Who was David Gergen? What to know about the advisor to four US presidents
Gergen's son, Christopher, confirmed his death to The Washington Post and The New York Times on Friday. He shared that his father died from Lewy body dementia, a brain disorder which, according to the Mayo Clinic, affects thinking, memory and movement.
The prominent political insider and Harvard professor regularly served as a senior analyst for CNN, drawing on insights he gained from his experience in the White House under former Republican Presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan, as well as Democrat Bill Clinton.
A North Carolina native, he was married to English family therapist Anne Elizabeth Gergen since 1967. The pair shared two children and five grandchildren, according to Gergen's Harvard professor page. Their son is a North Carolina social entrepreneur and Duke faculty member, while their daughter, Katherine, works as a family doctor at the Boston Medical Center.
"We at the Kennedy School count David among our greatest leaders: a man of courage and commitment who inspired generations of students to go out and change the world for the better," said Jeremy Weinstein, dean of the Kennedy School and Don K. Price Professor of Public Policy, in an obituary.
A veteran, author and Ivy League grad with 27 honorary degrees
Gergen was an honors graduate of both Yale and Harvard Law School, though he went on to receive 27 honorary degrees throughout his career.
He is an attorney with the D.C. Bar, a veteran of the U.S. Navy, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the U.S. executive committee for the Trilateral Commission.
He is also the author of two books: 2001's "Eyewitness to Power: The Essence of Leadership Nixon to Clinton" and 2022's "Hearts Touched with Fire: How Great Leaders Are Made."
In "Hearts Touched With Fire," Gergen wrote that Americans were living in an "immense volatility in our national life, when crises are hitting us from all directions," calling for "infusion of strong leaders to help us navigate safely."
"America is experiencing one of its worst crises since the beginning of the republic," he wrote. "While the next years are likely to be rough, we can be much more helpful about the long run if we remember who we are, if we take heart from our past, and if we prepare young generations for lives of service and leadership.
When did Gergen join Nixon's administration?
Gergen's political career began under President Richard Nixon's administration before the Republican's 1974 resignation following speculation he was potentially involved in the Watergate scandal.
In his memoir, Gergen wrote, "Before he self-destructed, Nixon was among the best of modern presidents," according to an excerpt quoted by CNN.
In the 1996 memoir "Call the Briefing," former White House Secretary Marlin Fitzwater described Gergen as "a political legend, a survivor of the Nixon White House" and "trusted member of the Reagan inner circle."
Fitzwater, who would serve as White House press secretary from 1982 to 1992, for Presidents Ronald Reagan and then George H.W. Bush, called Gergen the "spin master" because he had "a special knack for engaging a reporter in discussion, ascertaining the reporter's attitude on an issue, and, in midconversation, turning his explanation to fit the reporter's bias."
His White House career didn't end with the Watergate scandal as Gergen later advised GOP presidents Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan and eventually Democrat Bill Clinton.
When did Gergen become a journalist?
Gergen began his career as a journalist in 1984, first working for MacNeil-Lehrer NewsHour on PBS. Later that decade, he served as the editor-in-chief of U.S. News & World Report and went on to be a public affairs commentator for three decades.
Many Americans, however, best recognize him as one of CNN's longtime talking heads providing analysis on all things politics.
His work has earned him two Emmy Awards for political analysis and two Peabody Awards for his contributions to election coverage teams.
Gergen was also involved in various non-profit boards, including some at Yale and Duke Universities. He also served on the board of the New Profit, the leadership council of New Politics, and as an academic advisor to Leadership Now. In 2017, he co-founded and co-chaired non-profit With Honor, a group that aims to help pass bipartisan legislation and elect principled veterans.
What has Gergen said about former presidents?
David Gergen on the presidents he served, from his book "Eyewitness to Power: The Essence of Leadership Nixon to Clinton," published in 2000:
Richard Nixon: "Richard Nixon as the most fascinating man I have met in thirty years of public life. ... There was a side to Nixon, not reflected by Watergate or by the tapes, that to this day has inspired a legion of fine public servants. ... Nixon had it all and kicked it away. He complained later that he had simply made a bad mistake and it was really his enemies who destroyed him. ... He brought himself down."
Gerald Ford: "While I was in office, that image of Ford as a bumble, someone who meant well, but, as Lyndon Johnson once said, couldn't walk straight and chew gum at the same time, took deep root in public thinking. ... It was an unfair characterization, but something journalists ... and many others readily popularized, as did Ford's critics on the Democratic side of the aisle. Those of us around him in the government knew that he was more intelligent and more physically graceful than the press said (after all, he had been offered a contract to play professional football), and we struggled to help people see the man we worked for each day."
Ronald Reagan: "Reagan wasn't just comfortable in his own skin. He was serene. And he had a clear sense of what he was trying to accomplish. Those were among his greatest strengths as a leader. Nobody had to tell him those things. He knew where he wanted to go and how he might get there. Instead of trying to treat him like a marionette, as we did sometimes, the best thing we could do on staff was to help clear the obstacles from his path."
Bill Clinton: "To friend and foe, Bill Clinton is a mass of contradictions. He is one of the smartest men ever elected president and has done some of the dumbest things. He has a deeper knowledge of history than most of his predecessors and has used less of it. He genuinely wanted, as he pledged, to have 'the most ethical administration in history,' and enters history as the first elected president ever impeached. He is attached to his wife and needs her daily affirmation, yet he has wounded her repeatedly."
What is Lewy body dementia?
Lewy body dementia is a type of progressive dementia and the second most common form of the condition after Alzheimer's Disease, according to Norma Loeb, the founder of the Lewy Body Dementia Resource Center.
There are two forms of Lewy body dementia: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson's disease dementia.
The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke states that those with LBD may live anywhere between two to 20 years from diagnosis to death.
Contributing: USA TODAY's Joshua Bote and Jayme Deerwester
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Mahmoud Khalil: Trump admin wants to ‘make an example out of me'
Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil said during a recent appearance on CNN that President Trump's administration wanted use him as 'an example' after he was detained for over three months. 'It's absurd. It's basically to intimidate me. They want to conflate any speech for the right of Palestinians with a speech that's supporting terrorism, which is totally wrong,' Khalil, a green card holder and former Columbia University student, told CNN's Christiane Amanpour. Federal immigration agents arrested Khalil in early March and he was detained for over 100 days. Khalil was not charged with a crime and ended up being released last month. Khalil's case was the first arrested in a push by the administration to crack down on foreign students protesting on college campuses against the Israel-Hamas war. 'The protests were peaceful. We're asking a simple ask to stop Columbia University and the U.S. complicity in the genocide that's happening in Gaza,' Khalil said. 'And that's why I see these accusations as intimidation.' 'This is what's happening or what happened to me and to others. And it's a message that they want to make an example out of me,' he added. 'Even if you are a legal resident, even if you are a citizen, actually that we will find a way to come after you.' Khalil's lawyers filed a claim on Thursday for $20 million in damages against the administration, contending that the Palestinian activist faced political retaliation for his activism. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson told Axios that Khali has 'consistently engaged in conduct detrimental to American foreign policy interests.' During the Friday interview, Khalil detailed his experience while in custody in Louisiana. 'I was shackled all the time. And my ankles as well. It felt like I was criminal. I did not know what charges they have against me. And, by the time I arrived in Louisiana, my leg was, was fully swollen, and I couldn't walk to enter the detention center,' he said on Friday. 'So it was very, very dehumanizing experience, for someone who was not accused of any crime, whatsoever,' he continued. Khalil said being denied temporary release to see his son, who was born this spring, was the 'most difficult moment in my life,' adding that it 'could have been avoided.' 'And it's a combination of anger and happiness. I was happy that I'm finally holding him in my hands, but at the same time angry at the system that deprives people from such important moments in their lives,' he said.
The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
On NPR and at elite universities, liberals should openly admit their biases
I am a professor at a major research university. You'll be shocked to learn that I'm also a liberal Democrat. And here's another surprise: I listen to National Public Radio. Everyone knows that NPR caters mainly to liberals, just like our elite universities do. We just don't usually say it out loud. That's because we're afraid we might corroborate President Trump, who has repeatedly distorted what we do. But the only way to fight his lies is to be honest ourselves. Back in May, Trump signed an executive order instructing the Corporation for Public Broadcasting — which Congress created in 1967 — to stop funding NPR and the Public Broadcasting Service. According to a White House social media post that accompanied the order, NPR and PBS 'spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as 'news.'' That's a propaganda statement in its own right. There is no evidence — none — that NPR spreads 'radical' falsehoods in its news coverage. But it does have a liberal bias. Indeed, it caters to people just like me. According to a 2019 Pew survey, 87 percent of people who name NPR as their main source of news are Democrats. Only 12 percent are Republicans. That's not a skew — it's a chasm. And yes, audience-capture influences NPR's news coverage. In a blockbuster piece last year, business editor Uri Berliner showed how the network's political blinders affected how it reported on allegations of collusion between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign, the origins of COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop controversy. Berliner was placed on leave and resigned shortly after that. NPR did damage control. Instead of acknowledging the problems Berliner identified — and pledging to correct them — his bosses charged him with aiding and abetting the enemy. 'The next time one of our people calls up a Republican congressman … they may well say, 'Oh, I read these stories, you guys aren't fair, so I'm not going to talk to you,'' said NPR managing director Tony Cavin. Unfortunately, Cavin was right. A month after his executive order, Trump asked Congress to take back the $1.1 billion it had set aside for public broadcasters for the next two years. Next week the Senate will probably take up the proposal, which will expire if it isn't approved by July 18. But it is likely to pass, because Republicans hold a majority. But if NPR had just come clean last year instead of circling the wagons, things might be different now. It's not a radical propaganda outlet, but it definitely does lean Democratic. If we just admitted that, perhaps we could buy more credibility among the skeptics. Ditto for our elite universities, which continue to pretend that they're politically neutral. But everyone knows that's not true, either. At Harvard, which has faced the most brutal attacks from the Trump administration, 77 percent of faculty members identified as 'liberal' or 'very liberal' in a 2023 survey. Only 2.5 percent called themselves conservative. At Yale, likewise, liberal professors outnumber conservatives by 28 to 1. And if you think that doesn't influence the way we teach, you just haven't been listening. In a recent study of college syllabi collected by the Open Syllabus Project — which has amassed over 27 million syllabi from around the world — scholars at Claremont McKenna College showed that professors who assign left-leaning texts rarely couple them with readings that are critical of those interpretations. Between the World and Me, the best-selling memoir by African-American journalist Ta-Nehisi Coates, has been assigned in over 2,500 syllabi in the OSP database. But almost none of those syllabi also require readings from John McWhorter, Thomas Chatterton Williams, or the other prominent Black authors who have taken issue with Coates' claims about race, criminal justice and more. None of that means that universities are 'dominated by Marxist maniacs and lunatics,' as Trump has falsely alleged. Over half of the undergraduates at my university enter careers in finance or management consulting. If we're trying to make them into Marxists, we're doing a very poor job of it. But we are promoting a version of political liberalism. If we want to stave off Trump's lies — and, especially his vindictive cuts to our research grants — we need to tell the truth ourselves. I know some of my fellow Democrats will bridle at the idea of making any concessions in this battle. Admitting the political imbalances at NPR and at our universities can only feed our MAGA foes, or so the argument goes. But that gets things backwards. The job of journalists and academics is to critique the world, openly and honestly. And that includes critiquing our own institutions. If we stop doing that, to save our skins, we'll be granting the ultimate concession to Trump. He wants to stifle inquiry, debate and the free exchange of ideas. It would be a tragedy of we did the same, all in the guise of resisting him.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ted Cruz ensured Trump spending bill slashed weather forecasting funding
Ted Cruz has had quite a week. On Tuesday, the Texas senator ensured the Republican spending bill slashed funding for weather forecasting, only to then go on vacation to Greece while his state was hit by deadly flooding, a disaster critics say was worsened by cuts to forecasting. Cruz, who infamously fled Texas for Cancún when a crippling winter storm ravaged his state in 2021, was seen visiting the Parthenon in Athens with his wife, Heidi, on Saturday, a day after a flash flood along the Guadalupe River in central Texas killed more than 100 people, including dozens of children and counselors at a camp. The Greece trip, first reported by the Daily Beast, ended in time for Cruz to appear at the site of the disaster on Monday morning to decry the tragedy and promise a response from lawmakers. 'There's no doubt afterwards we are going to have a serious retrospective as you do after any disaster and say, 'OK what could be done differently to prevent this disaster?'' Cruz told Fox News. 'The fact you have girls asleep in their cabins when flood waters are rising, something went wrong there. We've got to fix that and have a better system of warnings to get kids out of harm's way.' Related: Deadly floods could be new normal as Trump guts federal agencies, experts warn The National Weather Service has faced scrutiny in the wake of the disaster after underestimating the amount of rainfall that was dumped upon central Texas, triggering floods that caused the deaths and about $20bn in estimated economic damages. Late-night alerts about the dangerous floods were issued by the service but the timeliness of the response, and coordination with local emergency services, will be reviewed by officials. But before his Grecian holiday, Cruz ensured a reduction in funding to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (Noaa) efforts to improve future weather forecasting of events that cause the sort of extreme floods that are being worsened by the human-caused climate crisis. Cruz inserted language into the Republicans' 'big beautiful' reconciliation bill, before its signing by Donald Trump on Friday, that eliminates a $150m fund to 'accelerate advances and improvements in research, observation systems, modeling, forecasting, assessments, and dissemination of information to the public' around weather forecasting. A further $50m in Noaa grants to study climate-related impacts on oceans, weather systems and coastal ecosystems was also removed. Cruz was contacted by the Guardian with questions about these cuts and his trip to Greece. Environmental groups said the slashed funding was just the latest blow to federal agencies tasked with predicting and responding to disasters such as the Texas flood. More than 600 employees have exited the National Weather Service amid a Trump administration push to shrink the government workforce, leaving many offices short-staffed of meteorologists and other support workers. About a fifth of all full-time workers at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema), meanwhile, are also set to depart. 'Ted Cruz has spent years doing big oil's bidding, gutting climate research, defunding Noaa, and weakening the very systems meant to warn and protect the public,' said Cassidy DiPaola, communications director of Fossil Free Media. 'That's made disasters like this weekend's flood in Texas even more deadly. Now he's doubling down, pushing through even more cuts in the so-called big beautiful bill. Texans are dead and grieving, and Cruz is protecting big oil instead of the people he's supposed to represent. It's disgraceful.' Cruz, who has previously cast doubt over the scientific reality of the climate crisis, said that complaints about cuts to the National Weather Service are 'partisan finger pointing', although he conceded that people should have been evacuated earlier. 'Some are eager to point at the National Weather Service and saying that cuts there led to a lack of warning,' the Republican senator told reporters on Monday. 'I think that's contradicted by the facts and if you look at the facts in particular number one and these warnings went out hours before the flood became a true emergency.' The Trump administration, too, has rejected claims that the service was short-staffed, pointing out that extra forecasters were assigned to the San Antonio and San Angelo field offices. The service's employees union has said the offices were staffed adequately but were missing some key positions, such as a meteorologist role designed to coordinate with local emergency managers. 'People were sleeping in the middle of the night when the flood came,' said Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary. 'That was an act of God; it's not the administration's fault the floods hit when it did.' Leavitt said any blame placed upon Trump for flood forecasting is a 'depraved lie'. Resources for weather forecasting, as well as broader work to understand the unfolding climate crisis, could be set for further cuts, however. The Trump administration's 2026 budget proposal seeks to dismantle all of Noaa's weather and climate research labs, along with Noaa's entire research division. This would halt research and development of new weather forecasting technologies and methods. This planned budget, which would need to be passed by the Republican-held Congress to become law, comes as the threats from extreme weather events continue to mount due to rising global temperatures. 'We have added a lot of carbon to the atmosphere, and that extra carbon traps energy in the climate system,' said Andrew Dessler, a climate scientist at Texas A&M University. 'Because of this extra energy, every weather event we see now carries some influence from climate change. The only question is how big that influence is. 'Measuring the exact size takes careful attribution studies, but basic physics already tells us the direction – climate change very likely made this event stronger.' In a statement sent after initial publication of this story, a spokesperson for Cruz claimed that the cut funding 'had nothing to do' with weather forecasting and added, without providing further evidence, that Noaa's funding could be spent more efficiently. 'Only a shameless and soulless partisan hack would tie the one, big, beautiful bill to the Texas floods,' she said. 'There's simply more productive ways to be faithful stewards of public money and improve weather forecasts than continuing to overfund every possible Noaa account.'
