Affordable housing in Goderich won't be rebuilt after a fire
An apartment building in Goderich that consisted of 18 affordable housing units will not be rebuilt after a weekend fire.
Around 2 a.m. on Saturday, crews responded to the Nelson Street building and evacuated other homes on Brock Street as a precaution.
According to Goderich Mayor Trevor Bazinet, the third level of the building had to be demolished for the Fire Marshal to enter for a proper review of the property.
He said the building itself will be demolished and owner is not planning on rebuilding and selling the property.
'What we would like to do is when the property is sold, have a conversation with the new owner, a lot of communities are struggling with affordable housing, this is something that we would like to see developed in that area because that's what was in place at the current time,' said Bazinet.
A total of 26 people in the 18 units have been displaced and are currently in the care of the Red Cross with help from Huron County social and property services.
Here's how to help
Bazinet said there has been a steady stream of people coming to town hall and sending messages asking how to help.
'[I'm] always proud of our community whenever there is a time of need,' he said.
Town Hall is open 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. and Bazinet said town staff are in council chambers rotating every hour to accept gift cards.
'We might think we know what the people need but its actually the people that know what the people need — so we figured gift cards is the right approach so they can purchase whatever they need whether it's clothing or materials or just some groceries and some food.'
'It's been a steady lineup here at town hall which is incredible and we're receiving ash donations as well,' Bazinet added.
Goderich council is meeting Tuesday afternoon to determine next steps.
— with files from CTV NEWS London's Bailey Shakyaver
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
17 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Northern Ontario communities propose widening sections of Trans-Canada Highway
Northern Ontario communities are looking to have sections of the Trans-Canada Highway widened as part of Prime Minister Mark Carney's push to support nation-building infrastructure projects under Bill C-5. The proposal from the Federation of Northern Ontario Municipalities, which represents communities in the northeastern part of the province, has backing from the Northwestern Ontario Municipal Association and the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, which wrote a letter in support last week to federal and provincial transportation ministers. FONOM's two-phase proposal, presented in a letter and briefing note to Mr. Carney and Premier Doug Ford last month, concerns provincially owned Highways 11 and 17, which run across northern Ontario but are a part of the federal Trans-Canada network. Currently, almost all sections of those highways between the Manitoba border and Renfrew, Ont., are two lane, according to the note. However, two-lane passages are widely considered a safety concern. When collisions occur and force closures, it impedes the flow of all forms of traffic. The briefing, citing 2013-2017 data from Statistics Canada, notes that there is as much transport traffic on Highway 11 and 17 as there is on the Highway 401 corridor, but 'it is forced to spread over narrower, less safe roads.' FONOM is proposing a 2+1 design, which involves the construction of a third lane for passing. This lane alternates between either direction of traffic roughly every three to five kilometres, and includes a centre median, preventing unsafe passing. This design is common in countries such as Germany and Sweden. FONOM President Danny Whalen said he has not yet received a reply from Mr. Carney. What federal Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, is all about Association of Municipalities of Ontario President Robin Jones said in an interview that the proposal is 'brilliant' and said it is 'not near as expensive as twinning, but provides the benefits of twinning,' which is when a parallel route is constructed. The first phase looks to construct a 2+1 design on Highway 11 segments from North Bay to Cochrane, as well as on Highway 17 from Renfrew to Sudbury. The second phase would see the configuration extended from Cochrane to Nipigon on Highway 11; from Thunder Bay to Kenora on Highway 11 and 17; as well as on Highway 17 from Sault Ste. Marie to Sudbury. Mr. Whalen said he did not have a cost estimate for the project. However, a February op-ed from Northern Policy Institute, a Thunder Bay-based independent think tank, said it has been estimated that the cost of twinning an existing two-lane highway is about $3-million per kilometre. Turning that same road into a 2+1 configuration would cost between $500,000 and $1.5-million for the same distance, the op-ed argued. Mr. Whalen said that there are many economic projects that both levels of government are looking at in Northern Ontario, such as critical mineral development, 'but you can't do that without safe highways.' Bill C-5, which contains the Building Canada Act, allows the federal cabinet to deem projects to be of national interest and exempt them from various laws to speed up approvals and construction. Cabinet will consider the extent to which a project would strengthen Canada's autonomy, provide economic benefits, have a high likelihood of successful execution, advance the interests of Indigenous Peoples and contribute to clean growth and meeting the country's climate commitments. Senate passes Carney's signature bill to fast-track major projects Mr. Whalen said the proposal would benefit the many Indigenous communities that use the highways. The briefing note also notes the 2+1 design would have a smaller environmental footprint compared to full twinning. Mr. Carney has said that examples of nation-building projects could include highways. The Liberals also promised in their election platform to build infrastructure that connects communities, which could include the twinning of the Trans-Canada Highway. Bill C-5's major projects office is expected to be operational by Labour Day, when it can start accepting proposals. 'As the selection of national interest projects will be discussed with provinces, territories, and Indigenous Peoples, it would not be appropriate for the Government of Canada to comment on individual projects that may or may not be considered under the Building Canada Act process at this time,' said Privy Council Office spokesperson Pierre Cuguen in an e-mailed statement when asked about the proposals for Highways 11 and 17. Mr. Ford's office said it could not comment on how the federal government intends to use Bill C-5. Spokesperson Hannah Jensen said the government is currently consulting with Indigenous communities on 'special economic zones' that would be created under its similar law, Bill 5. She said the Ontario government is spending $616-million on northern roads, bridges, and highways, including the twinning of Highways 11 and 17 between Thunder Bay and Nipigon, where more than 50 per cent of that corridor has been widened to four lanes. Ms. Jensen added the province has started the process of widening Highway 11 from North Bay to Temiskaming Shores, and announced it will extend a 2+1 section on Highway 11 another 220 kilometres from Temiskaming Shores to Cochrane. This follows a pilot project for a 2+1 portion of highway in the North Bay area that is expected to begin in 2026.
CBC
18 minutes ago
- CBC
China hits Canadian canola with 75.8% duty after anti-dumping probe
China has announced a preliminary anti-dumping duty on Canadian canola imports on Tuesday. The provisional rate will be set at 75.8 per cent and will come into effect on Thursday, according to a statement.
CBC
18 minutes ago
- CBC
B.C. court overturns Vancouver bylaw that forced ride-hailing firms to pay fees
The B.C. Supreme Court has invalidated a bylaw passed by the City of Vancouver that imposed a fee on ride-hailing companies working on city streets during peak hours. Uber Canada took the city to court over the bylaw, claiming it overstepped a municipal government's power to regulate so-called "transportation network services." The bylaw prevented ride-share vehicles from picking up or dropping off passengers in the "Metro Vancouver core" between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. unless they had a "congestion and curbside management permit." The provincial government made the Passenger Transportation Board the "centralized authority" to regulate ride-hailing in 2019, but the city later imposed the bylaw, which Uber challenged in B.C. Supreme Court. The court decision says the province made the changes to eliminate regulatory overlap, which the transportation minister at the time said had "plagued the passenger directed vehicle industry for years." The ruling says there is no "rational pathway" for the city to claim it didn't intend to regulate the number of ride sharing vehicles operating in Vancouver with the bylaw because its stated intention was to reduce traffic congestion. "Given the specifics of this particular bylaw, it is unreasonable for the city to decide it was authorized to invoke its powers to regulate stopping on city streets to defeat the purpose and text of its governing legislation," the ruling says. "Therefore, the bylaw is invalid and the decision to adopt it was unreasonable." The city said in a statement that it "respects the judicial process and acknowledges the B.C. Supreme Court's decision." "The city will take the time necessary to carefully consider next steps," it said.
