logo
‘Such a disgrace': Outrage as Trump ramps up attacks on Harvard, Columbia

‘Such a disgrace': Outrage as Trump ramps up attacks on Harvard, Columbia

News243 days ago

The Trump administration ramped up its campaign against top US universities.
All foreign students have been banned from attending Harvard.
Columbia University may lose its accreditation.
US President Donald Trump ramped up his campaign against top US universities on Wednesday, banning visas for all foreign students coming to attend Harvard and threatening to strip Columbia of its academic accreditation.
Trump is seeking to bring the universities to heel with claims their international students pose a national security threat, and that they ignored antisemitism on campus, and perpetuate liberal bias.
A proclamation issued by the White House late on Wednesday declared that the entrance of international students to begin a course at Harvard would be 'suspended and limited' for six months, and that existing overseas enrollees could have their visas terminated.
READ | Foreign students want to transfer from Harvard over Trump 'fear, concern, and confusion'
'Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers,' said the order.
'I'm trembling. This is outrageous,' Karl Molden, a Harvard government and classics student from Austria, told AFP.
'He is abusing his executive power to harm Harvard as much as he can.'
'My god!' said another international student at Harvard, who declined to be named for fear of retribution, on learning of the executive order.
This is such a disgrace.
Harvard student
The announcement came after the Trump administration's earlier efforts to terminate Harvard's right to enrol and host foreign students were stalled by a judge.
The government already cut around $3.2 billion of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the Cambridge, Massachusetts institution from any future federal funding.
Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and 'viewpoint diversity'.
Trump has also singled out international students at Harvard, who in the 2024-2025 academic year accounted for 27% of total enrolment, and a major source of income.
'This is yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the Administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights,' a university spokesperson said.
'Harvard will continue to protect its international students.'
The latest sweeping action against Harvard came as Trump's education secretary threatened on Wednesday to strip Columbia University of its accreditation.
The Republican has targeted the New York Ivy League institution for allegedly ignoring harassment of Jewish students, throwing all of its federal funding into doubt.
Unlike Harvard, several top institutions - including Columbia - have already bowed to far-reaching demands from the Trump administration, which claims that the educational elite is too left-wing.
But Wednesday's official action suggested it was not enough for Trump.
'Columbia University looked the other way as Jewish students faced harassment,' US Education Secretary Linda McMahon said on X.
She accused the school of breaking rules prohibiting recipients of federal funding from discriminating on the basis of race, colour, or national origin.
'After Hamas' 7 October 2023, terror attack on Israel, Columbia University's leadership acted with deliberate indifference toward the harassment of Jewish students on its campus,' McMahon said in a statement.
'This is not only immoral, but also unlawful.'
In the statement, the US Education Department said its civil rights office had contacted Columbia's accreditation body about the alleged violation.
Withdrawing Columbia's accreditation would see it lose access to all federal funding - a very significant proportion of the university's income.
Students attending the university would also not be able to receive federal grants and loans toward tuition.
Critics accuse the Trump administration of using allegations of antisemitism to target educational elites and bring universities to their knees.
The administration has already put $400 million of Columbia's funding under review, prompting the university in March to announce a package of concessions to the government around defining antisemitism, policing protests and conducting oversight for specific academic departments.
Following Wednesday's announcement, a Columbia spokesperson said the university 'aware of the concerns' raised by the government with its accreditation body.
'We have addressed those concerns directly with Middle States,' the spokesperson said, adding that 'Columbia is deeply committed to combating antisemitism on our campus.'
'We take this issue seriously and are continuing to work with the federal government to address it.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Immigration authorities extend activity in Los Angeles area amid street protests
Immigration authorities extend activity in Los Angeles area amid street protests

Washington Post

time21 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Immigration authorities extend activity in Los Angeles area amid street protests

LOS ANGELES — U.S. immigration authorities extended activity in Los Angeles area on Saturday in the wake of protests at an federal detention facility and a police response that included tear gas, flash-bangs and the arrest of a union leader. Border Patrol personnel in riot gear and gas masks stood guard outside an industrial park in the city of Paramount, deploying tear gas as bystanders and protesters gathered on medians and across the street, some jeering at authorities while recording the events on smartphones. 'ICE out of Paramount. We see you for what you are,' a woman announced through a megaphone. 'You are not welcome here.' One hand-held sign said, 'No Human Being is Illegal.' The boulevard was closed to traffic as U.S. Border Patrol circulated through the area. ICE representatives did not respond immediately to email inquiries about weekend enforcement activities. Arrests by immigration authorities in Los Angeles come as President Donald Trump and his administration push to fulfill promises to carry out mass deportations across the country. On Friday, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers arrested more than 40 people as they executed search warrants at multiple locations, including outside a clothing warehouse where a tense scene unfolded as a crowd tried to block agents from driving away. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the activity was meant to 'sow terror' in the nation's second-largest city. In a statement on Saturday, ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons chided Bass for the city's response to protests. 'Mayor Bass took the side of chaos and lawlessness over law enforcement,' Lyons said in a statement. 'Make no mistake, ICE will continue to enforce our nation's immigration laws and arrest criminal illegal aliens.' Protesters gathered Friday evening outside a federal detention center in Los Angeles where lawyers said those arrested had been taken, chanting 'set them free, let them stay!' Other protesters held signs that said 'ICE out of LA!' and led chants and shouted from megaphones. Some scrawled graffiti on the building facade. Federal agents executed search warrants at three locations, including a warehouse in the fashion district of Los Angeles, after a judge found there was probable cause the employer was using fictitious documents for some of its workers, according to representatives for Homeland Security Investigations and the U.S. Attorney's Office. Advocates for immigrant rights say people were detained Friday by immigration authorities outside Home Depot stores and a doughnut shop.

Whoopi Goldberg claims people keep telling her 'you can't elect a Black man' in America
Whoopi Goldberg claims people keep telling her 'you can't elect a Black man' in America

Fox News

time23 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Whoopi Goldberg claims people keep telling her 'you can't elect a Black man' in America

"The View" co-host Whoopi Goldberg claimed on Thursday that people aren't taking Maryland Gov. Wes Moore's presidential bid seriously because "you can't elect a Black man in America." Goldberg said that she is now questioning the Democratic Party because people are telling her that Americans aren't ready to elect a Black man to the presidency, despite the fact that former President Barack Obama was voted into the Oval Office twice. "I question the Republican Party, and I question the Democratic Party now," she said. "You know, you have someone like Wes Moore who is a perfect candidate… And people are saying, well, he, you know, you can't elect a black man. Why not?" The other co-hosts immediately pushed back on Goldberg's assertion, with Sunny Hostin noting, "We did it, twice!" Alluding to the fact that Obama — a Black man — had won the national election two times. Goldberg attempted to explain her reasoning, but was quickly cut off by the other co-hosts who expressed enthusiasm over the prospect of Moore serving as president. Shortly thereafter, Goldberg explained to the audience what she believes is necessary for "change to happen." "If we want change to happen, we're going to have to make it happen, because you're going to have to get out and vote," she asserted. "There's no way around it, you know?" Earlier on in the show, Goldberg claimed that while she's not an independent, she's also not a Republican or Democrat either. "There's no name for what I am," she claimed, drawing laughter from the audience. "There's no name. Because there are some things that fit what I want and some things that don't. And I am the crazy person who said, 'Why don't we have a Democratic president and a Republican vice president?'"

Gavin Newsom And Jay Pritzker Offering Red States The Deal Of Lifetime
Gavin Newsom And Jay Pritzker Offering Red States The Deal Of Lifetime

Forbes

time28 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Gavin Newsom And Jay Pritzker Offering Red States The Deal Of Lifetime

Government spending saps economic growth, which is no insight. It's stated routinely in my upcoming book The Deficit Delusion that the centralized and politicized allocation of goods, services and labor in sub-optimal fashion by politicians lays a wet blanket on economic growth. What makes the economically enervating nature of government spending worth mentioning is the ongoing debate about state and local taxes, also known as SALT. Governors in high-tax blue states would like to return to the old state of tax play whereby state and local taxes paid could be 100 percent deducted against federal tax bills. Red state citizens should take this gift from people with names like Newsom and Pritzker and run with it. Except that red state politicians are largely balking. So are their citizens. They see unlimited deductibility of state and local taxes as a subsidy of blue state taxpayers, and an incentive for blue states to tax and spend with abandon at a cost to federal tax collections. Their critiques speak to the undeniable good of an unlimited SALT deduction, for red states. To suggest otherwise is to imply that blue states benefit economically from excessive spending, all at the expense of the federal government's ability to spend. Actually, that's a feature of SALT, not a bug. Once again, government spending is economically harmful. The goal for red state politicians should be to localize the certain damage of government spending to the extent they can. Let California, New York, Illinois and New Jersey pursue a lot in the way of economy and freedom-sapping government so that the federal government has fewer dollars to harm the U.S. economy with. It's certainly odd, but not surprising, that blue state governors would clamor for an enhanced ability to further damage their economies with excessive spending born of high taxes. Much odder is that red states aren't taking the blue states up on an arrangement that to some degree erects a fence around economic foolishness. Red state politicians and their citizens yet again claim the SALT deduction subsidizes high-tax and high-spend blue states. More realistically, it subsidizes the red states that want neither. No doubt blue states see excessive taxing and spending in state as advantageous, and it should be obvious to red staters why: the discredited economic vision of John Maynard Keynes lives on most harmfully in blue states. Their politicians almost to a man and woman buy into the Keynesian notion that government spending grows an economy. Quite the opposite. With full deduction of state and local taxes, what an opportunity for red states to show why Keynes was wrong. Within them there's an underlying understanding that a government that does least does best. Which is yet again why red state politicians and voters should eagerly take the deal being offered from their taxing and spending opposites. The deal implies that blue states will foist more Keynes on their people, the red states quite a bit less. What a deal! Unknown is why red state politicians won't accept such a gift unless, of course, they're more wedded to discredited notions of government waste than their limited government rhetoric suggests.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store