logo
Assisted dying: What happens next?

Assisted dying: What happens next?

Times5 hours ago

Friday's Commons vote on assisted dying takes Britain one step closer to a historic change in the law that would allow terminally ill patients to end their lives at a time of their choosing.
But the legislation is still some way from entering the statute book and further still from coming into effect.
So what are the key hurdles that those supporting the move have to cross, what are the questions that remain and when is likely to come into effect?
The next stage for the legislation is the House of Lords, which will begin detailed consideration of the bill in the autumn.
The first stage will be the second reading where, unlike the Commons, there is not usually a vote and the bill is expected to pass to committee stage.
And here opponents of the bill have a dilemma. One option would be to flood the committee with amendments and demand that they are all considered individually rather than being grouped together, which is normal practice. This would ensure that the bill — which can only be debated on Fridays — runs out of time and falls when the current parliamentary session ends at some point in late spring next year.
• Assisted dying latest: MPs vote in favour of passing bill
However, it would not stop another MP from bringing back an identical version of the bill at the start of the next session and trying again.
The other option is not to try and kill off the bill but to use the Lords process to revise it and strengthen the safeguards within it. An opponent pointed out that only 12 of 133 amendments tabled to legislation came to a vote of all MPs, and argued that the Lords should scrutinise the legislation in a way that the Commons cannot, without killing it entirely.
Much will depend on the balance of views among those who have concerns about the legislation and whether they remain united. However, there is no way for supporters to force the bill through the Lords if opponents decide to sabotage it.
Ping pong is the process where a bill moves back and forth between the House of Commons and the House of Lords as they try to agree on amendments to the legislation. But private member's bills have limited time allotted to them — especially in the Commons — and if ping pong extends beyond the time available the bill falls.
Having tacitly supported the right of MPs to decide on the issue — by bringing forward the bill early in the session and allocating it government-controlled time — ministers might be expected to ensure that the bill does not fall at this last hurdle. But that decision may depend on what the final legislation looks like.
Wes Streeting, the health secretary, opposes assisted dying. But his department will be the one responsible for delivering it. Details of what this will look like remain vague, but in the next few months health officials will have to come up with a plan for helping NHS patients to die.
Rather than a dedicated NHS dying service, it is likely that separate assisted dying clinics would be set up by charities and organisations, which would then receive funding and contracts from the Department of Health and Social Care. This would mirror the system created after the Abortion Act 1967, with clinics run by charities such as MSI Reproductive Choices (formerly Marie Stopes) licensed to perform abortions.
The legislation has huge implications for the already stretched NHS workforce: hundreds of doctors and nurses will have to be trained and recruited to work in the new clinics. The Royal College of Psychiatrists has warned that 'there are not enough psychiatrists to do what the bill asks'.
There is an 'opt-out clause', which means no NHS staff or health professionals will be under any obligation to take part in the process of assisted dying. Professor Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer, has warned that only a minority of doctors will be 'happy to take part in the final stages'. New medical guidelines will also have to be issued to help doctors rule on when patients have less than six months to live — something that is notoriously difficult.
Even if the bill does become law, it will still be some years before terminally ill patients will be able to use it. The legislation makes clear that its provisions will not come into effect before 2029 at the earliest to give time for the health service to adapt to the changes and ensure robust legal safeguards are in place.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Assisted dying bill: How both sides of debate reacted to historic vote
Assisted dying bill: How both sides of debate reacted to historic vote

Sky News

time27 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Assisted dying bill: How both sides of debate reacted to historic vote

People on both sides of the assisted dying debate have told Sky News how they feel about the outcome of today's vote – and while some are popping open champagne, others are "incredibly disappointed". More than 300 MPs this afternoon backed a bill that gives people in England and Wales who have less than six months to live the right to apply for an assisted death. Each request will be evaluated by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Today's historic vote means the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will now go to the House of Lords for further scrutiny before becoming law. Following the landmark vote, individuals for and against it have shared their feelings on the result. Frank Tate-Sutton - For 6:04 Frank Tate-Sutton is terminally ill and told Sky News she's relieved the bill has passed, even though the law won't be changed in time for her. "These are happy tears," she said. "I am emotional. It's a very difficult subject for everybody." Ms Tate-Sutton said her quality of life is "very important - and I'm losing it". "I don't want to die without dignity, without it being my choice, without my family knowing that this is what I want," she continued. "As much as they [my family] want me alive, do they want to see me lying in my living room in a hospital bed, taking all these drugs, not being able to talk, not being able to control my bodily functions? "That is not a life, for me - living on all the medications and not being able to exist without that… the side effects and everything." Mike Smith - Against 5:20 Mike Smith is a spokesperson for the disability rights group Not Dead Yet - and he has been left "incredibly disappointed" by the outcome of the vote. "This particular bill had so many failings in the way safeguards are constructed and the significant scope for coercion, whether it's overt or subliminal," he said. Mr Smith says he fears some people will "end up ending their lives earlier than they should do or want to". "There are so many disabled people around the country that have told us they're absolutely scared." "I think it's this inherent fear people have about being disabled that drives this very emotional response on this really complex topic," he explained. "What we know is, with good palliative care, social care, access to housing and an income, many disabled people ... can lead amazing lives." 6:48 Rebecca Wilcox and her TV presenter mother Dame Esther Rantzen, who has terminal cancer, have long been campaigning for a change to the UK's law on assisted dying. Speaking from Parliament Square as fellow supporters of the bill popped champagne behind her, Ms Wilcox described today's vote as "an extraordinary moment". "It means so much to me," she said. "I spoke to mum and her one word to describe it was 'wow'. "She didn't think she was going to live to see the debate, let alone a conclusion that went our way." In response to concerns about safeguarding, she said it will "bring in layer upon layer of safeguards". "We're going to have scrutiny upon scrutiny for every case and at the moment, there is no scrutiny," she said. "Coercion could be happening as we speak. "There is now protection for vulnerable people, by having this bill passed." Dr Gordon Macdonald - Against Dr Macdonald said the bill passing with a majority of 23 - less than half what its second reading achieved - is proof that "the more people have thought about this issue, the more they've had doubts". The doctor, who is the CEO of anti-euthanasia organisation Care not Killing, said: "We will see what happens when it gets to the [House of] Lords, the Lords will hopefully give it more rigorous scrutiny than happened in the Commons". His biggest concern is "for people who are vulnerable, who will feel pressure to end their lives". "That might come from external forces, but it's more likely to just be internalised pressure," Dr Macdonald said. "They'll feel they're a burden on their family and friends, conscious of the cost of care, and think they should do the decent thing, as they would see it in that thinking." It's "of course a terrible message for society to send out to people," he said.

Some refuse workers will lose money
Some refuse workers will lose money

BBC News

time30 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Some refuse workers will lose money

The leader of Birmingham City Council has admitted for the first time some refuse workers will lose money under plans to reform the workers who are members of Unite the Union have been in a stand-off with the Labour-run council over proposed changes to roles and pay, since January. In an exclusive interview with the BBC, council leader John Cotton said he "absolutely understood" there would be "implications for individuals", but the authority had to "implement job evaluation fairly across the council". Unite claims 170 workers face an annual pay cut of £8,000, but the authority has said only 17 members of staff lose up to £6,000 - something Cotton had not acknowledged publicly. Cotton stressed that the council continued to negotiate with Unite in order to find a "reasonable settlement" to "reflect the workforce's concerns".He denied claims from Unite that the deal to end the dispute had been "watered down" and said the authority had provided a "fair and reasonable offer", which was being discussed by arbitration body Acas. All-out strike action in the city began on 11 March and rubbish has continued to pile up on streets, but securing a legal injunction in May enabled more bin lorries to to be brought in to clear the mountains of bin bags."Regarding the city as a whole, since we secure the injunction and have been able to deploy our available fleet we have collected 33,498 tonnes and average 1,288 per day which includes weekends," a spokesperson for the city council said."We have cleared the backlog so are now able to continue to implement our contingency plan, providing residents with one collection each week." 'Avoid repeating mistakes' The leader of the Labour-run authority described the situation as "incredibly frustrating" and said it continued to urge Unite to accept the offer it had placed on the table. "This strike needs to end so we can carry on with transforming the waste service and ensuring everyone gets the services they're entitled to," Cotton the council leader added that he had "set some straight red lines" to avoid "repeating some of the mistakes that happened in the past"."We have had to take a look at the grading of the driver roles, that is part of the process we have signed up to together with the trade unions, it is a recognised methodology for evaluating jobs."He said a negotiated settlement was "in everyone's interest" and it would allow the council to "get back to the business of improving the waste service in the city". Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

Trump's credibility gap and why Iran may want to take its chances in Israel conflict
Trump's credibility gap and why Iran may want to take its chances in Israel conflict

Sky News

time35 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Trump's credibility gap and why Iran may want to take its chances in Israel conflict

After hours of talks, the ayatollah's chief diplomat emerged giving little away. All eyes were on Abbas Aragchi. Would he give ground in the face of Israel's fierce bombardment of his country? Yes, but only if Israel stops that bombardment which is not going to happen. Especially after a day when two of Israel's big cities suffered direct hits from Iranian missiles. The best that can be said for almost four hours of talks, is they happened and might again. There were no breakthroughs to report, no ground shifting on either side. The talks were flawed in concept from the beginning. The countries meeting Aragchi here are not involved in the conflict. Israel and America were absent. The US did send a message, via Britain's foreign secretary David Lammy. We want to talk but we're serious about getting involved with military force if you do not. But the UK was delivering an American ultimatum and threat of force it does not itself believe to be a good idea. Britain and its European partners want de-escalation and oppose any idea of Donald Trump and his military getting involved. Iran is embattled, beleaguered and bombarded. But if its government is worried, its calm and collected foreign minister was showing none of it. The Iranians know Trump may send in the bombers and bunker busters within two weeks, but do they believe him? The president for whom they coined the acronym 'Trump Always Chickens Out' has a credibility gap. And if he takes action that leads to a chain of events where Americans end up dying, he will be crucified for it by his own MAGA movement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store