Ford files $100-million suit over alleged 'Lemon Law' scheme by L.A. lawyers
In a complaint filed early Wednesday in Los Angeles federal court, the Dearborn, Mich.-based car manufacturer claimed the lawyers violated the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act by working together to carry out the alleged fraud for years.
Describing the invoices it received from California lawyers as a 'magical mystery tour of fictitious billings,' Ford claimed that attorneys named in the lawsuit took advantage of a statute designed to protect consumers from faulty products, including cars.
Under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, commonly known as California's Lemon Law, automakers are required to pay for legal work, court fees and related expenses associated with defective vehicles.
That requirement, Ford alleged, has created an opportunity for lawyers to pad their bottom line by claiming more hours than they actually worked or reporting having been in more than one place at the same time.
The complaint alleged that Steve B. Mikhov was the 'ringleader of the criminal enterprise' and that he and Knight Law Group, the Los Angeles-based firm where he was a founding partner, 'orchestrated' the scheme.
Emails and phone messages seeking comment from Knight Law Group were not immediately returned Wednesday, nor were requests for comment made via email addresses and cellphone numbers for Mikhov listed in online databases.
Ford, which is being represented by New York-based Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, claimed in the complaint that an investigation uncovered payments of legal fees that reflected work that never could have happened.
For instance, the auto giant alleged that Knight partner Amy Morse 'billed more than 20 hours per day on at least 66 occasions, 34 of which exceeded 24 hours, including an ostensibly heroic but physically impossible 57.5-hour workday in November 2016." Morse did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment Wednesday.
Edward McNally, a former federal prosecutor and lawyer for Ford at Kasowitz Benson Torres, described how the alleged scheme worked in an emailed statement.
'When you look at any single legal bill for a single case it might show only one or two hours for a given lawyer on a given day—nothing to draw suspicion," he said. "However, when Ford searched across public filings, as alleged in the complaint, the conduct in this case was carried out through a sophisticated and unlawful enterprise of attorneys and law firms that spread their fraudulent and inflated bills across thousands of cases and against many auto makers.'
The other defendants who benefited from the alleged conspiracy, Ford claimed, include Knight partner Roger Kirnos and former Knight paralegal Dorothy Becerra; L.A.-based Altman Law Group and its founder and former member attorney, Bryan C. Altman; and San Diego-based Wirtz Law APC and Richard Wirtz, its founder and managing partner.
Emails and phone messages seeking comment from Kirnos, Altman Group, Wirtz Law, Altman and Wirtz were not immediately returned Wednesday. Contact information for Becerra could not be located immediately Wednesday.
Daniel J. Fetterman, a former federal prosecutor and partner at Kasowitz Benson Torres, said the firm's automaker client has been in contact with federal authorities.
'Ford reported this conduct to the United States Attorney's Office and has been cooperating with a grand jury subpoena served on it in the fall of 2021," Fetterman said. Ciaran McEvoy, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office in L.A., declined to comment Wednesday.
Sherman 'Tiger" Joyce, president of the American Tort Reform Assn., said via email that the alleged fraudulent scheme "is an affront to the civil justice system and these lawyers who have harmed consumers by needlessly dragging out and driving up costs of litigation should be held accountable."
Ford claimed in its filing that the scheme 'has an informal governing structure that at certain times operates as a command hierarchy," meaning it had a chain of command. The arrangement, Ford alleged, violated the RICO Act, which has played a central role in cases against high-profile organizations including Italian crime families, Mexican drug cartels and the Hells Angels motorcycle gang. Ford argues it is owed civil damages under the federal racketeering law.
The automaker's lawsuit said the attorneys involved "associated with one another in the Enterprise for the common purposes of preparing and filing fraudulent fee applications and billing records, negotiating fraudulent settlements, splitting inflated fees, and funneling fraud proceeds into attorney distributions and extravagant purchases.'
Ford said the nine-figure damage total it is seeking would recoup what it lost in allegedly bogus payouts, along with thousands of hours investigating the alleged scheme and what the company described as the harm to its reputation it sustained as a result of representations the lawyers allegedly made in court and online about the amounts they recovered from the automaker.
Kyla Christoffersen Powell, president and chief executive of the Civil Justice Assn. of California, said in an emailed statement that the alleged fraud scheme highlighted longstanding problems with the state's Lemon Law.
"The shocking attorney conduct outlined in today's filing by Ford underscores the need for the Legislature to consider additional reforms to the lemon law that remove perverse incentives for attorneys," she wrote.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
12 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Air Canada Withdraws Guidance as Flight Attendant Strike Grounds Planes
(AC) has withdrawn its third quarter and full-year earnings guidance as a strike by its 10,000 flight attendants has led to 700 canceled flights and a shut down of its operations. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The Montreal-based carrier, which typically carries 130,000 people a day within Canada and internationally, has been grounded as a strike by its flight attendants enters a third day. In a statement, Air Canada said it canceled 240 flights on Aug. 17 alone due to the strike, leaving thousands of passengers stranded. Canada's federal government in Ottawa moved quickly to order the flight attendants back to work and extend the union's previous collective agreement until a resolution to the current conflict is reached. The government also directed the airline and the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) to enter binding arbitration to determine the outcome of the contentious labor dispute. Unfortunately, the union has refused to comply with the government's back-to-work order and the flight attendants remain on picket lines throughout Canada. 'Hell No, We Won't Go' In a news release, representatives of CUPE said they want Air Canada to negotiate a fair deal at the bargaining table rather than rely on the federal government to order an end to the strike, which is now considered an illegal work stoppage. Along with pulling its guidance, the airline said that it plans to resume flights on Aug. 18, though it didn't provide details on how it would accomplish that feat. Management has said it will likely take between seven and 10 business days for Air Canada's schedule to normalize, if the strike were to end right away, though that appears unlikely. Is AC Stock a Buy? Air Canada's stock has a consensus Strong Buy rating among 12 Wall Street analysts. That rating is based on 10 Buy and two Hold recommendations issued in the last three months. The average AC price target of C$25.79 implies 33.20% upside from current levels.
Washington Post
17 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Menendez brothers to be evaluated by parole board for release after 30 years in prison
LOS ANGELES — The Menendez brothers are set to make their cases for parole starting Thursday, marking the closest they've been to winning freedom from prison since their convictions almost 30 years ago for murdering their parents. Erik and Lyle Menendez were sentenced in 1996 to life in prison for fatally shooting their father, Jose Menendez, and mother, Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills mansion in 1989 . They were 18 and 21 at the time. While defense attorneys argued the brothers acted out of self-defense after years of sexual abuse by their father, prosecutors said the brothers killed their parents for a multimillion-dollar inheritance. The brothers became eligible for parole after a Los Angeles judge in May reduced their sentences from life in prison without the possibility of parole to 50 years to life, making them immediately eligible for parole under California law because they were under the ages of 26 when they committed their crimes. A panel or two or three parole hearing officers from a board of commissioners appointed by the governor will evaluate the brothers individually. Erik Menendez will have his hearing Thursday morning, followed by Lyle Menendez on Friday, over videoconference from the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego. The board will assess whether the brothers pose an 'unreasonable risk of danger to society' if released, considering factors like criminal history, motivation for the crime and signs of remorse, behavior while in prison and plans for the future, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Even if the board grants their parole, it could still be months before the brothers walk free — if at all. If the board grants each brother's parole, the chief legal counsel has 120 days to review the case. Then Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has 30 days to affirm or deny the parole. Only then, if Newsom affirms the parole, would the Menendez brothers be able to leave prison. Newsom had previously ordered the state parole board to conduct a risk assessment of the brothers in response to a clemency request. At the time, he emphasized that the key question was whether the brothers posed an 'unreasonable risk to public safety.' He noted at a May news conference that he has both approved and rejected decisions by the parole board before and that he was the 'ultimate arbiter.' The brothers' lawyer, Mark Geragos, sought release last month for Erik Menendez after he was hospitalized for a 'serious medical condition.' He has since returned to prison. The case has captured the attention of true crime enthusiasts for decades and spawned documentaries, television specials and dramatizations. The Netflix drama ' Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story ' and the documentary 'The Menendez Brothers,' both released in 2024, have been credited for bringing new attention to the brothers. In the last year, weigh-in from celebrities such as Kim Kardashian and a greater recognition of the brothers as victims of sexual abuse has helped amass a legion of supporters who have called for their release. Some have flown to Los Angeles over the past few months, holding rallies and attending court hearings as the brothers' attorneys pushed for their resentencing. The previous LA County district attorney, George Gascón, first opened the door to possible freedom for the brothers last fall by asking a judge to reduce their sentences. Since their conviction, the brothers have gotten an education, participated in self-help classes and started various support groups for fellow people in prison, his office said in a petition. The judge's decision to ultimately resentence the brothers followed months of pushback from current prosecutors, who argued the brothers hadn't taken adequate responsibility for their crimes. The Menendez brothers still have a pending habeas corpus petition filed in May 2023 seeking a review of their convictions based on new evidence supporting their claims of sexual abuse by their father. Last month, a different judge ordered Los Angeles prosecutors to explain why their case shouldn't be reexamined. The state corrections department has selected one media representative to view the proceedings virtually and share notes with the rest of the press at set intervals.
27 minutes ago
FTC sues ticket reseller, saying it illegally exceeded purchase limits for Taylor Swift, other shows
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit Monday against a ticket broker, alleging the company used illegal tactics to exceed purchasing limits for popular events and then resold tickets at significantly higher prices. In a lawsuit filed in federal court in Maryland, the FTC said Maryland-based ticket broker Key Investment Group has used thousands of fictitious Ticketmaster accounts and other methods to buy tickets for events, including Taylor Swift's Eras Tour. According to the FTC, Key Investment Group – which does business under brand names like Epic Seats and Totally Tix – purchased at least 379,776 tickets from Ticketmaster between Nov. 1, 2022, and Dec. 30, 2023. The company spent nearly $57 million to buy the tickets and resold them on secondary marketplaces for approximately $64 million. For just one Taylor Swift concert, Key Investment Group allegedly used 49 different accounts to purchase 273 tickets, dramatically exceeding the Eras Tour's 2023 six-ticket purchase limit per event, the FTC said. Fans were so frustrated by the difficulty getting tickets for Swift's tour that the U.S. Senate wound up grilling Ticketmaster in a 2023 hearing. In a statement released Monday, Key Investment Group said it will vigorously defend itself against the FTC's lawsuit. 'The case threatens to dismantle the secondary ticket market for live events, further consolidating power in the hands of the industry's largest monopoly,' the company said. Key Investment Group said the FTC is misapplying the Better Online Ticket Sales Act, a 2016 law which it said was meant to target malicious software, not legitimate resale businesses. Key Investment Group sued the FTC in July to try to prevent the agency from using the law against it, saying it uses human employees — not bots — to buy tickets. But the FTC said that law also prohibits anyone from circumventing security measures and other controls meant to enforce posted ticket limits. In March, with Kid Rock by his side in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing U.S. officials to ensure ticket resellers are complying with Internal Revenue Service rules. The order also directed the FTC to ensure 'price transparency at all stages of the ticket-purchase process' and to 'take enforcement action to prevent unfair, deceptive, and anti-competitive conduct in the secondary ticketing market."
