HC reserves orders in pleas over local bodies' elections
While reserving the orders, the judge reminded Additional Advocate General Mohd. Imran Khan that the State government had earlier assured the HC that it would convene elections to local bodies by February 2025.
Responding to the query from the bench, the AAG said the State government would require a month to declare reservations for backward classes in local bodies. The authorities were ensuring that the reservations to be announced for BCCs would strictly be in compliance with the directions of the Supreme Court.
Senior counsel Vidyasagar, appearing for the State Election Commission, informed the bench that the Commission would hold elections to local bodies within 60 days of the government announcing reservations.
The six petitioners, who were sarpanches and whose terms expired by January 1, 2024, requested the bench to extend their terms or conduct elections to the village panchayats immediately. They contended that the government appointed special officers in their places following the expiry of their terms. Appointing special officers was against Articles 243E and 243K of the Constitution, they argued. The rule of special officers was also in contravention of the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act-2018.
They told the bench that they had spent money from their pockets for different developmental and infrastructural works in their respective villages. The government was obligated to reimburse the money they had spent, the petitioners said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Ghose Commission report: Telangana HC asks govt whether it would table action taken report in Assembly along with report for discussion of its findings
The Telangana High Court on Thursday sought to know from the state government whether an action taken report would be placed before the state Assembly when it meets to discuss the findings of the PC Ghose Commission of Inquiry report over alleged irregularities in the execution of the Kaleshwaram project. A Division Bench of Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice G M Mohiuddin was hearing the petitions filed by former chief minister K Chandrashekar Rao and former irrigation minister T Hareesh Rao against the PC Ghose Commission of Inquiry, which found Chandrashekar Rao and Hareesh Rao 'directly and vicariously accountable' for irregularities in the project. The Telangana government appointed former Supreme Court Judge, Justice (retd) Pinaki Chandra Ghose as the one-man judicial commission to investigate the alleged irregularities in the planning, design, and construction of Medigadda, Annaram, and Sundilla barrages, which formed integral components of the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Scheme (KLIS), a flagship project of the previous Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) government. The petitioners held that the inquiry commission was unconstitutional and illegal, and the inquiry report was invalid, and that the government's actions were unfair. During the hearing, the petitioners contended that the findings of the commission were prejudicial, scurrilous, defamatory, and scathing against the petitioners. Their counsel argued that not only were the petitioners not given a copy of the report and its findings to date, but also not issued a notice specifying the charges held against them or allowed to cross-examine the witnesses as per the rules. The petitioners sought the court's direction not to take any action against them unless the state produces proof of issuance of 8 (2) notice to the petitioners as per the Commission of Inquiry (Rules), 972. 'What we wanted to be clear about is if the government would await the acceptance of the report by the Assembly before taking any action on the basis of the findings given by the report or it will be acting on the report, take action, and place the report and the action taken before the Assembly,' the Chief Justice observed. While the counsel for the state initially said that no action-taken report is to be placed immediately, he sought time for further instructions from the state government. 'The acceptance of the findings of the report is to be done on the floor of the Assembly after a debate — whether any action is to be taken before that on the basis of the report or after acceptance of the findings,' the CJ clarified.
Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Computer-based tests, no interview, no descriptive papers: SSC cut recruitment cycle to 6–10 months, says Minister
The Staff Selection Commission (SSC) has undertaken several reforms to bring down the recruitment cycle from the earlier 15–18 months to 6–10 months. The Minister of State for Personnel Jitendra Singh informed the Rajya Sabha in a written reply that the notice period for examinations has been reduced from about 45 days to 21 days. The SSC has also moved completely from pen-and-paper-based examinations to computer-based tests. In addition, the number of tiers in certain examinations has been reduced. According to Singh, descriptive-type papers have been removed from all examinations except the combined Hindi translators examination. The interview process has also been discontinued. Verification of documents of selected candidates is now being handled directly by the ministries and departments concerned with the post-specific vacancy. The SSC has introduced an online centralised e-dossier system to ensure secure and transparent handling of candidate records. Singh said the system allows controlled, role-based access for authorised users and provides a tracking mechanism with unique numbers for data integrity. The e-dossier system has been implemented in examinations such as the combined graduate level 2024, combined higher secondary level 2024, junior engineer 2024, and multi-tasking staff and havaldar 2024. The minister said the new system has enabled faster validation and forwarding of dossiers, better coordination between SSC and ministries, and reduced use of physical records, thereby expediting pre-appointment verification and recommendations. On the use of regional languages in recruitment exams, Singh informed that since 2022, the SSC has been conducting three all-India examinations, multi-tasking staff and Havaldar, combined higher secondary level, and Constable (GD) in 13 regional languages in addition to Hindi and English. For civil services examinations, candidates have the option to write answers in any of the 22 languages listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution, besides Hindi and English. Other recruitment agencies, including the Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS) and the Railway Recruitment Boards (RRBs), also conduct their exams in 13 regional languages.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Governors' Delay On Bills Should Be Resolved Politically, Not By Court: Centre To SC
The Centre argued that not all issues require judicial intervention and that some should be resolved through political discussions The central government on Thursday told the Supreme Court that delays by governors in signing state bills should be handled through political dialogue rather than legal timelines. This was stated on the third day of hearings over a presidential reference on the matter. The Centre argued that not all issues require judicial intervention and that some should be resolved through discussions between the Chief Minister, Prime Minister, or President. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, responded to the court's query on what options are available if a governor holds back a bill, NDTV reported. 'Suppose a particular governor is sitting on bills… there are political solutions. And such solutions are taking place, but it is not everywhere. It is not everywhere the state government rushes to the Supreme Court," he said. 'The Chief Minister goes and requests the Prime Minister… meets the President," he added. Mehta stated that such matters can be settled even with a simple phone call and do not always end up in court. 'There are delegations that go and say, 'these bills are pending, please talk to the Governor and let him take a decision, one way or the other'. The issue can be sorted out on the telephone." 'In the absence of a timeline in the Constitution, can it be laid down by the court even if there is justification?" he asked. His remarks come in the wake of the Supreme Court's April verdict, which suggested that the President and Governors must act within a fixed period when clearing state bills. Several non-BJP ruled states, including Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Punjab, have complained in the past that their governors, appointed by the central government, have either delayed or denied assent to bills passed by their respective legislatures. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
