
Neo-Nazi teenager snared by MI5 as he tried to buy gun for attack, court told
A neo-Nazi teenager was snared by police and MI5 as he tried to buy a Makarov pistol for a terrorist attack, a court has heard.
Alfie Coleman was detained by armed police in a Morrisons car park moments after he paid £3,500 in exchange for what he thought was a gun and ammunition, the Old Bailey was told.
It was the culmination of a 'highly sophisticated operation' in which an undercover officer from MI5 allegedly agreed to sell Coleman weaponry, jurors were told.
Former Tesco worker Coleman had allegedly engaged in online chat with several undercover officers over months as he tried to buy the gun on various encrypted messaging platforms.
Prosecutor Nicholas De La Poer KC said an arrangement was made with the undercover officer for the supply of a Makarov pistol, five magazines and 200 rounds of ammunition.
Coleman was allegedly told they would be in a Land Rover Discovery parked in the Morrisons car park in Stratford, east London.
On the morning of September 29 2023, the defendant left £3,500 in cash in the front passenger seat footwell and collected the bag of items from the boot.
But before he had gone 30 yards, he was confronted by armed counter-terrorism police and arrested, the court was told.
Inside the bag he was carrying was what appeared to be a handgun and around 200 rounds of ammunition, jurors heard.
Mr De La Poer said members of the public going about their business shopping at Morrisons had witnessed the 'shocking scene' as Coleman was detained by three counter-terrorism officers pointing stun guns.
He said: 'There was much shouting at the young man. More men appeared and took hold of the young man who ended up on the ground.'
While planning a gun attack, the defendant had gathered terrorist information, carried out online research, and wrote a 'manifesto', jurors were told.
Mr De La Poer told jurors: 'The prosecution's case is that Mr Coleman believed in an extreme right-wing ideology which included idolising the likes of Thomas Mair, the man who murdered the MP, Jo Cox.'
He believed in the 'the supremacy of white people and neo-Nazism' and collected a number of documents to help with his attack planning, the prosecutor said.
He went on: 'The prosecution's case is that Mr Coleman engaged in conversation on encrypted social media platforms such as Wire and Telegram with people whom he thought were sympathetic to his views.
'And it was through such people that Mr Coleman sought to buy firearms. A mission which led him to the Morrison's carpark in Stratford on the morning of September 29 2023.'
The court heard how the defendant had emailed the far-right white supremacist organisation Patriotic Alternative in July 2021 saying he 'would like to start participating in activism'.
In June 2022, the defendant allegedly wrote a plan for a potential terrorist attack identifying his initial target as the ' Mayor of London house' and included the postcode of the Lord Mayor of London.
The note also made reference to what appeared to be a plan to put explosive in a cash machine and listed weapons including knives and crossbows, the court was told.
In the event, the plans were abandoned as his thinking developed, jurors heard.
Jurors were told of a file entitled 'you can't see me' containing another attack plan, this time to hijack a plane.
Mr De La Poer said that in the 'cold light of day' this plan appeared to be 'far-fetched and childish'.
He went on: 'The prosecution's case is that however he presented to the outside world when at work, Mr Coleman was seething with hatred on the inside. As a result he created a list.'
In September 2022, the defendant allegedly compiled a list of vehicle number plates on his phone, with one belonging to a colleague at Tesco labelled 'race traitor'.
Jurors heard how he had singled out the white female co-worker who was married to a man of mixed Indian and Seychellois heritage.
At the time, the defendant's reading included an extreme right-wing text which included a scene entitled 'The Day of the Rope' in which 'white race traitors' were hanged on a single day.
In the summer of 2023, the defendant allegedly turned his attention to an attack in France and attempted to arrange the purchase of military grade weaponry there.
In a 'Diary' document, he allegedly explained he had picked France because it was close to 'all out race war' and it was 'where I feel most useful and where I can create the biggest impact'.
In the event, Coleman never travelled to France due to practical difficulties, jurors were told.
Two days before he was due to pick up the Makarov and ammunition in Stratford, Coleman allegedly told an online contact: 'Just something has gotta be done, how long can we sit here and talk over the internet.'
The same day, Coleman ordered a Gerber Strong Arm knife with a 4.8 inch blade online, the court was told.
Jurors were told that Coleman accepted he had a significant quantity of extreme right-wing material and had pleaded guilty to possessing 10 documents which contain information likely to be useful to terrorists.
The defendant did not dispute writing a text bearing similarities to other 'manifestos' written by convicted extreme right-wing terrorists nor that he engaged in chat on Telegram and Wire with people who proclaimed extreme right-wing views and idolised Hitler, jurors heard.
Coleman has also pleaded guilty to attempting to possess both a firearm and ammunition but denied he was preparing for a terrorist attack.
Mr De La Poer said the defendant would claim he did not agree with everything he read and was always changing what he thought.
The defendant had dismissed the manifesto and online chat as a 'fantasy' and claimed he wanted a gun and ammunition because he thought that the breakdown of society was coming.
Coleman, now aged 21, of Great Notley in Essex, has denied preparing acts of terrorism and the trial continues.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's gamble has failed. Now Reeves will crucify the middle class
Don't believe the denials, the hubristic promises to fight on, the chest-thumping from deep down in the Number Ten bunker. It's all over for Sir Keir Starmer, a hollow husk of a Prime Minister stripped of his last vestiges of authority and credibility. His final, doomed showdown with his MPs over his plan to trim incapacity benefits will only expose his impotence and lack of strategic nous. His premiership, not even a year old, is already on borrowed time. He will have to surrender again, or suffer total humiliation. He is now beholden to Labour MPs, and survives only on their say-so. There are, for the first time, whispers that he could be ousted as early as after the May local elections. I'm not so sure: I suspect that Rachel Reeves, his beleaguered Chancellor, is likely to be sacrificed first. She has certainly failed disastrously. She convinced herself that her supposed technocratic brilliance and moral superiority meant she could manage Britain's broken economy and welfare state more competently than the Tories. She sought to combine a few cuts with a massive increase in overall expenditure in a crude attempt at 'triangulation'. She lied about Tory 'black holes' and repeatedly broke the spirit of her party's election promises, jacking up National Insurance. Her staggering arrogance has caught up with her. The deficit is too high, and gilt yields have surged. She hasn't fixed housebuilding or anything else. Her tax rises have vandalised the economy. Britain will lose 16,500 millionaires this year, on top of 10,800 last year, according to Henley and Partners. We are now home to just 156 billionaires, down from 165 in 2024. The rich are taking jobs, spending and tax receipts with them. The number of children in private schools is down 11,000; Labour expected its hateful VAT raid to force just 3,000 children to move to state schools. The irony is that Labour MPs still see Reeves as too Right-wing, even though she is the most Left-wing Chancellor since Denis Healey. Her Personal Independence Payments reforms would save £4.5 billion a year by 2029-2030; working-age health and disability spending would still increase by £15.4 billion between 2024-25 and 2029-30. These are not cuts, merely slightly slower spending growth, and yet even this has proved too much. Labour isn't in the mood for nuance, for being sensible. They want to revolutionise Britain, and damn the consequences. Starmer can't pass the buck. The activists who backed him for Labour leader liked his 2020 personal manifesto. He wasn't Jeremy Corbyn, for sure, but neither was he another Tony Blair. He promised to maintain Labour's 'radical values' and hailed 'the moral case for socialism'. His foreign policy proposals explains his choice of Lord Hermer as our worst ever Attorney General. Starmer demanded 'no more illegal wars. Introduce a Prevention of Military Intervention Act and put human rights at the heart of foreign policy. Review all UK arms sales.' His other ideas have yet to be implemented. He called for an 'increase [in] income tax for the top 5 per cent of earners', the dismantling of Universal Credit and an 'end [to] the Tories' cruel sanctions regime'; the abolition of tuition fees; massive labour market regulations and powers to the trade unions; a defence of 'free movement'; the lionisation of the 'green deal'; the nationalisation of utilities; and the end of NHS outsourcing. This is what Labour thought they would get when he became Leader, and they are determined Starmer should deliver at least some of this agenda as PM. They accepted he had to pretend to be somebody he wasn't at the election, to fool centrist voters, but will no longer tolerate any deviation from what they believe was the plan all along. Britain is becoming ever more polarised. Some 25 per cent of the public believe taxes on top incomes are too high, close to the highest support for that enlightened position of the past 35 years; 24 per cent think the level is about right, the British Social Attitudes Survey notes. But 44 per cent think they are too low, up from 27 per cent in 2006. The Right is becoming sounder, but the Left is becoming ever more extreme, which is bad for Labour. Whatever it does is never good enough. Today's average activist is a graduate with quasi-communist economic ideas who wants to rejoin the EU, implement woke radicalism, believes in open borders, hates Israel and is soft on crime. They are not happy that Starmer is buying F-35A jets able to carry nuclear warheads. They do not support spending 5 per cent of GDP on defence (including 'resilience' expenditure), as agreed with Nato. They are shocked that Palestine Action is being categorised as a terrorist group. They are ideologically and sociologically similar to the young, prosperous, uber-credentialed New Yorkers who picked the woeful 'democratic socialist' and 'anti-Zionist' Zohran Mamdani in the Democratic Mayoral Primary. The coup de grâce for Starmer will come if a new Left-wing party is launched. If it were led by Jeremy Corbyn, such a venture would attract 10 per cent of the electorate, a poll for the New Statesman suggests, cutting Labour's share to 20 per cent. In alliance with the Greens, a Corbynite party – absorbing the pro-Gaza independents – could poll 15 per cent, overtaking the Lib Dems, and doing to Labour what Reform did to the Tories. To buy time, Starmer will need to concede to the Left on everything. He will start defaming Israel again. He will push through his Employment Rights Bill. He will task Reeves with one final mission: raise even more taxes at a kamikaze Autumn Budget to pay for defence commitments, the U-turns and to splash out even more on Labour's client groups. She will surely freeze tax thresholds, dragging millions more into higher bands. She may impose the first increase in petrol duty since 2010-11. She will slap more taxes on gambling. Such 'soft' measures won't be sufficient. She may also target pension tax relief, or increase inheritance tax, or raid Isas, or revalue council tax, or mull nationwide road pricing, or even consider the nuclear option, a wealth tax. It will be tantamount to declaring total war on the aspirational, on anybody who wants to work, save and improve their lives. The Left will lap it all up, but Britain will never recover.


Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Yachtsman murdered ex-wife next to their late son's grave
A yachting enthusiast murdered his ex-wife at a cemetery by their late son's grave. Martin Suter, 68, admitted murder after his sailor ex-wife Ann Blackwood, 71, died where their son was buried at Crofton Cemetery, Stubbington, on July 24, 2023. Ms Blackwood, who friends described as 'kind-hearted', was killed on their late son Christopher's birthday, more than 20 years after he died aged 15. Suter lived in a £800,000 home around a mile from Ms Blackwood in Lee-on-the-Solent. He admitted murder in court in May last year but his case was subject to reporting restrictions, which have now been lifted. He faced a separate trial last year in which he was convicted of indecently assaulting a girl under 14. Friends and family said they were 'absolutely devastated' by Ms Blackwood's death, adding that she was a 'loving, caring, kind-hearted mother and friend who was very popular in her local community'. They said: 'She was enjoying her retirement with an active lifestyle which included tennis, sailing, cycling and music'. Suter was a Green Party member and council election candidate. He was also an active member of the St Faith's Church in Lee-on-the-Solent. He was due to stand trial for murder in May last year, but on the day of the trial changed his plea to guilty. His case has been fraught with legal complications and reporting restrictions imposed by Portsmouth Crown Court, preventing any details from being shared. At the same time, he faced proceedings at Minshull Street Crown Court in Manchester related to historic sex offences. He admitted indecent assault of a girl under 14 in May 2023 and faced five further charges at a trial in Manchester in July last year, but was cleared of those five counts. In September, he will appear at Portsmouth Crown Court for a hearing where he is due to be sentenced.


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Horrific moment sword killer rammed van into victim seconds before he stabbed tragic 14-year-old schoolboy death in video showing how Hainault rampage unfolded
This is the horrific moment a drug-crazed killer rammed a van into a screaming victim before he 'decapitated' a schoolboy in a 20-minute sword rampage. Marcus Monzo, 37, ambushed Daniel Anjorin, 14, as he walked to school in Hainault, east London, on April 30 last year. The Brazilian also tried to kill Yasmin Mechem-Whitfield, Henry De Los Rios Polina, Sindy Arias and Donato Iwule in the horror attack which began at 6.45am. Shocking new footage released by police today shows the moment Monzo 'deliberately' smashed his van into Mr Iwule, catapulting him into a nearby garden. The amateur musician then jumped out of his vehicle and slashed the screaming victim in the neck with his Samurai sword. Mr Iwule yelled in agony 'I don't know you' as Monzo approached on foot wielding the 60cm blade. The Brazilian replied: 'I don't care, I will kill you' as he swung towards the victim's neck and torso before Mr Iwule managed to escape. The video, which also shows Monzo's van reversing out of a driveway and heading down a busy street, reveals how the start of the Hainault rampage unfolded. A jury today found Monzo guilty of murder, attempted murder, aggravated burglary by entering a property with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, wounding with intent and having an article with a blade. The Old Bailey previously heard Monzo believed he was a character from The Hunger Games, in which contestants fight to the death on a TV show. After attacking, Mr Iwule, who was walking to work, he then encountered schoolboy Daniel. Prosecutor Tom Little, KC, said: 'He was simply walking to school, minding his own business, looking forward to the day ahead. 'His life was snuffed out in an instant. In fact, most accurately, he was slain by the defendant.' Mr Little said Monzo 'moved quickly like a predator behind Daniel. He lifted the sword above his head, swung it downwards towards Daniel's head and neck area. Daniel instantly fell to the ground.' Mr Little called the attack a 'near decapitation'. In mobile phone footage a woman can be heard saying: 'F***, he just killed that boy, he just killed him right outside my house.' A female police officer, Yasim Mechem-Whitfield, pursued Monzo through a series of alleyways before he launched a 'ferocious attack', striking her three times. He then charged into a nearby house and attacked a couple in their bedroom, but their lives were spared when their four-year-old daughter woke up and started crying. Monzo's rampage only ended when he was surrounded by officers in a garage area and tasered. Mr Little said it was a 'miracle' that more people were not killed that day. He said: 'This case involved a brutal string of attacks with murderous intent primarily committed with the use of a large sword. 'The prosecution say there was a clear intention to kill a number of people that morning on the defendant's part.' The defence argued Monzo had a pre-existing condition which made him vulnerable to psychotic episodes prompted by his use of cannabis. But forensic psychiatrist Nigel Blackwood said Monzo was capable of curtailing his cannabis use and aware of the risks. 'The violence would not, in Professor Blackwood's opinion, have happened in the absence of such voluntary substance misuse,' Mr Little said. Henry De Los Rios Polania suffered deep injuries to his arm while protecting his family after Monzo burst into their home When police searched Monzo's van they found a second knife which he had used to skin his cat before the attack and another 22cm sword. Monzo later told police that his personality had switched and 'something happened, like a game happening' claiming it was 'like the movie Hunger Games'. He told officers 'one of his personalities is a professional assassin'.