How many asylum seekers are in UK hotels and why are they being housed there?
On Tuesday, Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary injunction blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in the Essex town.
Here, the PA news agency takes a look at the latest overall data.
– How many asylum seekers are in hotels across the UK?
The most recent Home Office data showed there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March.
This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079.
New figures – published among the usual quarterly immigration data release – are expected on Thursday, showing numbers in hotels at the end of June.
Figures for hotels published by the Home Office date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023 when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels.
– How many hotels are in use for asylum seekers?
It is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023.
Labour said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210.
– Why are asylum seekers being housed in hotels?
Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available.
The Home Office provides accommodation to asylum seekers who have no other way of supporting themselves on a 'no choice' basis, so they cannot choose where they live.
When there is not enough housing, the Home Office can move people to accommodation such as hotels and large sites, like former military bases.
In May, the National Audit Office said those temporarily living in hotels accounted for 35% of all people in asylum accommodation.
– Is this likely to be a permanent arrangement?
Labour has pledged to end the 'costly use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this Parliament' – which would be 2029, if not earlier.
Campaigners and charities have long argued that hotels are not suitable environments to house asylum seekers.
The Refugee Council said they 'cost the taxpayer billions, trap people in limbo and are flashpoints in communities' and urged the Government to 'partner with local councils to provide safe, cost-effective accommodation within communities'.
– What is the Government saying since the legal ruling?
Ministers are 'looking at a range of different contingency options' following Tuesday's ruling, according to security minister Dan Jarvis
In the immediate aftermath of the judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle repeated criticism of the previous Conservative government, saying Labour had 'inherited a broken asylum system'.
She said the Government would 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns' around asylum hotels.
– What options does the Home Office have now?
Last month, amid protests outside the Bell Hotel and more migrants crossing the Channel, an extra 400 spaces were being prepared to house male asylum seekers at RAF Wethersfield in Essex.
The former military site, which has a usual capacity of 800 beds, is expected to house more adult men on a short-term basis.
The Labour Government scrapped the large site of the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland, Dorset, earlier this year, while Napier Barracks in Folkestone, Kent, is also due to end housing asylum seekers and be returned to the Ministry of Defence in September.
– Why were there protests outside the Bell Hotel?
The hotel in Epping has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl – something he has denied and he is due to stand trial later in August.
After the High Court's ruling, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage wrote in the Telegraph calling for Epping protests to inspire further action wherever there are concerns about the 'threat posed by young undocumented males' living in hotels.
But on Tuesday more than 100 women's organisations wrote to ministers warning that vital conversations about violence against women and girls are being 'hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda' that fuels divisions and harms survivors.
The joint statement, including from Rape Crisis England & Wales and Refuge, said: 'We have been alarmed in recent weeks by an increase in unfounded claims made by people in power, and repeated in the media, that hold particular groups as primarily responsible for sexual violence.
'This not only undermines genuine concerns about women's safety, but also reinforces the damaging myth that the greatest risk of gender-based violence comes from strangers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
a few seconds ago
- Reuters
Trump administration to vet immigration applications for 'anti-Americanism'
WASHINGTON, Aug 20 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's administration has said it will assess applicants for U.S. work, study and immigration visas for "anti-Americanism" and count any such finding against them, sparking concern about implications for free speech. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said in a "policy alert, opens new tab" dated Tuesday that it gave immigration officers new guidance on how to exercise discretion in cases where foreign applicants "support or promote anti-American ideologies or activities" as well as "antisemitic terrorism." Trump has labeled a range of voices as anti-American, including historians and museums documenting U.S. slavery and pro-Palestinian protesters opposing U.S. ally Israel's military assault on Gaza. "Anti-American activity will be an overwhelmingly negative factor in any discretionary analysis," USCIS said. "America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies." The announcement did not define anti-Americanism. But the policy manual refers to a section of federal law about prohibiting naturalization of people "opposed to government or law, or who favor totalitarian forms of government." The full text mentions supporters of communism or totalitarian regimes and people who advocate overthrow of the U.S. government and violence against government officers, among other factors. USCIS said it expanded the types of applications that have social media vetting, and reviews for "anti-American activity" will be added to that vetting. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, said the step hearkened to the 1950s when Senator Joseph McCarthy hunted alleged communists in a campaign that became synonymous with political persecution. "McCarthyism returns to immigration law," he said. Anti-Americanism "has no prior precedent in immigration law and its definition is entirely up to the Trump admin." In April, the U.S. government said it would begin screening the social media of immigrants and visa applicants for what it called antisemitic activity. Rights advocates raised free speech and surveillance concerns. (This story has been refiled to fix a typo in the headline)
Daily Mail
a few seconds ago
- Daily Mail
Price of Labour is a leap in inflation: Tax raid on employers and minimum wage hike have driven up costs, with more pain to come
came under fire on Wednesday after her tax raid on jobs helped push inflation to an 18-month high. The Tories warned 'Britain can't afford Labour' after figures showed consumer prices rose by 3.8 per cent last month compared with a year earlier. That was up from 3.6 per cent in June and higher than the predicted 3.7 per cent figure. Air fares, petrol costs and food prices were among the factors driving inflation higher. Hotel prices also climbed – with some experts citing an 'Oasis bump' as fans snapped up rooms near venues for the band's sold-out comeback tour. The Resolution Foundation think-tank said the UK was now 'increasingly looking like an inflation outlier', with prices rising at the fastest pace in the G7 group of advanced economies. Worse is to come as the Bank of England predicts inflation will climb to 4 per cent later this year – double its 2 per cent target. And the worsening picture has further diminished hopes of another interest rate cut by the Bank before the end of 2025, in a major blow to borrowers. It comes as households prepare for a further hit when regulator Ofgem announces its latest energy price cap next week –which is predicted to result in a rise in bills. Much of the surge in inflation has been caused by the Chancellor's £25 billion raid on employer national insurance as well as a big increase in the minimum wage, which has made it more expensive to hire staff. That has resulted in many firms passing on the costs in the form of higher prices – or in other cases cutting back the workforce. The figures will further fuel accusations that Ms Reeves' tax raid on employers has backfired. Yet with growth slowing and debt surging the Chancellor is likely to announce even more painful tax rises in her autumn Budget as she seeks to fill a financial black hole estimated at up to £50 billion. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said the rise in inflation was 'deeply worrying for families'. He added: 'Labour's choices to tax jobs and ramp up borrowing are pushing up costs and stoking inflation – making everyday essentials more expensive. 'And with leading economists warning that the Chancellor has blown a colossal black hole in the public finances, families and businesses are bracing for yet more pain come in the autumn Budget. 'Families are paying the price for Rachel Reeves' economic mismanagement. Britain can't afford Labour.' The Office for National Statistics said a sharp increase in air fares – blamed on the timing of school holidays – was to blame for much of the rise in inflation. Fares rose by a record 30 per cent between June and July and by 15 per cent compared with the same month last year. Petrol and diesel prices also went up, while food price inflation climbed for the fourth month in a row, to 4.9 per cent – the highest recorded since February last year. That means households have been seeing their supermarket shopping bills go up more quickly every month since the spring. Among the products seeing striking double-digit increases were staples such as milk, up 11 per cent, butter (18 per cent), and chocolate (17 per cent). The Food and Drink Federation (FDF), representing manufacturers, said the industry was being 'squeezed on all sides' by high energy and ingredient costs as well as Labour's new packaging tax and NI hike. Jim Bligh, director of corporate affairs and packaging at the FDF, said: 'We expect that high food and drink inflation will persist through the year, so any fresh costs for businesses in the autumn Budget will inevitably put yet more pressure on shoppers' pockets.' Steve Clayton, head of equity funds at investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Rachel Reeves landed a major bill onto employers when she hiked national insurance costs earlier this year and they are now trying to pass the buck on to consumers through price increases.' Stuart Morrison, research manager at the British Chambers of Commerce, said: 'Businesses tell us national insurance, wage growth and tariffs are all bubbling away in a cauldron of price pressures.' The Chancellor said: 'We're a long way from the double-digit inflation we saw under the previous government, but there's more to do to ease the cost of living.'
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
TUC in call for gender equality over pensions
Retired women effectively go more than four months every year without getting a pension because of a gender gap, according to research. The TUC estimated women were losing the equivalent of £7,600 a year on average. The union organisation said compared to men, retired women effectively stop receiving pension income from today. The income gap between men and women in retirement is now 36.5%, according to research from the Prospect union. The Government has revived the Pension Commission, which will bring together unions, employer and independent experts to look into the causes of the gap. TUC general secretary Paul Nowak said: 'Everyone deserves dignity and security in retirement, but too many retired women have been left without enough to get by. 'We must make sure that these inequalities are addressed for future generations. 'That's why reviving the Pensions Commission – bringing together unions, employers and independent experts – is a vital step forward. 'We now have a chance to make sure everyone, including women, receive the decent retirement income that all workers need.' A Government spokesperson said: 'We're determined to close the gender pensions gap, and the new state pension has already reduced historic inequalities faced by women and low earners. 'Alongside this, the Pensions Commission will tackle barriers to close the gender pensions gap in private pensions to ensure women have the dignity and security they deserve in retirement.'
