
London shares edge lower as mining, bank stocks weigh
(For a Reuters live blog on U.S., UK and European stock markets, click or type LIVE/ in a news window)
FTSE 100 down 0.14%, FTSE 250 falls 0.1%
OECD cuts global growth outlook, cites trade war impact
UK needs tough action on government budget policy, OECD warns
Chemring Group hits near 14-year high
Euro zone inflation falls below ECB target
June 3 (Reuters) - Britain's main indexes fell on Tuesday, pressured by mining and financial stocks, with investors growing cautious over unpredictable U.S. trade policies, dampening market sentiment.
As of 0946 GMT, the blue-chip FTSE 100 was down 0.14%, and the midcap FTSE 250 fell 0.1%.
The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) trimmed its global growth outlook and said the trade war was taking a bigger toll on the U.S. economy than before.
The Paris-based organization also urged Britain's government to make stronger efforts to reduce borrowing and debt, just days before Finance Minister Rachel Reeves presents her long-term spending plans.
Investors were already unsettled by U.S. President Donald Trump's Friday announcement to increase tariffs on imported steel and aluminum from 25% to 50%.
Industrial metal miners bore the brunt of the trade jitters, falling 2.5%, as London copper prices lost ground on concerns of possible U.S. tariffs on the metal.
Losses in financial stocks also weighed on both the indexes, with an index tracking the UK banks dropping 1.4%.
On the flip side, the aerospace and defence sub-index continued to gain for the second consecutive day after Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on Monday 15 billion pounds ($20.3 billion) in spending to bring Britain up to "war-fighting readiness".
Chemring Group jumped 6.5% to the top of the midcap index after the defence contractor posted the highest-ever order book for the six months ended April 30. The stock hit a near four-year high.
Elsewhere, euro zone inflation eased below the European Central Bank's target last month, underpinning expectations for another interest rate cut this week. (Reporting by Ragini Mathur in Bengaluru; Editing by Vijay Kishore)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘No Entry For…': Trump Imposes SUDDEN Travel Ban On Dozen Nations; Here's The Full List
President Donald Trump has issued a new travel ban targeting nationals from twelve countries. The White House said these nations present high security risks due to inadequate vetting systems. Countries on the list include Iran, Libya, Somalia, and others across Africa, the Middle East, and the Caribbean. The proclamation is being framed as a move to protect national security. Trump's spokesperson stated this fulfills his promise to safeguard Americans from foreign threats.#trump #TravelBan #BreakingNews #USPolitics #whitehouse #donaldtrump #ImmigrationPolicy #NationalSecurity #ExecutiveOrder #ForeignPolicy

Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ujjain hosts Spiritual & Wellness Summit
'You Can't Do A Damn Thing': Defiant Khamenei Vows To Continue Uranium Enrichment Despite U.S. Threats Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei has fiercely rejected U.S. demands to halt uranium enrichment, declaring that America "cannot do a damn thing" to stop Iran's nuclear progress. Speaking from Imam Khomeini's mausoleum, Khamenei emphasized that enrichment is the core of Iran's nuclear identity and accused the West of decades of sabotage. He reminded Iranians of past U.S. and European refusals to supply nuclear fuel, justifying Iran's pursuit of a complete fuel cycle. His defiant stance signals rising tensions as nuclear negotiations falter once again.#iran #khamenei #uraniumenrichment #nucleardeal #IranNuclearProgram #USIranTensions #MiddleEastPolitics #IranUSRelations #nucleartalks #tehran #AyatollahKhamenei #geopolitics 104 views | 1 hour ago


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump's travel ban: What's the difference between a ban and restrictions?
In a move that has left the world in utter shock, US President Donald Trump has signed a ban on travel to the US from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, Haiti, and Iran, in a bid to "protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors. " Starting on Monday, 9 June, citizens from 12 countries are set to be banned from travelling to the US: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. In a video message, Trump cited the recent attack in Colorado as an example of foreign nationals entering the US without being "properly vetted". Although the alleged attacker was an Egyptian national, quite notably, Egypt has been left out of the ban. Another seven countries have come under a partial ban: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. For the unversed, the proclamation echoes an order from Trump's first term in 2017, when he announced a ban on travel from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the US, and simultaneously fulfils a promise Trump made during his 2024 election campaign. However, there are some exemptions, including athletes travelling for major sporting events, some Afghan nationals, dual nationals with citizenship in unaffected countries, and immigrants who are "ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Mendaftar Undo But how exactly is a 'travel ban' different from 'travel restrictions'? What is a travel ban? A travel ban is an official prohibition on the entry of individuals from specific countries or regions into a nation. In the case of Trump's 2025 policy, the US government announced a full ban on nationals from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, and Somalia. This means that citizens from these nations are categorically denied entry into the United States, regardless of the purpose of their visit or their individual circumstances. The rationale behind such a ban typically centers on national security concerns, such as high visa overstay rates, inadequate vetting processes, or the potential for individuals from these countries to pose security threats. The administration cited these reasons when implementing the 2025 ban, emphasizing the need to protect US interests and prevent potential risks associated with travelers from these nations. What are travel restrictions? In contrast, travel restrictions are more nuanced and often involve limitations on specific types of travel or certain categories of travelers, rather than an outright ban. For instance, while a country may not impose a complete ban on nationals from another nation, it might restrict certain visa categories or impose additional vetting requirements. Under Trump's 2025 policy, nationals from seven countries—such as Cuba, Laos, and Venezuela—are subject to partial restrictions. These restrictions may include limitations on specific visa types, increased scrutiny during the application process, or additional documentation requirements. Unlike a full ban, these measures allow for the possibility of entry under certain conditions, provided the traveler meets the specified criteria. See More: Travel ban: 12 nations fully banned, 7 partially blocked; internet erupts over Donald Trump's travel crackdown Key differences between a ban and restrictions: While a travel ban is a complete prohibition of entry, travel restrictions deal with limited limitations on specific categories. A travel ban is implemented based on the rationale of national security concerns, whereas travel restrictions are due to specific risks or policy objectives. In the case of Trump's directive, while 12 countries have been 'banned' from traveling to the US, 7 countries have received travel restrictions regarding US travel. Is this ban going to affect the US? The implementation of travel bans and restrictions carries significant policy implications. Bans can strain diplomatic relations, particularly with countries whose nationals are affected. They may also impact international collaborations, trade, and tourism. As debates continue over the effectiveness and fairness of such policies, it remains essential to consider their legal, diplomatic, and humanitarian implications. 'Don't Want Troublemakers': Trump Wants Foreign Student Cap at Harvard; Indian Aspirants Furious One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change