Snoop Dogg addresses uproar over Trump Crypto Ball inauguration performance
Snoop Dogg appears to have responded to the backlash he received after performing at the Crypto Ball, which celebrated the election of US president Donald Trump.
The rapper born Calvin Cordozar Broadus Jr was filmed performing his classic hit 'Nuthin' But a G Thang' at the party hosted by David Sacks, former PayPal COO and newly appointed White House AI and crypto czar.
Many of Snoop's fans were appalled at his decision to appear, accusing him of selling out and claiming they would no longer listen to his music.
Snoop, 53, had previously been a vocal critic of Trump but appeared to switch allegiances last year, offering him public praise and declaring he had 'only done great things' for him.
In the wake of the controversy, Snoop shared a video to Instagram in which he was seen smoking and enjoying 'Ain't No Need to Worry' by US gospel group The Winans in his car.
'Y'all can't hate enough, I love too much,' he said. 'Get your life right, stop worrying about mine. I'm cool, I'm together. Still a Black man. Still 100 per cent Black. All out, 'til you ball out, or 'til you fall out.'
He added: 'I ain't going nowhere, I'm right here,' before telling his followers to 'get the crypto'.
Organisers of the crypto ball reportedly hailed Trump as 'the first crypto president' on an invitation that circulated on social media.
To rub shoulders with tech and cryptocurrency tycoons at the black-tie event, which was held in Washington DC, guests had to spend between $2,500 (£2,010) and $5,000 (£4,021) for tickets.
Enjoy unlimited access to 100 million ad-free songs and podcasts with Amazon Music
Sign up now for a 4 month free trial (3 months for non-Prime members)
Sign up
Trump himself did not attend, but pitched himself as a pro-crypto currency candidate for his 2024 campaign despite having previously dismissed bitcoin as 'a scam against the dollar' during his first term as president.
While fellow rappers Soulja Boy and Rick Ross also performed at the Crypto Ball, Snoop's attendance was particularly glaring as he had previously stoked controversy with his stance against Trump.
In 2017, he sparked outrage by pretending to shoot a clown resembling the then-president in his remix of the BadBadNotGood song 'Lavender'.
He referenced him again in his track 'MACA (Make America Crip Again)' that same year, rapping: 'The president say he want to Make America Great Again, f*** that s***.'
In another video, posted in 2018, he said 'f*** the president' while smoking a blunt outside the White House.
However, in a January 2024 interview, he stated that he had 'nothing but love and respect' for Trump after his pardoning of Michael Harris, the founder of Snoop's first label, Death Row Records, who was in prison for drug offences.
Later on in the video, Snoop remarked: 'We gotta learn to big each other up instead of putting each other down.
'That's what we're great at as Black people, we great at tearing each other down… But I'm a strong Black man, I'm cut from a different cloth. You can't tear me down, I'm one of God's children.'
Many of his followers seemed unimpressed, with some commenting 'sell out' or 'lost all respect'.
'Snoop you disappointed us,' another fan wrote. 'We been riding with you since we were kids. This one hurts for real.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
21 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Israel ‘killed top Iranian general' as Trump warns people to flee Iran's capital
Mr Trump left the G7 summit in Canada a day early to deal with the conflict between Israel and Iran, telling reporters on Air Force One during the flight back to Washington DC: 'I'm not looking at a ceasefire. We're looking at better than a ceasefire.' When asked to explain, he said the US wanted to see 'a real end' to the conflict that could involve Iran 'giving up entirely'. He added: 'I'm not too much in the mood to negotiate.' Later, he warned Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that the US knows where he is hiding and called for Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER'. Mr Trump's hard line added to the uncertainty roiling the region on the fifth day of Israel's air campaign aimed at Iran's military and nuclear programme. Residents of Tehran fled their homes in droves, and the UN nuclear watchdog for the first time said Israeli strikes on Iran's main enrichment facility at Natanz had also damaged its main underground section, not just an above-ground facility, as previously acknowledged. Israel says its sweeping assault on Iran's military leaders, nuclear scientists, uranium enrichment sites and ballistic missile programme is necessary to prevent its adversary from getting any closer to building an atomic weapon. The strikes have killed at least 224 people in Iran. Iran has retaliated by launching some 400 missiles and hundreds of drones at Israel. So far, 24 people have been killed in Israel. – Israel targets more Iranian leaders The Israeli military claimed to have killed another top Iranian general in a strike on Tehran. Iran did not immediately comment on the reported killing of General Ali Shadmani, whom Israel described as the most senior military commander in Iran. General Shadmani was little-known in the country before being appointed last week to a chief-of-staff-like role as head of the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard's Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters. That appointment followed the killing of his predecessor, General Gholam Ali Rashid, in an Israeli strike. The Israeli military warned the population to stay close to shelters as Iran fired new salvos of missiles, but officials said most were intercepted. Sirens blared in southern Israel, including in the desert town of Dimona, the heart of Israel's never-acknowledged nuclear arms programme. Iran has fired fewer missiles in each of its barrages, with just a handful launched late on Tuesday. It has not explained the drop in missiles fired, but the decline comes after Israel targeted many Iranian launchers. Meanwhile, Iran's state-run IRNA news agency reported Israeli airstrikes around the city of Isfahan, with air defences also firing. A series of explosions and anti-aircraft fire boomed throughout Tehran just before 6.30pm. – Shops closed, lines for gas in Iran's capital Echoing an earlier Israeli military call for some 330,000 residents of a neighbourhood in downtown Tehran to evacuate, Mr Trump warned on social media that 'everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran'. Tehran is one of the largest cities in the Middle East, with around 10 million people, roughly equivalent to the entire population of Israel. People have been fleeing since hostilities began. Asked why he had urged the evacuation of Tehran, Mr Trump said: 'I just want people to be safe.' Downtown Tehran emptied out early on Tuesday, with many shops shuttered, even the ancient Grand Bazaar, which has closed only in times of crisis, such as during the 2022 anti-government protests and the coronavirus pandemic. On the roads out of Tehran to the west, traffic stood bumper to bumper. Many middle- and upper-class Iranians were headed to the Caspian Sea, a popular getaway spot. Long lines snaked from Tehran's gas stations. Across the city, billboards called for a 'severe' response to Israeli strikes. – Signs that Iran is restricting access to outside world Iranian authorities appeared to be curbing the public's access to the outside world. Phone and internet service appeared disrupted, with landline phones unable to receive or dial international calls. NetBlocks, an internet monitoring group, reported that it had detected a significant drop in internet traffic from the country. Iran, which has crippled important communications tools in past nationwide protests and during the 1980s Iran-Iraq war, did not acknowledge any restrictions. International websites appeared to be blocked, but local websites were functioning, likely signalling that Iran had turned on the so-called 'halal net', its own locally controlled version of the internet aimed at restricting what the public can see. In another sign of restricted access, Iran's state TV on Tuesday urged the public to remove the messaging app WhatsApp from their mobile phones, alleging without evidence that the app gathered user information to send to Israel. In a statement, WhatsApp said it was concerned that 'these false reports will be an excuse for our services to be blocked at a time when people need them the most'.
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Instead of ending wars, ‘America First' is being dragged into more of them
It is difficult to discern exactly what the 'big stuff' is that prompted President Trump to leave the G7 summit and return to Washington a day early. Mr Trump wouldn't say what, precisely, but he did advise the 9 million residents of Tehran to 'immediately evacuate' their homes, causing mass panic. Any lingering hopes that the president was going back to the White House to work full time on a ceasefire were extinguished when Mr Trump declared that suggestions to that effect made by the president of France were mistaken: 'I'm not looking for a ceasefire, we're looking at better than a ceasefire.' What the president does want, in his words, is 'an end, a real end, not a ceasefire,' and a 'complete give-up' by Iran. At the same time, though, the president told the world that he had not contacted the Iranians to engage in peace talks in any 'way, shape, or form' because they 'should have taken the deal that was on the table'. Given that many American diplomats have left the region – and the USS Nimitz and its carrier strike group are transferring from the Pacific – it seems plain that the US government is at least contemplating how force (or the threat of it) might have to become necessary to pursue American strategic objectives. President Trump has long been perfectly clear about what one of those prime objectives is: Iran 'just can't have a nuclear weapon'. On that point, at least, he has the backing of his allies, endorsed in the G7 communique, which added that Iran is a 'source of terror'. As is his style, weeks ago he tried a bold – if unlikely – diplomatic initiative to strike a deal, with direct talks in Rome between American and Iranian officials. These were stalling even before Israel started its bombardment of Iran's labs, uranium enrichment facilities and other targets – and the US-Iran talks have since broken down. Yet even now, there is speculation that – pressured by Israel's actions and backed with a major US naval taskforce heading towards the Persian Gulf – Mr Trump may try to use this opportunity to achieve a breakthrough deal. Asked by reporters if he might dispatch his vice-president, JD Vance, and roaming negotiator Steve Witkoff to Iran for this purpose, Mr Trump did not rule it out. 'Peace through strength' is a slogan that the president frequently uses, but thus far in his presidency, it has seldom worked out in practice. This time, the world must hope, will be different. If diplomacy fails? Mr Trump could simply allow Israel to continue its efforts to eliminate Iran's nuclear capabilities, such as they are, and to so destabilise the theocratic regime that it is overthrown by the Iranian people. Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, has made no secret of his wish for 'regime change', addressing the 'Persian' people directly and having his photograph taken with the exiled son of the last shah of Iran, who was toppled by the ayatollahs in the revolution of 1979. Subcontracting the task of disarming Iran and persuading the people of Iran to replace their government with a more palatable, peace-loving alternative, all without any direct US involvement, must have some attractions for American foreign policy (though Mr Trump reportedly vetoed an assassination attempt on the supreme leader of Iran). That carries significant risks, however, which will be apparent to the defence, security and state department officials briefing Mr Trump. For some weeks, Israel has used the George W Bush playbook as applied in the last Gulf war to justify its attacks in Iran – a pre-emptive military strike to remove the threat of weapons of mass destruction, and, as the Americans did with Saddam Hussein, offering regime change as an alternative to destruction and defeat. A similar ultimatum is now being issued by Mr Trump, with Israeli backing – give up your nukes and you can stay in power. If not... But the world knows how that Iraqi story ended – a fractured country that fell into civil war and the rule of Isis, an even more murderous and dangerous entity than the Baathists. The collapse of Iran into chaos and civil war would be a far greater disaster for the world than anything that has happened in Iraq, Libya, Syria or Afghanistan in terms of the consequences for turning a stable (if malign) state into a failed one. Iran is in another league of military and political importance. If there was fighting for control of Iran – and the ayatollahs cannot be expected to meekly slink away to their holy places – then that would soon spread to Yemen, and restart the horrific proxy war there with Saudi Arabia. Russia remains Iran's friend and ally, and relies on its Shahed drones that proved so effective in Ukraine. What would Vladimir Putin do to protect his interests? If America intervenes, or acquiesces in Israel's escalating campaign, the regional conflagration so long feared between Israel and Iran would not remain a private dispute between the two regional superpowers of Israel and Iran, not least because Tehran's client terrorists in Hezbollah, the Houthi rebels and, above all, Hamas will continue to be involved. The more nations and groups become involved, the more unpredictable events will become, and the harder it will be for America to control them. Instead of ending far-away wars, this 'America First' is being dragged into more of them. That's very much 'big stuff' – and big risks.
North Wales Chronicle
33 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Healey defends Chagos Islands deal as ‘vital' to UK's long-term interests
The Defence Secretary was asked about the upsides of 'giving away the Chagos Islands' as he spoke at the Royal United Services Institute's (Rusi) land warfare conference in central London. Under the terms of the deal, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. The joint UK-US base on Diego Garcia is seen as vital for western influence in the Indian Ocean, and is also home to important military and intelligence infrastructure. Britain is ceding control of the archipelago to Mauritius, after the International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion on the UK's territorial claim in 2019 saying it should do so. A £40 million fund has also been established for the Chagossians, who were expelled from the islands between 1965 and 1973 to make way for the Diego Garcia base and have not been allowed to return. Asked by an audience member at the Rusi conference to set out the benefits of the deal, Mr Healey said: 'I mean, that's a description which is completely wrong. 'What we've done is to recognise that there were moves and jeopardy to our ability to continue to operate that sovereign base in an entirely sovereign way, jointly with the US.' He listed the Trump administration, the UN, and Britain's Five Eyes intelligence allies among those who backed the deal. Mr Healey added: 'This is the way that we secure our vital military and intelligence interests for the long-term, and this is the way that we secure what is perhaps the most important single contribution to that special relationship in defence and security and intelligence that we have in the US.' 'Did we have to do it?' the same audience member could be heard to ask. 'Yes,' Mr Healey replied. As he spoke at the conference, Mr Healey also announced the Government was investing £100 million in 'new initial funding to develop land drone swarms'. The swarms will fly alongside Apache helicopters to offer support in battle, Mr Healey said, as part of the UK's efforts to learn from Ukraine on drone warfare.
