Dog Cried 'Constantly' After Losing Leg To Cancer, Then Everything Changed
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A dog who was struggling after losing one of his front legs to cancer has been given a new lease of life thanks to the wonders of modern technology.
Rey the Doberman, aged 4, had a pretty perfect life with his family in Boston, Massachusetts. "We got him from a breeder down in Texas," Rey's owner, who chose not to disclose his name, told Newsweek.
"He's our only dog and he's attached to everyone, including my sisters and my parents. He's always following someone or in the kitchen when we're cooking dinner, he doesn't really like being alone."
However, in early December last year, Rey started walking funny. "It was something that kinda happened suddenly," his owner said. "We initially thought he just hurt himself or just slept on it funny and we put a heating pad and also a cold pack on him and checked his paws if there was a cut but there wasn't."
Rey the Doberman initially struggled after losing his leg to cancer.
Rey the Doberman initially struggled after losing his leg to cancer.
3DPets
Rey underwent a series of tests with his veterinarian before the devastating news that he had osteosarcoma, a type of bone cancer that is more common among large dogs. In cases like Rey's the most common treatment involves the amputation of the affected limb.
It was clear, almost straight away, that Rey would need surgery. "He couldn't use his leg that had the tumor and he would cry and whine constantly," his owner said.
"We couldn't play with him or take him on any walks or hikes due to him limping and the doctor said not to. That made him really sad because all he would really do is lay down and sleep. He would bring us his toys and we couldn't play."
Rey underwent the necessary surgery. While moving around on three legs was okay in the weeks that followed, Rey's owners were eager to ensure he enjoyed the best quality of life possible so turned to 3DPets, a pet mobility device company that designs prosthetics using 3D printing technology.
Rey represented a unique challenge to 3DPets, given his size and the fact dogs carry 60 percent of their weight on their front limbs. Lydia Mindek, Director of Operations at 3DPets said: "Printing the jacket for our full-limb prosthetics or carts in one piece is extremely important because we want to avoid any potential areas of weakness or fracture."
It was 3D printer company Elegoo that helped make Rey's prosthetic a reality, stepping in to cover the $1,750 costs to cover the design work, and provide 3DPets with access to the OrangeStorm Giga, a 3D printer big enough print the full-body harness Rey would need.
Rey has been given a new lease of life thanks to his prosthetic leg.
Rey has been given a new lease of life thanks to his prosthetic leg.
3DPets
Fast forward to today and the dog that had lost the ability to do so many of the things he loved for such a long time is back to running around and playing fetch with his family.
More importantly, for Rey's owner, he's back to being the focal point of the household. "Honestly he hasn't changed, he's still a ham," he said. "He just rolls around or whines when he doesn't get attention or he's curled up on the couch when we're watching TV."
While Rey's prosthetic will require regular cleaning and the occasional bit of maintenance, it's a small ask for something that has brought him back to being the happy dog he was once before.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
How Trump Administration Can Tackle America's Addiction Problems: Experts
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has long been adamant about fixing what he described as America's "opioid crisis," something which was a key focus of his first term as president as well as his second. The opioid crisis claimed the lives of over 80,000 Americans just last year, and that figure was a 27 percent decrease from the drug overdose death toll the previous year. While drug overdose deaths fell sharply in 2024, with the steepest year-over-year decline in five years, there is still a high prevalence of substance use disorders in the country. Drug addiction is recognized as a substance use disorder, a complex condition characterized by an individual's uncontrollable use of a substance despite its harmful consequences. Substance use disorders are not specific to drug use and can also include a patient's relationship with alcohol, tobacco and even medications. According to a 2023 report by the federal agency Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), 48.5 million Americans aged 12 and above have a substance use disorder. This equates to just over 17 percent of the population. Among those with a substance use disorder, just over 27 million had a drug addiction specifically. To prevent more lives from being lost to substance abuse, Trump has proposed major changes to be made to SAMHSA as well as other agencies, alongside cracking down on drug trafficking at the U.S.-Mexico border. However, experts have weighed in on what they think should be done to tackle the issue, and their suggestions differ from what Republican policymakers are currently implementing. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva What Has The Trump Administration Done To Tackle Addiction So Far? In March 2025, the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) announced that major changes would be made to SAMHSA and that it would be combined with other agencies as part of the "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) campaign. HHS wrote that the plan would increase the "operational efficiency" of SAMHSA, and more widely, the consolidation of various agencies would save taxpayers $1.8 billion per year through a reduction in workforce. The streamlining of various agencies has allegedly led to a reduction of around 50 percent of the staff at SAMHSA so far, according to Paolo del Vecchio, the former Director of the Office of Recovery at SAMHSA, who spoke to the substance use disorder website Addiction Center. When approached for comment, a SAMHSA spokesperson told Newsweek: "The SAMHSA employees affected were in administrative roles." They added: "The agency remains committed to ensuring that essential mental health and substance use services are available to Americans in need. Our grants, programs, and initiatives continue to support the President's vision to Make America Healthy Again by addressing the critical behavioral health challenges facing our citizens." There are also proposed cuts to various agencies as part of the GOP budget bill, which includes a $1 billion cut in funding for SAMHSA, according to Addiction Center. Cuts to the agency's funding, the Trump administration allegedly said, are being proposed because "SAMHSA grants were used to fund dangerous activities billed as 'harm reduction,' which included funding 'safe smoking kits and supplies' and 'syringes' for drug users." Newsweek has contacted the White House via email for comment from the Office of Management and Budget in regards to the budgetary changes to SAMHSA. What Experts Think Needs To Be Done However, despite the Trump administration's efforts to tackle the issue, experts have said that more needs to be done. "To reduce the prevalence of substance use disorder, the Administration should invest in prevention to reduce the number of people who develop the disorder in the first place," Keith Humphreys OBE, the Esther Ting Memorial professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University, California, told Newsweek. As substance use disorders often go hand-in-hand with other health conditions, "this also means that if you treat substance use disorder, you get benefits in other areas of health," he added. "So Medicaid paying for addiction treatment over time may actually reduce costs to Medicaid as people with substance use disorders don't develop or resolve other health problems for which they would otherwise need care," Humphreys said. Individuals with substance use disorders can develop other health problems like infectious diseases, injuries, and poor mental health, he said. "It thus costs more to cover the health care for someone with a substance use disorder than without," Humphreys added. Corroborating this, Peggy Quigg, a member of the President's Senior Service Advisors at the WestCare Foundation, a non-profit organization providing behavioral and mental health services in various locations throughout the country, told Newsweek that the effects of "long-term, chronic substance use takes a great toll on most of the organs in the body." As patients seek help for substance use, she added, medical providers "often discover additional undiagnosed and untreated medical problems especially with the endocrine system, liver, pancreas, stomach, liver, lungs and brain." The result of this is that those with substance use disorders have significantly higher costs than those without, so investing in preventative care could actually save costs in the long term. Spending on Medicaid enrollees with a substance use disorder diagnosis is twice as much as those without—a difference of around $1,200 compared to $550 per month on average, according to KFF. Humphreys added that alongside investment in treatment, there also needs to be "recovery services that lead people out of addiction and into a healthier life." The need to invest, rather than make cuts to funding, within the sector is something Quigg also said was crucial. "States and local communities have had successful programs in place that have just lost funding all across the country with the changes in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorneys Offices," she said. She added that "study after study has demonstrated that prevention works, we need more of it, and it is cost-effective." "We are at an extraordinary moment of opportunity in the drug overdose crisis as deaths are finally starting to come down in a meaningful way," Brendan Saloner, a professor of health policy and management at the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Maryland, told Newsweek. "Reducing the investment in treatment could completely undermine the recent progress we've seen as more people are getting treatment paid for with Medicaid funds," he added.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Hundreds of Thousands Told To Limit Outdoor Activity in 12 States
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Air quality alerts have been issued across large swathes of the United States on Thursday, as smoke from Canadian wildfires is expected to impact multiple states. The National Weather Service (NWS) has published alerts for parts of Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Maryland, Nebraska, Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Arizona. Health officials warned that deteriorating air quality poses a health risk to the public, particularly for sensitive groups such as children, older adults, and those with preexisting conditions. Residents in affected areas are advised to consider limiting strenuous outdoor physical activity to reduce the risk of adverse health effects. An air quality warning issued in Minnesota on Tuesday following wildfires in Canada. An air quality warning issued in Minnesota on Tuesday following wildfires in Canada. Mark Vancleave/AP This is a developing story and will be updated.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Here's why ‘loud talking' puts a strain on relationships: ‘I don't realize I'm doing it in the moment'
They say love is about communication — just not at full blast. A Reddit user has ignited an online discussion and debate after posting that their partner keeps asking them to 'lower your volume' — even though they say they're just excited, not screaming. The anonymous user, who goes by u/Farts2Long (yes, really), brought their relationship beef to the infamous r/AmITheA–hole forum, explaining that their voice naturally gets louder when they're engaged in conversation. 'Sometimes when I get excited about a topic, I naturally start speaking louder than usual,' they wrote. They added, 'Not shouting, just louder than normal conversation level. The thing is, I don't realize I'm doing it in the moment.' But their partner isn't a fan of the verbal volume. The poster noted that their significant other will often interrupt them 'mid-sentence,' asking them to 'lower' their volume. The Redditor acknowledged that this likely isn't 'in a mean or rude way,' but stressed that it still makes them feel dismissed and discouraged. Redditors rushed to weigh in, with over 12,000 upvotes and hundreds of mixed opinions. 'I lose my enthusiasm and no longer feel like talking about the thing I was excited about,' the original poster continued. While many commenters agreed the partner's request was reasonable, others urged empathy and better communication. 'I get it, you're happy to be speaking to someone who cares about something you care about,' one wrote. 'However, speaking as someone whose partner is the same as you in this situation, it's very hard to be sat trying to engage with someone when they are essentially shouting in your face.' Another chimed in, 'You have every right to feel how you feel, but it also does sound like you may be disregarding how it makes them feel.' Relationship expert Angelika Koch, of the LGBTQ+ dating app Taimi, recently told Newsweek that timing and tone are crucial when addressing someone's volume. 'Telling someone mid-sentence that they're being loud, even if it's well-intentioned, can feel a bit humiliating,' she explained. 'Most people don't even notice when their voice rises.' Koch suggested couples use a subtle hand signal or touch to gently flag the issue. 'Over time, they might even start to catch themselves,' she said. 'But this can only happen if they don't feel like their personality is being attacked.' If couples are looking for ways to speak up without ruining an entire conversation, they might take a cue from psychotherapist Amy Morin. Morin previously told CNBC Make It that mentally strong couples lean on a few key phrases to keep things cool and constructive. Among them? 'I'm going to tell you something that may be upsetting to hear,' and 'It's understandable you feel that way.' The goal: empathy, ownership, and solution-seeking. 'Taking responsibility for your share increases the chances that your partner will accept responsibility for theirs, too,' Morin said, as previously reported by The Post. 'Then you can both put your energy into developing a solution.' Sounds like a recipe for turning the volume down — without turning each other off.
