Lebanese President Aoun vows justice on fifth anniversary of Beirut Port explosion
'Justice is coming,' he declared in a message to the nation and to the victims' families.
The August 4, 2020, blast, considered one of the most powerful non-nuclear explosions in history, killed over 220 people, injured more than 6,500, and leveled entire neighborhoods in the capital. The disaster was caused by the ignition of nearly 3,000 tons of ammonium nitrate that had been improperly stored for years in a port warehouse. Despite repeated warnings, no officials have yet been held accountable.
Aoun promised that 'the law applies to all, without exception' and emphasized that the Lebanese state 'is committed to uncovering the whole truth, no matter the obstacles or how high the positions' involved.
Addressing victims' families directly, he said, 'The blood of your loved ones will not be in vain… Justice is coming, accountability is coming.'
Monday was declared a national day of mourning in Lebanon. Marches and protests are expected throughout the day, with demonstrators converging on the blast site to demand justice and transparency.
The investigation into the explosion has faced years of delays and political interference. However, according to a senior judicial source, Judge Tarek Bitar has now completed the questioning of suspects and is awaiting procedural formalities and responses to information requests sent to several Arab and European states. These steps are seen as the final phase before the judge issues formal indictments.
'We are working with all available means to ensure the investigations are completed with transparency and integrity,' Aoun added.
Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, who once served on the International Court of Justice, also weighed in. Speaking on Sunday, he emphasized that uncovering the truth was a matter of national responsibility and criticized Lebanon's long history of unchecked official misconduct.
Judge Bitar resumed his investigation earlier this year after both Aoun and Salam took office with pledges to safeguard judicial independence. His inquiry had previously been stalled due to strong opposition from Hezbollah, which had accused him of political bias and demanded his removal.
Mariana Fodoulian, representing the families of the victims, expressed continued frustration with the lack of progress. 'For five years, officials have been trying to evade accountability, always thinking they are above the law,' she said. 'We're not asking for anything more than the truth. We won't stop until we get comprehensive justice.'
In a symbolic move, Culture Minister Ghassan Salame announced that the damaged grain silos at the port, partially destroyed in the blast, would be listed as historic landmarks. Families of the victims have long pushed for the structures to be preserved as a permanent memorial to one of the darkest days in Lebanon's history.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Bawaba
an hour ago
- Al Bawaba
Under Israeli drones: Lebanon moves to dismantle resistance
ALBAWABA - On Tuesday, the Lebanese government held a very important cabinet meeting at the Presidential Palace in Baabda to deal with the rising call for the government to take control of all guns in the country. The meeting was led by President Joseph Aoun, and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam was also there. It happened because the U.S. is putting more and more pressure on Lebanon to give Hezbollah a clear deadline for giving up its weapons. The main topics of conversation also included putting Lebanon's cabinet statement on national authority into action and the peace agreements made with Israel after the war in November 2024. In the past few weeks, diplomacy measures have stepped up as Washington presses Beirut to take real steps toward disarming. Recently, U.S. envoy Tom Barrack told the Lebanese government that it needed to keep its promise and warned that the country's ability to control all armed groups may affect its ability to keep getting help from other countries. Hezbollah is the only group in Lebanon that kept its weapons after the 1975–1990 civil war, so the issue is still very controversial in the country's politics. President Aoun said again that Lebanon is determined to regain full military control. In comments last Thursday, he stressed how important it is for national security to remove all non-state players, including Hezbollah. He said that if nothing is done, terrible things will happen and that Lebanon has to choose between falling apart and getting better. More and more countries agree with Aoun that state control over guns goes hand in hand with political and financial backing. Hezbollah, on the other hand, has strongly rejected any idea of independent withdrawal. Sources connected to Hezbollah-affiliated media say that the group sees the American requests as an attempt to make Lebanon give in to Israeli interests. The group insists that any talk about disarmament must come with guarantees, such as Israel's complete withdrawal from lands it took during the most recent conflict, an end to airstrikes that break the ceasefire, the release of Hezbollah prisoners, and the start of rebuilding efforts after the war.
Al Bawaba
an hour ago
- Al Bawaba
Hezbollah tensions escalate as Qassem rejects disarmament push
Published August 5th, 2025 - 06:00 GMT His remarks coincided with a government session convened to discuss potential frameworks for managing Hezbollah's armed status following the recent war with Israel. ALBAWABA- In a sign of growing internal tensions, the Lebanese army has begun taking measures to restrict Hezbollah motorcycle rallies and limit the movement of the group's supporters in Beirut's southern suburbs, according to a report by Sky News. The move comes amid heated debate within Lebanon's government over implementing a disarmament mechanism targeting Hezbollah, a highly sensitive issue that could deepen domestic divisions. Hezbollah's Deputy Secretary General, Sheikh Naim Qassem, strongly warned against any attempt to address the group's weapons without national consensus, during a televised speech on Tuesday. — قناة الميادين (@AlMayadeenNews) August 5, 2025 His remarks coincided with a government session convened to discuss potential frameworks for managing Hezbollah's armed status following the recent war with Israel. "We do not accept the gradual surrender of our strength in exchange for the continuation of Israeli aggression," Qassem declared. Aggression is the issue, not our weapons. Solve the issue of aggression first, and then we can discuss arms." Qassem emphasized that resistance and national sovereignty are inseparable, arguing that any disarmament at the behest of Israel, the U.S., or Arab powers would amount to undermining Lebanon's autonomy. 'The ministerial statement talks about fortifying sovereignty,' he said. 'Is giving up weapons at the request of others sovereignty? Where is the state that defends Lebanon's borders?' He reiterated Hezbollah's readiness to respond to any Israeli attack, saying that "missiles will rain down" on Israel if war resumes, and warned that all the security infrastructure Israel has built over the past eight months "will collapse in an hour." Qassem also criticized recent U.S. diplomatic efforts, particularly the third memorandum presented by U.S. envoy Tom Barak, which he described as "worse than the previous two." According to Qassem, the proposal includes demands for Hezbollah to dismantle 50% of its military infrastructure within 30 days, in exchange for limited Israeli withdrawals from three contested points along the Lebanese border. He rejected the proposal outright, saying: 'The U.S. came with diktats designed to completely disempower Lebanon, its resistance, and its people—all in Israel's favor.' Hezbollah's position reflects growing anxiety that the international community is leveraging Lebanon's fragile post-war state to demand disarmament under pressure, while Israel continues its military posture unabated. The army's restriction of Hezbollah activities near Beirut is the clearest sign yet of institutional strain inside Lebanon, as calls for demilitarization mount. But with Hezbollah firmly resisting any changes to its status and emphasizing the lack of a state defense alternative, the issue threatens to ignite a broader national crisis. As one of the most powerful non-state military actors in the region, Hezbollah's future as an armed entity remains a contentious flashpoint in Lebanon's fragile political balance, one that could shape the country's sovereignty, security, and stability for years to come. © 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (
Jordan News
an hour ago
- Jordan News
Over Two-Thirds of Jordanians Are Optimistic About the Country's Direction – Citizens' Priorities Revealed
A recent public opinion survey conducted by the Center for Strategic Studies at the University of Jordan revealed that 72% of Jordanians believe the country is moving in a positive direction, while 26% think it is heading in a negative one. اضافة اعلان The survey also identified the top priorities for Jordanians. Unemployment and job creation for youth ranked as the most pressing issue, selected by 49% of respondents. This was followed by general economic reform (11%), improving public services such as healthcare and education (11%), and addressing rising prices and cost of living (11%). When asked about the government's recent decision to dissolve municipal and governorate councils and appoint interim committees until elections, 58% supported the move, while 29% opposed it. Regarding participation in upcoming local elections, 44% of respondents said they would definitely vote, 14% said they were likely to vote, and 40% said they probably would not. The survey also asked about the recent government decision to reduce taxes on certain types of passenger vehicles. 72% of respondents had heard of this decision, and 52% of those believe it benefits citizens, while 24% believe it benefits the government more. Additionally, 79% believe the decision will encourage people to purchase new cars, whereas 16% disagreed. On the political front, 97% of Jordanians believe security in the country is stable, with 57% saying it is very stable and 40% saying it is somewhat stable. Only 2% said it was unstable. In contrast, 57% believe the political situation in the region is unstable, including 10% who said it is very unstable. Meanwhile, 43% think the region is stable, with 10% saying it is very stable. When asked about the Palestinian cause, 73% of Jordanians believe it remains a top priority for the Arab world, especially in light of recent developments. In relation to the Iran-Israel conflict, 70% support the ceasefire between the two sides. 58% believe the recent attacks negatively impacted regional security, while 36% felt they had no impact. A significant majority—91%—think Jordan should strengthen its defense system in preparation for potential escalation. Only 5% disagree. On the use of sirens in Jordan during the Iran-Israel conflict, 55% said the sirens had no impact on them or their families, 43% said they caused worry and fear, and 2% said they were simply annoying. 62% reported following official safety instructions when hearing the sirens, while 38% did not. In terms of war-related preparedness, 12% of respondents said they took specific precautions, while 88% did not. Additionally, 89% reported seeing Iranian rockets, drones, or air defense responses with their own eyes, while 11% said they did not. Back on domestic issues, 63% of Jordanians said they rely primarily on social media for news and information about local events, making it the top source. Television came second at 27%, while friends and family made up 5%. Concerning recent amendments to the enforcement law regarding debtor imprisonment, 66% of respondents had heard of the changes, while 34% had not. Of those aware, 58% supported the amendments—24% strongly, 26% moderately, and 8% slightly—while 41% opposed them. When asked about social safety, 86% said they feel very or moderately safe in their communities, whereas 10% do not feel safe. Regarding the spread of drugs in society, 55% believe drugs are highly prevalent, 24% said moderately prevalent, 11% said slightly prevalent, and 5% said not prevalent at all. Respondents identified young adults aged 18–25 as the most affected age group, followed by teenagers aged 13–17 (25%), then adults aged 26–35 (13%), while 16% believe all age groups are equally affected. On the recent alcohol poisoning incident, 39% blamed regulatory authorities, 33% held the manufacturing company responsible, 20% blamed the individuals who consumed the drinks, and 5% felt all parties shared responsibility. Regarding the government's response to the incident, 60% believed the actions taken were quick and appropriate, while 27% found them delayed or inadequate. Finally, 93% of respondents expressed confidence in regulatory institutions to prevent similar incidents in the future. Specifically, 93% trust the Public Security Directorate, 73% trust the Ministry of Health, and 71% trust the Food and Drug Administration.
