The Dreadful Policies Halting Archeological Discoveries
Thanks to the creative application of new technologies, the 2020s are quietly shaping up to be a golden age of archaeology.
In 2023, then-21-year-old Luke Farritor (now with the Department of Government Efficiency) combined machine‑learning pattern recognition with high‑resolution CT scans to decipher the first word from the Herculaneum scrolls—a Roman library charred by Mount Vesuvius in 79 A.D. Fully decrypting the library could ultimately double the surviving corpus of Ancient Greek and Roman literature—an unprecedented bonanza for classical scholarship.
Analysis of ancient DNA has resolved long-debated questions about human migrations. After sequencing hundreds of Bronze Age human genomes, David Reich's research team at Harvard positively identified southwest Russia as the geographical origin of the Indo-European languages, while other genomic work has dated Homo sapiens-Neanderthal interbreeding to 47,000 years ago, several millennia prior to earlier best guesses.
Fossilized human footprints in White Sands, New Mexico, have been conclusively dated to about 23,000 years ago—proof that people were in North America during the last Ice Age and forcing scholars to rethink when and how humans first crossed into the New World.
Lidar has recently revealed massive ancient cities under jungle canopies, from the Mayan platform of Aguada Fénix in Mexico—larger than the Great Pyramid of Giza—to mysterious urban centers in the ancient Amazon.
These developments—whether driven by artificial intelligence, the decryption of ancient genomics, or airborne lasers—promise to momentously expand society's understanding of humanity's past. Notably absent from this bounty, however, are the fruits of traditional, physical, Indiana Jones-style archaeology. The world of bits, as has often been the case these days, is leaving the world of atoms in the dust.
While the storied bits over atoms problem is a complicated one, legal mechanisms are straightforwardly to blame for throttling archeological discovery.
The case of Italian antiquities policy is paradigmatic. Since the 1930s, Italy—along with Greece, Turkey, and Egypt—has vested ownership of all antiquities in the state. Commerce in freshly unearthed artifacts is outlawed, and unauthorized excavation is punishable by hefty fines and sometimes prison time. Even using a metal detector requires a permit.
Edward Luttwak, a historian and author of The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire, explains that in Italy, "if you find something, you report it to the authorities. The authorities take it, goodbye. Most often, what they take from you, they put in a depot, a basement, a warehouse, and it never even gets shown."
This is the unfortunate lot of the fortunate discoverer of an Italian artifact. Report a Roman coin? It'll be confiscated. Find an Etruscan urn while planting olives? Your land will be turned into an archaeological site the government may never have time to excavate.
It's unsurprising, then, that Italians frequently don't report their findings to the government. Many artifacts end up on the black market (in 2023, Italy's Carabinieri Art Squad seized nearly 70,000 illegally excavated artifacts), or are even simply destroyed or hidden away.
Private hoarding is an especially pernicious problem: When "illegally excavated" (read: most) Italian artifacts are privately held in people's houses, they are lost both to scholarship and public view. "You could fill twice the museums that exist in Italy from what people have hidden in their houses," says Luttwak, "which they wouldn't hide if you could report [them] to the authorities like they do in England."
The British model provides a striking contrast. Since the 1996 Treasure Act, British law has required that significant archaeological finds be reported. Instead of simply seizing them, if the state wishes to retain an item, it must compensate the finder and landowner at its full market value.
To capture the far larger universe of objects that fall outside the law's narrow legal definition of "treasure," the state-sponsored Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) established a voluntary nationwide program through which average Britons can log any find, whether or not the state intends to acquire it, into an open scientific database.
As of 2020, over 1 million objects have been logged in PAS. According to Michael Lewis, head of Portable Antiquities and Treasure at the British Museum, over 90 percent of PAS-recorded items are found by metal detectorists on cultivated land, indicating how the scheme has turned what was once seen as a threat into a fountainhead of archaeological data.
Thanks to these policies, Britain has been increasingly outpacing Italy in Roman archaeology despite its relatively modest classical history, as seen in this viral map of the provenance of hoards of Roman coins. Notice the sheer quantity of Roman coin discoveries reported in the U.K., far surpassing those in Italy. This disparity isn't explained by Roman Britain being richer than Roman Italy (quite the opposite), but by modern Britain recognizing and leveraging incentives to bring history out of occultation.
The Great Stagnation of physical archaeology is a choice. The failure of policymakers to get the basics right—to make physical archaeology worth anyone's time—renders the richest landscapes fallow.
Luttwak's attention is on one such landscape: the confluence of the Busento and Crati rivers on the edge of Cosenza, Calabria. Contemporary accounts record that in 410 A.D. the Visigoth chieftain Alaric—fresh from sacking Rome—was buried beneath the temporarily diverted river along with the treasures of the Eternal City.
"Alaric's treasure is located in the southern part of the city of Cosenza," says Luttwak. "It was documented by an eyewitness." Alaric took "gold and silver objects…statues, and all kinds of things—possibly even the Temple menorah….When Alaric died in Cosenza, he got as the king one third of the treasure [to be] buried with him."
"It could be found," explains Luttwak, "with hovering metal detectors, because he was buried with his weapons, too."
Alaric's hoard—and maybe Judaism's most iconic physical symbol—should be discoverable today with an aerial anomaly survey and some clever hydraulics. The technology is ready; the incentives are not.
Change the rules, and the payoff could be extraordinary.
The post The Dreadful Policies Halting Archeological Discoveries appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Musk and the Millers Got Cozy Outside the White House
During happier times at the White House, Elon Musk was known to spend large amounts of time with Stephen Miller and his wife, Katie, even outside of work. Katie Miller, an aide in the Department of Government Efficiency, was with Musk 'almost all the time' while he was at the White House, before opting to follow him out the door last month, The Wall Street Journal reports. Her departure is thought to have caused friction among White House officials. Miller was reportedly on Musk's payroll the entire time, even when her official role was as a special government employee, according to Politico's Playbook. 'And, like … who was she looking out for?' one unnamed administration official said. The idea that Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, was a close companion of Musk now seems far-fetched. The two have since had a public falling-out after Musk condemned President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act as a 'pork-filled' spending bill and a 'disgusting abomination.' Miller, one of Trump's most loyal allies, fired back with a thinly veiled attack on Musk on X on Thursday, writing: 'The only 'new' spending in the bill is to defend the homeland and deport the illegals—paid for by raising visa fees. All the other provisions? Massive spending cuts. There is no 'pork' in the bill. Just campaign promises.' Musk unfollowed Stephen Miller on social media around the same time his attacked him online. The Journal highlighted the fallout between Musk and Miller as yet another example of Musk burning bridges and irritating allies during his stint in the White House. Of course, there was an even more explosive falling-out between Musk and another former close ally on Thursday. The simmering tensions between Musk and President Donald Trump reached boiling point with an extraordinary back-and-forth playing out on social media. Trump lashed out at Musk for opposing his One Big Beautiful Bill Act and accused him of going 'crazy' over his plans to eliminate the electric vehicle (EV) mandate implemented under the Biden administration. Trump also suggested that the quickest way to save billions in federal spending would be to terminate the government subsidies and contracts awarded to Musk's tech companies. Earlier in the day, Trump told reporters during an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz that he believes Musk has 'TDS [Trump Derangement Syndrome].' Responding with a furious post, Musk claimed on X: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' and reposted in agreement a call for the president to be impeached and replaced with JD Vance. He also warned that Trump's import tariffs would trigger a recession later this year. Musk then dropped a 'really big bomb' in the spiralling feud. 'Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk wrote. It is well known that Trump and billionaire child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019, were at least acquaintances. Epstein partied with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago resort in the 1990s, and Trump flew on Epstein's private jet multiple times during that period. The two reportedly fell out around 2004 over a property dispute in Palm Beach, Florida. There is no evidence Trump was connected to or aware of Epstein's crimes. In a statement regarding the public falling-out, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' 'The president is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Top White House Aide Rails Against the Man Who Took His Wife
A livid Stephen Miller fired back against Elon Musk's criticisms of Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' without mentioning the billionaire by name. The top White House aide's voice gradually rose as he touted the sprawling piece of legislation, which Musk has repudiated, in a Fox Business interview Friday. The interview comes as rumors of a personal spat between Miller and Musk continue to swirl. On his way out the door of the White House, Musk took Miller's wife with him. Katie Miller, who had been a top aide at Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, left her post—and her husband's side—to continue working for the tech billionaire. 'Tax cuts and reforms. American energy independence. Full, complete, permanent border security and the largest welfare reform in American history,' Miller wailed. 'That's not pork. That's not waste. That's not new spending. That is the most conservative piece of legislation in my lifetime.' Miller's comments were a direct rebuke of Musk—who has described the bill as 'pork-filled' and a 'disgusting abomination.' The SpaceX founder's criticisms have erupted into a messy break-up with Trump, with the two heavyweights exchanging a series of blows on social media. 'There's this myth out there that we could do the DOGE cuts in this bill,' Miller said, addressing a criticism posed by supporters of the formerly Musk-led group where his wife worked. 'But that's a separate process.' Miller never mentioned Musk by name, but host Larry Kudlow—a Trump ally—made the connection for him. 'I don't think Elon understood that,' Kudlow said, referring to the nuances of legislation. 'I don't want to get into all that stuff... He's got $180 billion up on his website, okay. And God bless him for that. He's been helpful on that, that's terrific thing.' Miller smirked but said nothing. Musk became close with the Millers during his stint in government. The Wall Street Journal reported that Katie Miller was with Musk 'all the time' before following him out the door. Musk reportedly spent time with the couple even outside of work. The relationship between Musk and his underling's husband has deteriorated. 'The only 'new' spending in the bill is to defend the homeland and deport the illegals—paid for by raising visa fees,' Miller wrote on X this week in another dig at Musk. 'All the other provisions? Massive spending cuts. There is no 'pork' in the bill. Just campaign promises.' Musk unfollowed Miller on X shortly after.


Hamilton Spectator
5 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Elon Musk and Donald Trump feud: A breakdown of how they went from bromance to breakup
It has been exactly one week since Elon Musk last stood in the Oval Office. Clad in a shirt that read 'The Dogefather,' Musk gratefully accepted a golden key to the White House from Donald Trump — a parting gift the president said he gave only to 'very special people.' The tech mogul was stepping away from his role at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), officially ending his 130-day tenure at the Trump administration. 'Elon's service to America has been without comparison in modern history,' Trump said at the time. Musk, sporting a black eye he said came from one of his 14 children, returned the praises: 'The Oval Office finally has the majesty that it deserves, thanks to the president.' Days later, both men would tear into the other across social media and live TV. In a salvo of posts on his social media outlet X, Musk claimed Trump is 'in the Epstein files' and that he only won the 2024 presidency through Musk's influence. 'Such ingratitude,' he wrote. Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT! Trump responded by threatening to tear up Musk's government contracts, leading to a 14 per cent plunge in Tesla's stock price by market close Thursday. The feud appeared to have been sparked over disagreements on what Trump has deemed his 'Big Beautiful Bill.' But cracks have been present throughout their decade-long relationship. Musk wasn't always buddy-buddy with Trump. The tech titan backed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in her race against Trump in 2016, and was vocal in his criticisms of the president. Days before the 2016 election, Musk told CNBC : 'He's not the right guy. He doesn't seem to have the sort of character that reflects well on the United States.' Regardless, Trump would appoint Musk to his Strategic and Policy Forum alongside other Silicon Valley CEOs a month later. The bitter feud between the U.S. president and tech billionaire has spilled into another day. The bitter feud between the U.S. president and tech billionaire has spilled into another day. The appointment wouldn't stick; Musk departed from his roles within the administration in 2017, after Trump withdrew from the Paris Climate Accords: 'Climate change is real. Leaving Paris is not good for America or the world,' Musk wrote . Three years later, Musk would vote for Joe Biden over Trump in the 2020 elections, he said. U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, U.S. musician Kid Rock and Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk pose for a photo as they attend UFC 309 at Madison Square Garden in New York, on Nov. 16, 2024. Musk first signalled his shift to the right in May 2022, after what he said were years of voting Democrat. '(The Democrats) have become the party of division & hate, so I can no longer support them and will vote Republican,' he tweeted . 'Now, watch their dirty tricks campaign against me unfold.' Then, in November — days after purchasing Twitter for $44 billion (U.S.) — Musk used his platform to encourage 'independent-minded voters' to vote for 'a Republican Congress, given that the Presidency is Democratic.' Musk, who had donated to both Democrats and Republicans until that point, began to shift his funding toward right and far-right leaning candidates that year. But his feud with Trump continued, with him suggesting Trump should 'hang up his hat & sail into the sunset' in July of 2022. At a campaign rally, Trump shot back that Musk's companies would be 'worthless' without federal funding. After some debate, Musk decided to support Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in the 2024 presidential primaries over Trump; DeSantis even announced his campaign over a glitch-riddled Twitter livecast . But after the governor failed to gain traction among voters, Musk turned his eye to more promising prospects. The legacy of Musk's slash and burn to government lives on. The legacy of Musk's slash and burn to government lives on. Musk and Trump's whirlwind bromance began minutes after a bullet from a would-be assassin grazed the presidential candidate's right ear at a campaign rally in Butler, Penn., on July 13, 2024. 'I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery,' Musk wrote shortly after the incident was reported. The tech titan wasted no time throwing his full support behind Trump and joining him on the campaign trail. The following weeks saw Musk spend a total $288 million to help elect Trump and other Republican candidates, according to the Washington Post . The billionaire also announced he would give away $1 million each day to swing state voters who signed a petition from his political action committee (PAC). U.S. President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk speak to the press as they stand next to a Tesla vehicle on the South Portico of the White House on March 11. After his election victory in November, Trump announced that DOGE — an initiative purportedly meant to maximize efficiency and cut wasteful spending — would be led by Musk and former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy. The White House confirmed Ramaswamy would step away from the project soon after Trump's second inauguration, leaving Musk as its sole head — although the White House was never clear on Musk's exact role at DOGE. He dreamed of cutting $1 trillion in government spending. Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk with his son X Æ A-Xii join U.S. President Donald Trump as he signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House on Feb. 11. The following weeks saw Musk and his team gut federal agencies and slash government staff. DOGE would dismantle USAID , tear up billions of dollars worth of research funds for cancer and other illnesses and lead to the departures of tens of thousands of government staff . All the while, Musk would garner vast influence within the Trump administration, from flying on Air Force One and participating in Cabinet meetings to showing up at the Oval Office with his young son. 'I love @realDonaldTrump as much as a straight man can love another man,' Musk wrote on X in February. Musk's close association with Trump and his activities at DOGE resulted in public backlash against the billionaire and his companies. Global protests against Tesla led to attacks on dealerships and a plunge in its stock price. Trump soon came to the defence of Musk's company, parading several Teslas at a White House press conference and telling reporters he even bought one of Musk's cars in March — although experts predicted the public support would backfire . Musk's time in the Trump administration wasn't all smooth sailing. In April, Musk got into a public spat over automotive tariffs with Trump's top trade adviser Peter Navarro, calling him a 'moron' and 'dumber than a sack of bricks.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt stayed out of the feud: 'Boys will be boys, and we will let their public sparring continue,' she said. Later that month, Trump suggested at a cabinet meeting that Musk's time in his administration may be coming to an end . 'At some point, he wants to get back home to his cars,' he said, after praising Musk for his work. The Ontario government won't revive its $100-million contract with Starlink that was cancelled in March in retaliation for Trump's tariffs. The Ontario government won't revive its $100-million contract with Starlink that was cancelled in March in retaliation for Trump's tariffs. That point came just a month later, on May 30, after reaching the maximum amount of days he could serve as a government employee. In that time, DOGE claims to have tallied $180 billion (U.S.) in savings — well short of its $1 trillion goal. Days earlier, Musk told CBS he was 'disappointed' by the price of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' continuing that the legislation would further inflate the U.S. deficit. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill would add $3.8 trillion to the deficit by 2034. 'I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful, but I don't know if it can be both,' Musk said at the time. The disagreement would soon blossom into an all-out brawl between Musk and Trump. Within 100 hours of his departure from DOGE, Musk fired his first volley at Trump's spending bill (without naming the president directly). 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' he wrote on X Tuesday. 'Shame on those who voted for it.' Trump shot back Thursday, telling reporters that Musk 'knew every aspect of this bill — better than almost anybody — and he never had a problem until right after he left.' 'False,' Musk retorted mere minutes later . 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' President Donald Trump, right, presents a 'key to the White House' to Elon Musk during a news conference in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on May 30, 2025. The tech titan then broadened his attack. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' he wrote . 'Such ingratitude.' Trump then took to his own social media platform, Truth Social, writing: 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump said in a followup post. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' In response, Musk threatened to 'immediately' decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft — used to ferry NASA astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station — 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts.' He would later pull back on the threat. Musk also made another accusation. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,' he said. 'Have a nice day, DJT!' For his part, Trump defended his spending bill, writing on Truth Social: 'It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT.' But on Friday morning, Trump signalled he was no longer interested in speaking about his former ally: 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem, the poor guy's got a problem,' he told CNN.