Soviet-era spacecraft from aborted Venus mission set to plummet to Earth
ADVERTISEMENT
A Soviet-era spacecraft meant to land on Venus in the 1970s is expected to plunge uncontrolled back to Earth, possibly within the first two weeks of May.
It's too early to know where the half-tonne mass of metal might come down or how much of it will survive re-entry, according to space debris tracking experts.
Dutch scientist Marco Langbroek predicts the failed spacecraft will re-enter around 10 May. He estimates it will come crashing at around 242 kph, assuming it remains intact.
"While not without risk, we should not be too worried," Langbroek said.
Related
'Venus is a Russian planet': Russian space agency announces national effort to explore Earth's twin
The object is relatively small and, even if it doesn't break apart, "the risk is similar to that of a random meteorite fall, several of which happen each year. You run a bigger risk of getting hit by lightning in your lifetime," he said.
The chance of the spacecraft actually hitting someone or something is small, he added, but "it cannot be completely excluded."
Venus travels across the surface of the sun as seen through a telescope in Yellowknife, 5 June, 2012
AP Photo
What were the Soviet missions to Venus?
The Soviet Union launched the spacecraft known as Kosmos 482 in 1972, one of a series of Venus missions.
But it never made it out of Earth orbit because of a rocket malfunction.
Most of it came tumbling back to Earth within a decade. But Langbroek and others believe the landing capsule itself — a spherical object about one metre in diameter — has been circling the world in a highly elliptical orbit for the past 53 years, gradually dropping in altitude.
Related
NASA plans two visits to Earth's nearest neighbour Venus
It's possible that the nearly 500-kilogram spacecraft will survive re-entry.
It was built to withstand a descent through the carbon dioxide-thick atmosphere of Venus, said Langbroek of Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands.
Experts doubt the parachute system would work after so many years. The heat shield may also be compromised after so long in orbit.
A replica of the descent capsule of the Soviet Venera-9 depicting the first soft landing on planet Venus, 22 October, 1975
AP Photo
Jonathan McDowell from the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics said it would be better if the heat shield failed, which would cause the spacecraft to burn up during its dive through the atmosphere.
But if the shield holds, "it'll re-enter intact and you have a half-tonne metal object falling from the sky".
The spacecraft could re-enter anywhere between 51.7 degrees north and south latitude, or as far north as London and Edmonton in Canada's Alberta, almost all the way down to South America's Cape Horn.
ADVERTISEMENT
But since most of the planet is water, "chances are good it will indeed end up in some ocean," Langbroek said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sustainability Times
8 hours ago
- Sustainability Times
'We Are Finding Clues to Alien Existence': Robot Sent to Crack Jupiter's Frozen Shell in Wild Mission to Detect Life Beyond Earth
IN A NUTSHELL 🚀 NASA shifts focus from Europa to Enceladus, prioritizing more favorable exploration conditions. shifts focus from Europa to Enceladus, prioritizing more favorable exploration conditions. 🛰️ The Europa Clipper mission faced challenges due to intense radiation and harsh environments. mission faced challenges due to intense radiation and harsh environments. 🔧 Technological innovations developed for Europa can be adapted for Enceladus exploration. 🌊 Enceladus offers promising opportunities to search for biosignatures in its water plumes. In the ever-evolving landscape of space exploration, NASA's quest to uncover the mysteries of our solar system takes a fascinating turn. While the Europa Clipper mission was initially poised to unlock the secrets of Jupiter's icy moon, Europa, the focus has now shifted to another celestial body. Enceladus, Saturn's enigmatic moon, with its potential subsurface oceans and intriguing plumes, beckons scientists with the promise of discovering extraterrestrial life. This article delves into the journey of innovation and exploration that has led us to this pivotal moment in space exploration. The Allure of Icy Moons The allure of Europa and Enceladus lies in their potential to harbor life, hidden beneath their icy surfaces. These celestial bodies offer a tantalizing possibility of subsurface oceans, where life could potentially thrive. Europa, a moon of Jupiter, and Enceladus, a moon of Saturn, have captured the imagination of scientists for decades. Their icy crusts, concealing vast oceans, make them two of the most promising candidates for the search for extraterrestrial life within our solar system. Despite the initial excitement surrounding the Europa Clipper mission, NASA faced significant challenges. Europa's intense radiation, stemming from Jupiter, posed a severe threat to the mission's success. The lander's electronics would have been vulnerable, and communication would have been limited due to Europa's unique orbit. Moreover, the harsh cold and lack of communication satellites further complicated the mission. Nonetheless, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) persevered, developing a prototype robot capable of withstanding Europa's icy terrain. This innovation laid the groundwork for future missions, albeit on a different moon. 'Tesla's Dream, Hyundai's Reality': Ten Years Later, the Electric Car King Faces a Brutal Fall From the Top Technological Innovations for Space Exploration The Europa Clipper mission, although redirected, brought forth remarkable technological advancements. The prototype lander designed for Europa was a marvel of engineering, equipped with legs for safe landings and a stereoscopic camera for navigation. One of its standout features was the 'ICEPICK' tool, capable of collecting samples from 7.87 inches deep, a crucial capability for analyzing potential biosignatures. Moreover, the lander boasted autonomous software, allowing it to make critical decisions with limited power and communication time. Rigorous field tests on Alaska's Matanuska Glacier validated the lander's capabilities, simulating the harsh conditions it would face on Europa. These innovations not only demonstrated NASA's prowess but also paved the way for exploring other icy worlds, such as Enceladus. These Creeping Vineyard Robots Use Insect-Like Legs to Annihilate Weeds With Ruthless Precision and Rock-Bottom Costs Enceladus: A New Frontier As NASA's decadal strategy shifted focus, Enceladus emerged as the next frontier for exploration. This moon of Saturn presents a more hospitable environment compared to Europa. Enceladus experiences lower radiation levels, making it a more viable candidate for detecting biosignatures. Its intriguing water plumes, potentially rich in molecules essential for life, offer an exciting opportunity for scientific discovery. The lessons learned from the Europa prototype are invaluable for a potential Enceladus mission. The robot's design and capabilities can be adapted to explore Enceladus's surface, where biosignatures could be preserved longer. While the dream of exploring Europa's deep ocean with a submersible remains, the technological leap required is substantial. For now, Enceladus promises a more accessible yet equally thrilling target for space exploration. 'They Morph Like Liquid Metal': Scientists Reveal Mini-Robot Swarm That Shape-Shifts Just Like in Sci-Fi Movies A Path Forward in Space Exploration The journey from Europa to Enceladus exemplifies the dynamic nature of space exploration. It showcases the resilience and adaptability of NASA's scientists and engineers, who continuously strive to unravel the mysteries of our solar system. While Europa remains a tantalizing prospect, the shift to Enceladus demonstrates a pragmatic approach, leveraging existing technology and expertise. As we look to the future, the exploration of icy moons like Enceladus holds the potential to redefine our understanding of life in the universe. The innovations developed for these missions not only enhance our knowledge but also inspire future generations to reach for the stars. What new discoveries await us on Enceladus, and how will they shape our quest to find life beyond Earth? Our author used artificial intelligence to enhance this article. Did you like it? 4.5/5 (22)
France 24
16 hours ago
- France 24
As Arctic ice vanishes, maritime traffic booms fuel climate crisis
When a Russian gas tanker sliced through the icy waters of the Arctic in the middle of winter four years ago, it became clear global shipping routes would be forever changed. The Christophe de Margerie vessel, named after the former CEO of French oil company Total, made its way from eastern China through the Bering Sea, eventually docking at a remote Arctic port in Siberia in February 2021. For the first time in history, global warming caused by humans allowed a ship to navigate through Arctic winter ice. The Arctic has been warming four times faster than anywhere else on the planet since 1979, according to multiple scientific studies. Melting sea ice is opening up paths for increased shipping and other vessel traffic in the region, especially along the Northern Sea Route, the Arctic shortcut between Europe and Asia that stretches more than 9,000 kilometres. Shipping seasons are also being prolonged as a result of the warming climate. But with more traffic comes more environmental degradation. The consequences are dire, particularly for climate heating, loss of biodiversity and pollution. And since the Arctic is a key regulator of the Earth's climate, what happens in this region can be felt thousands of kilometres away. A vicious cycle It's a vicious cycle. As sea ice melts and opens new routes for maritime traffic in the Arctic, the environmental fallout caused by vessels burning fossil fuels adds to global warming, which in turn melts more sea ice. A perfect example of this is black carbon. It's a sooty material emitted from gas and diesel engines that aren't completely combusted. Not only does black carbon pollute the air with particulate matter, but because of its ability to absorb light as heat, it contributes to climate change by warming the air. When black carbon is deposited on ice in the Arctic, it takes away its ability to reflect heat. 'The black colour deposited on the white ice means the ice then absorbs more sunlight, leading to more melting,' explained Sammie Buzzard, a polar scientist at the Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling at Northumbria University. The use of heavy fuel oil, leftovers from the bottom of the barrel that lead to high black carbon emissions, grew by 75 percent in the Arctic in just four years, between 2015 and 2019. On the opposite end of the planet, in Antarctica, its use has been banned since 2011. Black carbon is one of the most significant contributors to climate change, after CO2. 'Lots of Arctic ice gets covered, and anything that changes the colour of the ice or causes it to melt also removes a key part of the ecosystem,' Buzzard said. Busy routes Almost all types of maritime traffic are on the rise in the Arctic, whether for tourism or transportation. Fishing boats are by far the most common type on ship in the Arctic, followed by cargo ships and bulk carriers. Between 2013 and 2023, every type of ship aside from oil tankers and research vessels took to the Arctic in higher numbers. Not only are there an increasing number of ships in the Arctic Ocean, but they are also navigating over greater distances. In the span of a decade, the total distance vessels covered more than doubled, with an increase of 111 percent. The area for ships to move safely in open waters of the Arctic route during a 90-day safety window expanded by 35 percent from 1979 to 2018. Every year, the area keeps growing. It's estimated that five percent of global shipping traffic will be diverted to the Arctic route as a result. Usually, navigating the frozen waters of the Arctic requires an escort well-versed in icebreaking. A boat designed to break open large chunks of ice glides alongside vessels that need to make it through one of the three main shipping routes: the Transpolar Sea Route, the Northwest Passage or the Northern Sea Route. But according to climate projections, unescorted navigation could be possible as early as 2030 in the summer months. In the Canadian Arctic, where the Northwest Passage is located, the number of vessels has quadrupled since 1990. But the exact number of weeks ships can navigate safely through the route is dwindling. Research has found that melting sea ice doesn't necessarily make all Arctic sea routes more accessible. Thin sea ice does indeed melt under global warming, but centuries-old floes break off and are released into the Arctic Ocean, moving southwards and creating choke points, which makes some key points in the Northwest Passage more dangerous and unpredictable. Still, the overall trend is alarming. Melting sea ice brought on by global warming allowed shipping traffic to increase by 25 percent between 2013 and 2019. The butterfly effect of the Arctic The Arctic helps keep the planet's climate in balance. As sea ice perishes and maritime traffic increases, further accelerating global warming, environmental consequences become ever more far-reaching. 'The polar regions act to help cool the rest of the planet through the white ice reflecting energy from the sun back to space,' Buzzard explained. 'They act a bit like a giant freezer for the rest of the planet.' This has an effect on global temperature. 'Sea ice regulates heat exchange between the atmosphere and ocean, impacting the global circulation of heat,' said Buzzard. '[So] anything that reduces the amount of ice, or darkens it, can mean less energy is reflected, which means extra warming, which then has consequences for the entire planet.' Some changes are being implemented to slow down this worrying feedback loop. A ban on heavy fuel oil, which releases black carbon, was introduced in July 2024, though some vessels can continue to use it until July 2029. The UN agency responsible for regulating maritime transport, the International Maritime Organization (IMO), also pledged to reduce emissions by at least 20 percent in the next five years. But the Clean Arctic Alliance, a group of 21 NGOs who advocate for government action to protect the Arctic's wildlife and its people, insists there is not enough being done to curb the rise of black carbon and methane pollution from shipping in the Arctic. Its lead advisor, Sian Prior, said that 'in recent years, black carbon emissions from Arctic shipping have more than doubled,' in a statement published on 14 May. For Buzzard, the economic interests of using Arctic shipping routes may be beneficial. But increased traffic must be coupled with strict environmental regulations. 'While there can be a saving both in terms of carbon and time for ships to travel across the Arctic, this is a very fragile ecosystem that is already struggling to cope with changes from human-created climate change,' she said. 'Sea ice not only acts to help cool the planet, it is a habitat for creatures like polar bears that use the ice for hunting,' Buzzard noted. The polar bear, now a mascot for environmental issues in the Arctic, relies on sea ice to hunt and move around to find crucial denning areas. It accounts for over 96 percent of the animal's critical habitat. Increased traffic also brings noise pollution, which disturbs mammals who travel through these frozen waters, like whales. Pods use sound to find their food, mates, avoid predators and migrate. A recent study found that underwater noise in some places in the Arctic Ocean has doubled in just six years because of increased shipping. The list of environmental consequences of the maritime traffic boom in the Arctic goes on. Vessels navigating through the Arctic also release air pollutants, flush out sulphur oxide into the ocean through scrubbers that remove the substance from a ship's exhaust, and can leave behind litter. 'There is also the increased risk of pollution from oil spills,' added Buzzard. As countries such as Russia and China eye the prospect of new exploitation that comes with melting sea ice, and US President Donald Trump covets the resource-rich island of Greenland, time is running out for this fragile environment. 'There needs to be careful regulation to minimise the [environmental] impacts to the area,' stressed Buzzard. 'The consequences won't just stay in the Arctic.'
France 24
2 days ago
- France 24
Trump-Musk showdown threatens US space plans
So when President Donald Trump threatened on Thursday to cancel Elon Musk's federal contracts, space watchers snapped to attention. Musk, the world's richest person, shot back that he would mothball Dragon -- the capsule NASA relies on for crew flights -- before retracting the threat a few hours later. For now, experts say mutual dependence should keep a full-blown rupture at bay, but the episode exposes just how disruptive any break could be. Founded in 2002, SpaceX leapfrogged legacy contractors to become the world's dominant launch provider. Driven by Musk's ambition to make humanity multiplanetary, it is now NASA's sole means of sending astronauts to the ISS -- a symbol of post–Cold War cooperation and a testbed for deeper space missions. Space monopoly? The company has completed 10 regular crew rotations to the orbiting lab and is contracted for four more, under a deal worth nearly $5 billion. That's just part of a broader portfolio that includes $4 billion from NASA for developing Starship, the next-generation megarocket; nearly $6 billion from the Space Force for launch services; and a reported $1.8 billion for Starshield, a classified spy satellite network. Were Dragon grounded, the United States would again be forced to rely on Russian Soyuz rockets for ISS access -- as it did between 2011 and 2020, following the Space Shuttle's retirement and before Crew Dragon entered service. "Under the current geopolitical climate, that would not be optimal," space analyst Laura Forczyk told AFP. NASA had hoped Boeing's Starliner would provide redundancy, but persistent delays -- and a failed crewed test last year -- have kept it grounded. Even Northrop Grumman's cargo missions now rely on SpaceX's Falcon 9, the workhorse of its rocket fleet. The situation also casts a shadow over NASA's Artemis program. A lunar lander variant of Starship is slated for Artemis III and IV, the next US crewed Moon missions. If Starship were sidelined, rival Blue Origin could benefit -- but the timeline would almost certainly slip, giving China, which aims to land humans by 2030, a chance to get there first, Forczyk warned. "There are very few launch vehicles as capable as Falcon 9 -- it isn't feasible to walk away as easily as President Trump might assume," she said. Still, the feud could sour Trump on space altogether, she added, complicating NASA's long-term plans. SpaceX isn't entirely dependent on the US government. Starlink subscriptions and commercial launches account for a significant share of its revenue, and the company also flies private missions. The next, with partner Axiom Space, will carry astronauts from India, Poland, and Hungary, funded by their respective governments. Private power, public risk But losing US government contracts would still be a major blow. "It's such a doomsday scenario for both parties that it's hard to envision how US space efforts would fill the gap," Clayton Swope, deputy director of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told AFP. "Both sides have every reason to bridge the disagreement and get back to business." Signs of a rift emerged last weekend, when the White House abruptly withdrew its nomination of e-payments billionaire Jared Isaacman -- a close Musk ally who has twice flown to space with SpaceX -- as NASA administrator. On a recent podcast, Isaacman said he believed he was dropped because "some people had some axes to grind, and I was a good, visible target." The broader episode could also reignite debate over Washington's reliance on commercial partners, particularly when one company holds such a dominant position. Swope noted that while the US government has long favored buying services from industry, military leaders tend to prefer owning the systems they depend on. "This is just another data point that might bolster the case for why it can be risky," he said. "I think that seed has been planted in a lot of people's minds -- that it might not be worth the trust."
