New Zealand's ‘everyone must go' tourism campaign mocked by locals heading for the exit
In an announcement on Sunday, officials said they were spending 500,000 New Zealand dollars ($287,000) on the campaign, which is aimed at visitors from neighboring Australia, New Zealand's biggest tourism market.
Like many countries, New Zealand has struggled to restore its tourism industry since the Covid-19 pandemic, and the number of visitors from Australia is still at 88% of 2019 levels.
'What this Tourism New Zealand campaign says to our Aussie mates is that we're open for business, there are some great deals on, and we'd love to see you soon,' Tourism Minister Louise Upston said in a news release.
Critics disagreed, saying the slogan sounded like New Zealand was advertising a clearance sale. Others said it invited bathroom jokes.
'I think 'Everyone Must Go' might refer to the need for toilets in some of our high-tourist spots. I mean, the queues are ridiculous,' Cushla Tangaere-Manuel, tourism spokesperson for the opposition Labour Party, told New Zealand news outlet RNZ.
Upston did not respond to an emailed request for comment.
The campaign comes as record numbers of New Zealanders are leaving the country of 5 million, driven in part by concerns about high living costs and lack of job opportunities. Last year, the country had a net migration loss of 47,100 New Zealand citizens, Stats NZ said Monday.
More than half of those migrants went to Australia, where they can live and work visa-free under a reciprocal arrangement.
There were 3.3 million visitor arrivals in New Zealand last year, Stats NZ said separately on Monday, up 12% from 2023. Australia, the United States and China were the biggest sources of visitors, with the 370,000 U.S. arrivals representing a record for a calendar year.
Tourism was New Zealand's biggest export earner before the pandemic, and the conservative government has looked to it as one way to boost the economy. Last month, officials said they were easing visa rules to allow digital nomads to work in New Zealand while visiting on holiday, in the hope that they would spend more time there.
Opposition lawmakers say that while they would welcome more tourists, they worry about the impact on the environment and whether the country's tourism infrastructure can support them.
'We've had the digital nomad announcement, now we've got this — and the attitude of anyone, anytime, anywhere, is concerning,' Tangaere-Manuel said.
In an effort to address those concerns, last year the New Zealand government nearly tripled the entry fee for international tourists to 100 New Zealand dollars ($62.20) from 35 dollars. Australians are exempted from paying the levy, the proceeds from which are funding the same campaign for their tourist dollars that has sparked the controversy.
Social media users skeptical of the 'Everyone Must Go' slogan pointed out another possible use for it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
9 hours ago
- Telegraph
Starmer has carried through one of the worst legacies of Tony Blair: ‘lawyer brain'
The recent spectacle of the Metropolitan police rounding up 500 peaceful protestors, half of them pensioners, for supporting a 'terrorist organisation' whose terrorist activities include spraying some paint on an empty plane does have one saving grace: it makes it clear what the Labour Party thinks about the public's right to dissent. Keir Starmer has been fond of juridical high-handedness for as long as he has been the Prime Minister: following the riots in Southport last year, he supported the police's round-up of over thirty people for their indiscretions on X, arguing that such posts were 'not free speech', and promising that online instigators would feel 'the full force of the law'. Now, the same treatment is being visited on middle-class, middle-aged liberals. Interestingly, though, rather than making any moral arguments in favour of the proscription, Labour partisans have decided that the best tactic is to keep repeating the statutes that enact it. Dan Jarvis argues that 'the UK's definition of terrorism was established in law a quarter of a century ago, and it has stood the test of time and extensive scrutiny since'; Lord Hanson of Flint spent most of a recent Lords debate repeating the line 'the terms of the proscription are clear' (as if, say, the Nuremberg Laws weren't pretty clear too). The fact that anyone in the Labour Party finds this kind of thing even remotely satisfying, or even coherent, suggests that the party is in the throes of a very specific pathology: 'lawyer brain'. In its broadest form, 'lawyer brain' is the belief that legislation alone can solve all human problems, and that the law is the law, whether it is ethically sound or not. Anything can be justified, provided it meets arbitrary legal standards of legality. Elderly protestors can be arrested if they meet definitions of 'terrorism'. Online posters can be rounded up if they meet definitions of 'incitement'. It certainly seems to capture something about Keir Starmer – a former lawyer whose former nickname, according to a leaked 2022 Labour memo, was 'Mr. Rules.' In this respect, Starmer is part of a long case-history of 'lawyer brain' in the UK Labour Party. Perhaps the worst offenders came from the Blair government, whose seasoned lawyer-politicians – Tony Blair, Lord Irvine, Jack Straw – passed a frenzied set of statutes and constitutional reforms without much in the way of democratic consensus. Urban crime was to be tackled by the invention of new, quasi-criminal categories like the 'ASBO'; broken families were to be fixed with 'parenting orders'; political violence was to be tackled by an enormous raft of new anti-terror legislation, that conveniently rolled back all those bothersome rights to privacy and fair treatment under the law that prior statutes had codified. Much of this new legislation was nonsensical with loopholes; it caused the day to day running of the country to be beset by legal challenge, and left a lot of citizens – peaceful protestors, for example – with far fewer rights than they had before. In Blair's New Labour, 'lawyer brain' took root for one reason above all else: it was the perfect instrument for justifying the actions of a party which technically had a large mandate, but which was, in real terms, haemorrhaging public support. 'Lawyer brain' was a kind of magic: given that whatever was lawful was, by definition, right, all an incumbent party had to do was write new legislation, invent new legal categories, and it could be justified in any pursuit – abolishing the office of Lord Chancellor, invading Iraq. It's no wonder Starmer – who possesses what must be one of the greatest discrepancies between parliamentary majority and public popularity in British history – is so susceptible to it. But government by diktat also has its drawbacks. As convincing as the arguments of 'lawyer brain' are to other lawyers, they remain unimpressive to the public. In Blair's case, the final straw came with Lord Goldsmith's mealy-mouthed declaration of the legality of the invasion of Iraq. In Starmer's, it seems to be working through accretion. Almost every well-touted 'communication failure' of Starmer's can be explained by the same, mad legalism: the man won't talk about gilt markets, or pension funds; he has to keep talking about the OBR and its arcane rules. He seems incapable of assessing the morality of what's going on in migrant hotels, or Gaza; he can only about international law, as though he were still back in the halls of Matrix Chambers. No wonder he has slumped to remarkable depths in the polls, and is facing considerable dissent from within his own party. He is on the verge of discovering what most of us knew already: that lawyers might be pretty good at getting their way, but they're not exactly well-liked.
Daily Mirror
10 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Horse racing goes on strike for the first time in extraordinary move
Four race meetings on September 10 at Lingfield Park, Carlisle, Uttoxeter and Kempton Park will no longer take place that day and will be rescheduled Horse racing will go on strike on September 10 for the first time in the history of the sport. The extraordinary move is in protest at the Government's proposed betting tax increase. Four race meetings on September 10 at Lingfield Park, Carlisle, Uttoxeter and Kempton Park will no longer take place that day and will be rescheduled. The strike is the day before the start of the historic four-day St Leger festival at Doncaster Racecourse. On the same day, the sport will host a major event in Westminster where senior leaders will be joined by owners, trainers and jockeys to highlight the threat of the Treasury's proposal on an industry which is worth £4.1billion to the UK economy. The shock announcement comes as British Racing's 'Axe the Racing Tax' campaign cranked up a gear in advance of the Autumn Budget. The campaign is urging the Government to scrap the Treasury's proposal to bring existing online betting duties into one single rate. Campaigners say it would have devastating consequences for the nation's second-largest spectator sport that supports 85,000 jobs and which is attended by almost five million people each year. Economic analysis commissioned by the British Horseracing Authority (BHA) has shown that aligning the current 15% tax rate paid by bookies on racing with that of online games of chance – currently taxed at 21% – by harmonising all remote gambling duties, could have a destructive impact on the sport with a £330 million revenue hit to the industry in the first five years, and putting 2,752 jobs at risk in the first year alone. Racing's decision not to race on September 10 is unprecedented. Race meetings in Britain take place on 363 days a year, with the exception of certain seasonal holidays. With the exception of meetings being called off due to adverse weather, equine virus outbreak and national crises such as the Covid-19 pandemic, this will be the first time in history that the sport has taken a collective decision not to race in protest at a Government proposal. Brant Dunshea, Chief Executive at the British Horseracing Authority said: 'We have decided to take the unprecedented decision to cancel our planned racing fixtures on 10th September to highlight to Government the serious consequences of the Treasury's tax proposals which threaten the very future of our sport. 'British Racing is already in a precarious financial position and research has shown that a tax rise on racing could be catastrophic for the sport and the thousands of jobs that rely on it in towns and communities across the country. 'This is the first time that British Racing has chosen not to race due to Government proposals. We haven't taken this decision lightly but in doing so we are urging the Government to rethink this tax proposal to protect the future of our sport which is a cherished part of Britain's heritage and culture.'
Press and Journal
12 hours ago
- Press and Journal
'We've made so many memories in our dream Countesswells townhouse'
Who: Jenny Sneddon, 41, an accountant, her wife Michelle, 42, an engineer and their two-year-old daughter Ruby. What: An immaculate four-bedroom semi-detached townhouse. Where: Countesswells, only a few miles from the city centre. 'Before moving here, we were in a traditional double upper flat in Rosemount. We loved the property but got the urge to move during the Covid lockdowns in 2020. At the time, we craved having our own outdoor space and more room to both work from home more comfortably. Also, we were thinking about starting a family and wanted a property with ground floor access and dedicated parking at the front door. So this house ticked all of those boxes and more. Jenny initially spotted the house on a Facebook advert – it was the ground floor herringbone flooring which caught her eye. We viewed the house in October 2020 on a whim, and made an offer within the week. It was probably the most impulsive purchase ever. At that point we hadn't made any moves to sell our current house but within a fortnight we had marketed and accepted an offer on it so it was obviously meant to be. When we first viewed the house, we were really impressed with the size. It was much more spacious than we expected of a new build, with higher ceilings and open hallways creating a feeling of space. The rooms are all very generously proportioned and the added bonus of built-in storage in each bedroom is great to keep clutter out of sight. There's also an abundance of natural light throughout the day which adds to the feeling of space and openness. The house was already finished to a great spec when we bought it. For example, the bathrooms are very luxurious, particularly the master ensuite with the twin basins and freestanding bath. We loved the open-plan kitchen/dining /living area with the pocket doors to close off the kitchen as needed. As it was the showhome, it had a lot of added extras such as full height tiling and full width mirrors in all bathrooms, chrome socket faceplates, LED skirting lights to the stairs and a landscaped garden. The location of the house was also part of the appeal as we have the Countesswells woods on our doorstep and have uninterrupted views across the countryside from the front windows. And on a clear day you can see Clachnaben. So we moved into the property in December 2020. Inside, the house is a relatively newly built semi-detached townhouse with four double bedrooms, two public rooms and four bathrooms including two ensuites. We initially did very little when we moved in. It really was ready to move into which was handy since we got the keys a week before Christmas! Over time we have made changes to a few rooms to make it more to our taste, such as adding wooden panelling and painting the upstairs 'snug' in a darker colour. We have redecorated the master bedroom, snug and spare bedroom which previously had a Spider-Man mural on the wall. The most work we have done was to the snug where we added panelling and changed the radiator to match the dark walls. We have also installed flooring and shelving in the attic with a Ramsay ladder to create additional storage space. In terms of interiors, we liked that the house was already decorated in quite a modern style which was very different to our previous house. It opened our minds a bit to different styles and has given us ideas which we'll take with us to our next home. We painted the master bedroom and 'snug' in Farrow and Ball 'Inchyra Blue'. The paint colour was actually inspired by the colour palette of our wedding venue, The Byre at Inchyra, so it felt only fitting to use it in the house. In the downstairs w/c, we used statement wallpaper from Emma J Shipley which works so well in the space. A lot of our furniture came from our old house, but we bought new furniture for the living room from Annie Mo's and the sofas from Loaf. Luckily for us, moving into this house was so easy. It truly was ready to move into with the house fully decorated, and flooring and blinds already in place. Reflecting on our time here, we've loved that the house is so big, there is no shortage of space and natural light throughout the day. The bathrooms in particular are very generous in size and finished to a high quality, creating a sense of luxury. We will especially miss this when we move to our next home. This has been a very happy home for us, with lots of special memories made here. Our daughter Ruby was born whilst we've lived here. So it's where we've watched her grow into the spirited toddler she is now.' 1 Gairnhill, Aberdeen, is on the market for offers over £435,000. To arrange a viewing contact Aberdein Considine on 01224 589589 or check out the website And if you enjoyed this story, you may also like: 'Our Aberdeenshire renovation was like a real-life episode of TV's Grand Designs'
