In the Age of AI, Human Storytelling Still Reigns Supreme: Why Advidly is Betting on People over Perfection
In a world flooded with AI-generated content and relentless algorithmic churn, there's a quiet revolution that's in play, one that's rediscovering the unparalleled value and necessity of the human voice.
And Skyler Stroup, founder of creative marketing agency Advidly, has been a vocal advocate of this subtle movement. While many race toward automation, Stroup has affirmed that it's these distinctly human stories that cut through the noise, and that's the philosophy that runs through every operation of his business.
Despite keeping human creativity at the forefront of Advidly, Stroup is no stranger to both sides of the storytelling coin.
With a background in digital marketing for one of the travel tech industry's top startups on one hand and a career as a signed musician with a prominent American record label on the other, Stroup has embodied a unique convergence of corporate strategy and raw creativity. This blend, he says, is at the heart of Advidly's success.
Advidly began with a simple yet radical idea, that every brand has a story which deserves to be told with emotion, nuance, and integrity, especially for founders and small businesses that don't see themselves as "marketers." These entrepreneurs are often closest to the magic of their work, yet paradoxically too far from articulating what makes them exceptional - and here's where Advidly comes in, to give a voice and identity to their brand through strategic collaborations and comprehensive marketing services rooted in creative expertise.
"We excavate the story from them and give it life through compelling video, content, and activations," Stroup explains. "The idea is to uncover what's already there and help them see the value in their own story." Team Advidly in Action
For many, this is no easy feat. Cultural conditioning around humility often makes self-promotion feel uncomfortable, and at times, even embarrassing. But Stroup argues that this connection is vital for brands, and that doesn't stem from brashness or bravado, but honesty and authenticity, something that the audience seeks most from companies.
"You don't have to be the next billionaire or run the next conglomerate. That's not how the real world works." Stroup states. "Even if you're a humble plumber, your brand is built on trust, and that's the narrative your marketing needs to reflect. Not some persona that you think you have to adopt to be taken seriously, one that's removed from you, or who your brand is underneath."
This philosophy, for Stroup, is more than just a talking point. It's a sharp critique of the current marketing landscape. As AI tools become more ubiquitous and widely adopted, from chatbots, AI-image generations to cloned avatars that deliver pitch-perfect videos on demand, many businesses are embracing speed, volume, and cost efficiency over substance, leading to an existential crisis in the creative world. Stroup, a passionate spokesperson for creativity and artistic integrity, sees this trend as both inevitable and dangerous.
"There's a real risk of creativity collapsing into redundancy," Stroup says. "If every brand uses the same tools to say the same things, then differentiation disappears. And more importantly, so does trust."
In Stroup's view, AI is a tool, a powerful one that would help facilitate tasks, but it's not a substitute for vision, and it's certainly not a match for human instinct, the very thing that drives the human race.
"We were early adopters of AI platforms," Stroup notes. "But after a year of using it across projects, the patterns started to repeat. There's only so much polish you can apply before it all blends into the same beige." Where AI scales by contributing to the already crowded content noise, Advidly refines. The team is strengthened by a collective of creatives from marketing, entertainment, and independent film backgrounds, and through their artistic prowess, they've deliberately built a foundation that challenges formative content creation.
Advidly's work goes beyond aesthetics. They aim for emotional resonance and connection, which, in today's saturated market and diminishing attention spans, is the key to customer retention. That's why their focus is not just on what a business does, but why it matters, what lies behind the name of the brand, its colors, and its offerings, and affirming to them that these stories are worth telling.
In a recent quote, Author Joanna Machiejewska said, "I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so that I can do my laundry and dishes." As these words resonate across Stroup's philosophy, he insists that at its best, marketing isn't about ego or attention. It's about trust. And trust, he believes, will always require a human touch.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
3 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
'Optimistic': Champagne Growers Hope For US Tariff Shift
Champagne growers say President Donald Trump's tariffs on European goods will hurt sales to the United States, their biggest export market, but hope that the sector may yet escape the new duties. Trump's steeper global tariffs, including a maximum 15 percent on EU goods, came into effect on Thursday, upending global trade. "It's going to hurt," said Christine Sevillano, a champagne grower and head of the independent champagne makers association. The US market accounts for nearly 10 percent of her turnover, Sevillano told AFP at her family-owned organic vineyard. Like many growers here, she hopes that ongoing talks between the European Commission -- which negotiates trade deals on behalf of EU members -- and the US government may yet result in a better deal for her sector. "I want to be optimistic," she said. "We sell an optimistic product, an optimistic wine." The champagne industry sells about 10 percent of its production volume to the US market, and 14 percent of its total output value, representing 820 million euros ($955 million), according to 2024 figures provided by the Comite Champagne industry association. Sevillano's US importers are "in a kind of limbo", she said. "They clearly hope that the Trump administration will change course." But unless it does, "the situation will become difficult for my importers", she said. Orders have already started to dry up over recent months, with the tariff threat compounded by US inflationary pressures weighing on consumer spending and the dollar exchange rate. The French producers are not the only ones set to suffer from Trump's tariffs, said Maxime Toubart, Comite Champagne's co-president. "Of course these tariffs weigh on our operations, our vineyards and our businesses," he said. "The entire value chain will suffer," he told AFP, from small-time Champagne growers and to US end-consumers. The economic impact on the US itself "has not yet been properly studied", he said. Ongoing EU-US negotiations, meanwhile, were "good news", he said. France's wine and spirits association FEVS said there was a chance that the French drinks sector could yet become exempt from the blanket tariffs. "That's our target, and precisely our message to the governments of France and the other EU members," it said. Toubart said champagne makers want to remain "very present" in the US market that is "very important for us". But amid US uncertainty, they will also seek to make up for lost American sales by targeting countries in southeast Asia, Latin America and Africa, said Toubart. "There are other markets waiting to be opened up," he said. Champagne professionals expect American importers and consumers to suffer, too AFP
Int'l Business Times
4 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump's Tariffs Drive Up Consumer Costs As Political Strategy Takes Center Stage
The latest wave of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration took effect this week, raising taxes on imports from more than 60 countries and sending prices higher for everyday American consumers. While the White House frames these measures as a bold move to protect U.S. industries and jobs, economists warn that the costs will be borne largely by households, fueling inflation and straining budgets. According to AP News, the United States now levies tariffs ranging from 10% to 50% on key imports from major trading partners, including Canada (35%), Brazil (50%), South Korea (15%), India (25%), and the UK (10%). Overall, the average tariff rate stands at 18.6%, the highest since 1933, per Reuters. Economic models from Yale's Budget Lab project that the average U.S. household will face approximately $2,400 in increased annual costs as tariffs drive up prices on consumer goods such as electronics, clothing, and auto parts, an AP report says. A recent survey by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, reported by Fox Business, reveals that nearly 75% of businesses affected by the tariffs are passing increased costs to consumers. This immediate price inflation impacts household budgets, especially among lower and middle-income Americans. While economists express concern about inflation and consumer strain, political analysts observe that the tariffs may be intended more as a messaging tool than an economic fix. Support for tariffs has increased among Republican voters. A recent CNN/ORC poll cited by The Guardian shows 62% of Republicans favor tariffs, even if they cause higher prices. Among independents, support rises when tariffs are described as retaliation against unfair trade practices. Analysis from JPMorgan's geopolitical risk team warns that these tariffs may persist beyond the Trump administration, highlighting the rise of protectionist policies as a longer-term trend, reported Reuters. International partners including Canada, the European Union, and Switzerland have protested the tariffs, describing them as excessive and harmful to global trade. Reuters reports Switzerland has requested urgent consultations with U.S. trade officials. The EU is considering retaliatory tariffs on American agricultural exports, while the World Trade Organization braces for formal complaints. Despite tensions, U.S. stock markets showed resilience. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.8% Thursday, buoyed by exemptions granted to companies investing in U.S. semiconductor manufacturing. Semiconductor firms such as TSMC and Samsung saw their stock prices climb following tariff exemptions, according to Business Insider. Congressional leaders from both parties are considering legislation to introduce transparency and sunset provisions for future tariffs, aiming to mitigate unintended consequences for consumers. However, with inflation slowing in other areas and voter support holding steady, the political momentum behind tariffs appears likely to continue through the 2026 election cycle. The administration's tariff strategy is already raising prices for U.S. consumers, but the political calculus behind the policy could outweigh short-term economic pain. As tariffs become entrenched, households, businesses, and global partners brace for ongoing adjustment.
Int'l Business Times
4 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Calls For Intel CEO's Immediate Resignation Amid China Investment Scandal
President Donald Trump has publicly called for the resignation of Intel CEO Lip‑Bu Tan, accusing him of having deep financial entanglements with Chinese companies that pose a national security threat. In a post shared Thursday morning on Truth Social, Trump wrote, "The CEO of Intel is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem." According to Reuters, the former president's demand came in the wake of mounting scrutiny over Tan's past investments in Chinese semiconductor firms. A letter penned by Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) to Intel's board chairman, Frank Yeary, alleged that Tan had invested over $200 million into hundreds of Chinese tech firms—some reportedly linked to China's military. As reported by The Guardian, many of these investments were made while Tan was leading Walden International and Cadence Design Systems, companies that have done extensive business with Chinese state-linked entities. Cadence recently settled a criminal export control case involving unauthorized technology transfers to Chinese military institutions. The New York Post also highlighted that Tan, who took over as Intel CEO in March 2025, has long-standing business ties in China and sits on the board of at least one Chinese firm connected to state-backed tech efforts. These associations have raised bipartisan concerns amid the Biden and Trump administrations' parallel efforts to decouple U.S. tech from Chinese influence. In a statement provided to Channel News Asia, an Intel spokesperson said: "Intel and Mr. Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the United States and fully support our government's efforts to protect domestic technology." The company did not directly address the investment allegations but reaffirmed its cooperation with U.S. regulatory authorities. Intel shares fell roughly 3.6% in early trading Thursday, as investors reacted to the political pressure and uncertainty around leadership. According to Investors Business Daily, the drop followed broader unease over new 100% tariffs imposed on Chinese chips, announced by Trump just one day earlier as part of his ongoing 2024 campaign platform. The Wall Street Journal noted that some analysts are concerned the CEO controversy could delay Intel's rollout of key semiconductor projects, especially given its reliance on federal funding through the CHIPS and Science Act. Lip‑Bu Tan, a Malaysian-born American businessman, was named Intel's CEO five months ago and immediately launched a cost-cutting campaign to revive the company's global competitiveness. As reported by TechCrunch, his restructuring efforts include workforce reductions of up to 22% and the shelving of certain fab expansions in Oregon and Ohio. Intel has received nearly $20 billion in federal grants and loans since 2023 under the CHIPS Act, intended to bolster domestic semiconductor production. Now, the question of whether a CEO with such a vast investment history in China should be managing that taxpayer-backed effort is at the center of a political firestorm. According to Bloomberg, Intel's board has not issued any public statement regarding Tan's future, though sources close to the company say emergency meetings have been held this week to discuss the issue. Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers are reportedly preparing to launch a congressional inquiry into whether any CHIPS Act funds were misused.
