Popular ice cream recalled over 'life-threatening' packaging
The problem arose because the Cookies & Cream flavor has soy and wheat. The Vanilla Bean flavor does not have soy or wheat, so people with severe allergies to those ingredients 'run the risk of a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction' if they consumed the product.
One of the biggest ice cream recalls this summer came in July when Rich's Ice Cream pulled more than 100,000 ice cream bars off shelves in 23 different states.
A total of 110,292 cases of frozen dessert products were initially recalled on June 27, but the recall was escalated to a Class II designation on July 17 - the second-highest risk level. A 'Class II' distinction poses a risk that the 'product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences.'
The recall was initiated because of a potential listeria contamination. The bacteria that causes listeria infections can spread through your blood into your brain and spinal cord if it goes untreated, according to the Mayo Clinic. In that scenario, symptoms include fever, chills, muscle aches, fatigue, diarrhea, and a stiff neck. Serious cases can involve confusion, loss of balance, and seizures. These symptoms often start within two weeks of eating tainted food, but it can take up to two months for symptoms to begin. Listeria infection is the third leading cause of death from foodborne illness in the US, killing about 260 people per year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
44 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Vinay Prasad returns to FDA days after leaving under pressure from Laura Loomer
Vinay Prasad is returning to his role overseeing vaccine, gene therapy and blood product regulation at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) a little more than a week after he left the agency. 'At the FDA's request, Dr Vinay Prasad is resuming leadership of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research,' Department Health and Human Services spokesperson Andrew Nixon said in a statement to Reuters. Prasad left the agency on 30 July after just a few months as director of the center. Stat News first reported the return of Prasad. Prasad, an oncologist who was a fierce critic of US Covid-19 vaccine and mask mandates, was named the center's director by the FDA's commissioner, Marty Makary, in May. Criticism of Prasad's tenure intensified around the agency's handling of a gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) from Sarepta Therapeutics. The FDA-approved therapy played a role in the death of two teens who had advanced DMD. After a third death in a separate experimental gene therapy from the company, the FDA asked Sarepta on 18 July to stop all shipments of the approved DMD therapy, saying it had safety concerns. The FDA changed course on Sarepta on 28 July and said shipments to the main group of patients for the drug could restart. Laura Loomer, a far-right influencer and conspiracy theorist with outsized sway over Donald Trump, had called Prasad a 'progressive leftist saboteur' who was undermining the agency's work. Two days before Prasad stepped down last month, Loomer had released misleadingly edited audio to suggest that that Prasad had admitted sticking pins in a Trump voodoo doll, when the full audio made it clear that he was talking about the kind of thing an imagined liberal Trump-hater would do. Loomer reacted to the news of Prasad's return on Saturday by renewing her attacks on him in a social media post in which she promised to produce 'exposes of officials within HHS and FDA' in the weeks ahead. 'There are several Senate Confirmation hearings coming up and I have multiple oppo books ready for distribution!' she wrote. Prasad was a physician who joined the agency from the University of California, San Francisco. He has had stints at the National Cancer Institute and the National Institutes of Health. The FDA and other health agencies have seen multiple shake-ups in recent months under the leadership of health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
I thought pregnancy would leave me glowing but I ended up unrecognisable – my face left me in tears
A WOMAN has revealed the dramatic change she underwent during pregnancy, with her face looking completely unrecognisable. Farah Faizal (@ayyitslala) thought she was going to look glowing during her pregnancy, but ended up crying over her changing appearance. 2 2 In a viral video, that has racked up 116 million views, Farah shared some snaps of herself before she was pregnant. The brunette beauty looks stunning, with clear skin and gorgeous features. However, she then shared a number of clips of how she looked during her pregnancy, and she is completely unrecognisable. Her nose had almost tripled in size, and her face was extremely red and swollen. "Survived nine months of chaos, cried over my face more than I'd like to admit, and now I'm officially someone's mum", she said. "Healing in progress…" Sharing a snap of herself one month after giving birth, Farah's skin looks a lot less red and swollen, and her nose is beginning to shrink in size. She revealed that she went to the doctor about her condition and has been healing herself with creams and laser treatment. Thankfully, Farah revealed that her husband was extremely supportive during her pregnancy, and helped her through every "breakdown". "He constantly reminded me that I was beautiful strong and loved", she said. I thought I was glowing in my pregnancy until my NOSE popped at week 25 - people say it looks like I've used a filter More than 40% of women experience acne during pregnancy, which is caused by hormonal changes. Many women also experience their noses growing in size. "Although 'pregnancy nose' is not a medical term, many women's noses do appear to be bigger toward the end of pregnancy, and they may also experience more frequent nasal drainage than prior to pregnancy," says Jessica Madden, M.D., IBCLC, a board-certified neonatologist, pediatrician, lactation consultant, and the medical director of Aeroflow Breastpumps. How to reduce pregnancy nose Face yoga instructor Angela Rosoff has revealed her free techinque to reduce the size of your nose during pregnancy. She starts with cleansing her face before applying a "light facial oil or serum." Next, she gets into position by pressing her index fingers on either side of her nose. "Start the compression," she said. "Place your fingers at the base of your nose, near the nostrils. "Compress and release. Gently press the sides of your nose together and hold for two to three seconds, then release." She then repeats the process 10 to 15 times, finishing off by massaging around the nose in soft, circular motions.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The most affordable US states for parents-to-be
By Having a baby is meant to be one of life's most joyful milestones - but in 2025, it's also become one of the most financially daunting. With inflation driving up healthcare costs and childcare prices hitting all-time highs, WalletHub has ranked all 50 states (plus Washington D.C.) to reveal where new parents are most - and least - likely to get a financial break. The average conventional hospital delivery in the U.S. costs over $2,600 with insurance and up to a staggering $15,000 without it. But as the report shows, costs - and care - vary wildly across the country. Some states offer top-notch neonatal care, family support programs and affordable delivery costs, while others fall drastically behind. WalletHub's analysts evaluated states across 31 metrics, including hospital charges for births, infant mortality rates, parental leave policies, food insecurity, childcare availability, and overall cost of living. States were scored in four key areas: cost, healthcare, baby-friendliness, and family-friendliness. So where's the best place to bring a baby into the world in 2025? Massachusetts: Best for birth and best for raising a family Massachusetts topped the charts - and not just because of its picturesque New England charm. The Bay State ranked #1 overall, thanks to its outstanding hospitals, generous parental leave policies, and high vaccination rates for children under three. It boasts the lowest infant mortality rate in the country, access to top neonatal care, and was ranked #1 in healthcare overall. North Dakota: Cheapest place to give birth Coming in at #2 overall, North Dakota dominated the affordability rankings. It's #4 for cost and boasts the lowest average price for a conventional birth without complications - just $7,500, compared to a high of $27,000 elsewhere. The state also has some of the lowest C-section rates and second-lowest complicated birth costs. Childcare is refreshingly affordable, with babysitters averaging just $17.56 an hour - the third-lowest in the nation. North Dakota also shines when it comes to access, with ample child care centers and mom support groups per capita. It ranks #3 for family-friendliness, making it a smart pick for budget-conscious families looking for long-term stability. Minnesota: Best for healthcare savings Minnesota snagged third place, driven by exceptional healthcare and some of the nation's lowest insurance premiums - just $355 per month on average. Expectant mothers benefit from the second-lowest maternal mortality rate in the U.S., and the state ranks high in availability of OB-GYNs, pediatricians, and nurse midwives. It also has one of the largest shares of nationally accredited childcare centers - a reassuring stat for working parents. Overall, Minnesota earned the #2 spot for family-friendliness, behind only Massachusetts. And at the bottom Experts warn: Don't bank on a smooth ride Experts say one of the biggest mistakes new parents make is being overly optimistic - and unprepared. Dr. Taryn Morrissey of American University warned that many couples underestimate the costs, complications, and emergencies that can arise with pregnancy and childcare. 'We tend to believe that we're less likely to experience negative events than others,' she said. 'Things like 'Other people have complications during childbirth, but that won't happen to us.' Dr. Jennifer Lansford, a distinguished public policy professor at Duke University, emphasized that one of the most immediate financial considerations is childcare in the early years - something often overlooked in baby budgeting. 'As the only high-income country without federal paid parental leave, r esponsibility in the United States falls to individual parents to determine if they can afford to take time off work to care for an infant or young child and to consider the costs of childcare if they will be working outside the home,' she said.
