‘Such a disgrace': Outrage as Trump ramps up attacks on Harvard, Columbia
All foreign students have been banned from attending Harvard.
Columbia University may lose its accreditation.
US President Donald Trump ramped up his campaign against top US universities on Wednesday, banning visas for all foreign students coming to attend Harvard and threatening to strip Columbia of its academic accreditation.
Trump is seeking to bring the universities to heel with claims their international students pose a national security threat, and that they ignored antisemitism on campus, and perpetuate liberal bias.
A proclamation issued by the White House late on Wednesday declared that the entrance of international students to begin a course at Harvard would be 'suspended and limited' for six months, and that existing overseas enrollees could have their visas terminated.
READ | Foreign students want to transfer from Harvard over Trump 'fear, concern, and confusion'
'Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers,' said the order.
'I'm trembling. This is outrageous,' Karl Molden, a Harvard government and classics student from Austria, told AFP.
'He is abusing his executive power to harm Harvard as much as he can.'
'My god!' said another international student at Harvard, who declined to be named for fear of retribution, on learning of the executive order.
This is such a disgrace.
Harvard student
The announcement came after the Trump administration's earlier efforts to terminate Harvard's right to enrol and host foreign students were stalled by a judge.
The government already cut around $3.2 billion of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the Cambridge, Massachusetts institution from any future federal funding.
Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and 'viewpoint diversity'.
Trump has also singled out international students at Harvard, who in the 2024-2025 academic year accounted for 27% of total enrolment, and a major source of income.
'This is yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the Administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights,' a university spokesperson said.
'Harvard will continue to protect its international students.'
The latest sweeping action against Harvard came as Trump's education secretary threatened on Wednesday to strip Columbia University of its accreditation.
The Republican has targeted the New York Ivy League institution for allegedly ignoring harassment of Jewish students, throwing all of its federal funding into doubt.
Unlike Harvard, several top institutions - including Columbia - have already bowed to far-reaching demands from the Trump administration, which claims that the educational elite is too left-wing.
But Wednesday's official action suggested it was not enough for Trump.
'Columbia University looked the other way as Jewish students faced harassment,' US Education Secretary Linda McMahon said on X.
She accused the school of breaking rules prohibiting recipients of federal funding from discriminating on the basis of race, colour, or national origin.
'After Hamas' 7 October 2023, terror attack on Israel, Columbia University's leadership acted with deliberate indifference toward the harassment of Jewish students on its campus,' McMahon said in a statement.
'This is not only immoral, but also unlawful.'
In the statement, the US Education Department said its civil rights office had contacted Columbia's accreditation body about the alleged violation.
Withdrawing Columbia's accreditation would see it lose access to all federal funding - a very significant proportion of the university's income.
Students attending the university would also not be able to receive federal grants and loans toward tuition.
Critics accuse the Trump administration of using allegations of antisemitism to target educational elites and bring universities to their knees.
The administration has already put $400 million of Columbia's funding under review, prompting the university in March to announce a package of concessions to the government around defining antisemitism, policing protests and conducting oversight for specific academic departments.
Following Wednesday's announcement, a Columbia spokesperson said the university 'aware of the concerns' raised by the government with its accreditation body.
'We have addressed those concerns directly with Middle States,' the spokesperson said, adding that 'Columbia is deeply committed to combating antisemitism on our campus.'
'We take this issue seriously and are continuing to work with the federal government to address it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I wanted to hyphenate my last names once married. I realized it'd be incredibly offensive.
I always wanted to hyphenate my name when I got married. It turns out that my initials make hyphenating impossible. I still have to be strategic about how I style my name in public. My maiden name is Khorey. Last year, I married a man whose last name is Khanna. A few weeks after the wedding, I was chatting about it with a couple of women from my team at work. "What about your name?" One asked. She was about to get married herself, and these questions were top of mind. "Are you going to hyphenate or what?" "Well, my full first name is actually Katherine with a K," I said, trying to keep it subdued. "So I don't think that would be a good idea." It took a second, and then they got it. My initials would be KK-K. I always planned to hyphenate when I got married Years ago, when this question was hypothetical, hyphenating my name once I was married seemed like the right and only choice. I wanted to keep my last name. Khorey is a spelling unique to my family, and I felt the need to help carry it forward. Khorey represented a lot of family history. It also belonged to me. My grandparents on the Khorey side had married across immigrant groups at a time and place where that was uncommon. Growing up, I often felt my grandmother's Slovak culture got lost in the Syrian family shuffle, to say nothing of my mother's family from a completely different part of the world. Keeping Khorey seemed like a way to keep every person and place I'd come from, and myself as well. At the same time, there was no question that I wanted to adopt my future husband's name as well. That name would represent his history and identity: getting married would merge that with mine. Adopting his name would seal that, signal it to the world, and ensure we always kept him as well. I thought hyphenating would be the best solution. Even if my name and initials turned out to be a little unwieldy, as I wouldn't give up my middle name either, I could accept that tradeoff. Then I grew up and fell in love with someone whose last name also began with "K". At least it's been nice to keep my monogram. Sometimes I have to be strategic with my signature Cassie has been my nickname since birth. Thanks to my parents' preference, it's always been spelled with a "C". By adopting it professionally early in my career, I saved myself a lot of trouble. Now I can freely use the LinkedIn interface to display "Cassie Khanna (Khorey)" on my profile, keeping the recognition I've built as Khorey while making my name change clear and not evoking a founding hate group. I can do the same on my résumé and in other settings where I'm Cassie first. Sometimes, I can't avoid it. I now feel the need to say, "Wow, that's unfortunate," to whoever has to read off my first, maiden, and married names to prove my ID at Walgreens. It's OK, though. People know I didn't do it on purpose. I'm happy with the name I chose I had to make a choice when I got married, and I did. Legally, I changed my name to my husband's, because that was what I wanted to do. It doesn't diminish me; it adds to both of us, just like it added to the women in my family before me, who are not lost now and truly never were. Together, we are a mashup of cultures, races, and religions, almost none of which, incidentally, would be KKK-approved. It's us. It's all of us, with our families, histories, and identities combined. That's what Khanna means today. It will always mean Khorey, too. And that's enough. Read the original article on Business Insider Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Asked for a yes or no on nonprofit transparency, top Maryland Democrats don't answer
BALTIMORE — It should be an easy yes-or-no answer, according to taxpayer advocate David Williams. But when Spotlight on Maryland asked the state's top three Democrats whether they would ensure transparency and accountability as tax dollars flow through nonprofits, none offered a yes or no response. The Baltimore Sun reported last month that neither state budget officials nor individual agencies can say exactly how much state money is flowing to nonprofits each year. That disclosure has led some state officials to call for more oversight. In response, Spotlight on Maryland — a partnership of The Sun, WBFF FOX45 in Baltimore and WJLA in Washington, D.C. — has launched an investigation into how much taxpayer money is allocated to Maryland nonprofits and how those dollars are spent. As part of that reporting, Spotlight on Maryland asked Gov. Wes Moore, House Speaker Adrienne A. Jones and Senate President Bill Ferguson, if they would ensure full transparency and accountability around nonprofit funding. After receiving no response from Ferguson and Jones, Spotlight on Maryland sent a follow-up question to all three, asking if they would assist the investigation in the public interest as journalists follow the money through Maryland nonprofits. Moore, Jones and Ferguson did not respond to the follow-up question. 'This is crazy. It's an easy answer,' said Williams, president of the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, an advocacy group based in Washington, D.C. 'They should all say yes.' Moore, for his part, gave an answer on camera to a Spotlight on Maryland reporter at an unrelated news event in Salisbury last week. 'I think people know and realize that our administration believes in full transparency, that we understand that the things that we are going to support are things that are both sustainable and effective. And when you're looking at the entire budget for the state of Maryland, we are, we are very wise and smart stewards of taxpayer dollars to make sure that the right capital is going to the right usages,' the governor said. When The Sun asked last month whether Ferguson believes taxpayers should have access to a full accounting of how their money is spent and how much of it flows to nonprofits in Maryland, he said: 'All public dollars should be spent wisely and with the utmost care, whether a public agency or a nonprofit uses them. To that end, nonprofits are an important bridge between the state government and the communities they serve. That's why we have a robust audit division of the Department of Legislative Services that has been doing this important oversight work for decades.' As part of its July reporting, The Sun sent inquiries to individual state departments and agencies, asking them to provide the amount of money they allocate to nonprofits. A few offered specific dollar amounts. 'Many nonprofits receive funds directly from agency grant programs, and we don't track that centrally,' said Raquel Coombs, chief of staff for the Department of Budget and Management, in a July email. This lack of oversight raises concern, especially for a state that needed to make cuts and raise taxes to resolve a $3.3 billion budget deficit earlier this year. Nonprofit spending 'increases the size of government,' Williams said. The more that government spends — on nonprofits and other line items — the more taxpayer money that is needed to fund the government, he said. One political analyst said the state's top Democrats appear 'overly cautious' in not answering Spotlight on Maryland's follow-up questions on nonprofit spending. 'It seems like a no-brainer,' said Flavio Hickel, a political science professor at Washington College. 'You'd think they would say, 'I will do everything in my power to ensure good governance with taxpayer money.'' Why aren't they saying that? 'There are good nonprofits, but they're probably being cautious in case one bad actor fell through the cracks on their watch,' Hickel said. 'They're probably being overly cautious to prevent campaign ads down the line.' Even as the state's top leaders declined to answer Spotlight on Maryland's follow-up, the governor was quoted in a news release about his chief of staff, Fagan Harris, leaving for the top spot at the Abell Foundation, one of the state's biggest and most influential nonprofits with more than $300 million in assets. 'While he will be deeply missed personally and professionally, I look forward to working closely with him as he leads the Abell Foundation for years to come,' Moore said. Top officials in government administrations moving to nonprofits is similar to Pentagon officials going to work for defense contractors, Williams said. 'We need more checks and balances to stop the revolving door,' he said. 'The government and nonprofits are way too cozy. There needs to be a firewall.' Hickel said he couldn't comment on the specifics of Harris moving to a nonprofit and noted that it could be 'perfectly coincidental and benign.' But, he added, 'it does raise questions' about the relationship between the governor's office and influential nonprofits that shape life in Maryland. 'It's not uncommon at all, though, to see someone in a high government role going to work at a nonprofit,' Hickel said. 'We advise students to do that. We tell them to do legislative work for a few years, meet people, then go to a nonprofit.' --------------- Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Which state has the most Waffle House locations? Here's how many Georgia has (there are many)
The first Waffle House was founded in Georgia 1955 and has since spread out all over the South. Residents know you can find one just about everywhere, even in smaller rural communities. ScrapeHero, a data extraction service, collected data on Waffle House's more than 1,900 locations, where they are, and where they aren't. Which state has the most Waffle Houses? Georgia wins by a landslide in this category with reportedly 447 locations and the runner-up being Florida with 193. This means the Peach State makes up nearly one-fourth of the Waffle House locations pie. Which city has the most Waffle Houses? Because Georgia is the state with the most Waffle Houses, it's probably no surprise that the city with the most is Atlanta with 20. This is not including Marietta which tied with Pensacola, FL with 16 locations each. Nashville came next with 15 followed by Mobile, AL with 14. The Georgia city with the second highest amount of Waffle Houses is Augusta with 14 followed by Macon with 11. Which states don't have Waffle Houses? There are 25 U.S. states without a Waffle House: Alaska California Connecticut Hawaii Idaho Iowa Maine Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New York North Dakota Oregon Rhode Island South Dakota Utah Vermont Washington Wisconsin Wyoming Where is the best Waffle House? ScrapeHero also ranked the best and worst Waffle Houses based on location reviews and ratings from customers. Here are reportedly the top 5: North Port, FL at 1385 Grand Venture Biloxi, MS at 618 Beach Blvd Tucson, AZ at 1380 West Grant Rd Biloxi, MS at 111 Reynoir St Knoxville, TN at 411 Cedar Bluff Rd Where is the worst Waffle House? Here are the lowest rated Waffle Houses ranked from worst to best: Chattanooga, TN at 2024 East 23rd St Birmingham, AL at 1801 4th Ave Charlotte, NC at 103 Stetson Dr Fairburn, GA at 5310 Campbellton Atlanta, GA at 1674 West Washington Rd Miguel Legoas is a Deep South Connect Team Reporter for Gannett/USA Today. Find him on Instagram @miguelegoas and email at mlegoas@ This article originally appeared on Augusta Chronicle: Does Georgia have the most Waffle House locations? Here is the data Solve the daily Crossword
