The Bayeux Tapestry headed to UK for first time in nearly 1,000 years
He said that France and the UK will 'save Europe' by standing for democracy, law and international order in a dangerous world.
The three-day state visit, at the invitation of King Charles III, is the first state visit to the UK by a European Union head of state since Britain acrimoniously left the EU in 2020.
It is a mix of political talks, royal pageantry and also cultural issues. And Macron did not come empty handed in this regard.
The French president came bearing a tantalizing cultural gift: an agreement to send the Bayeux Tapestry to Britain for the first time in more than 900 years.
The 70-meter tapestry showing the Norman conquest of England in 1066 will go on display at the British Museum from September 2026 to July 2027.
The treasured 11th-century artwork depicting the events leading up to the conquest of England by William the Conqueror was believed to have been commissioned by Bishop Odo of Bayeux. It has been displayed in various locations across France, including most recently at the Bayeux Museum in Normandy.
'The Bayeux Tapestry is one of the most iconic pieces of art ever produced in the UK and I am delighted that we will be able to welcome it here in 2026," Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said in a statement.
'This loan is a symbol of our shared history with our friends in France, a relationship built over centuries and one that continues to endure," she added.
In return, the British Museum will loan treasures from the Sutton Hoo collection - artifacts from a 7th century Anglo Saxon ship burial - to museums in Normandy.
The excavation of Sutton Hoo was dramatized in the 2021 film The Dig starring Ralph Fiennes and Carey Mulligan.
Other items to be loaned to France include the Lewis Chessmen, the mysterious medieval chess pieces carved from walrus tusks and whales' teeth dating from around the 12th century that were discovered on the Isle of Lewis in Scotland.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
20 minutes ago
- LeMonde
Isaac Asimov, Elon Musk and the replacement of humans by robots
Surprisingly, Elon Musk and French leftist politician Jean-Luc Mélenchon share common ground: Both are admirers of the work of American novelist Isaac Asimov (1920-1992). Considered one of the founding fathers of science fiction, this tireless writer published an astonishing 500 novels between 1939 and his death. Within this vast body of work, these two famous fans are especially fond of the Foundation cycle. This saga, widely regarded as the gold standard of science fiction, was initially launched as short stories in 1942, reworked into novels in the 1950s and then extended at the end of Asimov's life. As early as 1966, the series won the Hugo Award, a literary prize for science fiction, for "Best Series of All Time." It was a remarkable feat in a genre not lacking in masterpieces. Asimov had a scientific background, considered a prerequisite at the time for being recognized as a credible author in the genre. He was also a versatile, eclectic thinker. According to his autobiography I, Asimov (2000), his precocious brilliance set him apart from other children his age, leading him to retreat into reading. Gifted, by his own account, with a phenomenal memory, he retained everything he read. Musk's entourage said the same thing about him when talking about the American entrepreneur's childhood with his biographers, Ashlee Vance and Walter Isaacson. Aside from science, Asimov's great passion was history. Foundation tells the story of the fall and then the resurrection of a civilization. In the 13 th millennium, the empire Asimov imagined was at the height of its power, yet had already begun an irreversible decline. Asimov drew inspiration from a 1776 classic by Edward Gibbon (1737-1794): The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. According to the British historian, whom Asimov read countless times, Rome's fall was due to two causes: one external, the pressure of migration; the other internal, the rise of Christianity. Asimov's futuristic empire collapses under centrifugal forces, which is logical since it encompasses the entire galaxy. There are no external threats or borders. However, the loss of entrepreneurial spirit and love of innovation proves fatal. The empire suffocates under the weight of its own bureaucracy. Only someone like Musk could appreciate this kind of dramatic tension, despite Asimov's progressive views. Both Mélenchon and Musk were influenced by the character Hari Seldon, the inventor of a predictive science called psychohistory, who manages to influence humanity's future by wielding the law of large numbers. Asimov, who trained as a biochemist, was inspired by the kinetic theory of gases, as astrophysicist Roland Lehoucq of the French Atomic Energy Commission – a major science fiction enthusiast – wrote in the journal Bifrost in 2012. Universal reach As Asimov explained in the preface to his major opus, it's impossible to predict the motion of a single isolated molecule, but you can say with precision what quintillions of molecules will do. So he applied this principle to human beings. Foundation actually translates philosophical debates on historical determinism into science fiction narratives, making them accessible to everyone. Thanks to its universal scope, the series has remained in the science fiction bestsellers' top 10 and continues, generation after generation, to serve as an entry point into the genre. Due to its internal contradictions and the forces at play, the galactic empire in Foundation is destined to fail. Just as no one can escape climate change on Earth in the 21 st century. However, Seldon uses psychohistory to influence history, though not to reverse fate. With his plan for a foundation that preserves knowledge, he reduces the transition period between the empire's fall and its successor from 30,000 years to 1,000. In the story, this is viewed as a decisive push forward. In Marxist terms, Seldon would be considered a positive hero. Indeed, it was precisely because he found Marxism "a bit dry," in his own words, that Mélenchon became fascinated by psychohistory. Anticipating the crises that punctuate Foundation 's plot, Seldon recorded messages for his distant successors to view as holograms – effectively, oracles. The stage device used by Mélenchon in his 2017 presidential campaign was a nod to this gimmick from the saga. Although Musk has never used holograms for communication, many of his public statements refer to the idea of positively influencing sweeping changes around us. In 2017, he quoted Asimov almost verbatim at a TED conference in front of a captivated audience: "I look at the future from the standpoint of probabilities. It's like a branching stream of probabilities, and there are actions that we can take that affect those probabilities or that accelerate one thing or slow down another thing." "Philosophy underlying my actions. It's pretty simple and mostly influenced by Douglas Adams [another science fiction author] and Isaac Asimov," he wrote in 2018 on X. If Adams taught Elon Musk the art of questioning with his answer 42 in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, then Asimov taught him that every major turning point in humanity is always driven by a technical innovation. For those who claim to follow in Seldon's footsteps, there is only one way to influence history: through science. Although Asimov considered himself an optimist, his work reexamined the dichotomy between good and bad science established by British author Mary Shelley in Frankenstein (1821). When confronted with scientific progress, as with social and political organization, humanity is invariably torn between individual freedom and collective security. While Foundation remains his seminal work on determinism, his other major science fiction series, I, Robot, delves deeper into this contradiction. Replacement by robots In 1942, a particularly productive year for Asimov, he formulated his "Three Laws of Robotics." Intended to protect humans from a robot uprising, also known as the infamous "Frankenstein syndrome," in which a creation turns against its creator. These laws raise the question: Who counts as "human"? The individual, or humanity as a whole? To resolve this dilemma, Asimov's robots invent a fourth law, as Anne Besson explained on the French podcast C'est plus que de la SF ("It's more than SF"). This law prioritizes the species. One of the final stories in the series describes a revolt by humans that is suppressed "for their own good" by robots. As a rationalist atheist and staunch believer in evolution, Asimov did not believe that Homo sapiens was the ultimate stage of life. Whether it be astrophysics or the laws of evolution, recent scientific advances all indicate that the days of the human species on Earth are numbered. This bleak finitude pales in comparison to the space epics of Star Trek and Star Wars, with their hyperspace and distant galaxies. As always, Asimov was provocative when he predicted that robots would replace humanity. Far from being a cause for anxiety, he considered it a hopeful prospect, as he stated in an interview with Le Nouvel Observateur in 1985. He argued that robots would be the next step for humanity, more rational and unburdened by emotion. Musk, raised on dystopian visions like Terminator (1985) and The Matrix (1999), where robots and computers enslave humans in apocalyptic futures, has distanced himself – at least in his public statements – from his science fiction idol on this point. In 2017, essayist Ariel Kyrou recalled Musk clashing with Mark Zuckerberg, the co-founder of Facebook. Musk accused Zuckerberg of being reckless about the risks artificial intelligence poses to humanity. Musk had already directed similar criticisms at Larry Page and Sergey Brin, the co-founders of Google, and he would later target his new nemesis, Sam Altman, his rival at OpenAI. By Musk's logic, his competitors are followers of transhumanist ideals, which claim that technology will allow humans to transcend their limitations, such as mortality and terrestrial life. Musk sees them as distant descendants of Dr. Frankenstein, ready to sacrifice humanity's interests. However, his critics argue that Musk's fratricidal attacks are motivated more by economic self-interest than genuine ethical concern. He often sounds the alarm when others are making advances without him. As Kyrou pointed out, with Neuralink, Musk has taken a position far closer to transhumanism than he admits. His company's neural implants are designed to eventually serve as an interface between human neurons and computers. They are named after Iain M. Banks (1954-2013), the Scottish author and creator of the celebrated series The Culture. In that saga, every humanoid is equipped with a "neural lace" that serves as a means of communication and ensures their safety. This lace connects them to intelligent machines that handle production and the distribution of resources. The machines perform the labor while the humanoids enjoy the pleasures of hedonism. "In a way, it is anarchism assisted by artificial intelligence," said Yannick Rumpala, a political science researcher who analyzes the relationship between politics and science fiction. Backed by these vast computational powers, Banks's utopia resembles a successfully executed "Gosplan" (a Soviet-style planning committee), with AI serving as a vast thinking infrastructure and omnipresent planning authority. As Rumpala points out, this vision would have appealed to Asimov, who, in Foundation, imagined another form of collective consciousness – more organic – with the planet Gaia. In 2018, Elon Musk described himself on X as a "utopian anarchist of the kind best described by Iain Banks," an avowed socialist who is no longer here to defend himself. As usual, Musk interpreted Banks's work through his own lens. He said, "The Iain Banks Culture
Fashion Network
39 minutes ago
- Fashion Network
Swiss government is still talking to the US to lower tariffs
Switzerland plans to continue negotiating with the US to lower tariffs from the 39% that kicked in on Thursday and will refrain from implementing countermeasures. The government 'remains firmly committed to pursuing discussions with the US with the aim of reducing these tariffs as swiftly as possible,' it said in a statement after an emergency meeting on Thursday. 'The Federal Council is maintaining close contact with US authorities and the affected industry sectors.' President Karin Keller-Sutter returned empty-handed on Thursday morning from Washington, where she had sought to sway Donald Trump before the tariff started. The two-day emergency trip turned into a humiliation as she was denied a meeting with her counterpart and instead only talked to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, whose department doesn't lead trade negotiations for bilateral deals. Speaking to reporters in Bern, Keller-Sutter said that Swiss negotiators stayed in Washington and are still attempting to get a deal. 'At present, tariff countermeasures in response to the US tariff increases aren't being considered, as they would impose additional costs on the Swiss economy — particularly through higher prices for imports from the US,' the government said, reiterating an earlier stance. The 39% surcharge on exports — from Swiss-made luxury watches to Nespresso coffee capsules – is the biggest among developed countries and compares with just 15% on the neighbouring European Union. Pharmaceuticals and gold are so far exempt. While pharmaceuticals are excluded from the trade duties — bringing the average rate below 25%, according to Bloomberg Economics — the stakes for Swiss companies, which are big players in the US market, are high and the scale of the duty exceeded all expectations. The government 'will also shortly engage in detailed discussions on potential relief measures for Swiss businesses and continue to assess the need for further economic policy action,' according to the statement. The cooperative stance clashes with a cross-party push of Swiss politicians on Thursday cancel an order for three dozen F-35A fighter jets from US defence conglomerate Lockheed Martin Corp. in response to the tariffs. The tariff level stunned the Swiss after negotiations that they thought looked promising. But things came to a head late last week when Trump threw out a negotiated framework deal on a call with Keller-Sutter. He was particularly irked by Switzerland's bilateral trade surplus with the US of about $38.5 billion last year. If the 39% rate comes into effect across the board — including on pharmaceuticals — that would put up to 1% of Switzerland's economic output at risk over the medium term, according to Jean Dalbard of Bloomberg Economics.
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Algeria pushes back against Macron's tough line in diplomatic standoff
Algeria pushed back against President Emmanuel Macron's call for Paris to get tougher with its former colony on Thursday, August 7, saying France was seeking to "exonerate" itself from any blame as their standoff drags on. Tensions between Paris and Algiers have reached new levels in recent months, with Macron's hopes of the historic post-colonial reconciliation that he espoused at the start of his presidency now appearing a distant dream. "France must be strong and command respect," Macron said, in a letter to Prime Minister Francois Bayrou that was published by the daily newspaper Le Figaro online late on Wednesday. "It can only obtain this from its partners if it itself shows them the respect it demands. This basic rule also applies to Algeria," the letter said. The Algerian foreign ministry said Macron's remarks sought to "exonerate France from all its responsibilities" as relations between the two countries continue to fray, accusing Paris of putting "all the blame on the Algerian side." Atrocities committed by both sides during the 1954-1962 Algerian War of Independence have long strained relations, even half a century later. Measures targeting diplomatic passports Among the measures Macron requested from his government in his letter was the "formal" suspension of a 2013 agreement with Algiers "concerning visa exemptions for official and diplomatic passports." Algiers said that "France, and France alone" had pushed for that agreement. Macron also asked his government to "immediately" use a provision in a 2024 immigration law, which allows the refusal of short-stay visas to holders of service and diplomatic passports, as well as long-stay visas to all applicants. To prevent Algerian diplomats from being able to travel to France via a third country, France will ask its EU partners in the Schengen free travel zone to cooperate with this measure. Imprisoned writer and journalist A major bone of contention has been Algeria's imprisonment of French-Algerian writer Boualem Sansal and prominent French football journalist Christophe Gleizes. Paris has also accused pro-Algiers influencers of inciting hatred in France. In the letter, Macron referred to the cases of Sansal, who was sentenced to five years in prison for "undermining national unity," and Gleizes, sentenced to seven years for "apology for terrorism." Supporters of both men say they are entirely innocent and victims of the current political tensions. Macron insisted that his "objective remains to restore effective and ambitious relations with Algeria." The dispute Western Sahara Macron angered Algiers in July 2024 when he backed Moroccan sovereignty over the disputed Western Sahara, where Algeria supports the pro-independence Polisario Front. Upping tensions further, Algerian consulates in France have suspended cooperation with French government services on returning Algerians deemed dangerous back to Algeria after being ordered to leave by Paris. The French government fears that it will have to release Algerian nationals currently detained in detention centres due to the inability to keep them there indefinitely.
