Tesla doubles down on robotaxi timeline; investors enthused
Tesla peppered its latest earnings call with pledges to launch commercial robotaxi operations soon, with CEO Elon Musk promising that autonomous vehicles will "move the financial needle in a significant way" by late next year.
While the U.S. electric vehicle maker has missed targets many times before, its reiteration on Tuesday of a previously announced launch target has investors believing that its self-driving future is close.
As its core automotive business struggles, with vehicle sales down 13% in the first quarter, expectations are high for Tesla to prove it can overcome the technological hurdles of autonomous driving and demonstrate a sound business model for driverless car services.
Most bullish investors and analysts tie the bulk of Tesla's stock value to its plans for a massive robotaxi and autonomous-driving subscription business.
Now is the time for "the fundamental inflection" that "we're all hoping for," said Blake Anderson, associate portfolio manager at Carson Group, a Tesla investor.
Tesla stuck to its previously announced June timeline for launching a paid robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, providing investors confidence that Musk's time spent as a government cost-cutting adviser to President Donald Trump had not caused delays.
On Tuesday's call, Musk said Tesla will first use existing Model Y vehicles outfitted with self-driving software. The automaker is also developing a dedicated autonomous model, dubbed the Cybercab, with production starting next year.
Musk said he expects autonomous driving technology will begin to "affect the bottom line of the company, and start to be fundamental" by the second half of 2026.
"I predict that there will be millions of Teslas operating fully autonomously in the second half of next year," he said.
Musk made a similar prediction six years ago, in 2019, saying "next year, for sure, we'll have over one million robotaxis on the road."
Still, Brian Mulberry, client portfolio manager at Tesla investor Zacks Investment Management, said he felt "this is happening, this is coming soon. They have the miles, the safety record and the technology they need."
Investors and analysts in the next few months will be looking for concrete signs that Tesla can scale the robotaxi business and navigate technical challenges.
Anderson said in the coming months he wants to see specifics such as how much Tesla will charge per mile in Austin, and whether that can be profitable. He also wants more detail on Tesla's safety record and how frequently its vehicles in Austin have to disengage from autonomous driving mode.
"Safety is the thing they control the most, so I want proof that what they do control is ironed out," Anderson said. "Then I have a much greater line of sight into the national rollout."
Others are less convinced on Musk's timeline that robotaxis will play a material role in earnings by the second half of next year. Musk on Tuesday's call said the Austin robotaxi launch would start with 10 or 20 Model Y vehicles, and that Tesla would "scale it up rapidly after that," expanding to other U.S. markets later in the year.
During earnings calls in January and October, Musk said he expected to launch robotaxis in California by the end of this year. He did not mention California during Tuesday's call.
Tesla this year received a preliminary permit in California but needs several more permits from state agencies before it can launch a paid robotaxi service.
Seth Goldstein, equity strategist at Morningstar, said Musk's timeline of profitability next year sounded like "a very quick pace" for a technology that has taken competitors such as Alphabet's Waymo nearly a decade to work out.
Musk said on Tuesday's call that Tesla's current self-driving technology, being tested in Austin, would require driving 10,000 miles on average "before you get in an accident or an intervention." He did not elaborate on how he arrived at that number, and Tesla as of last year had not submitted data on interventions to regulators in California like other autonomous vehicle companies such as Waymo and Amazon's Zoox.
Goldstein still said he believes Tesla can fine-tune its testing by the end of next year and launch a wider robotaxi system that can compete with Waymo by 2028.
But he said he expects investors will be disappointed if Musk's predictions of revenue and profit generation by next year do not materialize.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
a day ago
- Zawya
US agency streamlining self-driving car exemption reviews
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on Friday said it was streamlining reviews of requests filed by automakers seeking to deploy self-driving vehicles without required human controls like steering wheels, brake pedals or mirrors. NHTSA has authority to grant petitions to allow up to 2,500 vehicles per manufacturer to operate on U.S. roads without required human controls but the agency has spent years reviewing several exemption petitions without taking action. Automakers have expressed frustration with the agency's slow reviews of autonomous vehicles. Under the law, fully self-driving vehicles do not need NHTSA approval if they have required human controls. Manufacturers must demonstrate vehicles without human controls provide an equivalent safety level and exemptions are in the public interest. In 2018, GM petitioned NHTSA to deploy up to 2,500 cars without steering wheels or brake pedals on U.S. roads. In 2020, GM withdrew the petition. GM in 2022 again sought NHTSA approval to deploy vehicles without human controls. GM withdrew the petition in October. Ford in 2023 withdrew its self-driving petition filed in July 2021 with NHTSA, citing its decision to close its self-driving venture Argo AI in 2022. Tesla tentatively plans to begin offering rides on its self-driving robotaxis to the public on June 22, CEO Elon Musk said this week, but those vehicles have required human controls. (Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama )
The National
2 days ago
- The National
Elon Musk's downfall could mark the end of a cultural era
A century ago, TS Eliot mused about the world having ended, not with a bang, but with a whimper. In his poem The Hollow Men, he described a generation unable to do anything with conviction, whether for good or ill, as societies, institutions and communities in Europe struggled with the new morality and the political upheaval following the devastation of the First World War. 'Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow' The parallels between 1925 and 2025 are legion, but perhaps none has been as striking as the culture wars that have shaped the current public discourse. Trust in government, experts and institutions is at a low ebb. Amid such a divisive political landscape, it is little surprise that individuals with maverick personalities have grown in influence. Arguably, no one illustrates this point as strongly as Elon Musk. His public image, cultivated through antics on X, meme culture and polarising rhetoric, has helped fuel a rise in his wealth and status as a business and technological prophet. Most pertinently, Mr Musk's vision of the future has also lacked empathy. His dreams of Mars colonisation, AI-human interfaces and radical innovation are as ambitious as they are detached from societal needs or human connection. There have also been actions that bring into question his ethics. For example, markets have been disrupted, if not manipulated, following his social media posts about Dogecoin and Tesla stock. Yet, until now, Mr Musk had insulated himself from the ire that enveloped other tech leaders. He had avoided the political theatre in the US Congress that Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, Google's Sundar Pichai and Amazon's Jeff Bezos were obligated to take part in. His purchase of X (when it was still called Twitter) and his subsequent alliance with the Republican Party seemed to keep regulators at bay while amplifying his influence. His track record means very little now, however, after his spectacular falling out with US President Donald Trump. On Wednesday, the shockwaves from the detonation of the most famous political alliance of our time seemed to finally fade with the words: 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far.' Could Mr Musk's post on X also be the waving of the white flag for his style of leadership? With never-seen-before gusto, Mr Musk had supported Mr Trump's presidential campaign and after the latter won the White House, he became a regular fixture in the Oval Office, even parading his four-year-old son in front of the cameras, such was the familiarity between the two men. It seemed a stunning triumph of his convictions. Eventually Mr Musk seemed to tire as his personal behaviour and his brainchild, the Department of Government Efficiency, became magnets for sustained controversy. So, he stepped back from the front lines. There had been a very clear cost, too, from such an unprecedented high-profile political affiliation. The Tesla share price is still down 14 per cent in 2025, but it had been even lower. After he was no longer on the inside of the administration, it took only days for him to turn against the President, attacking the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', a key part of Mr Trump's legislative agenda, and drawing return fire online and in the media from his one-time ally. Then, after Mr Musk made the explosive and since-retracted claim that Mr Trump appeared in the files related to the late financier and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, it became clear there could be no way back. Not only is Mr Musk's aura now diminished, but it could be the end of the techno-libertarian myth that has been at the root of so much divisiveness during the past decade. Figures like Mr Musk and Peter Thiel – also a supporter of Mr Trump – championed the idea that private innovators could outpace and outthink the state. The equivalent of shadow nations grew out of Silicon Valley and undermined the ability of governments to govern, further eroding trust and bringing extreme ideas to the mainstream, enabled by an unregulated flood of technological advances. The truth is, once any company achieves the scale of a country, it becomes nigh on untouchable. Mr Musk seemed to be trying to reach these heights while remaining bigger than his companies in the minds of the public. The social media age helped him to try to do this, and his approach has been very much a blueprint for the broader rise of content creators and influencers. Yet, back in the 1920s, TS Eliot warned of the perils of such hollowness. 'Between the desire And the spasm Between the potency And the existence Between the essence And the descent Falls the Shadow' Looking back 100 years from now, the Musk-Trump fallout will probably help mark the closing act of a cultural era defined by deficiencies in human connection and empathy for others.
Zawya
2 days ago
- Zawya
Musk backtracks on Trump criticism after White House outreach
Billionaire businessman Elon Musk backed off digs he took at President Donald Trump after extensive outreach from administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, with Musk saying on Wednesday he had gone "too far." The Tesla and SpaceX CEO voiced regret after having launched an exchange of increasingly personal attacks last week on their respective social media sites by calling Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill a "disgusting abomination." In other remarks, he called it too expensive. The feud escalated to a point where Musk threatened to start a rival political party and suggested Trump be impeached. For investors, the open rift potentially posed multiple hurdles for Tesla, SpaceX and the rest of Musk's sprawling business empire, including Starlink, which depends heavily on its relationship with the U.S. and other governments. "I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote in a post on his social media platform X on Wednesday, without saying which specific posts he was talking about. He has deleted some of the posts, including the one signaling support for impeachment. He has not walked back his criticism of Trump's tax bill, however. Vance, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and David Sacks, Trump's crypto czar and a longtime Musk friend, all pushed for Musk and Trump to make up, said two people briefed on the conversations. Asked if he had helped defuse tensions between the two, Vance told reporters at the Kennedy Center that he had spoken with Musk and Trump about "trying to ensure that Elon is publicly supporting and privately supporting the president's agenda." He said Trump was "rightfully very frustrated" with about Musk's comments, but had no desire to be in a long-term feud with the billionaire and big campaign donor. One of the sources said Musk was serious about potentially starting a new party, a risk for Trump's Republicans going into the November 2026 midterm congressional elections. In the 2024 vote, Musk gave Republicans roughly $300 million, contributing to their sweep of the White House and both houses of Congress. On Friday, James Fishback, a Tesla investor and adviser to Musk's government cost-cutting effort, posted on X that the billionaire owed Trump "a full-throated apology." Musk retorted: "What's the apology for exactly?" Musk subsequently deleted several posts, and a senior Trump adviser called Fishback to thank him, according to one of the sources. Musk spoke to Trump on Monday, according to a White House source with knowledge of the matter. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Wednesday that Trump appreciated the apology. Asked if the administration was reviewing Musk's government contracts after Trump's threat last week to cancel them, Leavitt said she was not aware of any such efforts. TESLA CONCERNS Tesla shares were marginally lower on Wednesday. The stock has recouped most of its losses from the Trump-Musk feud, but shares are still down 19% on the year, equal to roughly $300 billion in market value. Sales of Tesla have fallen across key markets in Europe, China and U.S. states including California as car buyers shun the company following Musk's embrace of hard-right politics in the U.S. and worldwide. Musk is betting big on driverless technology to grow the company, but self-driving tech is in early stages and faces skepticism. An acrimonious relationship with Trump would risk more scrutiny of Musk's business practices, as the U.S. Transportation Department regulates vehicle design standards and would have a big say in whether Tesla can mass-produce robotaxis without pedals and steering wheels. "The conciliatory tone from Musk recently might indicate his desire to protect his businesses in the light of the position he has found himself in," said Mamta Valechha, consumer discretionary analyst at Tesla investor Quilter Cheviot. Shawn Campbell, adviser and investor at Camelthorn Investments, said the relationship between Musk and Trump could be restored but also said it was unlikely it would return to where it once was. "The stakes between the richest man in the world and leader of the most powerful nation in the world are just so big, with billions of dollars of government contracts at stake, not to mention the power to investigate and regulate and tax," said Campbell, who personally holds Tesla shares. Musk took credit for Republicans retaining a majority of seats in the House of Representatives and retaking a majority in the Senate with his cash infusion last year. Trump then named him to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. He left the role late last month. Declaring their relationship over on Saturday, Trump said there would be serious consequences if Musk decided to fund Democrats running against Republicans who vote for the tax and spending bill. Trump also said he had no intention of repairing ties with Musk. (Reporting by Alexandra Ulmer and Nandita Bose; Additional reporting by Jeff Mason, Rachael Levy, Arpan Daniel Varghese, Akash Sriram, Sruthi Shankar and Gursimran Kaur; Writing by David Gaffen, Gursimran Kaur and Timothy Heritage; Editing by Colleen Jenkins, Howard Goller, Philippa Fletcher, Nick Zieminski and Lincoln Feast.)
