Thailand returns Cambodian soldiers before border talks
Long-simmering tensions on the Thai-Cambodian border exploded into clashes last week, including exchanges of artillery fire and jet fighter sorties, the worst fighting between the Southeast Asian neighbours in over a decade.
The clashes claimed at least 43 lives and left more than 300,000 people displaced.
A truce was achieved on Monday, following a push by Malaysia and phone calls from US President Trump who threatened to hold off tariff negotiations with both countries until fighting stopped.
Thailand and Cambodia previously faced tariffs of 36 per cent for sending goods to the US, their largest export markets.
Following further negotiations, they would now pay a 19 per cent tariff, the White House announced on Friday.
In Bangkok, Thai government spokesperson Jirayu Houngsub told reporters on Friday that two Cambodian soldiers had been sent back, and the remaining 18 were being processed for violating immigration law.
"The Cambodian soldiers intruded on Thai territory and the army took them into custody, treating them based on humanitarian principles," he said.
The Cambodian defence ministry repeated its call for Thailand to return all the detained soldiers.
Defence ministers and military leaders from both sides, who were previously scheduled to meet in the Cambodian capital next week, will now hold talks in Malaysia after Thailand sought a neutral venue for the meeting.
"Defence attaches from other ASEAN countries will be invited as well as the defence attaches from the US and China," a Malaysian government spokesperson told reporters, referring to the Southeast Asian regional bloc that the country currently chairs.
Thailand and Cambodia have for decades claimed jurisdiction over undemarcated points along their 800km land border, with ownership of several ancient temples at the centre of disputes.
In May, a Cambodian soldier was killed in a skirmish, leading to a troop build-up and a diplomatic crisis, which eventually snowballed into five-days of intense fighting in late July.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
40 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Donald Trump would find it 'difficult' to pardon 'hostile' Sean 'Diddy' Combs
US President Donald Trump would find it "difficult" to pardon Sean 'Diddy' Combs because the rapper was "very hostile" towards him. The 55-year-old music mogul is behind bars awaiting sentencing after being found guilty of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution and despite rumours the commander-in-chief is set to issue a presidential pardon, the former Apprentice star has suggested that won't be the case. Speaking to Newsmax host Rob Finnerty, he said: 'Well, he was essentially, I guess, sort of half-innocent. [He's] still in jail or something, but he was celebrating a victory. But I guess it wasn't as good of a victory... "I was very friendly with him. I got along with him great, and [he] seemed like a nice guy. I didn't know him well. But when I ran for office, he was very hostile. "It's hard, you know? We're human beings. And we don't like to have things cloud our judgment, right? But when you knew someone and you were fine, and then you run for office, and he made some terrible statements. " So I don't know …. it makes it more difficult to do.' Back in May, Trump - who previously described Combs as a "good friend" - insisted he wouldn't let people's personal opinions of him cloud his judgement when it came to a pardon. He said of the Bad Boy Records founder: 'I haven't seen him, I haven't spoken to him in years. He used to really like me a lot, but I think when I ran for politics, that relationship busted up. I read some little bit nasty statements in the paper all of a sudden.' Of a potential pardon, he added: 'I would certainly look at the facts. If I think somebody is mistreated, whether they like me or don't like me, it wouldn't have any impact on me.' Despite their previous friendliness, Combs argued in 2020 that Trump should be "banished". He told Charlamagne tha God: 'White men like Trump need to be banished. That way of thinking is real dangerous. This man literally threatened the lives of us and our families about going to vote … "The number one priority is to get Trump out of office.' The I'll Be Missing You hitmaker - who was acquitted of sex trafficking and racketeering charges - faces up to 20 years in prison when he is sentenced in October.
Herald Sun
3 hours ago
- Herald Sun
Woolworths, Coles, Aldi and McDonald's reject US beef
Don't miss out on the headlines from Companies. Followed categories will be added to My News. Woolworths, Coles and McDonald's say they will not import US beef following Australia's loosening of biosecurity restrictions. In a contentious move, the federal government has allowed Canadian and Mexican cattle killed in the US to be imported into Australia. Following the change to this 20-year policy, the Trump administration slapped Australia with the lowest of its universal tariff rates, applying a 10 per cent levy on Australian exports. Despite the North American beef now allowed to land in Australia, consumers are unlikely to see much US beef on supermarket shelves or in fast-food restaurants. Aldi, Coles, McDonald's and Woolworths all say Australian customers will be eating homegrown beef. 'We apply an Australia-first approach, and 100 per cent of our fresh red meat is sourced directly from Australian farmers, with whom we have longstanding relationships,' a Woolworths spokesperson told NewsWire. 'We have no plans to change that approach.' Spokespeople for Aldi and Coles say there are no plans to change from 100 per cent Australian beef. Some 80 million kilos of beef are dished out by the Golden Arches each year, and McDonald's too says it will not be buying from North America. 'We'll continue to source 100 per cent Aussie beef for our menu and provide our customers with the great taste, quality, and value they know and love.' Last month, Agriculture Minister Julie Collins confirmed Australia would remove the ban on American beef from cattle originating in Canada and Mexico after a decade-long review. The US has similar, granular farm animal tracing as in Australia that largely stamps out diseases spreading from beast to beast. Regulations are more lax in Canada and Mexico. The federal opposition criticised the move, suggesting Australia had bargained away its biosecurity to get a better negotiating position with the Trump administration over the President's sweeping global tariffs. The government rejected this claim. The Nationals also called for an independent review of the US beef import rules. US Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said Australia changing its rules was a nod to President Trump's acumen. 'This is yet another example of the kind of market access the President negotiates to bring America into a new golden age of prosperity, with American agriculture leading the way,' Ms Rollins said last month. 'It's absurd that non-scientific trade barriers prevented our beef from being sold to consumers in Australia for the last 20 years.' In the wake of President Trump's economy-rattling 'Liberation Day' tariff announcements earlier this year, countries have been scrambling to carve out exemptions or deals with the US. Australia and the US have a free trade agreement, and in 2024, the US exported twice as much to Australia as it imported from Down Under – $50.6bn versus $23.8bn. Despite the trade agreement and Australia being in a trade deficit, the US administration put its global baseline 10 per cent excise on Australian products. Australia was one of the few countries to escape with just a 10 per cent levy when the extended negotiation deadline came and went on Friday, August 1. Originally published as 'No plans': Aussie supermarkets, fast-food giants reject US beef
AU Financial Review
4 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
‘We're a sovereign nation': PM unfazed at upsetting US over Palestine
Anthony Albanese has shrugged off concerns it could anger the Trump administration if Australia formally recognises Palestine as a state, while party sources said Labor would erupt internally if the prime minister did not follow through with the move. With the government heading towards joining other like-minded nations such as the United Kingdom and Canada in recognising Palestinian sovereignty, Albanese said being at odds with the United States was not a factor being considered.
