by broadcasters, he claimed the 'situation in Ukraine has to do with fundamental threats to our security'. Stood next to Mr Putin in front of the words 'Pursuing Peace', Mr Trump said: 'We haven't quite got there but we've made some headway.' He stressed 'there's no deal until there's a deal' and added: 'I will call up Nato in a little while. 'I will call up the various people that I think are appropriate, and I'll of course call up President Zelensky and tell him about today's meeting.' Concluding their exchange, the US president said: 'We'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon. 'Thank you very much, Vladimir.' Mr Putin replied: 'Next time, in Moscow.' Mr Trump said: 'That's an interesting one. I'll get a little heat for that one. 'I could see it possibly happening.'
