logo
Series of bomb scares in South Korea raises security concerns

Series of bomb scares in South Korea raises security concerns

Straits Times2 days ago
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
Police say the surge in bomb hoaxes is putting an unsustainable burden on special operations forces.
SEOUL - Following a spate of bomb threats across South Korea, most of which turned out to be hoaxes, police say they are confronting the challenge of treating every report as a potential real danger while facing heightened public anxiety.
Between July 4 and Aug 11, eight bomb threats were reported to authorities, seven of which were made over the course of one week. All were determined to be false after police inspections.
On Aug 11 , police officials in Gwangju received a bomb threat claiming that an explosive device had been planted at Lotte Department Store in Seo-gu, despite no such store being located in that district.
Special operations units were deployed to search department stores nearby, such as the Lotte Department Store in Dong-gu and the Shinsegae Department Store in Seo-gu. According to authorities, no explosives were found after further searches.
On Aug 10 , a concert held by The Boyz was delayed for two hours after an anonymous bomb threat against the venue was sent by fax. The concert was cleared to go ahead at around 4pm after the police concluded that the threat was a hoax.
According to the police on Aug 11 , the bomb threat sent to the concert venue was traced to the same fax number used in an earlier warning of a sulfuric acid attack against students on Aug 7.
Both threats were sent under the name 'Takahiro Karasawa', a Japanese lawyer.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Business Singapore raises 2025 economic growth forecast but warns of uncertainty from US tariffs
Business StarHub buys rest of MyRepublic's broadband business in $105m deal; comes after Simba buys M1
Singapore Telco price undercutting expected to subside after sale of M1 to Simba: Analysts
World After tariff truce extended, a Trump-Xi summit in China?
Opinion For Singapore, the AI revolution is coming just in time
Asia Death of student in Sabah raises hurdle for Malaysian PM Anwar as he faces tough state polls soon
Opinion Sumiko at 61: Hearing loss is linked to dementia risk. Here's what you risk by ignoring it
Business S'pore start-up among 5 global picks for Japan construction group Kajima's mentorship and funding
Since August 2023, a total of 44 faxes and emails, including threats made by those claiming to be Karasawa and other Japanese lawyers, have been recorded by authorities. All related cases have been referred to the police cybercrime unit, which is working with Interpol and Japanese authorities to identify the sender.
Five other bomb threats were also made last week, targeting department stores, a public swimming pool and a gaming company's headquarters.
According to the Korean National Police Agency (KNPA), special forces responded to a total of 943 reports of terrorism-related threats, such as bomb threats, from 2023 to the first half of 2025. This is more than double the total number of incidents recorded from 2015 to 2021, at 395 cases.
Police say the surge in bomb hoaxes is putting an unsustainable burden on special operations forces.
Each report requires the deployment of units specifically trained for high-risk scenarios, including bomb disposal squads, K9 units and tactical forces, tying up resources for hours at a time.
'Even if the reports are suspected to be a hoax, the police cannot afford to take chances,' a KNPA official told The Korea Herald. 'However, every false alarm drains manpower and equipment that could be used to respond to genuine emergencies.'
Such repeated, large-scale responses can also increase public anxiety.
'Even if people know that many such threats are fake, the sheer frequency can create a sense among the public that something must be wrong in society. Or it can create something quite the opposite, where the public grows less cautious of terrorism threats and doesn't respond with the appropriate attentiveness,' Professor Kwak Dae-kyung from Dongguk University's Department of Police Administration told The Korea Herald.
'Both scenarios pose a general threat to civil security in Korea.'
Experts warn that weak penalties for making false threats may embolden offenders. According to the public intimidation law, which was only passed in February, offenders can face up to five years in prison or a fine of up to 20 million won (S$18,500).
However, according to the KNPA's data, only 1 in 10 suspects have been arrested in relation to that law. Of those arrested, 77 per cent have been referred to prosecutors, while the other cases have not moved forward.
'Considering the manpower and resources these cases actually consume, the current punishment is far too lenient to deter future offenders,' Prof Kwak added.
'The law needs to reflect the seriousness of the disruptions caused. Stronger legal measures, such as raising the maximum sentence and introducing mandatory restitution to cover the cost of emergency responses, may also be needed to deter these hoaxes.' THE KOREA HERALD/ASIA NEWS NETWORK
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More seniors remain employed after retirement, re-employment ages raised in 2022: MOM economists
More seniors remain employed after retirement, re-employment ages raised in 2022: MOM economists

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

More seniors remain employed after retirement, re-employment ages raised in 2022: MOM economists

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The study tracked the employment outcomes of about 180,000 residents born between 1959 and 1961 to assess the impact of raising retirement age. SINGAPORE – More older folk are staying in the workforce after Singapore raised the retirement age and re-employment age in 2022, noted a new study. It found that after the minimum retirement age rose from 62 to 63 from July 1, 2022, the employment rate for those affected went up by 0.4 percentage points over seniors not covered by the policy change. Similarly, the increase in the re-employment age from 67 to 68 also raised the employment rate for affected seniors by 0.7 percentage points, according to the study by Manpower Ministry senior economist Yuen Wing Shan and lead economist Samuel Huang. The study tracked the employment outcomes of about 180,000 residents born between 1959 and 1961 to assess the impact of raising retirement age. The effects of raising re-employment age were examined by tracking around 160,000 residents born between 1954 and 1956. Currently, resident senior workers who join their companies before turning 55 can keep their jobs until they meet the minimum retirement age of 63. They must also be offered the option to stay employed until the re-employment age of 68, provided their work performance is satisfactory and they are medically fit to keep working. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia India, Singapore ministers discuss deeper tie-ups in digitalisation, skills, industrial parks Singapore askST: Public bidding possible if assets seized in $3b money laundering case are sold at auction Singapore 2 dead after fire in Jalan Bukit Merah flat, about 60 evacuated Singapore TB screenings at two pre-schools after staff member diagnosed in July Business Haidilao to close Clarke Quay outlet on Aug 31; exit follows 3 earlier outlet closures Singapore HSA seeks Kpod investigators to arrest abusers, conduct anti-trafficking ops Opinion How to train a drone warrior, with lessons from Ukraine Opinion The truth about AI: Firms will profit, workers will lose jobs The study found that the hikes in 2022 work because they 'provide legislative protection and set the social norms of retirement for senior workers'. Specifically, raising the re-employment age could shift expectations among seniors and their employers as they adjust their idea of when retirement should happen. 'Given Singapore's increasing life expectancy and ageing population, the retirement age and re-employment age protect senior workers and enable them to work longer if they wish to,' noted the study. 'This in turn allows employers to meet their manpower needs in a tight labour market.' The study also said that raising the retirement age has benefited seniors working in knowledge-intensive roles in sectors such as manufacturing and wholesale trade, where employers might otherwise prefer younger staff with more updated skills. The policy also helped delay the retirement of seniors living in bigger flats and private housing, possibly because they valued being able to keep their full salaries and benefits for one more year. However, the study found that the retirement age for this cohort did not extend much beyond 63, suggesting that the policy helped delay, but would not stop seniors from leaving the workforce. The trend holds true for the re-employment age, suggesting that seniors were prepared to retire after hitting 68. The Retirement and Re-employment Act, enacted in 2012, has been revised several times to bring Singapore closer to its eventual goal of raising the retirement age to 65 and re-employment age to 70 by 2030.

The Trump administration's South-East Asia policy: a new era of pressure and diversification
The Trump administration's South-East Asia policy: a new era of pressure and diversification

Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Business Times

The Trump administration's South-East Asia policy: a new era of pressure and diversification

US PRESIDENT Donald Trump's return to the White House in January 2025 has marked a dramatic shift in US relations with South-east Asia. Central to the Trump administration's South-east Asia policy has been its all-encompassing tariff regime, implemented as part of the president's 'reciprocal tariffs'. On 'Liberation Day' (Apr 2), President Trump announced sweeping tariffs targeting every Asean member state , creating significant economic chaos across the region. The tariff structure reflected the administration's mixed approach to different South-east Asian countries. Cambodia faced the highest penalties at 49 per cent, followed by Laos at 48 per cent and Vietnam at 46 per cent. Thailand confronted a 36 per cent tariff, while Indonesia faced 32 per cent duties. Malaysia and Brunei each face 24 per cent tariffs, the Philippines 17 per cent, and Singapore 10 per cent. In August, Cambodia, Thailand, Indonesia, and Malaysia saw their tariff rate reduced to 19 per cent, while Laos' rate was adjusted to 40 per cent. The Philippines saw its rate go from 17 to 20 per cent in July, before being revised to 19 per cent. These measures have impacted key sectors across the region, including Vietnam's electronics and semiconductors, Cambodia's textiles and footwear, and Thailand and Indonesia's agricultural products and forced governments in the region to reassess their trade policies. The tariffs represented a fundamental challenge to decades of economic integration between the US and South-east Asia. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Trade shocks notwithstanding, the Trump administration appears keen to maintain and even strengthen its military and security relationships in South-east Asia. The approach reflects the administration's broader Indo-Pacific strategy, which views the region as a critical arena for competition with China. Stressing the need to reassert American strength in the region, and reflecting the transactional nature of President Trump's diplomacy, the US administration has promoted military modernisation and more direct negotiations on defence cooperation and burden-sharing arrangements. This focus on bilateral relationships over multilateral engagement represents a departure from previous approaches to regional security building. Rather than working primarily through Asean or other regional forums, the Trump administration has advanced direct bilateral relationships that can deliver more immediate strategic benefits. While the US administration has shown some tactical flexibility – announcing a 90-day pause on high tariffs in April and negotiating rate reductions with various countries – these moves have arguably done little to allay underlying strategic concerns. For many South-east Asian states, such abrupt policy shifts underscore American unpredictability, feeding anxiety about the reliability of Washington's long-term economic and security commitments. In response to this combination of economic pressure and strategic uncertainty from Washington, South-east Asian nations are actively diversifying their partnerships. This strategic realignment has pushed some closer to alternative economic blocs. Indonesia, for instance, formally joined Brics in early 2025, while Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam have become Brics 'partner' countries. As a result, governments across the region find themselves caught in a difficult balancing act. Their economic relationships with China and their security partnerships with the United States could force difficult choices. This strategic diversification is most evident in a wave of new bilateral agreements that extend beyond traditional regional frameworks. The strengthening relationship between Vietnam and South Korea exemplifies this trend. Elevating their 'Comprehensive Strategic Partnership', the two nations have agreed to double their bilateral trade to US$150 billion by 2030. This partnership has also created strategic supply chain diversification for critical materials like urea solution, reducing dependency on single sources. Meanwhile, Indonesia and the European Union appear to be making progress in ongoing negotiations on the Indonesia-EU Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement . Aimed to be finalised by September, the deal is projected to raise bilateral trade by around 8 billion euros (S$12 billion), and open access to new market opportunities. This wave of bilateral negotiations demonstrates how Asean's attractiveness as an economic partner continues to grow. The EU has been particularly active, concluding free trade agreements with Singapore and Vietnam and advancing negotiations with Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, and Malaysia. Asean's economic dynamism, robust growth and demographic advantages make its member nations attractive partners for global powers seeking to diversify their economic relationships. The Trump administration's South-east Asia policy presents both significant challenges and potential opportunities for the US. The economic disruption caused by tariffs has forced countries to diversify their trade relationships and reduce dependence on the American market. While the administration's transactional approach has produced quick results in bilateral negotiations, it could undermine confidence in the consistency and reliability of American commitments. For the Trump administration, the challenge will be balancing its economic nationalism with the strategic imperative of maintaining influence in a region increasingly important to the Great Power Competition. The success of this approach will likely depend on the administration's ability to demonstrate that its economic pressure produces tangible benefits for American interests while maintaining the security partnerships essential to its Indo-Pacific strategy. From a broader perspective, the Trump administration's policies toward South-east Asia reflect the tensions in American foreign policy between unilateral economic measures and multilateral strategic cooperation. How these tensions are resolved will significantly impact not only US-South-east Asia relations but the broader balance of power in the Indo-Pacific region. The effectiveness of the Trump administration's approach will be measured by its ability to achieve its stated goals of reducing trade deficits and strengthening strategic partnerships without undermining American influence in one of the world's most economically dynamic and strategically important regions.

Trump eyes three-way meeting with Putin, Zelensky
Trump eyes three-way meeting with Putin, Zelensky

Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Business Times

Trump eyes three-way meeting with Putin, Zelensky

US PRESIDENT Donald Trump said on Wednesday he would seek a three-way meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky and Vladimir Putin immediately after his Alaska summit with the Russian leader aimed at ending the three-year war in Ukraine. Trump spoke after what he described as a 'very good' call with European leaders, including Zelensky - even as Russian forces made their biggest advance into the Ukrainian president's country in more than a year. 'If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one,' Trump told reporters as he was questioned about the face-to-face in the Alaskan city of Anchorage with his Russian counterpart, set for Friday. 'I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelensky and myself, if they'd like to have me there.' The high-stakes summit comes with Trump struggling to broker an end to the conflict, and Zelensky and his European allies earlier urged the Republican to push for a ceasefire. The stepped-up Russian offensive, and the fact Zelensky has not been invited to Anchorage, have heightened fears that Trump and Putin could strike a deal that forces painful concessions from Ukraine. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The US leader promised dozens of times during his 2024 election campaign to end the conflict on his first day in office but has made scant progress towards securing a peace deal. He threatened 'secondary sanctions' on Russia's trading partners over its invasion of Ukraine but his deadline for action came and went last week with no measures announced. 'Severe consequences' Trump warned on Wednesday that he would take a follow-up meeting off the table if he felt Putin was acting in bad faith. 'There may be no second meeting because, if I feel that it's not appropriate to have it because I didn't get the answers that we have to have, then we are not going to have a second meeting,' Trump said. According to an AFP analysis of battlefield data from the US-based Institute for the Study of War, Russian forces made their biggest 24-hour advance into Ukraine in more than a year on Tuesday. As the war rages on in eastern Ukraine, Zelensky flew to Berlin and joined Chancellor Friedrich Merz on an online call with other European leaders, and the Nato and European Union chiefs, in which they talked to Trump and urged a united stance against Russia. The consensus was for Trump to secure a ceasefire, and Trump said Russia would face 'severe consequences' if it didn't halt its offensive. But Zelensky also voiced doubt about Moscow's intentions, saying: 'I have told my colleagues - the US president and our European friends - that Putin definitely does not want peace.' Trump on Monday played down the possibility of a breakthrough in Alaska but said he expected 'constructive conversations' with Putin. 'This is really a feel-out meeting a little bit,' Trump said. But he added that eventually 'there'll be some swapping, there'll be some changes in land'. Merz said Ukraine is ready to negotiate 'on territorial issues' but stressed that legal recognition of Russian occupations 'would not be up for debate'. After the call, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said Europe, the United States and Nato had 'strengthened the common ground for Ukraine' while Nato head Mark Rutte declared: 'The ball is now in Putin's court.' 'Wool over our eyes' The Russian foreign ministry had earlier branded the frantic round of diplomacy 'politically and practically insignificant' and an attempt at 'sabotaging' US and Russian efforts to end the conflict. Despite the upbeat comments by European leaders, Russia's offensive in eastern Ukraine was gaining speed and seizing ground on Wednesday. Russia has made rapid advances this week in a narrow but important section of the front line in Ukraine. The AFP data analysis showed that the Russian army took or claimed 110 sq km on Aug 12 compared to the previous day. It was the most since late May 2024. Ukrainian soldiers in Kramatorsk, an eastern city about 20 km from the front, said they had low expectations for Trump's meeting with Putin. Artem, a 30-year-old serviceman, said the war would likely continue for 'a long time.' 'Putin is massing an army, his army is growing, he is stockpiling weapons, he is pulling the wool over our eyes.' AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store