logo
Meet man who owns world's biggest house, 7000 cars, private jets, his name is...., now in news due to....

Meet man who owns world's biggest house, 7000 cars, private jets, his name is...., now in news due to....

India.com28-05-2025

Meet man who owns world's biggest house, 7000 cars, private jets, his name is...., now in news due to....
Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah of Brunei has been admitted to a hospital in Kuala Lumpur after complaining of fatigue. At 78, he holds the record as the world's longest-serving living monarch and is also among the wealthiest individuals globally. Sultan Hassanal became the ruler of Brunei in 1967 when he was just 21 years old. He comes from a royal family that has led the nation for over six centuries. Despite his age, he remains deeply involved in running the country, holding key roles such as Prime Minister, Finance Minister, Defense Minister, and Foreign Affairs Minister. In addition, he serves as the Commander-in-Chief of the military and oversees the national police.
During his long reign, Brunei gained independence from British rule in 1984 and rose to become one of the world's richest nations, thanks to its oil wealth. While he no longer holds the title of the richest person in the world, the Sultan still ranks among the wealthiest. Tales of wealth and style
Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah of Brunei is known not just for his long rule but also for his extravagant lifestyle. His lavish wealth has made headlines around the world. According to the Guinness World Records, his official residence, Istana Nurul Iman, is the largest residential palace in the world. The Sultan is also believed to own the biggest private car collection globally, with over 7,000 luxury vehicles valued at more than USD 5 billion.
In the 1980s and 1990s, the Sultan and his younger brother, Prince Jeffrey Bolkiah, were also famous for hosting extravagant parties. These events were known for their opulence, with reports suggesting millions of dollars were spent to bring international celebrities like Michael Jackson to perform. Surrounded by controversies
Despite his immense wealth and status, Sultan Hassanal's reign has not been without controversy. His decision to implement strict Islamic laws in Brunei sparked international criticism. In 2019, Brunei became the first country in Southeast Asia to fully enforce Sharia law nationwide, including punishments such as death by stoning for certain offenses. These laws drew sharp backlash from human rights groups and global leaders.
Another major controversy involved a high-profile family dispute in the 1990s. The Sultan and Prince Jeffrey were embroiled in a legal battle over the alleged misappropriation of USD 15 billion during Prince Jeffrey's time as the country's Finance Minister. The scandal damaged the reputation of Brunei's royal family and drew global media attention.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Putin vowed strong retaliation for Ukraine's drone attack
Trump says Putin vowed strong retaliation for Ukraine's drone attack

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Trump says Putin vowed strong retaliation for Ukraine's drone attack

US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin had warned him during a phone call that Moscow would respond to recent drone attacks by Ukraine. Trump revealed that the two leaders discussed the situation during a call that lasted over an hour. 'We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides,' Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. He added, 'President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.' Trump described the conversation as 'a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace.' Russia warns of military response Earlier in the day, the Kremlin indicated that it was considering military options in response to Ukrainian operations deep inside Russian territory. Russian officials also accused the West of playing a role in the attacks. Moscow urged both the United States and the United Kingdom to rein in Kyiv following these incidents, which Ukrainian officials have praised as signs of their continued resistance, even after more than three years of conflict. British and American officials, however, stated they had no prior knowledge of the recent drone strikes, which targeted Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers. Iran's nuclear programme also discussed Trump said his conversation with Putin also included discussions about Iran and its nuclear ambitions. 'I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement,' Trump wrote. He added that Putin had shown interest in engaging in talks aimed at reaching a new nuclear agreement with Tehran. 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion,' Trump wrote. He criticised Iran for delaying key decisions, stating, 'It is my opinion that Iran has been slowwalking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!'

Trump proposes $1,000 fast-track fee for US tourist visa interviews
Trump proposes $1,000 fast-track fee for US tourist visa interviews

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Trump proposes $1,000 fast-track fee for US tourist visa interviews

Pay USD 1,000 to skip the visa line? That could soon be a reality for tourists and business travelers under a Trump administration plan, making immigration feel more like airline a plan flagged in an internal State Department memo and confirmed by a US official, the Trump administration is weighing a USD 1,000 premium processing fee for non-immigrant visa applicants including tourists, seeking expedited interview entering the US on tourist and other non-immigrant visas already pay a $185 processing fee. The new USD 1,000 option the US is considering would be a premium service that allows some people to jump to the front of the line for visa interviews. The memo, obtained by Reuters, says the fast-track plan could be piloted as early as December. The internal memo also outlines legal concerns from the State Department's own lawyers, warning of 'high risk' that the plan would be rejected by the White House budget office or struck down in court.'Setting a fee above the cost to provide the service is contrary to settled Supreme Court precedent,' the legal review cautioned, casting doubt on the viability of a program that could be seen as turning government services into pay-to-play proposed fee for visa appointments, which has not been previously reported, comes alongside President Donald Trump's vision of a 'gold card' that would sell US citizenship for USD 5 million, granting faster access to those willing to pay.A State Department spokesperson declined to address the memo directly, saying only: 'The department's scheduling of non-immigrant visa interview appointments is dynamic and we are continually working to improve our operations worldwide.'Since returning to office on January 20, President Trump has moved fast to reshape immigration policy — rescinding some student visas, expanding vetting protocols, and now, potentially monetizing speed in the visa State Department issued 10.4 million non-immigrant visas in fiscal year 2023, including 5.9 million tourist visas, according to the agency's most recent annual report.(With inputs from Reuters)Tune InTrending Reel

We were up against Pak propaganda but armed with satellite images, proof, says Vadodara MP who was part of all-party delegation
We were up against Pak propaganda but armed with satellite images, proof, says Vadodara MP who was part of all-party delegation

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

We were up against Pak propaganda but armed with satellite images, proof, says Vadodara MP who was part of all-party delegation

Vadodara BJP MP Hemang Joshi, who was part of an all-party delegation that travelled to Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore to convey India's position on the April 22 Pahalgam attack and the subsequent Operation Sindoor, on Wednesday said that the delegation was faced with questions related to nuclear power, referendum in Kashmir, besides 'indirect attempts' by Pakistan to derail India's diplomatic mission. Which countries did your delegation travel to and whom did you meet? We first travelled to Japan and, thereafter, to South Korea, Singapore, Indonesia and Malaysia. In South Korea, we were in a bit of a tricky situation as the country was in election mode. We went with a briefing of the Indian Embassy that had indicated imminent change of power. We met the then incumbent government as well as the party that is the incoming government, as per the results declared just a day ago. Since South Korea is a strategic business country, we met business leaders such as Hyundai. Which of these countries were the most receptive to India's message on Operation Sindoor? Japan and South Korea. In South Korea, the shared sentiment is that due to their conflict with North Korea, they also understand the anguish of also had extremely enriching interactions in Singapore and Indonesia. Incidentally, the mastermind of Pahalgam attacks, Saifullah Kasuri of The Resistance Front, which has claimed responsibility, was seen at a victory rally in Pakistan during our visit to one of the countries. He was flanked by a Pakistan Cabinet Minister as well as the speaker of Punjab province. In the rally, he even said that the Pahalgam attack has made the TRF famous… It was another example to drive our point that Pakistan's proxy war against India is terror as it cannot overtake us on development and progress. Even the GDP of Tamil Nadu is more than that of Pakistan. Which was the trickiest part of the tour? In Malaysia, we learnt that Pakistan tried to derail our appointments through indirect influence. We learnt through insiders that Pakistan actively tried to sabotage our meetings with the think tanks in Malaysia and even handed out questionnaires to influencers to pick holes… We learnt that they were playing the card of being a fellow Islamic country. The think tanks in Malaysia…wanted to know who won, whose jets were brought down, and how many air base camps were destroyed in India. The questions were based on narratives spun by Pakistan but because we were armed with proofs, we ruled out the confusion. Later, the Pakistan High Commission in Malaysia also issued a public statement reacting to our visit and claiming that they were victims of terror. Meanwhile, Malaysia officially changed its stand and extended cooperation to India. In Malaysia, we have also given proof of military atrocity in PoK and Balochistan… We said if you need a referendum, it should be in PoK and Balochistan… In Kashmir, since the abrogation of Article 370, tourism has flourished and a democratic system is in place, which even saw a 62% voter turnout in the elections. In South Korea, people condemned terrorism in all forms but the country had been much under the influence of Western narrative thus far, which was a narrative also driven by (defence) commercial interests. How did the delegation arm itself to counter questions from the countries? We were up against the Western narrative and also the constant propaganda of Pakistan. But, we were armed with satellite images as well as previous antecedents where India, despite submitting dossiers and proofs, did not receive any positive response from Pakistan in the form of action against terror. Even when proof was given when Ajmal Kasab was caught alive (after Mumbai 2008 attacks), Pakistan did nothing. There was a lot of propaganda on how much destruction the Pakistani forces had caused to India during the attacks, but we refuted the claims with evidence. Several unilateral narratives of the West were forced to change after we put forth the proofs. That also led Pakistan to dispatch a copy-cat delegation. We also reiterated Prime Minister Narendra Modi's pledge to explain why India has decided to consider all acts of terror as acts of war by Pakistan because it has been using these terror attacks as proxy war. We emphasised that Pakistan should be kept on the grey list of the FATF (Financial Action Task Force). What were the questions of concern raised by the countries? We did not have any specific questions about the terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack but we did detail the action taken under Operation Sindoor. It is pertinent to note that the Pahalgam terror attack was not just an attack in isolation but it was designed with an evil plan to sow hatred across India and fan wider internal conflict between communities, which is why there was an explicit use of religion in the attack. The concerns about nuclear power possessed by both countries was also addressed… We categorically reiterated that India will not bow down to nuclear blackmail. What was the cultural interaction like during the visit to the countries? We visited the Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR) centres in Korea, Malaysia and Japan. We also interacted with the Indian diaspora and I, particularly, interacted with the Gujarati population that will continue to take forward our message. We had some touching interactions in Indonesia, where we met leaders who are Muslims but their names have Hindu roots, such as Agrasen, due to the influence of Indic civilisation. Members of the Nahdlatul-Ulama, which is the prominent Islamic organisation with lot of influence in ruling party, the way Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has in India, told us that they are not ashamed of accepting Indic civilisation roots and for them, Hinduism is a culture more than a religion. They even told us they do not subscribe to terror as part of Islam and extended support to India. What was the experience like sharing the limelight with leaders of other parties? We went as a team from India. We did not feel even one bit that we belong to different parties… We went with one message and we all believed in it. Rahul Gandhi has taken a jibe that a phone call from US President Donald Trump made PM Modi surrender… With his demeaning comments, Rahul Gandhi is not only lowering the morale of the Indian Army but also of all Indians. He is attempting to make a place in the hearts of Pakistani militants and the government by making such ridiculous statements… If he indeed intends to contest in the next polls, he must watch his words.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store