Firearms officer who shot dead Jean Charles de Menezes says he would do anything to turn back time as he apologies to his grieving family
Almost two decades after the tragedy, one of the two marksmen who killed Jean Charles de Menezes has spoken publicly about the shocking murder for the first time.
The 27-year-old was shot dead in the head by two officers at London 's Stockwell station on July 22, 2005 having been wrongly identified as failed July 21 bomber Hussan Osman in the aftermath of the 7/7 London bombings.
Now, in an emotional statement, one of his killers has expressed how he wishes to say 'sorry' to Mr Menezes' family, adding that he 'would do anything to roll back time, to have a different set of circumstances where that didn't happen'.
Speaking in a four-part Netflix documentary set to be released next week, the policeman, codenamed C2, reflected on the tragedy, adding: 'By the time I got home I was aware there was speculation regarding the identity of the person I had killed. I didn't get any sleep, and I still had massive tinnitus, a very, very loud ringing in my ears.
'The next day I caught the tube back to work and I was called into the chief superintendent's office. He told me that the man I shot was completely innocent. I can't describe how I felt, the worst feeling ever, I killed an innocent man'.
The firearm officers, who had only been given a 'ten-second glimpse' of the real target prior to the botched operation, had tracked Mr Menezes down while on his way to work.
The electrician had been wrongly identified by surveillance teams as Osman as he lived in the same block of flats in Tulse Hill, south London.
After being given the go-ahead by bosses for armed deployment, Mr Menezes was shot seven times in the head at point-blank range in a packed carriage during the morning rush hour.
All 17 eyewitnesses confirmed that he had not behaved aggressively or suspiciously and made no attempt to flee police.
But initial reports wrongly claimed he had vaulted station barriers while wearing a bulky jacket, fuelling assumptions he was a threat.
C2, who shot dead the innocent man with six bullets after his colleague initially opened fire, said that he 'accepts responsibility' for the tragic murder, but questioned 'why were we in that position?' in the first place.
Calling on those who instructed him to shoot Mr Menezes to acknowledge their role in the tragedy, he added: 'Those people in command put me in that position, they also have to answer'.
Meanwhile, the other firearms officer involved, named only by his cypher C12, reflected on the awful tragedy during a Channel 4 documentary released late last year.
The former officer choked back tears as he described the moment he first pulled the trigger while on the stationary train.
He said: 'He (Mr Menezes) just got up and immediately turned to his right, which is where we were, and came towards us.
The electrician had been wrongly identified by surveillance teams as Hussan Osman (pictured) as he lived in the same block of flats in Tulse Hill, south London. Pictured: Osman's gym membership card found in a rucksack at the site of the failed bombing on July 21, 2005
'At the same time I brought my weapon up and pointed it at his head and I shouted 'armed police.
'At that stage in my head, this person knew who we were. This person was coming forward in order to detonate a bomb and kill us.'
C12 said he had suffered in the two decades after the shooting, with the trauma remaining a 'weeping sore' on his life.
For Mr Menezes' heartbroken family, there is no apology or remorse that could help relieve the pain of their loss nearly 20 years on.
The young man's two cousins, Patricia Da Silva Armani and Vivian Figueiredo, who were sharing a flat with him at the time of his death, acutely remember the agony of finding out he had been wrongfully killed.
Ms Figuieredo, who realised Mr Menezes had not come home that night, initially believed he had simply been arrested due to being suspected of terrorism.
Speaking to The Mirror, she said: 'I was shocked. But I also had hope. It was just a matter of going to the police to clarify everything.'
But the reality was to be far worse. The pair were then taken to a police station, alongside their two other cousins, Alex Alves Pereira and Alessandro Pereira, where they were later told of the devastating tragedy.
Ms Armani, who had last seen her beloved cousin just two days prior, said: 'My English wasn't great and I didn't understand a lot of what they were saying. I only understand the last part - "He is dead". Still, I didn't think I heard right.
'I went into total despair. Everyone was crying and screaming.'
Despite the family's pursuit of legal action, no officers were charged for Mr Menezes' murder, although the Metropolitan Police was found guilty of health and safety failures.
After an inquest into the death returned an open verdict, the force was fined £175,000 over the botched operation and the de Menezes family agreed an undisclosed settlement in 2009.
Ms Figueiredo, who said that her 'whole world fell apart' when Mr Menezes was killed, described her cousin as a 'happy person' and an 'extrovert' that simply 'wanted to help people and make his family proud'.
She added: 'I remember him all the time but especially at times when I wished he were still here, like when my daughter was born. He'll never be forgotten'.
Meanwhile, Mr Menezes' 80-year-old mother Maria previously told the Mirror that she has made peace with the officers who took her son's life.
Speaking from her home in Brazil, she said: 'I forgive, but I cannot accept what they have done because they destroyed my son's life.
'But I've come to realise that I don't want to keep this hatred inside my heart. I believe those people who made the mistakes will pay for it somehow.
'They have souls, and I have entrusted it to God, as to what will happen to them. But I don't want this hatred for myself anymore, because I don't want this to destroy me.'
In a previous statement the Metropolitan Police said that the tragedy occurred 'at a time of unprecedented terrorist threat to London'.
'No officer sets out intent on ending a life. Our sole purpose is the protection and preservation of life, and we have taken extensive action to address the causes of this tragedy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
27 minutes ago
- Times
Nicola Sturgeon: I cried in the toilets after being bullied by MSP
Nicola Sturgeon cried after a male MSP spread unfounded rumours that she had hurt a boyfriend during oral sex. The former first minister revealed in her new book that she was bullied by a male politician from another party who called her 'Gnasher', including to her face, in reference to the claims. She said the behaviour escalated to the point that he would often make 'jokes' about dentists and teeth in her presence. Sturgeon said she broke down in the parliamentary toilets when she first heard the story but only later came to realise in 2017 when filling out a Holyrood survey provoked by the Me Too movement that she had been a victim of misogynistic bullying. She said she had thought 'long and hard' about whether to name the politician, who is still alive. However, she said she had decided not to as 'the thought of his face all over the media, and of the backlash he might try to whip up against me, makes me feel sick'. Sturgeon revealed that when she stood for the SNP leadership in 2004, before aborting the bid and standing on a joint-ticket with Alex Salmond, a former boyfriend had even been doorstepped by a tabloid journalist asking if he had 'been the one'. 'Whether he was the instigator of the story or just enjoyed referencing it to make me feel uncomfortable, I don't know,' Sturgeon writes of her tormentor. 'It was untrue, and the fact I feel the need to say that is in itself horrible, but I was utterly mortified. 'On the day I found out about the story, I cried in one of the toilets in the parliament office complex, wondering how I was ever going to face people.' Sturgeon, who was 28 when she was elected an MSP in 1999, then says the bully's behaviour got 'steadily worse' and that she became 'quite scared of him', with her heart racing whenever she saw him or heard his voice. She said his taunting 'abated eventually' but only after 'months of what felt like torture' with the story continuing to resurface as she became ever more prominent in Scottish politics. 'I thought it was just part or parcel of politics, something I had to endure,' she writes in her memoir Frankly. 'It wasn't until 2017, when I was filling out a survey conducted by the Scottish parliament authorities in the wake of the #MeToo revelations that I realised it had been bullying. 'It was bullying of an overtly sexual nature, designed to humiliate and intimidate, to cut a young woman down to size and put her in her place.' Sturgeon adds: 'Perhaps the fact I have not named this man is another sign that things have not changed as much as I might have hoped. I have thought long and hard about whether I should reveal his identity. 'I worry that in deciding not to, I am being less brave than I should be. But the thought of his face all over the media, and of the backlash he might try to whip up against me, makes me feel sick. 'Even just thinking about it transports me back to the day I cried in the toilet all those years ago. It is for my own sake that I am letting him off the hook. 'But he knows who he is. I can only hope that he has the decency to reflect on how his behaviour made me feel.' The revelations are likely to provoke speculation about the identity of the bully, with several MSPs who were elected in 1999 going on to hold prominent roles in politics and professional life. There are well over 40 male politicians, who were elected to the first term of the Scottish parliament for parties other than the SNP, who are still alive.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Death of Prince William's businessman pal who 'collapsed after swallowing a bee' sparks a £3billion inheritance row
The death of an Indian billionaire and friend of Prince William who swallowed a bee has triggered a feud over a £3 billion inheritance. Sunjay Kapur, 53, collapsed in front of horrified teammates during the game at Guards Polo Club in Windsor. Indian-born Mr Kapur was thought to have suffered a fatal heart attack after being stung in the mouth, potentially triggering anaphylactic shock. Kapur was the heir too the global car parts giant Sona Comstar, a £2.7 billion business founded by his father. Now the company has been plunged into a bitter succession battle, between the businessman's mother Rani Kapur and the firm's board of directors, The Telegraph reported. Rani Kapur reportedly wrote to the board on July 24 saying her son had died in 'suspicious and unexplained circumstances'. It came just a month after the board unanimously appointed a new chairman on June 23. In the letter, she reportedly accused people in the company of exploiting the family's grief to 'wrestle control' of the company. She said she had been forced to sign documents behind locked doors while under emotional distress. Mrs Kapur claimed she had been blocked from accessing her bank accounts and did not authorise appointments to represent her family. In her letter, which was also sent to India's market regulator, she claimed her late husband, who died in 2015, made her the sole beneficiary of his estate as well as majority shareholder of the Sona Group. The company said Mrs Kapur had not been a shareholder for six years and said she was not majority shareholder of the group. Sunjay Kapur's widow Priya Sachdeva also appears to have sided with Sona Comstar. Ms Sachdeva was appointed as a non-executive director at the company's annual meeting on July 25, despite Ms Kapur's objections and request to delay the meeting. Her office last week shared the coroner's report which confirmed that her husband had died of natural causes. The report said he died from ventricular hypertrophy and ischaemic heart disease and the investigation was closed. Ms Kapur wrote to the UK authorities calling for an investigation into his death, which was rejected. Mr Kapur's sister Mandhire Kapur has also been dragged into the dispute. In an Instagram post, she shared a photograph with her brother and mother saying she would 'protect what you would have wanted, and what Dad dreamed' Mrs Kapur claimed there was a conspiracy to take control of the company away from her family. Vaibhav Gaggar the senior advocate who represents Ms Kapur, told The Telegraph: 'It quite clearly reinforces what she's been saying, that her entire legacy is being usurped and no one is willing to look into the cause of death.' 'It may all be very well interlinked and she has quite unequivocally said there is a conspiracy behind her son's death.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Sir Keir Starmer would not call shoplifters 'scumbags', No 10 says in the wake of 'data protection' saga
Sir Keir Starmer would not call shoplifters 'scumbags', No 10 has said amid the 'data protection' saga. Last week, a shopkeeper was left stunned after police told him to change his sign in which he called shoplifters 'scumbags' because it may be offensive. Rob Davies, 61, who runs the Run Ragged vintage shop in Wrexham, North Wales, installed the notice to tell shoppers some cabinets were locked against theft. The hard-working retailer put it up after he caught five thieves red-handed in the last 12 months alone and lost roughly £200 of stock to shoplifting. He felt the police did little to help when he reported the five thefts and so he gave up doing so, instead taking matters into his own hands to protect his small business. But officers later showed up at his store, demanding he remove a handwritten note that calling thieves 'scum bags' because it was 'provocative and potentially offensive'. Now, Downing Street has said that the Prime Minister would not use the same word to describe the thieves blighting Britain's retailers. When asked if he resonated with Mr Davies' view, the PM's official spokesman said: 'It is not the language I would directly use', the Telegraph has reported. The spokesman did, however, state that the government had been 'clear through our actions' that they see shoplifting as a 'serious' issue and recognise the detrimental impact it is having on the UK's high streets and local businesses. It comes following a warning from the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) that shaming shoplifting suspects could 'breach data protection' laws. On an advice page for tackling shoplifters, the UK data watchdog warned that putting up images of thieves in a local area could 'not be appropriate' behaviour. As a result, they advised retailers to 'only share personal information that's proportionate and necessary to achieve your purpose'. But shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick called the advice 'madness' and suggested that shopliters should be 'named and shamed'. He told The Telegraph: 'We should be letting the general public know of the photographs of people who have a track record of stealing in towns.' Meanwhile, Labour MP Alex Davies-Jones admitted that shoplifting across the UK had 'got out of hand'. When asked if it was right to display images of thieves in shop windows, Mr Davies-Jones responded: 'I think it is on all of us to be aware of what is going on in our local communities.' Taking to X, Shadow home office minister Katie Lam recounted a story about a constituent who had been ordered by police to remove pictures of suspected shoplifters. 'He gives police CCTV, card details, licence plates. No action apart from a visit to say he must take down pics of thieves "because of GDPR",' she wrote. 'Our system should crush the lawless and protect the law-abiding. It does the opposite.' The number of shoplifting incidents taking place in pharmacies and chemists across England has also been described as both 'unacceptable' and 'appalling' by Henry Gegg, the National Pharmacy Association (NPA) chief executive. In the past year, around nine in 10 pharmacies experienced an incident of shoplifting, while the number of thefts of drugs and other medical supplies increased by 88 per cent, according to figures obtained by the NPA. Of the 476 pharmacies across England surveyed, 87 per cent reported an increase in aggressive or intimidating behaviour towards staff, while 22 per cent recounted instances of physical assault. Around nine in 10 pharmacies experienced an incident of shoplifting, while the number of thefts of drugs and other medical supplies increased by 88 per cent in the past year, according to the National Pharmacy Association (NPA). Meanwhile, nearly three-quarters of those who had reported an incident to the police described the response as insufficient. Several pharmacy owners have resorted to putting up photos of thieves in their shop windows, wearing body cameras and even paying for security guards. Sanjeev Panesar, who owns a pharmacy in Birmingham, described a 'noticeable rise' in hostility towards staff As a result, several pharmacy owners have resorted to putting up photos of thieves in their shop windows, wearing body cameras and even paying for security guards. Sanjeev Panesar, who owns a pharmacy in Birmingham, described the 'noticeable rise' in hostility towards staff as both 'disheartening' but also capable of having a 'lasting effect on job satisfaction, morale, and feelings of safety at work.' Ashley Cowen, owner of three pharmacies across Leeds and York that have been subjected to incidents, described the lack of police action on the issue as 'shocking'. He also described witnessing brazen thieves going as far as to burn, cut and even sow through 'steel grilles' in a bid to access drug stock. Mr Davies, who says he was driven to put his handwritten sign on his shop door because of escalating shoplifting in Wrexham, told The Mail on Sunday that he had no intention of taking it down. He added: 'The sign is staying – and I may even get a bigger one. 'It's a simple point, in my opinion, and succinctly put, and can't cause offence apart from to anyone intending to steal from me. 'I was even polite and put "Thank you" on the bottom.' Mr Davies, 59, said he put it up a month ago in frustration after discovering that he was losing almost his entire monthly profit because of thieves – but was astonished to then get a visit from the police. He said: 'A police officer and PCSO came in. They said the sign was provocative and potentially offensive. 'When I asked, "Why, who it could be offensive to?" the officer didn't answer. The only person who can be offended by the words "scum bag" is a scum bag who wants to steal from me!' Mr Davies said he had received overwhelming support from fellow shopkeepers in the face of a tidal wave of theft in the town. 'There's been massive support everywhere since the sign went up,' he added. 'Shopkeepers are all in the same boat; everyone is having stuff stolen, even cafes.' A spokesman for the Information Commissioner's Office said: 'We don't set strict requirements on how organisations should respond to shoplifting, as data protection law recognises that circumstances can vary. Instead, we provide guidance to help organisations use people's information in a way that is lawful, fair and proportionate. 'Data protection law enables retailers to share images to prevent or detect crime, as long as it's necessary and proportionate in the circumstances. For example, this could include sharing images with the police, shopping centre security teams, or other relevant authorities. 'Retailers will need to consider the relevant privacy implications, such as having a legal reason and appropriate security measures, when considering publishing any images of suspected shoplifters.' North Wales Police said: 'All reports of shoplifting are taken extremely seriously. We are committed to combatting retail theft.' Shoplifting figures released this week by the British Retail Consortium (BRC) showed just 2.5 per cent of offences were recorded by the police each year. It said 50,000 shoplifting incidents go unreported every day as firms give up on the police. BRC chief executive Helen Dickinson said: 'Many retailers do not see the point of reporting incidents to the police.'
