logo
Nostradamus' prediction: Will the world end in 2027 with Pope Leo XIV as the last pontiff

Nostradamus' prediction: Will the world end in 2027 with Pope Leo XIV as the last pontiff

Time of India14-05-2025

Nostradamus' prediction
The recent election of
Pope Leo XIV
, the first American to ascend to the papal throne, has sparked intense interest in ancient prophecies that foretell the end of the Catholic Church and, potentially, the world itself.
Central to this speculation is the prophecy of
Nostradamus
, the enigmatic 16th-century French seer whose cryptic verses have been interpreted to predict everything from global wars to natural disasters. According to some modern interpretations, Nostradamus hinted that a pope named Leo would preside over the final days of the Church, aligning ominously with the claim that the world might end in 2027.
Adding to this intrigue is the "Prophecy of the Popes," a medieval list attributed to 12th-century Archbishop Saint Malachy, which also suggests that the current pope may be the last in a long line of St.
Peter's successors.
Nostradamus warns of a Pope named Leo and the world's end
Michel de Nostredame, better known as Nostradamus, published his first collection of prophecies in 1555. These quatrains, organized into centuries, have been interpreted as foretelling significant historical events, from the rise of Napoleon to the September 11 attacks. However, his work is notoriously ambiguous, relying on metaphor, allegory, and archaic language that makes precise interpretation challenging.
One quatrain often linked to the end of the papacy reads:
"The great lion on the throne, in the final age, Will preside over a world consumed by fire and flood, As the earth trembles beneath the feet of men, And the old faith crumbles into dust."
While this verse does not explicitly mention a pope, some modern interpreters believe it refers to a pontiff named Leo reigning during an era of global upheaval. This interpretation gains traction when considering the current global landscape, marked by climate change, political unrest, and technological disruption.
The 'Prophecy of the Popes' and its final prediction
Adding to the intrigue is the "Prophecy of the Popes," a medieval text attributed to Saint Malachy, a 12th-century Irish archbishop. This prophecy lists 112 future popes, each described by a brief Latin phrase. According to this list, the final pope, known as "Peter the Roman," will lead the Church through a period of great tribulation, culminating in the destruction of Rome and the end of the world.
While Pope Leo XIV's birth name is not Peter, some theorists argue that his American origins and symbolic choice of the name Leo could align him with this final prophetic figure.
The theory suggests that just as Pope Benedict XVI (described as the "Glory of the Olive") was linked to the Olivetan order, Pope Leo XIV may fulfill a more symbolic interpretation of the final pope, guiding the Church during a time of unprecedented global crisis.
The significance of the name 'Leo' in papal history
The choice of the name "Leo" by the newly elected Pope Leo XIV is itself a rare occurrence in modern papal history. The last pope to adopt this name was Pope Leo XIII, who reigned from 1878 to 1903.
The use of this name has long been associated with strength and resilience, symbolized by the lion, a powerful figure in both Christian and secular symbolism. However, for those steeped in esoteric prophecy, the selection of the name Leo carries a more ominous meaning.
According to Nostradamus scholars, the French mystic wrote in his famed work Les Prophéties about a "lion on the throne" during the twilight of civilization.
This line has been interpreted by some as a direct reference to a pope named Leo who would rise to power as the world approaches its final reckoning. Though these interpretations are speculative, the convergence of this papal name with global crises has fueled renewed interest in the idea that Pope Leo XIV could be the last to lead the Catholic Church.
A papacy born in uncertainty
Pope Leo XIV, formerly known as Cardinal Robert Prevost, was not a leading candidate in the early stages of the 2025 papal conclave.
His unexpected election on the fourth ballot surprised many Vatican observers, marking a dramatic shift in the Church's leadership. His choice of the name Leo, combined with his American heritage and deep ties to the Augustinian order, has fueled speculation about his symbolic role in the broader arc of Church history.
His opening words as pope, "Peace be with you," resonated deeply in a world grappling with conflict, climate disruption, and social upheaval.
These words, though meant to calm, have taken on a prophetic tone in light of the dire warnings embedded in both the Nostradamus and Malachian prophecies.
Will the world end in 2027? Prophecies suggest a final countdown
Another striking aspect of this emerging narrative is the claim that the world might end in 2027. This date, derived from interpretations of various prophecies and numerological calculations, aligns with the supposed end of the current papal line. Some theorists argue that the countdown to this date began in 1585, when Pope Sixtus V, seen as a pivotal figure in the prophetic timeline, ascended to the papacy. If accurate, this calculation suggests that 442 years later — 2027 — could mark the end of an era for the Church and possibly the world.
Also read |
Baba Vanga's chilling prediction comes true: The device that's becoming a silent killer for all ages
Discover everything about
astrology
at the
Times of India
, including
daily horoscopes
for
Aries
,
Taurus
,
Gemini
,
Cancer
,
Leo
,
Virgo
,
Libra
,
Scorpio
,
Sagittarius
,
Capricorn
,
Aquarius
, and
Pisces
.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The View From India newsletter: From best friends to foes: the bitter Trump-Musk fallout
The View From India newsletter: From best friends to foes: the bitter Trump-Musk fallout

The Hindu

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

The View From India newsletter: From best friends to foes: the bitter Trump-Musk fallout

Just as we were making sense of President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the U.S. by citizens from 12 African and West Asian countries, the dramatic collapse of the alliance between billionaire CEO of Tesla and X, Elon Musk, and President Trump took the internet by storm. The partnership that demonstrated the deliberate yet effortless bond between power and capital, also exposed how either reacts to any perceivable threat. The Guardian's columnist Jonathan Freedland wrote that 'Musk and Trump are enemies made for each other – united in their ability to trash their own brands'. What drove this wedge between the two men — one, the most powerful leader and the other, the one of the richest businessmen — prompting them to trade such rage and bitterness in public? Watch this video to understand the controversial bill that sparked sharp disagreement between the two. Also read Smriti S. on the rise and fall of the partnership between Mr. Trump and Mr. Musk. Shutting the door Meanwhile, President Trump's new travel ban came into effect at 12 am ET on Monday, amid protests in the U.S. San Francisco is suing President Donald Trump, claiming an executive order over immigrant-protecting 'sanctuary cities' is unconstitutional and a severe invasion of the city's sovereignty. Demonstrators torched cars and scuffled with security forces in Los Angeles June 8, 2025, as police kept protesters away from the National Guard troops President Donald Trump sent to the streets of the second biggest U.S. city. Unrest broke out for a third day, with protesters angry at action by immigration officials that have resulted in dozens of arrests of what authorities say are illegal migrants and gang members. The Hindu editorial noted: 'Many of the people seeking entry into the U.S., from countries that had seen American military intervention, such as Haiti and Afghanistan, are fleeing war, persecution and systemic violence. They are not national security threats but victims in search of refuge. By shutting America's doors on them, and immigrants in general, Mr. Trump is not making the U.S. safer. Rather, he is turning a country, which historically welcomed immigration and has benefited from it, into an insular, paranoid, self-doubting republic.' Mounting rage over Israel's brutality Amid Israeli forces' relentless attack on Gaza, its members stopped a Gaza-bound aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg and other activists early Monday and diverted it to Israel, enforcing a longstanding blockade of the Palestinian territory that has been tightened during the war with Hamas. 'The selfie yacht of the celebrities is safely making its way to the shores of Israel,' the Foreign Ministry said in a social media post. The British-flagged yacht Madleen, operated by the pro-Palestinian Freedom Flotilla Coalition, sought to deliver some aid to Gaza. The tolerance for Israel's brutality is certainly waning in many parts of the world. Tens of thousands of demonstrators marched through the streets of Rome on Saturday against the war in Gaza in a protest called by Italy's main opposition parties, who accuse the right-wing government of being too silent. Our London correspondent Sriram Lakshman reports on the mounting pressure on the U.K. government of Keir Starmer to take a stronger position against Israel's actions in Gaza. It was on full display recently, with MPs, including those from the governing Labour Party, quizzing the government on its positions and accusing the Israeli government of Benjamin Netanyahu of genocide. Neighbourhood watch Watch: Justifying Operation Sindoor | Was multi-party delegation a success? – our latest episode of Worldview with Suhasini Haidar takes a closer look at the mandate for Multi-party delegations abroad, and whether it was mission accomplished. Bangladesh: Delivering his Id speech on June 6, 2025, the Chief Adviser to the interim government of Bangladesh, Prof. Mohammed Yunus announced that the next national election will be held in April 2026. However, he announced the country would witness the launch of the 'July Proclamation', a document that he said was 'agreed upon by all parties.' Kallol Bhattacherjee reports. Top 5 stories this week: 1. Under pressure on the battlefield, Ukraine turns to drones to hurt Russia – read Stanly Johny's analysis of the most recent escalation in the Russia-Ukraine war and its likely implications 2. A strategy fuelled by vision, powered by energy – Union Minister Hardeep S. Puri writes that India's energy sector can be defined in three words — confidence, self-reliance and strategic foresight 3. Should India amend its nuclear energy laws? Kunal Shankar discusses with experts Ashley Tellis and D. Raghunandan 4. Read Franciszek Snarski's profile of Karol Nawrocki, the 42-year-old conservative historian, who won the run-off of the Polish presidential election on June 1 5. Purtika Dua writes on South Korea's newly elected President, Lee Jae-myung, who brings to office a personal history marked by hardship and an agenda shaped by reform

Gaza-Bound Activist Boat With Greta Thunberg On Board Intercepted by Israel
Gaza-Bound Activist Boat With Greta Thunberg On Board Intercepted by Israel

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Gaza-Bound Activist Boat With Greta Thunberg On Board Intercepted by Israel

Activist Greta Thunberg aboard the Madleen, which departed from Sicily earlier in June to bring humanitarian aid to forces intercepted a sailboat carrying a group of activists, including climate campaigner Greta Thunberg, who planned to bring humanitarian aid to Gaza in defiance of an Israeli blockade on the enclave. The Israeli foreign ministry said early Monday that the ship was 'safely making its way to the shores of Israel' and that the passengers were expected to return to their home countries. The ministry also posted a video of masked Israeli military personnel handing out sandwiches and bottled water to the activists. 'The maritime zone off the coast of Gaza is closed to unauthorized vessels under a legal naval blockade, consistent with international law,' the Israeli foreign ministry had earlier said in a social-media post. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition, the activist group that organized the boat, said Israeli forces had boarded the vessel just after 3 a.m. local time and detained those onboard. The coalition said the interception took place in international waters, posting a set of coordinates north of Egypt's Port Said near the entrance to the Suez Canal. Earlier, activists on the vessel posted videos they said showed the boat being sprayed with an unidentified white substance. The activists gathered in a group holding their hands in the air after throwing their phones overboard, according to a video posted by the group. Asked about the activists' claims, the Israeli military referred to statements from the foreign ministry. The British-flagged 59-foot sailboat, nicknamed Madleen, departed from Sicily earlier in June carrying a cargo of baby formula, flour, rice, diapers, women's sanitary products, water desalination kits, and medical supplies, according to the coalition. Also on board the boat were activists from Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands, Turkey, and Brazil. Among them is a French member of the European Parliament, Rima Hassan. A previous attempted voyage to Gaza by a flotilla of aid ships in 2010 ended in an international fracas when Israeli commandos boarded the vessels, killing 10 Turkish activists on board. The killings caused a rupture in Israel's ties with Turkey, a major Middle East power that was the first Muslim-majority country to recognize Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu later apologized over the incident and Israel paid $20 million in compensation to the Turkish civilians who were killed. Organizers of the new sea mission to Gaza said that while the ship is carrying a small amount of aid, the group's mission is a political attempt to challenge Israel's siege of Gaza and potentially open a maritime corridor for other ships to bring aid to the Gaza Strip. The enclave is seeing a humanitarian disaster unfold after a year and a half of war between Israel and the U.S.-designated terrorist group Hamas. 'We are doing this because we have to keep our promise to the Palestinians,' Thunberg said at the launch of the boat earlier in June. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition, which organized the 2010 flotilla and this year's boat, includes a range of pro-Palestinian activist groups from across the world, including the Free Gaza Movement, the European Campaign to End the Siege, and the Turkish nonprofit Humanitarian Relief Foundation (IHH). The charity is seen as having ties to Turkey's ruling party. The activists' attempt to sail to Gaza comes after a year in which the group struggled to get the mission under way. The group attempted to sail last year from Turkey but was stymied when the African nation of Guinea-Bissau withdrew its flag of convenience from a pair of ships involved in the plan. The new aid ship sailed as the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is deepening. Nearly half a million people in Gaza are facing starvation, according to a report in May by a U.N.-backed international famine warning system. Write to Jared Malsin at Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.

The EU can play it cool with Trump's trade threats
The EU can play it cool with Trump's trade threats

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

The EU can play it cool with Trump's trade threats

London:Other governments have so far taken three main approaches to dealing with Donald Trump's trade threats. China hit back hard at the U.S. president's tariffs and got him to back down partly. Canada also retaliated and avoided some of the pain Trump inflicted on other countries. Meanwhile, Britain cut a quick deal that favoured the United States. None of these is a model for the European Union. The 27-member group is not China. Though its bilateral goods trade, opens new tab with the United States last year was worth 70% more than between the U.S. and the People's Republic, opens new tab, the EU is not an autocracy that can outpunch Trump. If it antagonises the U.S. president, he might up the stakes by pulling the rug from under Ukraine and undermining the EU's defences. American hard power gives it what geopolitical strategists call 'escalation dominance'. The EU is not Canada either. Ottawa was able to hang tough because its people were infuriated that Trump was trying to blackmail Canada into becoming part of the United States. While anti-Trump sentiment is high, opens new tab in the EU, politicians who are sympathetic to him, such as Poland's new president, can still get elected. On the other hand, the EU is not the United Kingdom. Both are at risk from Russia's invasion of Ukraine. But the EU trades seven times more goods with the United States than Britain, opens new tab does - so Washington has more to lose if economic relations break down. There is another way for the EU to handle Trump's threats: play it cool. That is more or less what the bloc is doing. It involves neither escalating the conflict nor accepting a bad deal. It means being open to a good agreement if the U.S. lowers its demands, but willing to play the long game if it does not. One reason to buy time is to help Kyiv. The longer the EU has to prepare its own support package for Ukraine, which should include getting it a lot of cash, the less the damage if Trump ultimately cuts off all U.S. aid to the country. The president's own vulnerabilities may also increase over time. Just look at the spectacular end of his alliance with Tesla, opens new tab boss Elon Musk. The fragile truce with China may break down causing more financial turmoil, making Trump less keen to pick a fight with the EU. If the Supreme Court stops him using emergency powers to impose tariffs, his negotiating position will be weaker. And tariffs could hurt the U.S. more than its supposed victims, by pushing up inflation and crimping growth. Trump has zig-zagged in his trade threats and actions against the EU. The current state of play is that there are 50% tariffs on U.S. imports of steel and aluminium from the bloc, a 25% tariff on cars and 10% so-called reciprocal tariffs on most other goods. The U.S. president has threatened to jack up these reciprocal tariffs to 50% if there is no deal by July 9. He is also looking at more 'sectoral tariffs', including on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. While the EU has complained to the World Trade Organization (WTO), it has delayed its own retaliation. Its negotiators accept that they are unlikely to overturn the reciprocal tariffs, the Financial Times, opens new tab has reported. The bloc still aims to avoid the sectoral ones. Those on cars and any on pharmaceuticals would hurt it the most. It has dangled the possibility of buying more U.S. equipment and natural gas to get a deal. An agreement on those lines could be good for the EU. It needs to beef up its defences and eliminate its purchases of Russian gas. While it would be best to have its own arms and energy supplies, buying more from the U.S. makes sense as an interim measure. An important nuance, though, is that the EU should reserve the right to take action against the reciprocal tariffs after the WTO issues its verdict, says Ignacio Garcia Bercero, opens new tab, a former senior EU trade official. Such a pact would involve quite a climbdown by Trump. True, arms and gas purchases would narrow the U.S. goods deficit with the EU, which was $236 billion, opens new tab last year. But his administration has a host of other complaints including the bloc's value-added tax and food safety standards as well the digital taxes that some of its members impose on tech giants. It is hard to see the bloc agreeing anything in those areas, says Simon Evenett, professor of geopolitics and strategy at IMD. Although the U.S. side described last week's trade talks with the EU as 'very constructive, opens new tab', discussions could easily break down. The question then is how the bloc would react if Trump imposed higher reciprocal tariffs. The EU has so far imposed no countermeasures. Though it has agreed to tax 21 billion euros of U.S. imports in response to the steel and aluminium tariffs, it has delayed these until July 14 to try to get a deal. The European Commission, its executive arm, is also consulting on taxing a further 95 billion euros of U.S. imports in response to the car tariffs and the reciprocal ones. But added together, these tit-for-tat measures would be equivalent to only a third of the 379 billion euros of EU imports subject to Trump's tariffs. Some analysts, opens new tab think the bloc needs to be tougher. One idea is to crack down on American services, where the U.S. had a 109 billion euro, opens new tab surplus with the EU in 2023. Another is to activate its 'anti-coercion instrument, opens new tab', which would allow retaliation against U.S. companies operating in the bloc. Yet another is to threaten to ban exports of critical goods, such as the lithographic equipment necessary to make semiconductors. Extreme events may require extreme responses. But for now, the EU should keep its cool. It should not kid itself that it is stronger or more united than it is. It should remember that Trump may get weaker with time. And it should never forget Ukraine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store