logo
‘Quango Cull': Almost as many State agencies now as in aftermath of financial crash

‘Quango Cull': Almost as many State agencies now as in aftermath of financial crash

Irish Times13-06-2025
The total number of State agencies has almost returned to the peak it reached before a so-called
'quango cull'
was announced following the 2008 financial crash, information released by Government departments shows.
A 'quango' is typically defined as an organisation to which Government departments have devolved some degree of responsibility, and which are, in most cases, funded by the State. Certain agencies, such as AirNav Ireland, Coimisiún na Meán, and the Home Building Finance Agency are self-financing and do not receive funding from the State.
When in opposition in the run-up to the 2011 general election,
Fine Gael
promised a 'quango cull' and a 'burning of the quangos', believing there to be far too many in the State.
There were almost 300 such agencies by the time tough austerity measures were announced in 2010.
READ MORE
A subsequent 2016 review by Dr Richard Boyle for the Institute of Public Administration (IPA) found a net total of 37 agencies had been abolished in the interim. Although 62 had been shut down in total, 25 new agencies were established over the five-year period.
[
Vow to scrap quangos unashamedly populist
Opens in new window
]
Of the 62 abolished, just 10 ceased to exist entirely. The other 52 were either merged with another organisation or combined to create new bodies.
However, newly released information shows at least 33 new quangos will have been created between the end of 2015 and the end of 2025. At least four more – including AirNav Ireland, which provides air traffic management – have directly replaced another agency.
In replies to parliamentary questions submitted by
Fianna Fáil
TD
John McGuinness
, 14 of the 15 Government departments disclosed new quangos established since 2015 (the
Department of Health
was not in a position to provide the information requested).
The information supplied showed a total of 33 have been created, or planned, across the 15 departments, in addition to four that have been renamed or had their role expanded (including
Coimisiún na Meán
, the broadcasting and online media regulator, and AirNav Ireland).
The
Department of Justice
has established the largest number of new agencies with 10 quangos introduced since 2015. They include Cuan (set up in 2024), the agency that deals with domestic, sexual and gender-based violence.
Other new agencies established under the Justice umbrella include the Independent Examiner of Security Legislation, which reviews the effectiveness of related laws; the Office for Community Safety; the Judicial Council; the Legal Services Regulatory Authority; and the Gambling Regulatory Authority of Ireland.
While the department could not provide information, several large agencies have been established in the health sector. They include Children's Health Ireland (CHI) and the Decision Support Service. Two more – a pandemic and emerging threats agency, and the Assisted Human Reproduction Regulatory Authority – are proposed by the end of 2025.
Other significant agencies created in the past decade include An Coimisiún Toghcháin, the Maritime Area Regulatory Authority and Home Building Finance Ireland.
Despite its early objection to 'quangos', Fine Gael's post-2011 coalition with Labour saw a more modest reduction, with an estimated 13 per cent of agencies abolished during that government's term in office.
Details of more recent agencies were furnished in replies to a series of parliamentary questions tabled by Mr McGuinness who noted that during his time chairing the Public Accounts Committee, it had been difficult to establish how many there were.
'Many of these quangos are getting enormous amounts of money and because they are one step removed from the department, there is not a direct route to audit their finances by the
Comptroller and Auditor General
(C&AG),' he said.
'The so-called burning of the quangos never happened. It's hard to see how many of them are adhering to good practices in terms of governance, as they are not subject to the same scrutiny as Government departments.
'We need legislative change to make the C&AG responsible for all those agencies,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gareth Sheridan: Nutriband ‘will help a lot of people who are dealing with addiction and people who are dealing with pain'
Gareth Sheridan: Nutriband ‘will help a lot of people who are dealing with addiction and people who are dealing with pain'

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Gareth Sheridan: Nutriband ‘will help a lot of people who are dealing with addiction and people who are dealing with pain'

Nutriband is a pharmaceutical company that was founded in Dublin in 2012 before relocating to Florida in 2016. Gareth Sheridan, who recently announced his intention to run for president and has stepped aside for three months as chief executive, is its founder. The company's lead product is Aversa, which it describes as 'abuse-deterrent transdermal technology', which incorporates aversive agents to prevent the abuse, diversion, misuse, and accidental exposure of drugs with abuse potential, specifically opioids. Its first application is its abuse-deterrent fentanyl transdermal patch, which it is developing to provide clinicians and patients with extended-release chronic pain relief. It is awaiting regulatory clearance for this product in the US. The company has operations in Florida, Georgia, and North Carolina, and recently began its expansion back to Dublin. READ MORE What lightbulb moment prompted you to start-up in business? It was originally a thesis idea. I had noticed a patch that my dad wears and began wondering what other types of medications could be delivered that way that had not been explored yet. The thesis became a business plan, and Nutriband was registered in 2012. Describe your business model and what makes your business unique. We structured the company in a unique way, using capital markets and a public listing approach. We listed on the OTC Markets in 2016 and started using stock to purchase companies and technologies in place of cash. This helped us to avoid raising expensive early capital and retain a major equity stake in the company today, even after an eventual qualification to list on the Nasdaq (in New York) in 2010. We also do not develop new drug applications. We take existing generic medications and use our technologies to improve upon those and relaunch them as a branded product again. What is your greatest business achievement to date? Growing the company to a level where we qualified to list on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange and getting to ring the opening bell. What was your back-to-the-wall moment and how did you overcome it? We almost got sued by the SEC (The US Securities and Exchange Commission) for an accidental erroneous disclosure in one of our filings while on the OTC markets. At first, we thought it could be explained. However, it grew to the point where they were doubling down. We hired an excellent attorney with SEC experience and eventually settled the issue in a cease-and-desist, no-admit, no-deny agreement. This led to our back-to-the-wall moment, where, while running on fumes financially, we received a rejection from Nasdaq in our first application. After a couple of days of self-pity, we got back to work, raised some working capital with existing shareholders, and grew the company's equity by $7.5 million (€6.4 million) over the course of the next year. We reapplied to list again successfully. What moment would you cite as a turning point for the company? Credibility provided by our Nasdaq listing and subsequent partnership with Kindeva Drug Delivery (formerly 3M Drug Delivery), where Kindeva supplied their generic approved fentanyl patch for us to add our technology to. What were the best and the worst pieces of advice you received when starting out? The worst advice was that banks and institutions have your company's best interests at heart. I firmly believe that today, Wall Street is built on companies failing, not succeeding. Describe your growth funding path. We were reluctant to raise expensive capital early on and instead listed the company to use stock as an acquisition currency to grow. Our gamble on this paid off, and although we raised modest cash along the way, we were able to build Nutriband without any significant seed or angel rounds. We reached a market capitalisation of $120 million (its market value currently is about $75 million), and we have been able to maintain stable and steady control as a result of the minimal capital rounds. We turn down anywhere from $5 million to $15 million on a weekly basis from funds and institutions because we do not need it. We are not in the business of raising money, and having as little dilution as possible is a core focus for us as a company. How will your market look in three years and where would you like your business to be? For our first product, we are expected to reach annual revenues of $200 million. Our second product is independently estimated to have upwards of $135 million in yearly revenue. We are targeting the billion dollar club before the end of 2027. What are your annual revenues and profits? We are not yet profitable, as is typical with clinical development-stage companies. However, we also contract manufacture sports tapes and products for brands such as Reebok and KT Tape. Our target revenue from this source for the financial year to the end of January 2026 is $3 million * . This goes towards operational costs and reduces our clinical burn. Why have you decided to seek a nomination for the presidency? It's never been a more important or relevant time in our history for a young president, particularly with the average age just under 40. I would be hoping that having a younger president would help narrow the division we're seeing in the country at the moment and that we can work together to tackle the issues, particularly the housing crisis. The younger generation aren't feeling very enthusiastic that their voices are being heard. What impact will this move have on your business? The company is in very safe hands and the biggest asset at the company is the team. We've got a very definite plan and timeline between now and Christmas on what needs to be achieved. Whether I'm in there or not that timeline needs to be adhered to. The company is motoring along fine. Stepping aside is not something that I think will fundamentally affect the opportunity for the company. What happens if you win? There are mechanisms where I can put the shares into a trust. I would be very proud that it was a company that I started and be very keen to still follow the journey, just not as CEO. Nutriband as a whole is going to do a lot of will help a lot of people who are dealing with addiction and people who are dealing with pain. *An earlier version of this article stated a higher target figure for contract manufacturing, which has since been revised by the company.

Presidential campaigning ramping up as potential candidates take stock after McGuinness withdrawal
Presidential campaigning ramping up as potential candidates take stock after McGuinness withdrawal

The Journal

time4 hours ago

  • The Journal

Presidential campaigning ramping up as potential candidates take stock after McGuinness withdrawal

NO WEEKEND REST today for public figures with their eyes on the forthcoming presidential election. Campaigning is picking up pace as potential candidates take stock of a changed election landscape after the unexpected withdrawal of Fine Gael nominee Mairéad McGuinness, who has taken herself out of the running due to health reasons after spending time recently in hospital. Fine Gael is now faced with deciding who will replace her to run against left-wing candidate Catherine Connolly and others who may secure a place on the ballot between now and the official start of the election period. Some potential contenders within the party include former MEP Seán Kelly, who previously signalled his interest in the role but ultimately did not challenge McGuinness' bid , and former TD Heather Humphreys. Speaking on Newstalk's Anton Savage show this morning, Kelly said that given the 'goalposts have changed', he will 'reconsider' whether to campaign for the nomination. Advertisement He said he believes discussions about who the next Fine Gael nominee will be haven't taken off yet because it is 'unfair on Mairead, having had such a trauma all of a sudden and having to withdraw'. He said there will be time next week to 'reflect properly on that and take action'. Meanwhile, Catherine Connolly, the only formally confirmed candidate, has clarified some of her views on international issues, criticising both Nato countries for 'warmongering' and Russia for its 'horrific assault' on Ukraine. Catherine Connolly launched her campaign last month. Sasko Lazarov / © Sasko Lazarov / © / © Speaking to the Irish Times , she said that Ireland should 'resist' the European Union becoming 'increasingly militarised', adding that the EU has 'lost its moral compass'. The article referenced a Dáil session in February in which Connolly indicated, in the context of whether to keep or remove the triple lock, that Ireland 'cannot trust' countries like the US, UK and France in terms of their foreign policy positions. In her new remarks, Connolly reaffirmed her position that 'the US, England and France are deeply entrenched in an arms industry which causes bloodshed across the world' and said that 'as a staunch advocate for neutrality, this behaviour must be condemned'. Related Reads Frances Fitzgerald not entering Áras race for Fine Gael as Sean Kelly mulls bid Connolly also criticised Russia, saying that it is 'conducting an illegal invasion of Ukraine' and 'must immediately end its horrific assault'. Asked if she would meet with US President Donald Trump if she was elected, she said she 'would meet all heads of state as mandated by the Constitution and the office of President'. Gareth Sheridan, a millionaire pharma boss who launched a campaign this week but has not formally secured a nomination to date, took a swipe at Connolly this afternoon in response, accusing her of engaging 'in a form of aggressive nationalism' and 'attacking our long-established allies'. He called her comments about the US, UK and France an 'ill-judged over-step', though acknowledged that we do 'need the EU, the US and the UK to do more' to stop the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. 'The Ireland that I would like to represent is the one which forged strong international ties on the world stage,' he said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand and suggests Putin plan could bring peace
Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand and suggests Putin plan could bring peace

Irish Times

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand and suggests Putin plan could bring peace

US president Donald Trump on Saturday split from Ukraine and key European allies after his summit with Russian president Vladimir Putin , adopting Putin's plan for a sweeping peace agreement based on Ukraine ceding unoccupied territory to Russia, instead of the urgent ceasefire Trump had said he wanted before the meeting. Skipping ceasefire discussions would give Russia an advantage in the talks, which are expected to continue on Monday when President Volodymyr Zelenskiy of Ukraine visits Trump at the White House. It breaks from a strategy Trump and European allies, as well as Zelenskiy, had agreed to before the US-Russia summit in Alaska. Trump told European leaders that he believed a rapid peace deal could be negotiated if Zelenskiy agrees to cede the rest of the Donbas region to Russia, even those areas not occupied by Russian troops, according to two senior European officials briefed on the call. In return, Putin offered a ceasefire in the rest of Ukraine at current battle lines and a written promise not to attack Ukraine or any European country again, the senior officials said. He has broken similar promises before. READ MORE Trump had threatened stark economic penalties if Putin left the meeting without a deal to end the war, but, as European and Russian officials acknowledged, he suspended those threats in the wake of the summit. The American president's moves got a chilly reception in Europe, where leaders have time and again seen Trump reverse positions on Ukraine after speaking with Putin. Trump wrote on Truth Social early on Saturday that he spoke by phone to Zelenskiy and European leaders after his meeting with Putin. He said that 'it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' European leaders made clear, publicly and privately, that was not the case. They issued a statement that did not echo Trump's claim that peace talks were preferable to a ceasefire. Britain, France, Germany and others welcomed Trump's efforts to stop the war but threatened to increase economic penalties on Russia 'as long as the killing in Ukraine continues'. Still, in public statements, the European leaders praised Trump – in mellower terms than normal – for his efforts to broker peace, and in particular for his pledge to involve the United States in guaranteeing Ukraine's security going forward. Giorgia Meloni , Italy's prime minister, said in a statement that Trump supported a collective-security clause that would allow Ukraine 'to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the US, ready to take action if it is attacked again'. Trump confirmed Zelenskiy's announcement earlier on Saturday that the Ukrainian president would come to the White House on Monday. If that visit goes well, Trump said, he would schedule another meeting with Putin. With Russia advancing on the battlefield, a ceasefire would give Ukraine relief from Moscow's attacks and deprive Putin of some leverage at the bargaining table. Before his meeting with Putin, Trump had agreed with European allies and Zelenskiy that no peace negotiations could begin without a ceasefire in place. Zelenskiy, who was left out of the summit, said in a statement that he and Trump would on Monday 'discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war'. Trump, in an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity after the summit, put the onus for securing peace on Zelenskiy. 'Now it is really up to President Zelenskiy to get it done,' he said. 'I would also say the European nations have to get involved a little bit.' Russia, which launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, has demanded that Ukraine cede a large part of its land, disarm, swear off joining Nato and change governments. This article originally appeared in The New York Times . 2025 The New York Times Company

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store