Tip us first: Why new Uber push faces government ire
The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) has raised concerns about Uber's 'advance tip' option. But Uber's not alone in this. What exactly is an advance tip? Is it unethical? And why has it drawn regulatory scrutiny? Mint breaks it down.
Also Read | Covid cases are rising again. Should we be worried?
Why are cabs pushing for advance tips?
They ask users to tip drivers before booking a ride in exchange for faster service. Apparently this is to compensate drivers for frequent cancellations by riders. Ride cancellations have been the major pain-point in India's mobility sector for years. To be sure, it works both ways: 84% of app taxi consumers face cancellations when drivers are told the destinations and the preferred digital payment method, according to LocalCircles. It also discovered that the issue has intensified in the last two years. A guaranteed tip upfront might make drivers more likely to accept and complete rides.
Also Read | Can Bangladesh afford to mix politics and trade?
Is Uber alone in this controversy?
No, Uber was actually late in introducing this feature. Bengaluru-based mobility startup Namma Yatri, launched in November 2022, was among the first to introduce advance tipping in India's ride-hailing ecosystem. The feature prompts users during the booking process to add a tip of ₹20, ₹50, ₹75 or ₹100, suggesting that a driver may be more likely to accept the ride if a tip is added. Following Namma Yatri, Rapido incorporated advance tipping into its service by late 2023. Ola also offered an option to add an advance tip, without suggesting a faster ride. Uber introduced this feature only in April 2025.
Also Read | Mint Primer: US GDP contracts 0.3% in Q1—why the IMF still sees no recession
How does tipping work globally?
India is an outlier with this experiment. Globally, Uber's standard practice has been to prompt users to tip drivers after the ride is completed. The introduction of pre-ride tipping in India marks a departure from this norm. Other international cab aggregator companies including Lyft and Bolt, among others also enable tipping—but only after the ride ends.
Why has the government stepped in?
The CCPA sent a notice to Uber after a directive from food and consumer affairs minister Pralhad Joshi, who called the practice unethical and exploitative, raising concerns about consumer rights. A tip is given as a token of appreciation, not as a matter of right, after the service, he said. The argument is that the pay-to-prioritize model puts pressure on riders to pay extra. Reflecting broader scrutiny, the CCPA also pulled up Ola and Uber this year over charges of differential pricing for iOS and Android users.
Are there any rules on trip cancellations?
The Motor Vehicle Aggregator Guidelines (2020), introduced a penalty of 10% of the fare capped at ₹100 for cancellations by riders or drivers. But its enforcement has been inconsistent. In a first, Maharashtra on Tuesday came out with a policy providing for a 10% penalty on drivers and 5% on riders for cancellations. Other states, such as Karnataka, have implemented aggregator regulations focusing on licensing and operational guidelines, without specifically addressing cancellation penalties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
OpenAI finds more Chinese groups using ChatGPT for malicious purposes
OpenAI is seeing an increasing number of Chinese groups using its artificial intelligence technology for covert operations, which the ChatGPT maker described in a report released Thursday. While the scope and tactics employed by these groups have expanded, the operations detected were generally small in scale and targeted limited audiences, the San Francisco-based startup said. Since ChatGPT burst onto the scene in late 2022, there have been concerns about the potential consequences of generative AI technology , which can quickly and easily produce human-like text, imagery and audio. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2 Simple Profitable Strategies That Can Make You 5K Per Day thefutureuniversity Learn More OpenAI regularly releases reports on malicious activity it detects on its platform, such as creating and debugging malware, or generating fake content for websites and social media platforms. In one example, OpenAI banned ChatGPT accounts that generated social media posts on political and geopolitical topics relevant to China, including criticism of a Taiwan-centric video game, false accusations against a Pakistani activist, and content related to the closure of USAID. Live Events Some content also criticised US President Donald Trump 's sweeping tariffs, generating X posts, such as "Tariffs make imported goods outrageously expensive, yet the government splurges on overseas aid. Who's supposed to keep eating?". Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories In another example, China-linked threat actors used AI to support various phases of their cyber operations , including open-source research, script modification, troubleshooting system configurations, and development of tools for password brute forcing and social media automation. A third example OpenAI found was a China-origin influence operation that generated polarized social media content supporting both sides of divisive topics within U.S. political discourse, including text and AI-generated profile images. China's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment on OpenAI's findings. OpenAI has cemented its position as one of the world's most valuable private companies after announcing a $40 billion funding round valuing the company at $300 billion.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Uber appoints Palo Alto CEO Nikesh Arora to board
Uber has appointed Palo Alto Networks chief executive Nikesh Arora to its board, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. He will serve on the Nominating and Governance Committee and Compensation Committee. Arora, 57, has been the Chairman of the board and chief executive officer (CEO) of cybersecurity firm Palo Alto Networks since June 2018. Prior to joining Palo Alto Networks, he was an angel investor from 2016 to 2018. Before that, he worked with SoftBank Group Corp in various senior capacities from 2014 to 2017. Notably, SoftBank made significant investments in Uber in 2018 and 2019, becoming its largest shareholder at one point. SoftBank sold a third of its stake in the ride hailing platform in 2021 and offloaded the rest between April and July 2022. Arora was also one of the top candidates being considered as successors to former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick after he resigned in June 2017. The job went to Dara Khosrowshahi . Prior to SoftBank, from December 2004 through July 2014, Arora held multiple senior leadership operating roles at Google , Inc., including serving as senior vice president and chief business officer, from January 2011 to June 2014. The Palo Alto CEO also serves on the board of Compagnie Financiere Richemont S.A., a public Switzerland-based luxury goods holding company. He has previously served on the boards of insurance company Aviva PLC, Indian telecom major Bharti Airtel , US communications services company Sprint Corp, global FMCG company Colgate-Palmolive Company, SoftBank, and Yahoo! Japan. 'Nikesh is one of the technology industry's great executives: a strategic and disciplined operator, and a fierce competitor. We're thrilled to welcome him to the board and look forward to his contributions as we continue to advance our long-term strategy,' said Uber chief executive officer Khosrowshahi. As an Uber director, Arora will receive a $60,000 annual cash retainer and restricted stock units with a fair value of $300,000, the SEC filing said.
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
No rollback of satcom recommendations, government to decide: Trai official
NEW DELHI: The telecom regulator's views were based on an extensive consultative process involving divergent views from multiple stakeholders, and could not be reconsidered, while it's for the government to take a final call, a senior regulatory official said. "We have duly followed the extensive and transparent consultative process with multiple stakeholders sharing divergent views. It is for the government to decide," a Trai official on the conditions of anonymity told ETTelecom, adding that "a level-playing field is out of question" in the current context. "Satellite communications or satcom is a complementary service to terrestrial network providers, with no question of a level playing field between the two. The ₹500 per subscription charge is aimed at enhancing coverage and encouraging space broadband providers to offer services across the country's rural landscape." Early this week, Delhi-based Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), which represents Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea, in a letter to the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) said that the watchdog has "underestimated the potential capacities of satellite networks" while possibly overstating those of terrestrial networks. "Incorrect assumptions have led to unjustifiably low spectrum charges for satellite services relative to terrestrial networks," COAI director general SP Kochhar added in his letter to DoT secretary Neeraj Mittal. However, Trai, citing a huge capacity variation between the two sets of players, strongly defended its move. "In our recommendation, we have clearly brought out that there is no case of level-playing field between the satellite service providers and terrestrial service operators because of the huge difference of capacity between them," the senior official said. "So, the capacity of a typical satcom service provider in terms of the internet capacity, is of the order of maybe 0.5 to 1 or 2 percent of the capacity of a typical large terrestrial service provider. So there is no question of level-playing field. It is a complimentary service." The telco lobby group said that the planned capacity of Elon Musk-owned Starlink and Jeff Bezos led-Amazon Kuiper are expected to surpass the current capacity of Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea combined. The idea behind prescribing ₹500 additional charge for urban subscription, according to the official, was to "encourage and nudge satellite service providers" to offer services in the country's rural areas as well. "They can divert their capacity to urban areas to some extent, but we want to nudge them to focus on rural and remote regions. This is the background under which the recommendation was made," he added. Meanwhile, satcom players backed the regulator, and said Trai's views were aimed at bringing affordable space broadband services to bridge the existing digital divide. Telecom watchdog recommended administrative allocation of satcom spectrum with a fee pegged amounting to 4% of adjusted gross revenue (AGR), for a five-year term, and that can be extended by another 2 years. The 4% AGR fee applies to both geostationary and non-geostationary satellite operators. Trai's proposal to subsidise user terminals for satellite operators through the Digital Bharat Nidhi (DBN) fund further tilts the level playing field against the terrestrial operator, especially given that a majority of the DBN levy is contributed by telcos, Kochhar added in his letter. The regulatory official said that it has recommended facilitating a target set of users that the government might want to support in unserved or rural and remote areas. "The government can consider subsidising the cost of the terminal. It is for the government to make a decision based on a targeted group or category of users." Lately, the activity in India's nascent space-led communication services sector has intensified following the entry of spaceflight company SpaceX's satellite network Starlink, partnering with Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Jio and Sunil Mittal-driven Bharti Airtel.
