Birmingham Queen Elizabeth Hospital uses warzone training to help patients
Surgical skills developed by doctors in war zones are now routinely being used to treat victims of gun and knife crime.Effective treatment of penetrating wounds, including stabbings, and stabilising blast injuries have become embedded in trauma care at the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM) at Birmingham's Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QE)."All of those military lessons we have learned, we have tried to make them routine in our civilian practices," explained trauma specialist Dr Justine Lee, who served in the Army for 18 years."That would be such amazing legacy for our soldiers and everyone who's been injured or killed in conflicts."
The RCDM has been based at the QE for 15 years, after moving from the old Selly Oak Hospital.In that time, it has treated dozens of military personnel.
The BBC was invited to see a mass casualty simulation, a training exercise for medical staff to prepare them for a major incident.Held at the QE roughly every six months, scenarios may include multiple stabbings, a bomb blast, a road traffic accident or any incident involving multiple severe injuries.There is a strong focus on providing a rigorous local response."We need to be able to respond to all of the interpersonal violence that's happening in our communities," said Dr Lee."Penetrating trauma is what we experienced in wartime, and we learned how to manage those injuries."Now, we're just doing it in greater numbers".
Among those taking part in the training were consultants, nurses, resident doctors, paramedics, haematology staff and hospital portersIn another area of the hospital, military personnel from overseas were drilled in the highly pressurised environment of trauma care.If a reminder were needed of the importance of fast, effective surgical care, a video was sent to staff at the QE from one of their best-known former patients – Malala Yousafzai.The women's rights campaigner and Nobel Peace Prize recipient underwent cranial surgery at the hospital after being shot in the head by the Taliban in Afghanistan.Ms Yousafzai, then 15, was returning home from school in the north-western Swat district when her school bus was boarded by gunmen.She underwent reconstructive surgery in Birmingham and was discharged in early 2013.
Ms Yousafzai paid a special tribute to the hospital to mark its 15th anniversary."I am so grateful to doctors, nurses and staff members who looked after me," she said. "I want to thank you all for the service you do for the community".It's a reminder to Dr Lee of the importance of the work carried out at the hospital, and the training that staff continually undergo."Trauma care delivery in Birmingham is very focused," she said."We learn so much in warfare but as soon as the war ends, we don't want that knowledge to disappear."We really want to sure that those lessons remain."
Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Alcohol-free beer 'raises diabetes and obesity risks', research suggests
Sales are booming and demand for alcohol-free beers is higher than it has ever been. But now research suggests they are not exactly the health boost many people hope. Scientists found that drinking two bottles a day is enough to drive up blood sugar levels – increasing the risk of type 2 diabetes. The drinks led to a build-up of insulin in the blood, another warning sign that diabetes could set in. And levels of harmful cholesterol and triglycerides – blood fats linked with heart disease – also rose with some types of no or low-alcohol beers. Many also have a high calorie content, which can raise the risk of obesity. Pub sales of alcohol-free beers hit a record 120million pints in 2023, up 14 per cent from the previous year and a huge 77.8 per cent increase since 2019. The steep rise reflects a marked change in drinking habits, with more and more Britons opting to avoid alcohol in favour of 'healthier' alternatives. While there is little doubt this approach is better than heavy alcohol consumption for health, the latest study suggests no-alcohol beers are far from harmless. Scientists from Germany and the US followed 44 healthy young men who drank either two 330ml bottles of alcohol-free beer or water every day for four weeks. They had regular blood tests to monitor how it affected their bodies. The results, in the journal Nutrients, showed a worrying effect on cardiovascular health. The dangers were greater with booze-free wheat beers and so-called 'mixed beers' – which are often flavoured with orange or lemon soda. Lighter Pilsner-type beers stripped of alcohol, or with a maximum 0.5 per cent alcohol content, were slightly less damaging. In a report on their findings researchers said: 'Non-alcoholic beer is increasingly consumed as an alternative to alcoholic drinks. 'But the benefits and risks are not yet known. We found they have an unfavourable effect on metabolism, mainly driven by their calorie and sugar content.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Why the NHS may never use breakthrough Alzheimer's drugs
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) is expected to refuse the use of Alzheimer's drugs lecanemab and donanemab on the NHS, despite their success in slowing the disease's progression. The regulator's decision will reportedly be based on cost-effectiveness, as the drugs are estimated to cost between £20,000 to £25,000, which is considered too high for the limited benefit they provide. Trials showed lecanemab can slow Alzheimer's progression by 27 per cent over 18 months by removing build-ups of the protein beta-amyloid from the brain, while donanemab teaches the body's immune cells to remove the amyloid protein. Around 70,000 adults would have been eligible for treatment if the drugs had been approved. Both drugs have UK drug licenses and are available privately, but Nice estimates that the cognitive decline slowed by donanemab is not enough to justify the cost to the NHS. Alzheimer's Research UK expressed disappointment, stating that while the treatments are not perfect, they represent a vital foundation for further scientific progress.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Starmer facing challenge to intervene on assisted dying vote after more than 50 Labour MPs demand Commons delay
Sir Keir Starmer is facing a major challenge for his government to intervene and delay a vote on assisted dying to go ahead on Friday this week. A group of more than 50 Labour MPs have this weekend written to the Leader of the House Lucy Powell asking her to intervene and postpone this Friday's final third reading vote on Kim Leadbeater's assisted dying bill in the Commons. Instead they are demanding that the government provides more parliamentary time to scrutinise a bill which will bring 'fundamental changes' to healthcare in England. The move marks a serious split over the issue among Labour MPs and in effect is a challenge to Sir Keir who is in favour of assisted dying. Even though the bill is a free vote as a conscience issue for MPs, it is now becoming a dividing line in the Labour parliamentary party. Sir Keir and the government have consistently insisted they are 'neutral' on the issue which has been the subject of a private members bill and have attempted to take a 'hands off' approach to it. But Labour MPs including Paul Waugh, Torcuil Crichton, Florence Eshalomi, Jess Asato, Adam Jogee, Polly Billington, Debbie Abrahams, Dawn Butler, Antonia Bance, Anna Dixon, Paul Frith, Daniel Francis and dozens of others now believe the limited private members bill procedure is not good enough for an issue which will deliver huge change. The letter to Ms Powell, seen by The Independent, says: 'On Friday, Members will debate and vote on perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations. 'This is not a normal Bill. It alters the foundations of our NHS, the relationship between doctor and patient, and it strips power away from Parliament, concentrating it in the hands of future Health Secretaries. 'MPs will be arriving at Westminster on Friday morning without sight of the final version of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill.' They noted: 'The sponsor of the Bill [Ms Leadbeater] has proudly stated that it has received more time in Parliament than some Government Bills have. And yet; MPs have had the opportunity to vote on just 12 of 133 amendments tabled at Report Stage. 'Just fourteen percent of MPs have been afforded the opportunity to speak in the chamber on this Bill Several movers of amendments haven't been able to speak to the changes they have laid.' One of the amendments not voted on was a protection against people with anorexia and other eating disorders being subject to assisted dying put forward by Labour MP Naz Shah. Even though Ms Leadbeater had indicated she would agree to the late provision, despite rejecting similar amendments before, it did not come up for a vote. The letter went on: 'Despite this, the Bill has been radically changed from the one presented to MPs at Second Reading in November. As it stands today, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is now longer than the Government's Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill with a staggering 64 clauses and two schedules. 'The fact that such fundamental changes are being made to this Bill at the eleventh hour is not a badge of honour, it is a warning. The private member's bill process has shown itself to be a woefully inadequate vehicle for the introduction of such a foundational change to our NHS and the relationship between doctor and patient. 'New Clause 2 was added to the Bill last Friday with a sizable majority. Such a profound alteration to this Bill at the last minute reflects the discomfort uniting the House about the current format of this Bill and the desire to further amend it to protect vulnerable people.' They added: 'This is no longer about debating the abstract principle of assisted dying. The Bill before Parliament has created real concern with medical experts and charities. MPs and the Government should listen to their expertise. 'We implore you as the Leader of the House to allocate more Parliamentary time to the scrutiny of this Bill, the valid concerns that Members have about its implementation, and the consequences it could have on vulnerable populations.' However, supporters of the Bill have complained about delaying tactics used by opponents. On Friday Lib Dem MP Christine Jardine, one of the Bill's sponsors, made a point of order claiming opponents were 'hiding in the lobby toilets' during votes, to delay the Bill's progress. The Independent has approached Ms Leadbeater for comment. Other signatories to the letter include Labour MPs Antonia Bance, Florence Eshalomi, Richard Baker, Neil Coyle, Gurinder Singh Josan, Dan Francis, James Frith, Anna Dixon, Siobhan McDonagh, Katrina Murray, Julie Minns, Scott Arthur, John Grady, Richard Quigley, Debbie Abrahams, Tom Collins, Bell Ribeiro-Addy, Catherine Atkinson, Rachael Maskell, Kenneth Stevenson, David Baines, David Smith, Sarah Smith, Sean Woodcock, Kirsteen Sullivan, Laurence Turner, Polly Billington, Josh Newbury, Kate Osamor, Patricia Ferguson, Jonathan Davies, Ruth Jones, Katrina Murray, Paul Foster, Adam Jogee, Blair McDougall, Naz Shah and Valerie Vaz.
