Trump Hotel set to open in war-torn city sparking fears skyscraper will become terror target
The Trump family's plans to open a new hotel in war-torn Israel have sparked fears it could become a terror target as tensions in the Middle East continue to escalate.
The first family is eying the under-construction Sarona Hotel in Tel Aviv as it continues to expand in the region
While the Trump Organization has not officially said it is partnering with the Sarona, Eric Trump told The New York Times there have been 'strictly preliminary' discussions about the Israeli market.
'Israel has always been a market we would love to explore,' he told the outlet.
The 47-floor hotel - which could become larger if Eric gets his way, sources said - is in a ritzy neighborhood in the capital city.
On June 13, the trendy area got caught up in the conflict between Israel and Iran when the latter bombed Tel Aviv as part of retaliatory strikes.
Local businesses were left covered in shattered glass and debris after Iran responded forcefully to Israel's strikes against its military facilities in its capital of Tehran.
With Israel involved in a war with Hamas in Gaza and currently in a temporary ceasefire with Iran, the Middle Eastern country is a point of contention.
Peter Bazeli, managing director of Weitzman, believes any Trump-branded property is 'clearly at risk of becoming a target'.
'It's not only at the center of the US government, but it also hits the president's pocketbook,' he told The New York Times.
The discussion about a partnership between the Trump Organization and the Sarona happened in the Spring, sources told The Times.
Records showed that the Trump name might be affixed to the outside and the family's company would manage the hotel.
These talks occurred before the Iranian-Israeli conflict began and before the US bombed Iran's nuclear sites.
Before the attacks, Eric reportedly said he wanted to get one deal struck in Israel by the end of the year. It is unclear if the president's son still wishes to achieve this.
The Trump Organization has already struck many deals in the Middle East to license the family name on luxury properties, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar,
The Trump Administration has even proposed an idea to take over Gaza and make it a resort.
The idea faced backlash from world leaders who said two million Gazans would have to be displaced for the idea to happen.
But more deals are expected, with up to 30 in the making, sources told The Times.
Many of the Trump family's plans are international and the president has been trying to get into Israel's hotel market for two decades.
In 2016, after his presidential victory, his company retracted a deal from a 61-story hotel in Tel Aviv.
The company tried again for a hotel in Jerusalem after Trump lost the 2020 victory, but ultimately pulled out of the deal due to the October 7 attack on Israel, The Times reported.
The Jerusalem hotel was owned by Nitsba, the same company which holds the Sarona.
However, it it is unclear how far into the deal the Trumps were or if the Sarona Hotel will bear the Trump name once completed.
Daily Mail has reached out to the Trump Organization and Nitsba Group for comment.
Not all prospects are lost however, as Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have agreed to end the war in Gaza after the US bombed Iranian nuclear sites.
The two leaders agreed that four Arab states, including the United Arab Emirates and Egypt, would jointly govern the strip in place of Hamas, Israel Hayom is reporting.
Leaders of the Hamas terror group would be exiled and all hostages released, a source is said to have told the outlet.
But it remains unclear how such a proposal would be implemented, with Hamas vowing it will not leave the territory and Arab states repeatedly asserting that they would not step into a governing role.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Trump reveals what mystery trucks at nuke site were REALLY doing before blitz… destroying claims Iran rushed uranium out
Israel didn't know if US would join Iran strikes, says Defense Minister Katz Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz admitted in an interview with Channel 12 that Israel launched its assault on Iran without knowing if the US would join in, according to The Times of Israel. 'In defense, we knew they [the US] were with us — and they did an amazing job,' Katz said, praising American support once the operation began. He confirmed the uranium stockpiles weren't directly targeted: 'The uranium itself, the material, was not a target for attack.' Katz added that Israel would have taken out Ayatollah Khamenei 'if he had been in our sights.' Defence Minister Israel Katz
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
The 3 lingering questions Trump and Hegseth must answer about their Iran nuke strikes ‘success'
Donald Trump hailed the recent U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities as a 'spectacular military success,' claiming the bombings he ordered left the sites 'completely and totally obliterated.' But almost a week on from Operation Midnight Hammer, serious doubts remain about whether the mission actually achieved its aims. At issue is whether the attack set back Iran's ability to build a bomb by months or years, and if the strikes may have made it more difficult to track the country's progress towards that goal than before. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth held a press conference on Thursday in which he admonished the media for continuing to ask questions about the impact of the strikes on Iran's nuclear program. "Because of decisive military action, President Trump created the conditions to end the war, decimating – choose your word – obliterating, destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities,' he said. Here are the three key questions that remain unanswered about the strikes. What happened to Iran's highly enriched uranium? One of the primary justifications for the U.S. to strike Iran was that it had built up a stockpile of some 400 kilograms of uranium that was enriched to a record level of 60 percent, not far from the 90 percent required to make a nuclear weapon. Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is peaceful. But Israel and the U.S. concluded it was now close enough to a bomb to warrant immediate military action. The facility at Fordow had centrifuges — the highly technical machines that enrich uranium — capable of enriching that uranium to the 90 percent purity level, which is why it was targeted by the 30,000 pound bunker buster bombs in the U.S. attack. But the Trump administration doesn't appear to be able to account for Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium. When asked by a reporter on Thursday if it was possible that Iran would have moved its stockpile from Fordow or other sites ahead of the bombing, Pete Hegseth said he was "not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be … moved or otherwise," suggesting it would have been destroyed in the strikes. But European intelligence agencies are telling a different story. Preliminary assessments provided to European governments suggest that Iran moved its stockpile away from its nuclear facilities before the strikes, leaving it largely intact, according to a report in the Financial Times. That matches what Iranian officials have claimed, and what Vice President JD Vance acknowledged in the days after the attack when he said: 'We are going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel and that's one of the things that we're going to have conversations with the Iranians about.' International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said Wednesday that his agency does 'not have information of the whereabouts of this material." Experts have pointed out that the Trump administration has been unable to answer questions about what happened to the uranium. Nor have Trump officials discussed in detail other facilities that may have the capability to enrich that uranium further, potentially paving the way for Iran to build a bomb in secret. "They can't tell you what happened to the highly enriched uranium, and they have tried a million excuses. They can't, or won't engage with any of the questions about the facilities or what happened to the equipment,' Dr. Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the Middlebury Institute, told The Independent after watching Hegseth's press conference Thursday. Does Iran still have the ability to enrich the uranium it has? Fordow was not the only nuclear site targeted in the U.S. strikes, even if it attracted the most attention due to the size of the bombs required to hit the underground facility. Grossi, the IAEA director, has warned for months that the agency does not know where all of Iran's centrifuges are. It has not had access to those aspects of the nuclear program since February of 2021. Eric Brewer, a former U.S. intelligence official from the Nuclear Threat Initiative nonprofit, told NBC News that Iran 'still has a stockpile of advanced centrifuges that have been built up over the past few years that the IAEA didn't have access to during that time.' Other experts believe Iran may have thousands of uranium-enriching centrifuges that were never installed in the facilities that were hit by U.S. strikes. If some of those centrifuges are still intact, it is not inconceivable that they could be used or adapted to further enrich Iran's stockpile of uranium to weapons-grade level. Now, however, they will be harder to track. Have the strikes made Iran more likely to pursue a bomb in secret? There have only ever been two ways to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon: diplomacy or military action. Barack Obama, when he was president, was able to strike a deal with Iran and world powers in 2015 that dismantled much of its nuclear program, placed limits on how much uranium it could enrich, and opened its facilities to inspections. That diplomatic effort led to a massive reduction in uranium enrichment and the ability to monitor Iran's nuclear facilities. Trump tore up that deal in 2018, insisting that he could strike a better one, which spurred Iran to kickstart its enrichment into high gear, build its stockpile to record levels, and remove monitoring equipment from nuclear facilities. His decision to launch military strikes may damage Iran's ability to enrich in the short term, but it will also limit the ability to monitor and track its activities. Not only that, it has likely significantly increased the political will inside Iran to build a nuclear weapon — something U.S intelligence agencies have consistently said that Iran's leadership had not yet chosen to do. All of that raises the risk that hardliners in Iran will decide that building a nuclear weapon in secret is essential for the country's defense. 'Iran has responded to attacks against this facility in the past by burying, hardening and dispersing its nuclear sites,' Kelsey Davenport, the Director for Nonproliferation Policy at the Arms Control Association, where she focuses on the nuclear and missile programs in Iran, told The Independent earlier this week. 'If Iran is focused on preserving its leverage and its option to weaponize over the long term, then it can build new, more fortified facilities, and it can disperse those facilities. And the international community is blind right now because inspectors are not in Iran's facilities,' she said. 'So if these strikes were aimed at preventing a nuclear-armed Iran, they have failed spectacularly. They have likely driven Iran closer to a nuclear weapon, while degrading confidence and credibility in U.S. diplomacy as a viable off-ramp to resolve this crisis,' she added. The Trump administration has offered no clear plan to track or prevent Iran from secretly building a bomb. With diplomacy now likely to be more difficult than before, the U.S. faces the prospect of further military entanglement — and a potential long-term quagmire.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Gulf shipping costs drop as Israel-Iran ceasefire holds
LONDON, June 26 (Reuters) - Shipping costs for the Gulf have fallen in the past two days after a ceasefire was reached between Israel and Iran, although rates could rebound if tensions increase, shipping and insurance industry sources said on Thursday. The conflict had raised concerns that Iran could close Hormuz, the strait between Iran and Oman through which around 20% of global oil and gas demand flows amid broader fears that oil could soar to $100 a barrel. Shipping rates for supertankers, which can carry 2 million barrels of oil, jumped over the past week before the ceasefire - more than doubling to over $60,000 a day. Rates were quoted around $50,000 a day on Thursday, freight data showed. "Tanker rates ... have been pulling back following the halt to hostilities between Israel and Iran," Jefferies analyst Omar Nokta said in a note. Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire on Tuesday after 12 days of war. Greece's shipping ministry on Thursday eased requirements for its merchant fleet, no longer advising them to report voyages through Hormuz, saying the situation "appears to have been improved". War risk insurance premiums for Gulf shipments softened to between 0.35-0.45%, from a peak of 0.5% on Monday, sources said. This compares with levels of around 0.3% in recent months. The cost of a seven-day voyage is based on the value of the ship and the drop will translate into tens of thousands of dollars less in additional costs each day. "Rates have definitely softened," said David Smith, head of marine with insurance broker McGill and Partners. "Whilst war premiums are still significant there is a large number of war risk insurers looking to underwrite risks and offer capacity, which in combination with the improved political situation is adding ever downward pressure on rates. That said, the situation remains very fluid." Iran would respond to any future U.S. attack by striking American military bases in the Middle East, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday, in his first televised remarks since the ceasefire.
