Immigration advisor loses license, ordered to repay victims $58,500
Photo:
RNZ / Yiting Lin
An immigration advisor has lost their license after charging Chinese migrant workers tens of thousands of dollars in visa fees for jobs that didn't exist.
Tzu Tong (Jane) Ma has had her license cancelled by the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, over breaches relating to arranging work visa applications for two migrants at a building company ZR Homes.
The company ZR Homes was owned by Ma's husband, which she hadn't disclosed as a conflict of interest, and there were no jobs.
She has been ordered to repay the victims $58,500 in compensation and has also been fined $10,000.
There have been widespread reports of fraudulent employers and agents
selling jobs under the Accredited Employer Work Visa scheme since early 2023
.
The latest decision by the Tribunal comes more than a year after the Tribunal upheld 51 breaches by Ma, involving advice given to five other clients.
The breaches included six counts of dishonesty involving giving false information and documents to Immigration New Zealand, as well as other breaches of the licensed immigration advisers Code of Conduct.
Ma was ordered to compensate $19,061 to one victim, and fined $17,000 across three different complainants.
Ma's license was suspended in April 2024, shortly after the first Tribunal decision against her, but was not revoked then.
In this latest case, the two migrants arrived in New Zealand only to find there was no available work with ZR Homes.
They filed complaints to the Immigration Advisers Authority against Ma, and stated that they had no work or any income for several weeks after arriving in New Zealand, which caused them significant mental distress.
Immigration Advisers Authority registrar Duncan Connor said the numerous breaches and deliberate attempt to conceal a conflict of interest was unacceptable.
"The seriousness of the complaints and pattern of behaviour prompted the Authority to seek suspension of Ms Ma's licence which was granted by the Tribunal pending the outcome of the final Tribunal decision which we were pleased the tribunal agreed with," Connor said.
Tribunal chairperson DJ Plunkett said in his decision that the misconduct is aggravated by the lack of any acknowledgement of serious wrongdoing by Ma.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
a minute ago
- Otago Daily Times
Credit card fee changes highlight unfair costs
New Zealanders continue to be ripped off by credit and debit card surcharges. The issue was noted in passing when Civis complained a fortnight ago about misleading price advertising. It's time this week for Civis to get to grips with the gripe about surcharges. Civis' indignation was spurred after being charged the equivalent of 3.94% for an online credit card fee. While the actual extra amount for the shuttle bus was only a little more than $2, unjustified charges can soon add up to hundreds of dollars a year. Reacting becomes a matter of principle. Businesses are making money not on goods or services provided, but via bonus income from their charging methods. That's not right. Many businesses ignored commission "guidance" after high bank "interchange" fees were capped in 2022. Businesses were being charged up to 2.25% on credit cards and up to 1.5% on online debit card transactions. These were slashed to 0.8% and 0.6% respectively. The fee for contactless debit cards remains capped at 0.2%. On Thursday, the commission cut the fees again on the dominant Visa and Mastercard credit card networks, from 0.8% to 0.3% for in-person transactions, and to 0.7% for online. Debit card fees didn't change. The interchange fee makes up about 60% of what businesses pay as merchant fees. Although the earlier caps should have saved consumers about $140million, the commission estimates businesses failed to pass on $45m to $60m in savings. The cuts announced this week should reduce business costs by another $90m. It's reasonable that sellers then pass on fees to customers if they choose. Although individual costs are small, they can quickly accumulate for businesses as well. Because eftpos doesn't attract direct costs, customers using that method need not, in effect, subsidise those paying with credit cards, contactless debit cards or Apple or Google Pay. Many businesses, including supermarkets, absorb the costs. It's often cost-effective and more convenient to accept electronic payments than cash. Customers must be informed of any surcharge before payment and be made aware of cheaper ways to pay, where available. This requirement is sometimes breached. "We expect sellers to offer at least one payment method that does not incur a surcharge," the commission's website also says. The shuttle bus company had an alternative, though less convenient, way of paying directly. Even that option carried a small fee. "We would expect any surcharges to be no more than 0.7% for contactless debit card payments or 1.5%-2% for credit card payments," the commission says. "Many merchants only have one rate, so we consider any surcharge above 2% is hard to justify." Thanks to Thursday's decision, one would expect that 1.5% to 2% to come down further. The commission said operating costs like staff, electricity and point-of-sale were general expenses and shouldn't be included in a surcharge. They were required regardless of the payment type. Because the commission's "expect" and "should not" guidance is so often ignored, it's time for compulsion. On Thursday, the commission itself said regulation might be needed and that it would be monitoring the situation. The banks and credit card companies were brought into line on interchange fees. Retailers must be, too. The commission received 571 inquiries about surcharging in the past 18 months. It said concerns were managed case by case. High interchange fees were an easy way for banks and credit card companies to make money, and they competed for customers through reward schemes. Many have been reviewed because excess profits were cut. Expect more to be ditched. ASB advises merchants how to calculate a fair surcharge. It also notes: "Some payment methods do not incur costs, such as eftpos or debit cards that are accepted via insert or swipe, and so payment with these methods should not have a surcharge applied." Amen to that. civis@
RNZ News
a minute ago
- RNZ News
ASB rejects offer to settle class action lawsuit for more than $300m
ASB and ANZ have both rejected an offer to settle a class action lawsuit for more than $300 million. Photo: ASB bank has rejected an offer to settle a class action law suit for historic breaches of credit disclosure laws . The offer on behalf of more than 150,000 customers of the ASB and ANZ was to settle for just over $300 million. ASB has joined ANZ in rejecting the offer as a move to influence MPs considering changes to the credit laws to close historic loopholes and bad drafting. ASB said it did not understand how the offer had been calculated, and that it would not put an end to legal action. The consumers' group said the proposed credit law changes might undermine their claim, while the industry said the loopholes posed a multi-billion dollar risk for the financial system. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
a minute ago
- RNZ News
Wellington footbridge faces demolition after earthquake closure
The demolition will close roads around Wakefield Street on Saturday. Photo: Nick James / RNZ A Wellington central-city pedestrian bridge will be knocked down on Saturday as part of a series of works underway on streets near Civic Square. The Amora footbridge connects the Amora Hotel to the former Michael Fowler Centre carpark on Wakefield Street. The hotel has been deemed earthquake prone and has been closed since 2017, which made the bridge redundant, and caused it to attract anti-social behaviour, squatting, graffiti and illegal access to the hotel and the adjoining building. Wellington City Council said, while the link bridge was secure, it was prudent to remove it as soon as possible. To safely remove the bridge, the section of Wakefield Street from Taranaki/Wakefield intersection to lower Cuba Street would be fully closed to traffic and pedestrians, with the public asked to follow traffic management plan detours. Over coming months, the council will have several closures in place on nearby roads, as it co-ordinates needed infrastructure work, before it upgrades and reopens Civic Square next year. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
