
Nostradamus' prediction: Will the world end in 2027 with Pope Leo XIV as the last pontiff
The recent election of
Pope Leo XIV
, the first American to ascend to the papal throne, has sparked intense interest in ancient prophecies that foretell the end of the Catholic Church and, potentially, the world itself.
Central to this speculation is the prophecy of
Nostradamus
, the enigmatic 16th-century French seer whose cryptic verses have been interpreted to predict everything from global wars to natural disasters. According to some modern interpretations, Nostradamus hinted that a pope named Leo would preside over the final days of the Church, aligning ominously with the claim that the world might end in 2027.
Adding to this intrigue is the "Prophecy of the Popes," a medieval list attributed to 12th-century Archbishop Saint Malachy, which also suggests that the current pope may be the last in a long line of St.
Peter's successors.
Nostradamus warns of a Pope named Leo and the world's end
Michel de Nostredame, better known as Nostradamus, published his first collection of prophecies in 1555. These quatrains, organized into centuries, have been interpreted as foretelling significant historical events, from the rise of Napoleon to the September 11 attacks. However, his work is notoriously ambiguous, relying on metaphor, allegory, and archaic language that makes precise interpretation challenging.
One quatrain often linked to the end of the papacy reads:
"The great lion on the throne, in the final age, Will preside over a world consumed by fire and flood, As the earth trembles beneath the feet of men, And the old faith crumbles into dust."
While this verse does not explicitly mention a pope, some modern interpreters believe it refers to a pontiff named Leo reigning during an era of global upheaval. This interpretation gains traction when considering the current global landscape, marked by climate change, political unrest, and technological disruption.
The 'Prophecy of the Popes' and its final prediction
Adding to the intrigue is the "Prophecy of the Popes," a medieval text attributed to Saint Malachy, a 12th-century Irish archbishop. This prophecy lists 112 future popes, each described by a brief Latin phrase. According to this list, the final pope, known as "Peter the Roman," will lead the Church through a period of great tribulation, culminating in the destruction of Rome and the end of the world.
While Pope Leo XIV's birth name is not Peter, some theorists argue that his American origins and symbolic choice of the name Leo could align him with this final prophetic figure.
The theory suggests that just as Pope Benedict XVI (described as the "Glory of the Olive") was linked to the Olivetan order, Pope Leo XIV may fulfill a more symbolic interpretation of the final pope, guiding the Church during a time of unprecedented global crisis.
The significance of the name 'Leo' in papal history
The choice of the name "Leo" by the newly elected Pope Leo XIV is itself a rare occurrence in modern papal history. The last pope to adopt this name was Pope Leo XIII, who reigned from 1878 to 1903.
The use of this name has long been associated with strength and resilience, symbolized by the lion, a powerful figure in both Christian and secular symbolism. However, for those steeped in esoteric prophecy, the selection of the name Leo carries a more ominous meaning.
According to Nostradamus scholars, the French mystic wrote in his famed work Les Prophéties about a "lion on the throne" during the twilight of civilization.
This line has been interpreted by some as a direct reference to a pope named Leo who would rise to power as the world approaches its final reckoning. Though these interpretations are speculative, the convergence of this papal name with global crises has fueled renewed interest in the idea that Pope Leo XIV could be the last to lead the Catholic Church.
A papacy born in uncertainty
Pope Leo XIV, formerly known as Cardinal Robert Prevost, was not a leading candidate in the early stages of the 2025 papal conclave.
His unexpected election on the fourth ballot surprised many Vatican observers, marking a dramatic shift in the Church's leadership. His choice of the name Leo, combined with his American heritage and deep ties to the Augustinian order, has fueled speculation about his symbolic role in the broader arc of Church history.
His opening words as pope, "Peace be with you," resonated deeply in a world grappling with conflict, climate disruption, and social upheaval.
These words, though meant to calm, have taken on a prophetic tone in light of the dire warnings embedded in both the Nostradamus and Malachian prophecies.
Will the world end in 2027? Prophecies suggest a final countdown
Another striking aspect of this emerging narrative is the claim that the world might end in 2027. This date, derived from interpretations of various prophecies and numerological calculations, aligns with the supposed end of the current papal line. Some theorists argue that the countdown to this date began in 1585, when Pope Sixtus V, seen as a pivotal figure in the prophetic timeline, ascended to the papacy. If accurate, this calculation suggests that 442 years later — 2027 — could mark the end of an era for the Church and possibly the world.
Also read |
Baba Vanga's chilling prediction comes true: The device that's becoming a silent killer for all ages
Discover everything about
astrology
at the
Times of India
, including
daily horoscopes
for
Aries
,
Taurus
,
Gemini
,
Cancer
,
Leo
,
Virgo
,
Libra
,
Scorpio
,
Sagittarius
,
Capricorn
,
Aquarius
, and
Pisces
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Putin briefs Belarus, Kazakhstan leaders on Trump summit, calls talks ‘useful' for Ukraine peace
President Vladimir Putin spoke to the leaders of Belarus and Kazakhstan on Sunday to update them on the summit with U.S. President Donald Trump which the Kremlin has cast as a potentially significant stepping stone towards peace in Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sunday spoke with the leaders of Belarus and Kazakhstan to share details of his meeting with US President Donald Trump, which Moscow has described as an important step toward resolving the conflict in Ukraine. The Alaska summit, the first US-Russia meeting at this level in more than four years, was followed by consultations with senior Russian officials in the Kremlin on Saturday. Putin called the discussions 'timely and very useful,' saying both sides explored the possibility of ending the war on what he termed a 'fair basis' while addressing its underlying causes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We have not had direct negotiations of this kind at this level for a long time. I repeat once again: there was an opportunity to calmly and in detail once again set out our position,' Putin told Russian officials. 'We, of course, respect the position of the American administration, which sees the need for a speedy end to military action. Well, we would also like this and would like to move on to resolving all issues by peaceful means.' The press service of Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko said Putin had discussed the talks in Alaska. 'Putin informed his Belarusian counterpart in detail about the results of the last Russia-US summit,' the Lukashenko's press service said. Kazakhstan President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev's press service said that Russia-U.S. talks 'contributed to a better understanding of the American side of the Russian position on Ukraine.'


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
50% US Tariff Casts Shadow Over India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement Talks
New Delhi: The sixth round of talks scheduled to finalise the outline of the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA) between India and the US has been postponed. Government sources said the American delegation was scheduled to come from August 25 to 29 to hold negotiations on the bilateral trade agreement. The decision by the US trade delegation comes at a time when the deadline to implement US President Donald Trump's decision to impose 50 per cent tariffs on India will come into effect (on August 27). Talks between Mr Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska have also yielded no concrete outcome. Earlier, India and the US failed to reach an agreement on a mini trade deal. One of the main reasons was the US' demand for lower duties on agricultural and dairy products, which India declined. India has made it clear that it cannot allow the import of genetically modified (GM) foods. During his address from the Red Fort on the 79th Independence Day on August 15, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had said India's farmers, cattle-rearers and fishermen are the government's top priority. "I stand as a wall against any harmful policy concerning them. India will never accept any compromise when it comes to the interests of farmers, cattle-rearers and fishermen," PM Modi said. A senior Commerce Ministry official told NDTV US officials verbally expressed their inability to visit India, so both countries have decided to reschedule the sixth round of talks soon. The India-US bilateral trade agreement began in March this year, with the aim of concluding its first phase by October-November this year. Several virtual meetings between the two sides have already taken place. India is currently reviewing the implications of the recent developments. The Ministry of Commerce and Industry is consulting all stakeholders to assess their feedback, sources said. India's major exports to the US include mobile phones, cut and polished gemstones, textiles, and pharmaceutical products. The imposition of the 50 per cent reciprocal tariffs is expected to impact these four sectors the most. Labor-intensive sectors like textiles are projected to suffer particularly. "Boosting the morale of stakeholders (exporters) is essential. Everyone passed a resolution expressing their full support for Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Exporters also stated that they will explore alternative markets," Union Textile Minister Giriraj Singh told NDTV on Wednesday after a long meeting with large textile exporters. The meeting discussed the strategies required to deal with the impact of the 50 per cent US tariffs. Textile exporters demanded financial assistance from the Union minister to cope with the tariffs and also suggested the introduction of a relief package.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Want to be a US citizen? USCIS will take a holistic view of your ‘good moral character'
The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced a major policy shift that restores a rigorous and holistic approach to evaluating 'good moral character' (GMC) of foreign nationals applying for American citizenship. To illustrate: Driving under influence could impair your eligibility, but if you have skipped on taxes – but subsequently coughed up your dues this could be a redeeming factor. Or if you have good educational qualifications and job stability, this too could score you brownie points. The policy memorandum, issued on Aug 15, emphasizes that US citizenship is more than a legal benefit—it represents a profound transformation into active and responsible membership in American society. In fiscal 2024 (year ended Sept 30), 8.18 lakh foreign nationals acquired US citizenship. Mexicans led with as many as 1.07 lakh becoming American citizens (13% of the total), this was followed by Indians, with a little over 49,000 (or 6% of the total) acquiring US citizenship. The trend was similar to earlier years, Indians are the second largest contingent to acquire US citizenship. Going forward, those aspiring to become US citizens will be subjected to the new policy guidelines. Titled – 'Restoring a rigorous, holistic and comprehensive good moral character evaluation standard for aliens applying for naturalization (citizenship)', under it USCIS officials will no longer treat GMC as a simple checklist of disqualifying offenses. Instead, they are directed to consider the 'totality of circumstances', weighing both negative conduct and positive contributions. The policy highlights that while certain offenses—such as murder, aggravated felonies, torture, or genocide—remain permanent and unconditional bars to naturalization, officials must now also assess evidence of rehabilitation and reformation in other cases. 'The regulations and policy affirm that GMC findings must go beyond the absence of disqualifying acts—it must reflect a genuine positive assessment of who the applicant is and how they have lived in their community,' the policy states. Positive attributes and contributions such as sustained community involvement and contributions in the US; family caregiving, responsibility, and ties in the US; educational attainments; stable and lawful employment history and achievements; length of lawful residence in the US, compliance with tax obligations and financial responsibility in the US will carry greater weight. . At the same time USCIS officials will scrutinize behaviours inconsistent with civic responsibility, including repeat driving under influence convictions, false claims to citizenship, unlawful voting, and even patterns of reckless or disruptive conduct. Immigration attorneys are largely of the view that a move away from a rule-based model to a more discretionary one may be a slippery slope. Eligibility results could vary based on the subjective discretion of the official vetting the application and could result in lack of uniformity across cases. In general individuals can apply for US citizenship, after they have been lawful permanent residents (green card holders) for at least five years. A Chicago based Indian family that was examining the possibility of applying for citizenship told TOI, 'Years ago, when we initially moved to the US, both of us faced tax disputes owing to interpretation of the India-US tax treaty. This could be a blot on our record.' Loss of jobs during the pandemic and non repayment of interest or principal amount against loans could also be issues that come up for many aspirants during processing of citizenship applications, they point out. However, there appears to be a ray of hope. For applicants with past 'wrongdoing' , USCIS officials will look for concrete evidence of rehabilitation, including repayment of taxes, compliance with court-ordered conditions, or testimony from community members. According to the policy guidelines, such evidence may support a finding of good moral character even where negative history exists, provided no permanent bar applies. It may be recalled that Joseph Edlow, who was confirmed as director of USCIS in July, told NY Times in an interview that the current US citizenship test is 'too easy'—noting that many applicants can simply memorize answers and pass without true understanding. This is another change that could be on the anvil.