logo
The bloated quango with a £1.7bn pensions bill – paid for by the taxpayer

The bloated quango with a £1.7bn pensions bill – paid for by the taxpayer

Telegraph01-03-2025

Taxpayers have been handed an eight-figure bill for a gold-plated government pension scheme that cannot afford its payments, new figures show.
The Environment Agency's closed pension fund has taken £1.25bn in government bailouts and needs almost £400m more, according to a Freedom of Information request by The Telegraph.
The scheme still holds £264m in assets, but has lost £65m through investments in the past two years alone. The taxpayer has funded every pension payment made in the past 19 years.
In the late 1980s, Britain's state-run water industry employed 50,000 workers, and their pensions were held in the Water Authorities Superannuation Fund. After privatisation in 1989, staff and their pensions were transferred to the newly-formed National Rivers Authority and private water companies.
All remaining pensions, for those who had either already retired or left to work elsewhere, were moved into a closed fund. The Government and the National Rivers Authority accepted that the fund might one day be unable to meet its obligations, but every pension was also legally guaranteed by the state.
When the Environment Agency was created in 1996, it took over managing the scheme, and by the scheme's 2004 valuation, it had a deficit of £880m.
The former environment secretary, Margaret Beckett, duly contacted the scheme to confirm it would run out of money by autumn of 2006, and that the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs would fully fund pensions from April the same year.
The arrangement cost the taxpayer £91m in 2006-07, and has required an average of £69.5m a year in funding ever since.
Neil Record, a pensions expert and former Bank of England economist, said it was a glaring example of 'both waste and protecting public sector workers at the expense of ordinary taxpayers.'
He said: 'A whole panoply of scheme compliance and administration is effectively being wasted because the Government has chosen to bail out the failing scheme with cash every year – leaving the pension scheme as onlooker.
'Were it in the private sector, the same scheme would fall into the Pension Protection Fund, and the pensioners would see a fall in their pensions – sharing the costs of the bailout.
'It is a microcosm of everything that is wrong with public sector culture.'
The generous scheme, which is part of the Local Government Pension Scheme, provides retirees with a pension worth one 80th of their final salary for every year worked, along with an automatic tax-free lump sum of three times their annual entitlement.
It means a worker retiring on £50,000 after a 30-year career would receive £18,750 a year, rising annually with inflation, and a one-off lump sum of £56,000.
Almost 8,800 pensioners are currently being paid by the scheme, with nearly 600 more yet to claim. It cost the taxpayer £42m in 2023-24.
Meanwhile, the Environment Agency's multi-billion pound open scheme, run separately for current workers, made a profit of £369m during the same period.
Across the two schemes combined, there are 103 members with annual pensions in excess of £50,000, and two members receiving more than £100,000.
An Environment Agency spokesman said: 'The Closed Fund pension has outperformed its benchmark on investment returns, and grant-in-aid payments are used to ensure we meet our statutory obligation to fund members' pensions.
'It is managed according to the high standards of financial integrity expected of those responsible for the management of public assets.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Justice Jackson warns Supreme Court is sending a 'troubling message'
Justice Jackson warns Supreme Court is sending a 'troubling message'

The Herald Scotland

time16 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Justice Jackson warns Supreme Court is sending a 'troubling message'

"It is particularly startling to think that grants of relief in these circumstances might be (unintentionally) conveying not only preferential treatment for the Government but also a willingness to undercut both our lower court colleagues' well-reasoned interim judgments and the well-established constraints of law that they are in the process of enforcing," Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote. Jackson was dissenting from the conservative majority's decision to give Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency complete access to the data of millions of Americans kept by the U.S. Social Security Administration. Once again, she wrote in a dissent joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, "this Court dons its emergency responder gear, rushes to the scene, and uses its equitable power to fan the flames rather than extinguish them." A district judge had blocked DOGE's access to "personally identifiable information" while assessing if that access is legal. Jackson said a majority of the court didn't require the administration to show it would be "irreparably harmed" by not getting immediate access, one of the legal standards for intervention. "It says, in essence, that although other stay applicants must point to more than the annoyance of compliance with lower court orders they don't like," she wrote, "the Government can approach the courtroom bar with nothing more than that and obtain relief from this Court nevertheless." A clock, a mural, a petition: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's chambers tell her story In a brief and unsigned decision, the majority said it weighed the "irreparable harm" factor along with the other required considerations of what's in the public interest and whether the courts are likely to ultimately decide that DOGE can get at the data. But the majority did not explain how they did so. Jackson said the court `plainly botched' its evaluation of a Trump appeal Jackson raised a similar complaint when the court on May 30 said the administration can revoke the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans living in the United States. Jackson wrote that the court "plainly botched" its assessment of whether the government or the approximately 530,000 migrants would suffer the greater harm if their legal status ends while the administration's mass termination of that status is being litigated. Jackson said the majority undervalued "the devastating consequences of allowing the Government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending." The majority did not offer an explanation for its decision. More Supreme Court wins for Trump In addition to those interventions, the Supreme Court recently blocked a judge's order requiring DOGE to disclose information about its operations, declined to reinstate independent agency board members fired by Trump, allowed Trump to strip legal protections from 350,000 Venezuelans and said the president can enforce his ban on transgender people serving in the military. Jackson disagreed with all of those decisions. The court's two other liberal justices - Sotomayor and Elena Kagan - disagreed with most of them. More: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson can throw a punch. Literally. The court did hand Trump a setback in May when it barred the administration from quickly resuming deportations of Venezuelans under a 1798 wartime law. Two of the court's six conservative justices - Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito - dissented. Decisions are expected in the coming weeks on other Trump emergency requests, including whether the president can dismantle the Education Department and can enforce his changes to birthright citizenship.

SNP ministers accused of secrecy over £2m Grangemouth carbon capture study
SNP ministers accused of secrecy over £2m Grangemouth carbon capture study

Scotsman

time19 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

SNP ministers accused of secrecy over £2m Grangemouth carbon capture study

Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... SNP ministers have been accused of secrecy after refusing to publish a £2 million study into whether a pipeline that will connect Grangemouth with a key carbon capture project will fall flat. The 'alarming' move comes as Chancellor Rachel Reeves is poised to confirm at her spending review this week whether the Acorn carbon capture project for St Fergus, near Peterhead, will finally receive the funding it needs to get off the ground. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Carbon capture technology is seen as being essential to Scotland and the UK reaching net zero | POOL/AFP via Getty Images The previous Conservative UK government only granted the Acorn project reserve status and ploughed funding into carbon capture and storage projects south of the Border instead. This comes as finance secretary Shona Robison asked Chancellor Rachel Reeves to award funding for the Acorn carbon capture project and to ensure Scotland receives a share of GB Energy funding that matches its contribution to UK clean energy goals, ahead of the UK spending review. She also called on the Chancellor to 'prioritise growth' and to fully fund the employer national insurance increase for Scotland's public services. Ms Robison urged the UK Government to abandon some of its 'damaging policies' such as cuts to welfare support for disabled people, to scrap the two-child benefit cap and to reinstate a universal winter fuel payment, ahead of the review on 11 June. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She said the Scottish Government had not yet been provided with 'clarity' on spending priorities. The delays to the project has been partly blamed for SNP ministers rolling back climate targets, with the Acorn plans initially hoped to be up and running before 2030. But now, the Scottish Government has refused to release the results of a feasibility study into the pipeline, despite confirming the document was completed in March. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad SNP ministers handed over £2m to National Gas last year to assess whether it was possible to turn an old 174-mile gas pipeline that runs from Grangemouth in the Central Belt to St Fergus, Aberdeenshire into 'Europe's largest carbon capture pipeline'. Officials have refused to release details of what the study shows, despite campaigners requesting it under Freedom of Information law. Acting Energy Secretary Gillian Martin during a visit to drone manufacturer Flowcopter in Loanhead, to mark the publication of the Scottish Government's Green Industrial Strategy | Andrew Milligan/PA Wire Concerns have been raised about carbon capture technology, which campaigners warn simply allows oil and gas companies to continue burning fossil fuels. Under the technology, harmful carbon emissions are prevented from being released into the atmosphere and instead trapped and injected into the seabed. Fears have been raised about leakage, with the technology not yet tested at commercial scale. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad During a trip to St Fergus in 2023, then prime minister Rishi Sunak also raised concerns about the technology, warning that it would be a boost 'if we can get it to work'. Now, campaigners have warned that any further public funds for the Acorn project would benefit major oil companies, including Shell, which have made £90 billion profits in recent years and Harbour Energy who recently laid off 250 staff despite paying out almost £1bn to shareholders in the past three years. The UK government has already pledged £22bn to the carbon capture industry, a move which the Public Accounts Committee branded a 'high risk gamble' that could push up household energy bills. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad First Minister John Swinney has vowed to increase the public handout from the Scottish Government for the Acorn project beyond £80m. But that is contingent on the UK government first backing the project - amid doubts the funding could be axed in the spending review amid a perilous economic backdrop. Friends of the Earth Scotland's climate campaigner Alex Lee said: 'The public are again being forced to pay for the oil industry's greenwashing carbon capture plans, and it is deeply alarming that we don't even get to see what our money has unearthed. 'Plans to run a 280km high pressure carbon pipeline through towns and villages are fraught with danger and uncertainty because this has never been done before in Scotland. Have the people who live along the route of this pipeline proposal been informed of the risks and consulted on these proposals? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It is a farce that ministers have been talking up carbon capture for 20 years and only now are they checking whether it would even be feasible to do this. 'When working climate solutions are crying out for funding, there should be no public investment in dodgy scams like carbon capture.' Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves and Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband during a meeting of the National Wealth Fund Taskforce in 11 Downing Street. PIC: Justin Tallis/PA Wire Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said: 'The Greens have always been sceptical about putting too much reliance on untested carbon capture technology, and we are firmly opposed to using it as an excuse for more fossil fuel extraction or burning. 'Even its advocates don't think it will make any impact on our emissions in the near future, so the priority has to be the action we know how to take right now - cutting road and air traffic levels, insulating homes and shifting to clean heating, and supporting communities to change land use. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Climate action isn't rocket science and we don't need to wait for new technologies to get off the drawing board - we just need to do what we know works.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government provided National Gas with a £2m grant to support a study to explore the technical feasibility and viability of repurposing an existing gas pipeline for the transportation of carbon dioxide. 'The conclusions of the study were requested under environmental information regulations. However, for reasons of commercial confidentiality these can't be released. 'The Scottish Government fully supports the deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS), and we have been advised by the Climate Change Committee that they 'cannot see a route to net zero that does not include CCS'.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A UK government spokesperson said: 'We are delivering first of a kind carbon capture projects in the UK, supporting thousands of jobs across the country, reigniting industrial heartlands and tackling the climate crisis.

Activists ‘lack faith' in Northumbrian Water's new pledge to Whitburn
Activists ‘lack faith' in Northumbrian Water's new pledge to Whitburn

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Activists ‘lack faith' in Northumbrian Water's new pledge to Whitburn

Campaigners have said they have "little faith" in a water firm's commitment to cut pollution at a seafront. Northumbrian Water has agreed to pay out £15.7m after failures in the maintenance and operations of its sewage and water network. As part of this deal, the firm agreed to a "binding commitment" to work with the Environment Agency (EA) to ensure its system at Whitburn, South Tyneside, complied fully with environmental Water said it was "working hard" to improve its waste management process. The BBC previously reported that nearly one million tonnes of raw sewage was estimated to have been released from a pumping station at Whitburn into the North Sea in 2024. The area along the Whitburn coast is part of the Durham special area of figure was released following an Environmental Information Regulations (EIR) request from South Tyneside resident Steve Lavelle. Prof Darren Grocke, a biogeochemist at Durham University, told the BBC that this was "an enormous amount of sewage discharge that will certainly have an impact on the coastal and marine environment".Mr Lavelle said the fact Northumbrian Water had been forced to make such a commitment to the region was a "testament to the perseverance and resilience of campaigners". But he said he had "little faith" in the firm and worried that the EA did not have the resources to challenge the company. The EA has been approached for comment. In a case brought forward by retired engineer Bob Latimer, in 2012 the European Court of Justice ruled that sewage discharge by Northumbrian Water at Whitburn broke EU water treatment laws. He said he appreciated Ofwat's latest investigation but that he lacked confidence in the water firm's new commitment to cutting pollution in the region. Northumbrian Water said it was investing more than £1bn over the next five years to cut the number of spills from storm overflows and to improve "our coasts and rivers". Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store