Heartbroken parents fear mouldy house contributed to death of 15-week-old son
Aiat Mohammed still clutches one of the last babygrows her son wore.
Exhausted by grief, she holds the tiny blue and green outfit tight. Occasionally, when everything becomes too much, she lifts it to her face and breathes in deeply.
"I didn't wash it," she tells me, "because it's got his scent".
Her son, Akram, was just 15 weeks old when he died in hospital in London on 21 February.
His parents took him to hospital a day after raising concerns about his breathing. Doctors attempted CPR in front of them - but the little boy couldn't be saved.
Aiat remembers the moment she saw the monitor flatline, and the medical team stepped away from his tiny body: "They said to me, 'You can come and touch his head now'. I was saying, 'Please, can you try again? Please, do the CPR again?' And they said, 'Sorry, we can't. We can't do anything anymore. We need to stop'."
An inquest to determine the circumstances of how and why Akram died will be held in the summer.
The family lawyer, Mark McGhee, says a pathology report suggested he died of acute pneumonia due to a late-onset Group B Strep infection. But he fears the state of their crowded and mouldy housing association flat played a part.
Home riddled with damp
Photos make it clear their one-bedroom Camden home was riddled with damp, long before Akram - the couple's third child - was born at the end of last year.
Black mould pushed the wallpaper from the walls, stains and damp kept coming back no matter how much they scrubbed and cleaned with harsh chemicals, and no matter how much they begged the housing association - Notting Hill Genesis - for help.
An independent inspection before the baby's birth in December found the landlord "in breach of its duty to ensure the property is and will remain fit for human habitation".
Mould was found on either the walls or ceiling in the single bedroom, living room, bathroom and kitchen. To make things even worse, the family say that after complaining about broken windows, a contractor arrived to seal them shut - making ventilation almost impossible.
Akram's father Abdushafi Mohammed, a car mechanic from Sudan, told Sky News: "You felt it in the air, in your chest as soon as you walked into the flat." Aiat remembers the "very, very rotten smell, very strange smell. You don't want to be in there for more than a minute".
Their baby began to rasp at night, and then they could hear a rattle in his chest during the day. But his worried parents were told he would "grow out of it".
'Drowning in fluids'
Savvas Panas, the chief executive of the Pillion Trust Charity, who has supported the family for years, told Sky News: "The child was strong, he was big and very healthy, but he was drowning, you could hear it, he was drowning in fluids."
He claims to have spent months escalating concerns through the housing association, and Camden Council.
Abdushafi puts it simply: "No one helped us."
The cause of death is unknown, an inquest has been set up, and a coroner is expected to rule on how and why he died later in the year.
Patrick Franco, chief executive of Notting Hill Genesis, said: "We are deeply saddened by the tragic loss of Akram Mohammed and extend our sincere condolences to his family, their friends and neighbours. We will continue to support the family in any way we can during this difficult time.
"We know that this is a complex situation and will continue working with the relevant authorities as they conduct their investigations.
"No determination has been made by HM Coroner as to the cause of Akram's death, and it would therefore be inappropriate to comment further or to speculate at this time."
A Camden Council spokesperson said: "The council has been chasing Notting Hill Genesis on a regular basis to identify a new home for the family, and to ensure that they continue to get the right support.
"Akram's death is a tragedy, and our thoughts are with his family at what is a very sad time.
"As with any unexpected death, there will be an inquest to determine any contributory factors and learnings for local agencies."
Richard Blakeway, housing ombudsman, said: "This is a tragic case and our thoughts are with the family at this difficult time.
"Whilst the complaint was still within the landlord's complaints process when Akram passed away, and therefore we were unable to take it on as a formal investigation, we have offered support and advice to the family, including progressing their complaint with the landlord. We will continue to liaise with the family as this case progresses
"Landlords should take a zero tolerant approach to damp and mould. The introduction of Awaab's Law is a positive step. However, landlords should not wait for its introduction to take further action, including proactively identifying damp and mould in homes rather than waiting for residents to report it."
Complaints about conditions have risen sharply
Akram's death comes as the housing ombudsman's office reveals complaints about substandard living conditions in social housing are more than five times higher than they were five years ago.
The ombudsman deals with disputes between residents and social housing landlords in England, and found there were 6,380 complaints investigated in the year to March 2025, up from 1,111 in the year to March 2020.
Reasons for complaints included asbestos, electrical and fire safety issues, pest control, leaks, damp and mould.
'I would have ripped that family out of there'
Mr Panas said that despite their long-standing battles with the mould, he advised the family to stay in the sub-standard flat, knowing that if they left, they would lose social housing support by making themselves "intentionally homeless".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
9 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Tuesday briefing: Is Britain's move to ‘war-fighting' readiness enough to ensure its security?
Good morning. The government's strategic defence review was launched on Monday and billed as a blueprint to modernise the military so that, in the words of Keir Starmer, the UK is 'safer and stronger, a battle-ready, armour-clad nation with the strongest alliances and the most advanced capabilities'. Reviews like this one come along every decade or so – but the context now appears more urgent than at any time since the end of the cold war. In the place of the old consensus that the UK simply needed to be ready for (deeply questionable) deployments to places such as Iraq and Afghanistan is a view that the threats now are much closer to home, and much closer to existential. 'UK armed forces have begun the necessary process of change in response to this new reality,' the review said. 'But progress has not been fast or radical enough.' Even within its carefully conceived terms of reference – which insisted on maintaining a role in the Indo-Pacific region and the Middle East, and did not allow for proposals to increase overall spending beyond what Starmer has already set out – the review amounts to a severe critique of the state of the armed forces. Today's newsletter explains the problems, the proposed solutions and the views of those who suggest that all of this is answering the wrong question. Here are the headlines. Israel-Gaza war | A series of recent deadly airstrikes on school buildings sheltering displaced people in Gaza were part of a deliberate Israeli military bombing strategy, the Guardian has learned. The strikes followed a loosening of controls on actions targeting Hamas operatives at sites with large numbers of civilians present, sources said. Health | The proportion of people surviving cancer in the UK has doubled since the 1970s amid a 'golden age' of progress in diagnosis and treatment, a report says. Half of those diagnosed will now survive for 10 years or more, up from 24%, according to the first study of 50 years of data on cancer mortality and cases. US news | Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, has been charged with a federal hate crime and multiple other offences after he allegedly used a makeshift flamethrower and incendiary devices to burn people in Boulder, Colorado who were raising awareness about Israeli hostages in Gaza. Iran | Tehran is on the brink of rejecting US proposals on the future of its nuclear programme after a US draft insisted on the suspension of enrichment of uranium inside the country. The US proposal also offered no clear route map for lifting sanctions. Scotland | A Scottish Labour councillor has defected to Reform UK on the eve of a pivotal Holyrood byelection, as the rightwing populist party's leader, Nigel Farage, defended a controversial advert attacking Anas Sarwar that has prompted accusations of racism. The review published yesterday is the first since 2010; John Healey, the defence secretary, says it is a departure from past iterations because it is externally led. When the review was launched, the government said it would 'consider the threats Britain faces, the capabilities needed to meet them, the state of UK armed forces and the resources available'. Led by Lord Robertson – a former defence secretary and Nato secretary general who conducted Labour's last defence review in 1998 – it has consulted 150 external experts, received 8,000 submissions to a call for evidence, and runs to 48,000 words. What is the current state of Britain's armed forces? Most judges of the UK's military readiness paint a dire picture of the armed forces as not being fit for purpose, and the review's call for a 'truly transformational' approach implicitly adopts the same view. In a report on the lessons from the Ukraine war published last year, the House of Lords' international relations and defence committee said that the armed forces 'lack the mass, resilience and internal coherence necessary to maintain a deterrent effect and sustain prolonged conflict'. Philip Stephens of the Financial Times wrote that (£) those conclusions 'are viewed within Whitehall as wholly uncontroversial'. There are plenty of numbers pointing to that conclusion. In 2010, the regular army was 110,000; now it is short of its target of 73,000, the smallest since the Napoleonic wars. Across all the armed forces, the number is down from 192,000 in 2010 to 136,000 today. Even before the war in Ukraine, ammunition stockpiles were in decline, and in 2023, Gen Sir Richard Barrons – who has been working alongside former US presidential adviser Fiona Hill on Robertson's review team – said the UK would probably use up its existing supplies in a 'busy afternoon' . RAF aircraft numbers fell from 724 in 2016 to 564 in 2023, a reduction of 22%. And the Royal Navy has two aircraft carriers that have had serious mechanical problems, without enough sailors to crew the ships needed to protect and supply them – or enough fighter jets to fill them. What does the defence review say is necessary? The review suggests that a military 'optimised for conflicts primarily fought against non-state actors' needs to be drastically rethought to contend with the prospect of 'state-on-state war' through ''whole-of-society' preparations'. It presents Russia as an 'immediate and pressing' danger to the UK, and China as a 'sophisticated and persistent challenge', while Iran and North Korea are termed 'regional disruptors'. To be ready to meet those challenges, the review lists 62 recommendations; the government has accepted every one in principle. The most eyecatching measures were trailed beforehand, from £6bn in spending on six 'always on' munitions factories to a new cyber command unit coordinating offensive digital operations. There will be a £15bn investment in modernising the production of nuclear weapons, and a pledge to build 'up to' 12 new attack submarines. And through the force multiplying effects of artificial intelligence and a £2bn investment in drones, the review promises a 'ten times more lethal British Army'. Ben Quinn has a more detailed breakdown. More conventionally, Healey had reportedly hoped to increase the size of the army by a few thousand. But he appears to have lost that fight with the Treasury, at least for now. And of the £350bn the UK is expected to spend on defence over this parliament, only £10bn is thought to be new spending committed through the strategic defence review. When will the new capacity come online? Part of the explanation of the disconnect between major announcements and new spending is the length of time that much of what is proposed will take to be enacted. The new submarines will not launch until the late 2030s. There is no timeline on the new munitions factories, while Healey said there would be no increase in the number of troops until after the next election. And on the fundamental question of how much the UK will spend on defence, Keir Starmer has promised 2.5% of GDP by 2027-28 but described 3% as an 'ambition' to be pursued at some point during the next parliament – that is, by 2034, if it materialises at all. As one source familiar with the budget process quoted by the Economist puts it: 'Basically, all their investment is for an era when Putin will be dead.' The UK's 2.5% pledge may soon start to look behind the pace against its European allies: defence ministers meeting in Brussels this week are expected to agree a 3.5% target, with the main question whether that should be scheduled for the early 2030s or later in the decade, the Economist reports. The review says that a rapid move to 2.5% and subsequent lift to 3% should make what is proposed affordable in the end – but warns that 'it may be necessary to go faster'. So is the plan enough to ensure the UK's security? The government pointed out that this is the first defence review since the end of the cold war that has not resulted in cuts. And it is important to note that, while the armed forces are undoubtedly weaker than they once were, the UK retains the world's sixth-largest defence budget. That puts it behind the US, Russia, China, India and South Korea – but the government is likely to observe that its alliance with other European countries means that it will have considerably greater impact. (The review describes a 'Nato first' outlook, and says: 'We will never, in the future, expect to fight a major, 'peer' military power alone.') Even if the threat from Vladimir Putin is far greater than might have been understood a decade ago, Russia's war in Ukraine has so depleted its resources that it is thought to be years away from being able to consider such a conflict. In this analysis, Dan Sabbagh writes that 'Britain is not under direct military threat and is not likely to be any time soon'. But there is still a sense of a military that is fundamentally overstretched. In 2023, David Richards, the former chief of the defence staff, said in the House of Lords: 'This country must stop deluding itself that it can have a global role. We are a medium-sized country with a faltering economy. 'The UK must focus ruthlessly on the Euro-Atlantic theatre, not state that this is our priority but then spread our efforts so thinly that we are strong nowhere.' In contrast, Robertson, Hill and Barrons describe 'the connection between Euro-Atlantic security and that of other regions such as the Middle East and Indo-Pacific'. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion What is the broader economic context? Others suggest that the plans should be subjected to a much more fundamental critique. Paul Johnson of the Institute for Fiscal Studies noted yesterday that if the UK plans to spend an additional £10-15bn on defence while spending more on other priorities like health and pensions, 'the only choice that is available … is some really quite chunky tax increases'. Meanwhile, claims that military spending can boost the economy may look questionable when compared with the impact that the same money might have if spent on green energy or healthcare, among other priorities. (This Greenpeace analysis makes that case.) Unsurprisingly, others, like the Stop the War Coalition, the Green party and some within Labour, question whether a boost to defence spending can possibly be the right priority at a time when public services are generally agreed to be creaking. They also note that cutting the international aid budget to serve the military may have unintended consequences. Ellie Chowns, the Greens' defence spokesperson in the House of Commons, said yesterday: 'Security is not just based on arms expenditure and threats, but on real leadership that uses diplomacy and development too.' Mark O'Connell's long read about Mr Beast is gimlet-eyed, quietly droll, and utterly convincing that his subject is worth the intention. He is 'some type of genius,' O'Connell writes – 'a prodigy of a form that, as degraded as it is, deserves to be taken seriously as one of the signature artefacts of our time'. Archie They're free to use, refreshing to the mind and body and transcendentally beautiful – so who would want to harm America's national parks? Donald Trump, comes the inevitable reply. Margaret Sullivan explains why his administration is so determined to despoil the things that make life worth living. Alex Needham, acting head of newsletters Henry Hill has an essential column on the Conservative party's impatience with Kemi Badenoch: 'The balance of opinion inside the party seems to be not whether there will be a challenge ... but when.' Archie He wrote Jerusalem, saw angels in his local park and inspired artists ranging from Gilbert and George to Patti Smith. Now the poet William Blake is being celebrated, in an exhilarating piece by Philip Hoare, as a queer icon centuries ahead of his time. Alex From ChatGPT to Google, artificial intelligence is an increasingly inescapable part of our daily lives. Emine Saner speaks to the film-makers, writers and academics who are doing their best to avoid it, given its impact on the environment and even, potentially, on human nature itself. Alex Tennis | Jack Draper missed out on the chance of a place in the French Open quarter-finals, losing in four sets to the inspired world No 62, Alexander Bublik. Draper's compatriot Cameron Norrie was beaten by Novak Djokovic in straight sets. In the women's draw, French wildcard Lois Boisson beat third seed Jessica Pegula to reach the French Open quarter-finals and send shock waves around Roland Garros. Formula One | Max Verstappen has issued a veiled apology for his crash with George Russell by admitting it 'was not right and should have not happened'. The four-time world champion was hit with a 10-second penalty by the stewards for causing a collision with Russell with two laps remaining of Sunday's Spanish Grand Prix. Football | Lisa Nandy has removed herself from the final decision over who will lead the new football regulator, after it emerged the preferred candidate had donated to the culture secretary's Labour leadership campaign. David Kogan revealed last month that he had given money to Nandy during her bid to succeed Jeremy Corbyn in 2020. 'Starmer pledges to make Britain 'battle-ready' with drones and AI' says the Guardian, while the Times has 'Tax rises loom to put Britain on war footing'. The i paper leads with an interesting angle: 'British over-18s offered taste of military life with 'gap year' in army, navy and RAF'. The Express naturally finds cause to criticise: 'Budget delay won't 'cut the mustard' as Russia threaten'. 'Police in major new hunt for Madeleine' – that's the Telegraph and the Mirror also covers that with 'New Maddie search'. The Mail goes with 'Tory warnings over 'backdoor blasphemy law''. The Financial Times splashes on 'Musk launches $300mn share offer for xAI in bid to refocus on business'. A terrible case from an inquest leads Metro: ''Bullied' soldier dead 3 weeks in bed at barracks'. Keir Starmer needs you: Britain readies for war Former Guardian security editor Richard Norton-Taylor talks through the strategic defence review and Britain's new plans to be ready for war A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad In Indonesia, the architecture firm Shau created the Microlibrary Project to promote literacy but its inventive, ecologically minded structures offer much more, including respite from the heat. The Hanging Gardens microlibrary, completed in 2019, has a rooftop garden, while another, Bima, has a facade of 2,000 discarded ice-cream buckets providing natural lighting and cross-ventilation. Shau co-founders Daliana Suryawinata and Florian Heinzelmann, who have built eight libraries since 2012, call the spaces 'laboratories for experimentation', and they are popular with young people who come to read, learn, garden and play. Their goal is to increase the number of libraries to 100 by 2045. And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How Starmer became Reeves's biggest enemy
Rachel Reeves has one eye on the bond market and the other on her own backbenchers. The Chancellor has been forced to spend the last few weeks focusing on rebellions over benefit cuts and spending plans that she must stick to if she wants to balance the books. Now, though, her authority is starting to be undermined much closer to home. The latest challenge is not coming from investors, the Red Wall or Reform UK. Instead, it is the man next door – her partner at the top of the Government – the Prime Minister. Two bold announcements from Sir Keir Starmer shed some light on the issue. Starmer's pledge to restore the winter fuel allowance to pensioners and his hint that the cap on benefits for families with more than two children will be removed were welcomed by the party faithful. However, they have left Reeves to count the cost, putting Britain on a path to higher taxes in the autumn. Restoring winter fuel payments to all pensioners and scrapping the two child benefit cap entirely would cost a combined £5bn a year if each policy was fully reversed, according to the Resolution Foundation think tank. That's a significant amount considering Reeves only has a £10bn buffer to meet a self-imposed goal of ending borrowing to fund day-to-day spending. But with less than a fortnight until she locks in Whitehall spending plans for the next three years, Starmer appears to have decided that it's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission. For the Government, though, it will be seen as a sign of a breakdown in relations. This chaotic approach to policy-making is understood to have stemmed from growing tensions in Downing Street, particularly in the leader's office itself. Some blame Liz Lloyd, No10's director of policy, delivery and innovation. Lloyd, who also served as Sir Tony Blair's deputy chief of staff, is being singled out as the trigger of a wave of recent adviser departures, including one who was accused of 'mansplaining' the economy to Reeves. Lloyds is said to have clashed with Stuart Ingham, Starmer's longest-serving aide, who was appointed alongside career civil servant Olaf Henricson-Bell to run the No10 policy unit. 'They're all in each other's business,' says a source. 'Stuart threatened to resign if Liz was appointed. Yet they are both there and have a toxic relationship with each other. Olaf is fed up with both.' Several others in the unit are said to feel frozen out, although Labour Party HQ says it doesn't recognise the tensions and insists it is business as usual. However, few can deny that it is resulting in incoherent policymaking, including a flat-out denial of reports detailing changes to the winter fuel allowance that were subsequently vindicated just weeks later, and a Downing Street that doesn't look like it has anywhere near a majority of more than 170 seats. Another battle is under way over a cap on benefits that means that families can only claim child tax credit and universal credit for their first two children if they were born after April 2017. Morgan McSweeney, Sir Keir's chief of staff, is said to be against the policy. Many of the Labour Left are making it their mission to reverse it. One Labour source summarises the party's dilemma. 'The two child cap is a political bind,' they say. 'On the one hand, how can the state subsidise poor people to have three kids when it's too costly for middle class couples to have one? On the other, how is it morally ethical for a Labour government to choose to keep kids in poverty?' At the same time, Starmer is facing the biggest rebellion of his premiership over £5bn in welfare cuts that will affect hundreds of thousands of people claiming disability benefits. Reports suggest another £500m climbdown is on the cards, in a move that could allow up to 200,000 people to keep their cash. However, it is understood that while options for further tweaks to the policy are on the table, changes are being kept on the back burner for now as Starmer and Reeves focus on other electoral carrots. Part of this will come from big spending in infrastructure in Red Wall seats to combat the threat of Reform. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) highlights that choices around health spending until 2030 will also determine how much other Whitehall departments receive. For example, if Reeves chooses to raise health spending by 3.4pc per year in real terms – or roughly the long-run average, departments outside defence face a 1pc real terms cut to their budgets. That's less funding for schools, policing and prisons. What's more, if Starmer wants to get defence spending to 3pc of GDP by 2030, it implies real terms cuts of 1.8pc. While it would not be anything like the austerity presided over by George Osborne as chancellor, for some departments where the low-hanging fruit was plucked a decade ago, it will feel like it. 'Sharp trade-offs are unavoidable,' the IFS warns in a report. Public sector pay continues to be a headache for the Chancellor. An announcement that public sector workers in England will receive a pay rise of between 3pc and 5pc this year – higher than the 2.8pc budgeted for by the Chancellor – will cost about £3bn. Reports suggest that as many as 50,000 civil service jobs could go as Reeves wields the axe as part of the Spending Review on June 11. But stopping the public sector workforce growing further above the current level of 6m will be a hard task. Keeping costs down while allowing those already on the payroll to be paid more is in theory a good idea. The IFS estimates that if public sector employment stayed constant between now and 2028–29, and the pay pot grew at 1.2pc each year in real terms in line with the overall spending envelope that has already been set out, pay awards could average 2.6pc per year in cash terms. However, Bee Boileau, an economist at the IFS, says this may not be realistic. 'Constraining the growth of the overall public sector will be tricky in the context of an NHS workforce plan that implies growth in the health service workforce of 3.1pc to 3.4pc per year, a manifesto promise to hire 6,500 more teachers, and a likely reluctance to reduce the number of police officers, prison officers or members of HM Forces,' she says. There is also a bigger problem: weak growth. JP Morgan believes Starmer's trio of trade deals with the US, EU and India will reduce borrowing by around £2.5bn. However, it thinks this will be more than offset by a tariff hit of £7.3bn and weaker growth delivering another £9bn blow to the public finances. This, together with a reversal on winter fuel, benefits for families and another fuel duty freeze is expected to turn a £9.9bn borrowing buffer into a black hole of around £15bn. Capital Economics says higher UK bond yields and expectations that interest rates will remain higher for longer also currently imply £4.4bn more will be devoted to servicing the Government's interest payments by 2030. It also warns that the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) is likely to say the Government's policy to cut migration 'by up to around 100,000 per year', will reduce growth 'and therefore raise the OBR's borrowing forecast by £6bn in 2030'. In short, there could be another £25bn of extra tax rises coming this autumn. With the threat of more tax raids around the corner, Starmer has voiced concerns about the fiscal watchdog itself. While its authority is not being questioned, the Prime Minister has asked why Reeves faces adjusting taxes and spending twice a year if she is deemed to have missed her borrowing rules when she only has one Budget. There is little appetite within Downing Street to change fiscal rules that have already been altered nine times in 16 years. 'Ripping up her so called 'iron-clad' and 'non-negotiable' rules only a year after introducing them could erode the Chancellor's political credibility,' says Ruth Gregory at Capital Economics. However, some in government are now thinking about whether one official economic forecast a year is more sensible. Such a move would require legislation. Either way, Reeves is likely to keep coming under pressure to spend more in the next few years. The bond vigilantes may be watching. But so is Starmer.
BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
West Bromwich barber shop gets men talking about mental health
A barber shop in West Bromwich is helping men open up about their mental health with the help of two NHS-trained Stars Barbers offers customers the opportunity to talk about issues in a safe and private evening sessions are led by two mental health experts who run Melanin Moods, an organisation set up in 2020 "to provide specialist support to black and brown communities".Rowan Farrell, from the barbers, said it helped people to "offload and vent" and discuss their feelings. "People start talking because it's a safe space, they feel like they can talk and engage with their barber," Mr Farrell said."They've got 30 minutes in the chair and it helps them to off load and vent, whatever issues they've got."Dr Chanelle Dennis, from Melanin Moods, jointly leads the sessions and said it was a service that aimed to tackle the taboo and stigmas that existed within the black and brown communities. Her colleague Talisa Mesquitta added: "We want to ensure that the barber shop, as it always has been for black men, remains that safe space."They know that they can come here and be open and talk about whatever it is they want to talk about and it's not going to leave here."The evenings have been running for two years and participants said subjects that have been covered included fatherhood and learning more about anxiety and understanding the impact on themselves and men come up with action plans to hold one another to account to deal with issues while "checking in" on each other. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
