UK Government accused of stitching up Palestine Action vote
If MPs vote to approve the proscription order, it would then need to go before the Lords on Thursday afternoon.
The proscription order does not relate solely to Palestine Action, but includes three other groups: the "Maniacs Murder Cult", a Moldovan neo-Nazi group, the Russian Imperial Movement – a far-right group aiming to rebuild the Russian Empire – and its paramilitary wing the Russian Imperial Legion.
READ MORE: LIVE: Latest updates as MPs vote on proscribing Palestine Action
Independent MP and former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn raised the matter in a point of order, as he asked for Palestine Action to be considered separately to the other organisations.
He asked deputy speaker Roger Gale: "Can you consult with the Speaker's office about any process that could happen between now and the start of the debate on the statutory instrument on prevention of terrorism, so that the three organisations listed can be voted on separately?
"Because I think that would be a proper way of members of the House expressing their views."
Responding, Gale told Corbyn: "I thank the right honourable gentleman for his point of order.
"I'm afraid that his request is simply, in procedural terms, not possible.
"The chair is not responsible for the selection or the grouping of motions such as this.
"The motion is and will be put to the House as it is on the order paper."
READ MORE: Plane damaged by Palestine Action flying over Scotland
Commenting, Palestine Action said on Twitter/X: "Jeremy Corbyn's request to vote on the proscription of Palestine Action separately to two neo-Nazi groups, one of which is the 'Maniacs Murder Cult', was rejected.
"This is a stitch up to try and force through the first proscription of a domestic direct action protest group."
Jeremy Corbyn's request to vote on the proscription of Palestine Action separately to two neo-Nazi groups, one of which is the 'Maniacs Murder Cult', was rejected.
This is a stitch up to try and force through the first proscription of a domestic direct action protest group. pic.twitter.com/ypIYvJF4OI — Palestine Action (@Pal_action) July 2, 2025
The Independent Alliance – a group of Independent MPs, which Corbyn is a member of – released a statement ahead of the debate, arguing that the Labour Government's use of the Terrorism Act is "an outrageous clampdown on civil disobedience" and is "an assault on the democratic rights of us all".
The statement said: "We unequivocally oppose the proscription of Palestine Action.
"Yesterday, at least 24 people were killed in an Israeli strike on a crowded seaside café in Gaza. Among those killed were women, children and the elderly.
"Still, our Government allows the supply of arms to Israel. The real crime is the Government's complicity in genocide – and the proscription of Palestine Action is a shameful attempt to silence dissent.
READ MORE: Ryanair cancels more than 800 flights due to conflict in the Middle East
"The use of the Terrorism Act is an outrageous clampdown on civil disobedience. We implore MPs to recognise this gross misuse of state power for what it is: an assault on the democratic rights of us all.
"Moreover, we are appalled by the government's cynical move to bundle Palestine Action in with foreign neo-Nazi organisations, as part of one piece of legislation. This represents a transparent ploy by the government to coerce MPs into supporting its authoritarian crackdown on Palestinian solidarity."
The statement added: "Today, we look back and celebrate those who protested for the freedoms we enjoy today. Years from now, we will look back and commend those who stood on the right side of history.
"The Government will not succeed in shielding itself from accountability. We will continue to demand an end to the UK's military cooperation with Israel. We will continue in our search for truth and justice. And we will continue to campaign for the only path to peace: an end to the occupation of Palestine."
The debate is expected at around 5.30pm, with a vote taking place after.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Palestine Action is malign, but terror status goes too far
At midnight on Saturday, Palestine Action became officially proscribed under the Terrorism Act. In that ignoble status, it joins al-Qaeda, Hamas and Isis. Voicing support for, or being a member of, Palestine Action is now punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Predictably enough, a number of adherents of the anti-Israeli direct action group do not seem to have been chastened. Following a failed last-minute High Court effort to block the group's proscription, dozens of protestors were arrested over the weekend on suspicion of supporting the organisation. They included an 83-year-old priest, as well as others thought to be 'wearing clothing or displaying articles' indicating membership of a terrorist organisation. That Palestine Action is a malign force is beyond doubt. Its members include sinister ideologues, deeply confused in their geopolitical outlooks and their assessment of the best way to secure their objectives. The group's 'disruptive tactics' involve calculated acts of criminal damage, illegal occupation of premises, and intimidating acts of vandalism. Since its founding in 2020, the group has had a hand in around 500 distinct instances of 'direct action', often targeting firms and property suspected of having links to Israel. The most serious act for which the group claimed credit was when four people were arrested on suspicion of causing £7 million of damage to two military transporter aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. It was this that prompted Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, to judge that the group had 'crossed the threshold established in the Terrorism Act'. • Police defend arrest of 83-year-old Palestine Action activist Yet, however wanton its criminality, it remains a stretch to brand Palestine Action a terror group. Its members are qualitatively different from those of al-Qaeda, and pose a substantially different kind of threat to public order and national security. Their tactics more closely resemble those of extremist environmentalist groups like Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion than those of Islamist terrorists. In recent months, a combination of public ill will, effective prosecution and proportionate sentencing have made it unviable for climate activists to persist with their criminal antics. In March this year, Just Stop Oil announced an end to its practices of criminal vandalism, claiming implausibly to have achieved its objectives. In reality, they were prosecuted into submission by legitimate use of the criminal law. The heavy-handed branding of Palestine Action as terrorists risks seeming absurd when bona fide hostile military groupings like the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps remain unproscribed. The destruction of property that Palestine Action has made its calling card can already be prosecuted. There are legitimate concerns that such measures risk suppressing dissent on the part of those politically opposed to the government's support of Israeli defence policy. Palestine Action's members may be misguided, but Britain must remain a country in which the right to express unpopular and dissenting political views is not subject to outright prohibition. The emergence in recent years of activist groups that make criminal forms of destruction and public nuisance their modus operandi does raise challenges for law enforcement. Lord Walney, the government's former independent adviser on extremism, has recently mooted an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill which would give police greater power to curb the illegal antics of extremist groups that fall shy of terrorist organisations. These might include powers to block their ability to fundraise, organise on social media, or live-stream acts of criminality. These lighter-touch measures would be an obviously apt response to the level of threat posed. Palestine Action are an antisocial menace to public order; but politicians should not do them the service of taking them as seriously as they take themselves.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
‘Enemies of Labour' to benefit from Corbyn-led party, says peer
Lord Kinnock has criticised plans by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana to form a new left-wing party, saying it would "only assist the enemies of Labour". Kinnock mockingly suggested the new party be called the "Farage assistance group", arguing that division on the left would benefit right-wing parties such as the Conservatives and Reform UK. Ms Sultana announced her resignation from Labour and her intention to co-lead a new party with Mr Corbyn last week, saying they aim to tackle poverty and inequality, and oppose war. Mr Corbyn appeared to be surprised by Sultana's announcement, issuing a non-committal statement, and his team reportedly urged her to retract it. Polling data indicates a hypothetical Corbyn-led left-leaning party could attract 10 per cent of voters, primarily drawing support from Labour, the Greens, Lib Dems, and the SNP.
Belfast Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
History will harshly judge every leader who trades with Israel while refusing to acknowledge a genocide as clear as day
Gaza: Doctors Under Attack, the film the BBC refused to air, is an hour of televised horrors that will never leave me. Shown on Channel 4 last week, this film was initially commissioned by the state broadcaster, only to be dropped when another documentary — Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone — was attacked over alleged impartiality concerns by the pro-Israeli lobby.
