logo
GOP Will Extend Student Loan Forgiveness Tax Relief, But Only Narrowly

GOP Will Extend Student Loan Forgiveness Tax Relief, But Only Narrowly

Forbes12-05-2025

UNITED STATES - APRIL 9: Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., left, and ranking member Rep. Richard Neal, ... More D-Mass., conduct the Ways and Means Committee hearing on the "Trump Administration's 2025 Trade Policy Agenda," in Longworth building on Wednesday, April 9, 2025. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer testified. Smith unveiled a sweeping tax proposal that would narrowly extend certain student loan forgiveness tax benefits while allowing other provisions to expire. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Republican House lawmakers on Friday unveiled legislation that would narrowly extend student loan forgiveness tax relief for borrowers and their families due to death and disability. But loan forgiveness for most borrowers under other programs would revert to being taxable again next year, as lawmakers allows key provisions of the tax code to expire at the end of the year. This could put millions of borrowers at risk of facing massive tax liability associated with debt cancellation.
The legislation is just one piece of congressional Republicans' plans to enact much of President Donald Trump's legislative agenda through the budget reconciliation process, which would allow the GOP to pass a massive bill through narrow party-line votes in the House and the Senate.
'Pro-family, pro-worker tax provisions are the heart of President Trump's economic agenda that puts working families ahead of Washington and will create jobs, grow wages and investment, and help usher in a new golden age of prosperity,' said House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (MO-08) in a statement on Friday.
Republican lawmakers want to extend and expand an array of tax cuts that are scheduled to expire at the end of 2025 without legislative action. To pay for the costs of those cuts, which could add trillions of dollars to the national debt, GOP lawmakers are proposing significant spending reductions, including major reforms to student loan forgiveness and repayment programs that could cut off debt relief and increase the monthly payment requirements for millions.
Here's what the narrow student loan forgiveness tax relief extension would mean for borrowers.
Historically, most forms of student loan forgiveness, discharge, and cancellation have been taxable events for borrowers. Lenders and loan servicers would issue a Form 1099-C for the tax year in which the student debt was forgiven, requiring borrowers to report the amount of cancelled debt as 'income' on their federal (and, if applicable, state) tax return. Borrowers would then be required to pay income taxes on that cancelled debt, as if they earned the amount of the forgiven balance in income. For large balances, this can lead to devastating tax consequences unless the borrower can qualify for an exemption, such as through insolvency.
In 2017 during the first Trump administration, Republican lawmakers passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act which included the slew of tax cuts and benefits that current GOP lawmakers are hoping to extend beyond 2025. Included in that legislation was a temporary exemption for federal student loan forgiveness based on death and disability. While federal student loan borrowers are entitled a discharge upon their death, historically that discharge would have been taxable to the estate. The same was true for borrowers requesting relief through the Total and Permanent Disability discharge program. But the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act temporarily ended federal taxation on these forms of loan forgiveness until January 1, 2026.
Then, in 2021 during the Biden administration, Democratic lawmakers passed the American Rescue Plan Act. Included in that legislation was a provision that broadly exempted all federal student loan forgiveness from taxation under federal law. This meant that borrowers receiving loan forgiveness under other programs – in particular, through income-driven repayment plans – have not had to face federal tax consequences. But this exemption is also set to expire at the end of 2025.
'If your loans are discharged on or after Jan. 1, 2021, and before Jan. 1, 2026, you won't get taxed by the federal government,' says Department of Education guidance on IDR student loan forgiveness. 'Any debt forgiven as a result of IDR forgiveness won't create a federal tax liability for you. The American Rescue Plan Act included a provision temporarily modifying the tax treatment of discharged student loan debt. Specifically, the law excludes from gross income qualifying student loans that are discharged on or after Jan. 1, 2021, and before Jan. 1, 2026. During this period, the amounts of forgiven student loan debt won't be subject to federal taxation.'
In the proposed reconciliation legislation unveiled on Friday by GOP lawmakers on the House Ways and Means Committee, the tax relief on student loan forgiveness for TPD discharges and death would be extended.
'In the case of an individual, gross income does not include any amount which (but for this subsection) would be includible in gross income for such taxable year by reason of the discharge (in whole or in part) of any loan described in subparagraph (B)," if the student loan balance was 'otherwise discharged on account of death or total and permanent disability of the student," reads the legislative text. The exemption would cover both the federal TPD discharge program, as well as similar discharge programs for 'a private education loan as defined in section 140(a) of the Consumer Credit Protection Act."
The extension of this tax relief would be critical not only for borrowers who may need to request TPD discharge relief in the coming years, but also for borrowers who have already been approved for student loan forgiveness under the program within the last two years. That's because the TPD discharge program has a three-year post-discharge monitoring period, and most borrowers (except for veterans) who are approved for relief under the TPD discharge program would not get hit with the tax consequences until after the three-year post-discharge monitoring period ends.
'You're considered to have received the discharge for federal tax purposes at the end of the post-discharge monitoring period,' says current Department of Education guidance. 'For example, say your discharge was approved in July 2022. If so, you would not be considered to have received the discharge for federal tax purposes until July 2025, at the end of your monitoring period. In this case, the IRS would not consider the discharged loan amount to be taxable income for federal tax purposes.' But borrowers approved for a TPD Discharge starting in 2023 would not end their monitoring period until 2026 or later, after the TPD discharge tax relief provisions would otherwise expire. So the extension of the tax exemption will provide critical relief to these borrowers.
However, the GOP legislation would not extend the student loan forgiveness tax relief that is separately set to expire under the American Rescue Plan Act. As a result, starting on January 1, 2026, student loan forgiveness under IDR plans and a handful of other programs will revert to being taxable again, leading to potentially severe tax consequences for borrowers who reach their loan forgiveness threshold in the coming years. Profession-based student loan forgiveness, such as Public Service Loan Forgiveness (or PSLF) and Teacher Loan Forgiveness, should remain tax-free federally as it is always has been, barring any separate legislation by Congress. Most states will mirror the federal tax treatment of student loan forgiveness, but not all.
Separately last month, the House Education and Workforce Committee unveiled reconciliation-related legislation that would reshape the federal student loan system. If enacted, the bill would repeal several existing income-driven repayment plans and push out student loan forgiveness thresholds to 30 years for many borrowers, while cutting off loan forgiveness entirely for others. The bill would also impose new restrictions on PSLF, and limit pathways to relief for borrowers whose school closed or engaged in misconduct.
The Department of Education also initiated involuntary collections efforts against defaulted federal student loan borrowers last week, putting many at risk of wage garnishment and federal benefits offset. Some borrowers could be trapped in default as a result, with traditional student loan forgiveness pathways cut off. The Student Borrower Protection Center characterized the resumption of collections actions against borrowers in default as "cruel, unnecessary, and will further fan the flames of economic chaos for working families across this country.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No Pipeline, No Progress: Meeting The Demand For Advanced Degrees
No Pipeline, No Progress: Meeting The Demand For Advanced Degrees

Forbes

time8 minutes ago

  • Forbes

No Pipeline, No Progress: Meeting The Demand For Advanced Degrees

As demand for master's and doctoral degrees surges, too few programs exist to support the students most often excluded—despite their potential. The United States stands at a crossroads. While innovation, competitiveness, and global leadership increasingly depend on highly educated workers, access to graduate education remains deeply unequal and underfunded. Over 60% of business and government leaders hold graduate degrees—with more than half in business and nearly a third in law. A 2020 report by Brint and colleagues found that 61% of top media figures and 78% of think tank and foundation leaders also held advanced degrees. In many leadership roles, graduate education is no longer a competitive advantage—it's a requirement. Demand is rising. A 2024 report from Georgetown University's Center on Education and the Workforce projects that nearly 1 in 5 jobs will soon require an advanced degree. Among 'good jobs'—those offering middle-class wages of $43,000 or more—1 in 4 will demand graduate credentials. Yet access to graduate education remains deeply inequitable. Madeline Brighouse Glueck finds that parental education still shapes graduate enrollment, especially in high-investment, high-return programs like law, medicine, and PhDs. In medicine alone, over 75% of students come from the top two income quintiles. Even academically qualified first-generation and low-income students are often left behind. While families with financial and social capital can navigate elite admissions and cover soaring costs, others are shut out. The only federally funded graduate pipeline program is the McNair Scholars Program, which supports first-generation, low-income, and underrepresented undergraduates seeking PhDs. This program—and others like Upward Bound—are now at risk of being defunded. As the federal government grows increasingly hostile toward identity-based programs in higher education, the burden of promoting equitable access is falling to the private sector and nonprofit organizations. Yet only a handful of national nonprofits directly focus on this issue: These organizations are doing powerful work—but their combined reach can only serve a fraction of the students who deserve access. To meet the moment, coordinated investments are needed—not just in graduate preparation, but also in affordability, mentorship, and long-term support: Graduate education is not a luxury—it is a national imperative. If we want to lead in science, health, law, and business—and if we believe in opportunity—we must invest in the people who will lead those fields. Let's ensure that talent, not zip code or family background, determines who has a seat at the table. Change can't wait. The time to invest is now. —--------- Help us widen the pipeline. Support Leadership Brainery in creating equitable pathways to graduate education. Donate today!

The Cheapest Pickup Trucks You Can Buy in 2025 Aren't All Small
The Cheapest Pickup Trucks You Can Buy in 2025 Aren't All Small

Motor Trend

time10 minutes ago

  • Motor Trend

The Cheapest Pickup Trucks You Can Buy in 2025 Aren't All Small

Almost across the board, pickup truck prices are creeping upward. Most of this is due to inflation (and more recently, tariffs), but formerly cheap trucks like the new generation Toyota Tacoma are going somewhat upmarket, while the price creep affecting the cheapest pickups like the Ford Maverick appears to be due to automakers capitalizing on unexpected success and, again, more recently, responding to tariffs. (The Maverick, like some other trucks on this list, is assembled outside of the U.S., which raises price pressure compared to home built options.) For now, the cheapest work trucks you can buy can still be had for under $40,000, but you don't need us to tell you that the versions of the most common full-size trucks most consumers buy are in the $50,000 to $60,000 range. Of course, the base price isn't the only metric by which to measure a truck, but it's an important one. If you want to explore other ways pickup trucks stack up against each other, MotorTrend 's proprietary algorithm provides the ultimate source of automotive data by combining over 75 years of our own instrumented performance, comfort, and efficiency testing on more than 5,000 vehicles. That data is fused with decades of expertise from former heads of design, engineering, and our own car buying experience experts. Built by statisticians and honed by automotive experts, MotorTrend 's Ultimate Car Rankings will assist in finding your perfect vehicle. But, you came here for cheap trucks, and here they are, the cheapest trucks you can buy in 2025:

NCLA Asks Sixth Circuit to Revive Suit Over Dept. of Education's Illegal Student Loan Payment Pause
NCLA Asks Sixth Circuit to Revive Suit Over Dept. of Education's Illegal Student Loan Payment Pause

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NCLA Asks Sixth Circuit to Revive Suit Over Dept. of Education's Illegal Student Loan Payment Pause

Mackinac Center for Public Policy v. U.S. Department of Education; Sec'y of Education Linda McMahon, in her official capacity; and James Bergeron, Chief Operating Officer of Federal Student Aid, in his official capacity Washington, DC, June 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The New Civil Liberties Alliance filed an opening brief today asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to reverse a district court's dismissal, for lack of standing, of our Mackinac Center for Public Policy v. Dept. of Education lawsuit against the Department's unlawfully forgiving 35 months of interest on student loans. Without any statutory authority, the Department extended Congress's original six-month interest forgiveness and payment suspension for nearly three more years, cancelling debt in violation of the Constitution's Appropriations Clause at a cost of at least $175 billion to taxpayers, harming the Mackinac Center in the process. This scheme injures public-service employers like Mackinac by reducing the financial incentives for (potential) employees to participate in the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program. The Sixth Circuit should decide Mackinac does have standing and require the district court to hear the case on the merits against the Department's unlawful policy. Established by Congress, the PSLF program allows employees to have their student-loan debt forgiven after ten years of work with one or more public-service employers. When the Department excused debtors from paying interest on their loans, it decreased—dollar for dollar—the wage subsidy the program promised to public-service employers like the Mackinac Center, making it more expensive for them to keep compensating their PSLF employees at the same level. The economic harm caused by the Department's unlawfully excusing student-loan debtors from honoring their obligations is enough, on its own, to require the government to answer for its actions in court. But in addition to that, the Department's lawless decisions also skewed the labor market in a way that frustrates the congressionally-designed PSLF program, increases the cost for the Mackinac Center to compete for college-educated employees, and costs taxpayers billions. The Department caused these injuries, and now the Court of Appeals should make sure it must answer for them. NCLA released the following statements: 'Governmental agencies cannot blithely ignore the law without expecting to answer for the harm their unlawful actions cause organizations like the Mackinac Center. We trust the Court of Appeals will make that clear to the Department of Education.'— Daniel Kelly, Senior Litigation Counsel, NCLA 'The Department of Education under Secretary McMahon should settle this case. What possible reason does it have to keep defending the lawless regime instituted by former Secretary Miguel Cardona and Richard Cordray to forgive student-loan debt—or in this case interest on that debt—without authority from Congress?'— Mark Chenoweth, President, NCLA For more information visit the case page here. ABOUT NCLA NCLA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group founded by prominent legal scholar Philip Hamburger to protect constitutional freedoms from violations by the Administrative State. NCLA's public-interest litigation and other pro bono advocacy strive to tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies and to foster a new civil liberties movement that will help restore Americans' fundamental rights. ### CONTACT: Joe Martyak New Civil Liberties Alliance 703-403-1111 in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store