The Genocidal Partnership of Israel and the United States
Image: AFP
Norman Solomon
For decades, countless U.S. officials have proclaimed that the bonds between the United States and Israel are unbreakable. Now, the ties that bind are laced with genocide. The two countries function as accomplices while methodical killing continues in Gaza, with both societies directly—and differently—making it all possible.
The policies of Israel's government are aligned with the attitudes of most Jewish Israelis. In a recent survey, three-quarters of them (and 64% of all Israelis) said they largely agreed with the statement that 'there are no innocent people in Gaza'—nearly half of whom are children.
'There is no more 'permitted' and 'forbidden' with regard to Israel's evilness toward the Palestinians,' dissident columnist Gideon Levy wrote three months ago in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz.
The biggest Israeli media outlets echo and amplify sociopathic voices.
Last week, Levy provided an update: 'The weapon of deliberate starvation is working. The Gaza 'Humanitarian' Foundation, in turn, has become a tragic success. Not only have hundreds of Gazans been shot to death while waiting in line for packages distributed by the GHF, but there are others who don't manage to reach the distribution points, dying of hunger. Most of these are children and babies… They lie on hospital floors, on bare beds, or are carried on donkey carts. These are pictures from hell. In Israel, many people reject these photos, doubting their veracity. Others express their joy and pride at seeing starving babies.'
Unimpeded, a daily process continues to exterminate more and more of the 2.1 million Palestinian people who remain in Gaza—bombing and shooting civilians while blocking all but a pittance of the food and medicine needed to sustain life. After destroying Gaza's hospitals, Israel is still targeting healthcare workers (killing at least 70 in May and June), as well as first responders and journalists.
The barbarism is in sync with the belief that 'no innocent people' are in Gaza. A relevant observation came from Aldous Huxley in 1936, the same year that the swastika went onto Germany's flag: 'The propagandist's purpose is to make one set of people forget that certain other sets of people are human.' Kristallnacht happened two years later.
Renowned genocide scholar Omer Bartov explained during an interview on Democracy Now! in mid-July that genocide is 'the attempt to destroy not simply people in large numbers, but to destroy them as members of a group. The intent is to destroy the group itself. And it doesn't mean that you have to kill everyone. It means that the group will be destroyed and that it will not be able to reconstitute itself as a group. And to my mind, this is precisely what Israel is trying to do.'
Bartov, who is Jewish and spent the first half of his life in Israel, said:
"What I see in the Israeli public is an extraordinary indifference by large parts of the public to what Israel is doing and what it's done in the name of Israeli citizens in Gaza."
In Israel, 'compassion for Palestinians is taboo except among a fringe of radical activists,' Adam Shatz wrote last month in the London Review of Books. At the same time, 'the catastrophe of the last two years far exceeds that of the Nakba.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The consequences 'are already being felt well beyond Gaza: in the West Bank, where Israeli soldiers and settlers have presided over an accelerated campaign of displacement and killing (more than a thousand West Bank Palestinians have been killed since 7 October); inside Israel, where Palestinian citizens are subject to increasing levels of ostracism and intimidation; in the wider region, where Israel has established itself as a new Sparta; and in the rest of the world, where the inability of Western powers to condemn Israel's conduct—much less bring it to an end—has made a mockery of the rules-based order that they claim to uphold.'
The loudest preaching for a 'rules-based order' has come from the U.S. government, which makes and breaks international rules at will.
During this century, in the Middle East, the U.S.-Israel duo has vastly outdone all other entities combined in the categories of killing, maiming, and terrorising. In addition to the joint project of genocide in Gaza, and the USA's long war on Iraq, the United States and Israel have often exercised an assumed prerogative to attack Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Iran, along with encore U.S. missile strikes on Iraq as recently as last year.
Israel's grisly performance as 'a new Sparta' in the region is coproduced by the Pentagon, with the military and intelligence operations of the two nations intricately entangled. The Israeli military has been able to turn Gaza into a genocide zone, with at least 70% of its arsenal coming from the United States.
While writing an afterword about the war in Gaza for the paperback edition of War Made Invisible, I mulled over the relevance of my book's subtitle: 'How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine.'
As the carnage in Gaza worsened, the reality became clearer that the Orwellian-named Israel Defence Forces and the U.S. Defence Department are essentially part of the same military machine. Their command structures are different, but they are part of the same geopolitical Goliath.
The lethal violence from Israeli-American teamwork is of such magnitude that it epitomises international state terrorism. The genocide in Gaza shows the lengths to which the alliance is willing and able to go.
While public opinion is very different in Israel and the United States, the genocidal results of the governments' policies are indistinguishable.
American public opinion about arming Israel is measurable. As early as June 2024, a CBS News poll found that 61% of the public said that the U.S. should not 'send weapons and supplies to Israel.' Since then, support for Israel has continued to erode.
In sharp contrast, on Capitol Hill, the support for arming Israel is measurably high.
In the House, only 26 out of 435 members have chosen to become cosponsors of H.R.3565, a bill introduced more than two months ago by Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) that would prevent the U.S. government from sending certain bombs to Israel.
'Israel is the largest cumulative recipient of U.S. foreign assistance since World War II,' the Congressional Research Service reports. During just the first 12 months after the war in Gaza began in October 2023, Brown University's Costs of War project found, the 'U.S. spending on Israel's military operations and related U.S operations in the region' added up to $23 billion.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
Sudan accuses UAE of bringing in Colombian mercenaries to support RSF
PORT SUDAN -Sudan accused the United Arab Emirates on Monday of hiring Colombian mercenaries to fight against the government-aligned army on behalf of its rival, the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces. Since April 2023, war between the Sudanese army and the RSF has killed tens of thousands of people and created the world's largest hunger and displacement crises. It has also drawn widespread accusations of foreign involvement -- namely Abu Dhabi's backing of the RSF. "The government of Sudan possesses all the documents and evidence proving the involvement of mercenaries from Colombia and some neighbouring countries, sponsored and funded by the UAE," the foreign ministry said Monday. The UAE has repeatedly denied allegations of arming the RSF, despite reports to the contrary from UN experts, diplomats, US politicians and international organisations. Mercenaries have been spotted on both sides, with reports of Colombian fighters first emerging in the western region of Darfur late last year and corroborated by United Nations experts. This week, the Joint Forces -- a coalition of armed groups in Darfur aligned with the army -- reported more than 80 Colombian mercenaries fighting on the RSF's side in the North Darfur state capital El-Fasher. The coalition said "several Colombian mercenaries involved in drone operations and artillery coordination were killed" in the most recent RSF attempt to seize the city, which it has besieged for over a year. READ: Sudan paramilitaries kill 14 civilians fleeing besieged city: monitor El-Fasher is the last state capital in Darfur still under control of the army, which on Sunday released video footage it said was of "foreign mercenaries believed to be from Colombia". AFP was not immediately able to verify the videos. The ministry said on Monday that it had previously submitted evidence of the foreign fighters' involvement to the UN Security Council, adding their presence was making the conflict a "cross-border terrorist war waged by proxy". A report this year from UN experts monitoring an ongoing arms embargo on Darfur called the accusations of Colombian mercenaries fighting for the RSF credible. Sudan said in December that the Colombian foreign ministry had extended its regret "for the participation of some of its citizens in the war", according to Sudan's state news agency. Retired Colombian soldiers and ex-guerrillas -- hardened by more than half a century of conflict back home -- have turned up in recent years in conflicts in Ukraine, Haiti and Afghanistan. They have previously been recruited by the UAE to fight Huthi rebels in Yemen and to guard oil pipelines in the wealthy Gulf state, according to AFP reporting.


The South African
5 hours ago
- The South African
EFF calls for regime change in US: 'Unstable' Trump needs to go to!
The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) launched a scathing attack on United States President Donald Trump, describing him as an 'unstable and illiterate imperialist'. The Red Berets rejected the 30% tariffs imposed by the US on South African exports, calling it a deliberate attempt to assert dominance by destabilising weaker economies. In a strongly worded statement, the party also criticised the South African government, warning that this is not the time for what it termed 'sheepish diplomacy.' The EFF said Trump's 'reckless and irrational' tariffs are rooted in a misguided understanding of global trade. The party said the US president poses a serious threat to global economic stability. In the statement, the party also said Trump is a danger to humanity and called for progressive forces across the world to unite and support efforts to remove him from office. The EFF also added that the world has suffered under Trump's rule for too long, calling him a dictator. The statement drew attention to EFF leader Julius Malema's political history. In 2012, he was expelled from the African National Congress (ANC) for calling then-president Jacob Zuma a dictator. Malema had earlier been suspended after being found guilty on three charges, including bringing the ANC into disrepute for advocating regime change in Botswana. The EFF also accused the ANC-led government of failing to improve the country's economy since the end of apartheid. 'Without resolving domestic structural constraints, our country will always be at the mercy of dominant imperial powers, tossed between competing global interests like a leaf in a storm,' the party said. Their comments followed remarks by International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola, who criticised opposition parties for failing to present a united front in response to the US tariff hike. The new tariffs are set to take effect at 12:01 am on Friday, 8 August. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news

IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
SA government dismisses US State Department's report on farm attacks
The Presidency said the US State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (DRL) report on farm attacks lacks credibility. Image: Supplied / GCIS The Presidency said the US findings, that farm attacks are not ordinary crimes, lacks credibility and has accused the country of ignoring reliable information in order to sustain a disinformation campaign against South Africa. The US State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (DRL) claimed that attacks on farms display a distinctly brutal pattern. The bureau said this was uncovered during its recent visit to the country as part of the President of the United States, Donald Trump's executive orders to learn more about the rural farm attacks and the breakdown of the rule of law. While AfriForum welcomed the findings, Presidency spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, said there is no credibility that can be attached to the report. He said the bureau visited Cape Town only, and also ignored credible SAPS statistics in order to sustain a disinformation campaign against South Africa. 'There is nothing constructive or new out of their report. We are fully aware of all challenges relating to crime in our country, including crimes that are committed in rural and farming areas. We are also working on addressing all crimes that affect our citizens,' said Mangwenya. The bureau said local sources reported 296 farm attacks and 49 murders in 2023, adding that victims are disproportionately elderly, isolated and face delayed police response. It said the SAPS also reported that the number increased to 44 murders in 2024. 'These are not ordinary crimes. In some documented cases, reports detail victims tortured or killed without anything being stolen,' DRL said. 'Earlier this year, a man was beaten and hacked with a machete. In another incident, an elderly woman was assaulted and repeatedly stabbed. In both cases, no theft occurred. These attacks are not motivated by poverty alone.' The DRL added that in one of the notable incidents in 2023, assailants chanted 'kill the boer, kill the farmer' as they stabbed their victim, adding that these are not fringe slogans as some South African leaders chant the same words to cheering crowds. 'In one case, graffiti praising these leaders was painted on a farmhouse before its owners were brutally attacked. Despite this, as the President of the United States highlighted earlier this year, many South African leaders have failed to condemn this song,' the bureau said, adding that the international community and mainstream media decided to remain silent on this issue. In response to the report, AfriForum said it was convinced that this is the result of years of consistent advocacy and awareness-raising aimed at exposing the seriousness of farm attacks and murders to the local and international community. 'We are grateful that the United States has confirmed what we have been emphasising for years, namely that farm attacks are not ordinary crimes,' says Jacques Broodryk, AfriForum's Chief Spokesperson for Community Safety. 'Farm attacks are brutal, targeted attacks that are often accompanied by torture, murder without anything being stolen and politically charged rhetoric such as 'Kill the Boer'. The ANC-led government's silence on this issue is shameful. When the government refuses to condemn hate speech and refuses to prioritise the protection of our farmers, they are complicit in this crisis,' Broodryk said. However, violence monitor Mary de Haas said the report was not objective, adding that crime affects everyone in South Africa. She said if there was objectivity in the report, the bureau would look at what is happening in rural black communities, where the murder rate is far higher. 'This is a very biased racist agenda to focus on white farmers when most of the victims of brutal crime and torture are black people in South Africa .They are trying to punish South Africa because of the world court case. (The case filed in 2024 against Israel at the International Court of Justice). The genocide is in Gaza, not in South Africa,'' she said. US President Donald Trump took aim at South Africa earlier this year after he took office for the second term, promoting claims that white farmers were targeted-he stopped all aid to South Africa, accusing it of discriminating against its white minority. The South African government and President Cyril Ramaphosa have labelled notions that there is a genocide against White South Africans as false and said while there was crime in South Africa, the majority of victims were Black. Trump also imposed a 30% tariff wall on South African exports, while other African nations, including Nigeria, Ghana, Lesotho and Zimbabwe have been hit with 15%, which is expected to come into effect in days. Political analyst Sandile Swana said the US decided to focus on the interests of the white minority while the issue should be resolving the economic struggles of black people. He said the DRL's visit aims to turn South Africa into a colonial State of the US, adding that the report is biased, unscientific and prejudice to favour Trump and his Make America Great Again campaign. 'This must be seen as a racist measure by the US. The former South African Ambassador to the US Ibrahim Rasool was expelled for correctly identifying the white supremacy tendencies of Trump's presidency,' Swana said. Meanwhile, the government said 'some actors with South African society' have undermined efforts in resetting the relationship with the US. [email protected]