
White House purges transcripts of Trump's remarks from its website
WASHINGTON — The White House has removed official transcripts of President Donald Trump's public remarks from its government website, replacing them with selected videos of his public appearances.
As recently as Sunday, transcripts of Trump's speeches and comments were still showing up in the 'Remarks' section of WhiteHouse.gov. The next day, they were gone, snapshots of the site from an internet archive show. The only transcript appearing now is of Trump's inaugural address on Jan. 20.
Government stenographers are still recording and transcribing Trump's remarks, a White House official said. But in an internal policy change in recent days, the White House took down the transcripts in favor of audio and video of his appearances.
The idea behind the move is that people will get a fuller and more accurate sense of Trump by watching and listening to him as opposed to reading a transcript, which they may not be inclined to do anyway, the official said. Purging the transcripts and switching to audio and video of Trump's remarks was intended to create "consistency" across the website, the official said.
'In an effort to maintain consistency, previous transcripts that were available have been removed and replaced with the audio and visual components of that transcript,' the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'The White House continues to work to upload the multitude of public engagements that the president has done and will continue to make sure that the website consists of a full and complete representation of the president's public comments.'
In a statement, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'The president's remarks are live on the website for every person in the world, including journalists, to access and watch for themselves. The Trump White House is the most transparent in history.'
Meanwhile, Vice President JD Vance's office continues to make public transcripts of his remarks, sending them out to the media. Since last month, Vance's office has shared eight transcripts with reporters, including his comments at a meeting with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, a speech he gave about U.S. manufacturing and another one that involved the war between Russia and Ukraine.
Asked why Vance is putting out official transcripts while Trump is not, Vance's office declined to comment.
Historians and former White House officials denounced the move to do away with public transcripts that have long served as the definitive record of what the president says in public.
"I hope he and his communications team see the light on this,' said Barbara Perry, a co-chair of the presidential oral history program at the University of Virginia's Miller Center.
'It's not only good for history, which they may not care about, but they do care about how he's viewed by history. And second, they should also realize that it is his very communication style and substance that won him the presidency twice.'
A public transcript also provides some protection for Trump if he feels misquoted or misunderstood. He can point to the document to settle the issue.
Transcripts coming out of the White House have at times become points of contention. Days before the 2024 election, President Joe Biden made a comment that seemed to disparage Trump voters.
A comedian speaking at a Trump rally had referred to Puerto Rico as a " floating island of garbage."
Speaking to a Latino audience, Biden said, "The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters." That comment had the potential to alienate millions of voters on the eve of the election and potentially harm Democratic nominee Kamala Harris' chances.
The Biden press office, however, altered the stenographer's transcript and instead released a document that changed the meaning of his remarks, adding an apostrophe so that the quote read "supporter's" — an apparent reference to the comedian who had made the remark, according to T he Associated Press.
President Barack Obama once mistakenly used the word "abortion" in an interview when he meant to say, "aberration," said Beck Dorey-Stein, who was a White House stenographer during his presidency and in the first couple of months of Trump's last term. Obama aides flagged Obama's bit of misspeak, but the transcript was allowed to stand, Dorey-Stein said.
In another transcript kerfuffle, in 2007, President George W. Bush talked about how " childrens do learn when standards are high and results are measured." The official transcript, however, changed the word to "children." The White House insisted it had not asked for the edit and had it changed back to Bush's actual words.
Withholding transcripts 'seems really irresponsible and a self-inflicted wound,' Dorey-Stein said. 'With a transcript he can say, 'This is exactly what I said.''
'How many times in the press briefing room would someone say, 'President Obama said this,' and the press secretary would say, 'No, he didn't. Check the transcript'? Now, there's no way for anyone to check the transcript,' she added.
Others questioned the rationale the White House official put forward. The real motivation may be that Trump's frequent digressions — which he calls ' the weave ' — can come off as gibberish in written form, critics said.
Perhaps the White House 'didn't want 'the weave' exposed,' said Mike McCurry, a press secretary in Bill Clinton's White House.
The last presidential event that the White House transcribed and made public happened more than two months ago — an Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.
Though some videos of Trump's appearances are available on the White House's website, many are not.
The site shows 10 videos in April, including events with Ohio State University's football team, the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball team, the Philadelphia Eagles football team and the Italian and Norwegian prime ministers.
Not shown are videos of more than two dozen events Trump participated in last month. Among them is an Oval Office meeting on April 14 with El Salvador President Nayib Bukele, who is accepting migrants deported from the United States and putting them in a maximum-security prison. In the meeting, Trump said he wanted Bukele to take in as many criminals 'as possible.'
Also missing are videos of Trump's various interactions with the media. There is no record, for example, of a Q&A with reporters on April 17 covering issues involving a school shooting at Florida State University ('The gun doesn't do the shooting; the people do,' he said) and Harvard University's tax-exempt status ('I think Harvard is a disgrace. They're obviously antisemitic.").
This month, the White House website has posted 11 videos of Trump's appearances. That accounts for less than half of the Q&A sessions with the media and other events Trump has participated in so far.
The left-out events include a meeting with Canada's new prime minister, Mark Carney, who batted down Trump's interest in making Canada the 51st state.
'Canada won't be for sale, ever,' Carney said.
Past White Houses routinely publicized the official transcripts of the president's remarks. Indeed, in the first four months of Trump's first term, the White House posted more than 100 transcripts of his remarks. By contrast, in Trump's new term, his White House posted only 30 before they disappeared.
Dorey-Stein said that in her brief stint at the start of Trump's first term, the new president's aides were wary of the stenographer corps. A former press officer said that the stenographers were positioning their microphones too close to Trump's face and that he did not like it, Dorey-Stein recalled.
'At the time, there was an overwhelming feeling of distrust,' she said in an interview. 'They really felt we were an extension of the press rather than a safeguard.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
36 minutes ago
- NBC News
Israel-Iran conflict splits Trump's MAGA backers
As the percussion of Israeli munitions rattled Tehran on Thursday night, President Donald Trump's MAGA movement observed a rare silence — a sign, influential Republicans say, of the divide within their own party when it comes to the prospect of a war between Israel and Iran. It took Trump, who comments publicly more often than any president in recent memory, about 10 hours to put out a statement on his Truth Social platform, in which he urged Iran to give up its nuclear weapons program. The first official U.S. assessment had been issued by the White House under Secretary of State Marco Rubio's name, and it emphasized that America was 'not involved' in the strikes. In the meantime, Charlie Kirk, the co-founder of Turning Point USA, polled his 5 million X followers on the question of whether America should 'get involved in Israel's war against Iran.' By Friday afternoon, the poll showed more than 350,000 votes, with an overwhelming proportion in the 'No' column. When Kirk read Rubio's statement on the strikes during a podcast Thursday night, Jack Posobiec, a right-wing activist popular with the MAGA audience, interjected that it was 'not a supportive statement at all.' Earlier Thursday, before the strikes, Posobiec had warned on X that a 'direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition.' And Steve Bannon, host of the 'War Room' podcast, which is influential with MAGA adherents within the administration and outside of it, steered clear of public commentary Thursday night. It all adds up to a demonstration of the quandary facing Trump as he and other elected Republicans seek safe political turf. Trump's electoral success owes in no small part to his isolationist-leaning 'America First' platform and his fierce criticism of drawn-out U.S. engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan that were launched by Republican President George W. Bush and continued by Democratic President Barack Obama. But Israel's latest action pits traditional Republican support for the Jewish state — and antipathy toward Iran — against the MAGA base's fear that the U.S. will be drawn into a new foreign war. And even within Trump's MAGA wing, there's a long-running split over American backing of Israel. Trump has always been on the pro-Israel side of the divide. 'Republicans are a pro-Israel party, and the president hasn't wavered on that,' said one longtime Trump adviser who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the political sensitivity within the MAGA movement. 'I think the challenge here is not how to move forward. The question is how to sell that to the recalcitrant base.' If Trump is able to do that, it will be despite powerful voices on the other side of the debate weighing in. Tucker Carlson, one of Trump's most influential supporters, wrote in his newsletter Friday that the U.S. should "drop Israel." "If Israel wants to wage this war, it has every right to do so. It is a sovereign country, and it can do as it pleases,' Carlson wrote, according to Jewish Insider. 'But not with America's backing.' Israel launched its attack to forestall Iran's development of a nuclear weapon and perhaps pressure Tehran into giving up that goal. Trump has been trying to construct a new version of an Obama-era nuclear deal that he shredded during his first term, and he articulated his hope Friday that Israel's campaign will help serve as a catalyst for Iran to sign a new pact. But it is not at all clear that the fighting won't have the opposite effect and spark a broader war between the two Middle Eastern powers. That's a showdown that establishment Republicans like Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., have been itching for. 'Game on,' Graham — whose hawkish worldview predates the rise of the MAGA movement — wrote on X on Thursday night as video of explosions in Tehran bounced around the world. On the other side of the spectrum, Infowars host Owen Shroyer, one of the hundreds of people pardoned by Trump in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol, posted a video to X that framed the new conflict as an existential question for the president's base. 'America, the Trump movement, MAGA — however you want to say it, there's going to be a lot of soul-searching as these events go on, because a lot of MAGA is anti-war,' Shroyer said. 'What good is 'Make America Great Again' if we can't even be isolated from this war-torn region of the world, if we can't even be isolated from these foreign countries and these foreign conflicts that are just filled with hate?' 'We'll never be able to make America great again,' he added, 'as long as we're entangled in the Middle East.' With Trump signaling approval for how Israel conducted strikes while cajoling Iran to make a deal Friday morning, some of the president's MAGA faithful seemed to settle on a narrative that U.S. involvement is acceptable to a point: troops on the ground. On a call with reporters Friday, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., asserted his own opposition to U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts while expressing confidence that Trump feels the same. 'It's one thing to support our ally, which we're doing, and we should do, unequivocally,' Hawley said. 'It's one thing to provide them with arms for their own self-defense, which we have done and should do. But I can't imagine a world in which we would send United States troops, in which we would be involved in any kinetic activity, as the defense people like to say, there in the region, unless it's just defending our own installations.' Israeli airstrikes on Iran are a far cry from American troops invading a nation that has been far more vulnerable to internal revolution than foreign conquest over the course of thousands of years of existence. Even the Republicans who are most aggressive when it comes to Iran talk about missiles and bombs rather than staging an incursion with American ground forces. But drawing a line on that is a middle ground that may satisfy most, if not all, Trump supporters for the moment. In the hours after the strikes, Trump allies hewed closely to the administration's sparse talking points. Alex Bruesewitz, a Republican consultant with close ties to the White House, shared Rubio's statement on X, emphasizing that the 'US WAS NOT INVOLVED IN STRIKES AGAINST IRAN.' Meanwhile, Laura Loomer, the right-wing conspiracy theorist aligned with Trump, posted several messages supportive of Trump and Israel. 'Iran,' Loomer wrote, 'must never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.' Mehek Cooke, an attorney and pro-Trump political commentator active in the MAGA movement, said Friday that her recent visit to Israel opened her eyes to the 'devastation of Iran's Oct. 7 proxy war' there. Israel's strikes, Cooke added, 'were not just justified; they were inevitable. This matters to every American, including the MAGA movement. You can't negotiate with regimes chanting 'Death to America.'' Cooke also pointed to recent polling from Rasmussen, a right-leaning firm, that found that 57% of respondents favored U.S. military action to combat Iran's nuclear weapons program. She said she believes MAGA loyalists will 'remain united' behind Trump. 'MAGA wants peace, but we're not blind,' Cooke added. 'Yes, some in MAGA lean isolationist. But appeasement is not an option. Iran's leaders just threatened both Israel and the U.S., bringing us to a dangerous tipping point. Trump's 60-day deadline — blatantly ignored by Iran was followed by real consequences.' Still, the political perils of taking sides in the early stages of what Israel says could be a sustained campaign were underscored by the reluctance of some MAGA figures to deal with the question head-on. Asked to explain the tension within the MAGA movement, former Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., a close Trump ally, texted: 'MAGA is more concerned with the Battle for Los Angeles,' where Trump has deployed the National Guard and Marines in a standoff with Americans protesting against immigration raids, 'than the Battle for Tehran.' What the White House appears to be most concerned about, at least in terms of Trump's domestic politics, is portraying the U.S. as uninvolved in the Middle East conflict. The word that trickled out overnight from the White House, and from a phone interview Trump gave to Fox News, emphasized that U.S. military had no role in the strikes. It wasn't until Friday morning that Trump weighed in directly — and ominously. 'There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE. God Bless You All!'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
‘Shoot a couple, the rest will go home': Far-right groups are sharing scary messages ahead of ‘No Kings' protests
Far-right groups are sharing violent messages ahead of the 'No Kings' protests this weekend to coincide with President Donald Trump's military birthday parade. Accounts associated with extremist groups are also sharing detailed information about protest organizers, including names and where they work, The Wall Street Journal reports. Protests in more than 2,000 cities are scheduled to take place Saturday. 'Shoot a couple, the rest will go home,' one meme circulating on a Proud Boys Telegram channel said. Another meme posted in the channel depicted four armed men. 'HANG THE TRAITORS, EXPEL THE INVADERS,' it said. The Northern Illinois Proud Boys shared a meme on their Telegram channel falsely claiming the LAPD was seeking support from vigilantes ahead of the protests this weekend. Other far-right groups are frequently sharing memes in support of the Trump administration's efforts to increase raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. Experts on extremism in America are alarmed by the posts because they could inspire 'lone-actor violence' or persuade someone to 'get off the couch, pick up a gun and go out to one of these cities,' Jon Lewis, a research fellow at George Washington University's Program on Extremism, told The Journal. University of Pittsburgh sociologist Kathleen Blee also told the outlet that white nationalists are uniting against nonwhite immigrants. Far-right beliefs are resonating in the mainstream media with these groups more than ever before, Blee said. 'It's by far the worst. It's scarily the worst. It's flashing red,' she said. 'It's a very precarious time right now.' A faction of the Proud Boys group also shared an anti-immigration poster originally put out by the Department of Homeland Security. In the image, Uncle Sam is depicted nailing a poster to a wall. 'REPORT ALL FOREIGN INVADERS,' it says. At least two far-right X accounts claimed to have had some involvement in creating or disseminating the image before the department shared it, according to CNN. Elisabeth Fondren, a journalism professor at St. John's University, told the network that the poster 'fits within a long history of anti-immigrant rhetoric and, yes, state propaganda.' In response, DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin said that 'every American citizen should support federal law enforcement in their just effort to deport criminal illegal alien invaders from our country.' As organizers across the country gear up for Saturday's mass demonstrations, Trump was asked for his take on the 'No Kings' demonstrations this week. 'I don't feel like a king,' Trump said, and proceeded to complain that he must 'go through hell' to get anything done. 'No, no, we're not a king. We're not a king at all.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Britain should offer Israel aid, not lectures
Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear programme were a necessary act of self-defence. The Iranian state, which has called repeatedly for Israel's destruction, is hell-bent on obtaining the shield of nuclear weapons. It has seen how North Korea has been able to hide behind its weapons programme and wield it as a tool in negotiations with the South and the United States, and intends to obtain the same degree of protection from external pressure. When Iranian leaders have 'brazenly, openly called for Israel's destruction' – as Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu pointed out yesterday – this would be an outcome that Jerusalem cannot see come to pass. With the International Atomic Energy Agency declaring Tehran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations and no realistic prospect of a US-brokered deal that would take Iran off a pathway to the bomb, Israel's hands were effectively tied; when intelligence indicated that the regime had sufficient material to assemble weapons in short order, the decision was taken to dismantle that weapons programme rather than wait and face what Mr Netanyahu called 'the threat of annihilation '. Friday's strikes against Israel underlined the threat the regime still poses. While US president Donald Trump had urged Tehan to reach a deal or face 'slaughter', Iran instead fired dozens of ballistic missiles as Israel ordered its citizens to shelters. Apparent impacts were filmed in Tel Aviv amid a flurry of interceptor launches. Israel's ambassador to the United Nations has stated bluntly that strikes will 'continue' until his country has 'eliminated the threats from Iran'. This is the correct approach, and one that deserves our backing. Yet while Sir Keir Starmer has at last managed to bring himself to express 'concerns, grave concerns' about Tehran's nuclear ambitions and to 'recognise Israel's right to self-defence', the Prime Minister is still somehow calling for 'de-escalation'. The time for half-measures is long passed. Iran already funds a Middle East-wide network of proxies which carry out acts of terror against Israel and the West, and poses a direct threat on British soil. If it were to obtain the protection of nuclear weapons, it would only be emboldened. As much as it appears to have passed Sir Keir by, it remains true that a desire for peace is not a virtue when it permits terrible outcomes. Rather than attempting to talk Mr Netanyahu into changing course or offering pointed remarks about escalation, Britain should be offering Israel our thanks, and our assistance. It is in our interest, and that of the wider West, to bring an end to the possibility of a nuclear-armed Iran once and for all.