
Moscow claims UK is plotting mass raids on its fleet of tankers to create ‘ecological catastrophe'
The attacks would be designed to look like accidents, the SVR said, so the UK and the West could claim that the ships were a danger, and move to restrict their movement.
An ecological catastrophe in international waters is being prepared
'British intelligence services are planning to use Nato allies to launch a mass raid on the 'shadow fleet'; for this purpose, an ecological catastrophe in international waters is being prepared,' the SVR report claimed.
It suggested the UK planned to commission Ukrainian special forces to sink a vessel in 'one of the bottlenecks of sea communication'.
However, the report is likely to raise concerns that Russia is preparing its own 'false flag' − an operation designed to look like an attack − to justify an act of war.
Western governments have previously been accused of planning attacks on Russia's liquefied natural gas ports or ageing fleet of tankers, in what could be considered an attempt to widen its war with Ukraine to Nato nations.
The UK is often on the receiving end of such allegations as Moscow seeks to deter its support for Kyiv.
It is also understood the Kremlin uses this narrative to potentially shift the blame of any oil leaks that may be caused by any one of its ill-maintained vessels.
The US and EU sanctions regime against Russia's shadow fleet has started to seriously affect its operations.
Moscow has previously signalled its anger at the growing restrictions on the vessels
According to the Brookings Institute, a US think-tank, the volume of oil carried on its vessels has fallen from over 50 million barrels a month to less than 20 million a month since the start of 2025.
Moscow has previously signalled its anger at the growing restrictions on the vessels by escorting them with military jets, the first time it explicitly acknowledged the shadow fleet as linked to its national security.
The SVR report says: 'The impetus for such a campaign, according to London's plan, should be given by a resonant incident with one or several tankers.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Trump hikes India levy over Russian oil as tariff deadline looms
US President Donald Mr Trump has ordered steeper tariffs on Indian goods over the Asian country's continued purchase of Russian oil, opening a new front in his trade wars hours before another wave of duties takes effect. The additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, coming into place in three weeks, stacks atop a separate 25% duty entering into force, taking the level to 50% for many products. Mr Trump's order also threatens penalties on other countries who "directly or indirectly" import Russian oil, a key revenue source for Russia's war in Ukraine. Exemptions remain however for goods targeted under sector-specific duties such as steel and aluminum, and categories that could be hit later, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. Smartphones are in this list of exempted products for now, shielding Apple from a major hit as the US tech titan shifts production from China to India. India's foreign ministry condemned Mr Trump's announcement, calling the move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable." The ministry previously said India began importing oil from Russia as traditional supplies were diverted to Europe over the war - noting that Washington had "actively encouraged" such imports to strengthen "global energy market stability." However, Mr Trump recently raised pressure on India over the oil purchases, threatening new tariffs as part of a campaign to force Moscow into ending its devastating invasion of Ukraine. India's national security adviser was in Russia, media ii reported, coinciding with US envoy Steve Witkoff's visit. The 25% additional tariff is lower than the 100% Mr Trump floated last month when he told Russia to end the war in Ukraine within 50 days or face massive new economic sanctions. The Republican said at the time that these would be "secondary tariffs" targeting Russia's remaining trade partners, seeking to impede Moscow's ability to survive already sweeping Western sanctions. Tariff turmoil Mr Trump has separately taken aim at Brazil over the trial of his right-wing ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro - who is accused of planning a coup. US tariffs on various Brazilian goods surged from 10% to 50%, although broad exemptions including for orange juice and civil aircraft are expected to soften the blow. A new wave of tariffs impacting dozens of other economies, from the European Union to Taiwan, is set to kick in later today. These updated "reciprocal" tariffs, meant to address trade practices Washington deems unfair, go up to 41% for Syria US trading partners face varying increases from a current 10% level, starting at 15% for economies like the EU, Japan and South Korea. Countries not targeted by these "reciprocal" tariff hikes continue facing a 10% levy Mr Trump imposed in April. Mr Trump's plans have sparked a rush to avert steeper duties, with Switzerland's President Karin Keller-Sutter hurrying to the US ahead of the deadline. It was unclear if she would meet Mr Trump or any top economic officials. While Switzerland's key pharmaceutical sector has been spared from the incoming 39% duty for now, Mr Trump has warned that future pharma tariffs could eventually rise to 250%. Many of Mr Trump's sweeping tariffs also face legal challenges over his use of emergency economic powers, with the cases likely to ultimately reach the Supreme Court. Tokyo's tariffs envoy Ryosei Akazawa was also in Washington, pressing for clarity on when promised cuts to tariffs on Japan's auto imports from 25% to 15% would take effect. A US official said meanwhile that, unlike for the European Union, tariffs on other Japanese imports would not be capped at 15% but that these "reciprocal" levies would be added to existing ones. Japan averted threatened extra tariffs of 25% in a deal struck in July, but the two sides appear at odds over key details, including over Japanese investments of $550 billion into the United States. "It's our money to invest as we like."


Sunday World
2 hours ago
- Sunday World
Declassified docs reveal UDA leadership pledged to stop paramilitary activity 20 years ago
Details of the broken promise have emerged in declassified British government documents from 2003-4 National Archives records photo dated 06/02/03 of the former Northern Ireland Secretary, Paul Murphy, talking to reporters outside the Old Library at Trinity College, Dublin. Sinn Fein raised security concerns with the Government about housing Northern Ireland's new Assembly at Stormont, according to newly released documents from the National Archives. Issue date: Wednesday December 29, 2021. PA Photo. See PA story RECORDS Ulster Stormont. Photo credit should read: Haydn West/PA Wire ...A The UDA leadership pledged to stop all paramilitary activity in a secret meeting with government officials more than 20 years ago. Details of the broken promise have emerged in declassified British government documents from 2003-4. In a number of meetings with officials and then Secretary of State Paul Murphy, the UDA leadership, in the shape of Brigadiers Jackie McDonald, Billy McFarland, Andre Shoukri and Tommy Kirkham, said in return for certain assurances they were ready to transition away from criminality. They had agreed to make an announcement at Remembrance Sunday services in advance of putting their plan in the place. The proposals were warmly welcomed by British officials. Billed as an Ulster Political Research Group (UPRG) delegation, the four leading loyalists raised concerns about the influence of UFF commander Johnny Adair and they also demanded equal treatment when compared to the 'support'' given to the IRA as they stood down their activities. memo The UDA made the demands during a meeting with the NIO's Nick Perry, a senior government official. His memo, dated November 4, 2004, said: 'They had two main points to make. First, they want specification lifted before they make their statement on 14 November. Second, they are very concerned about the negative impact which Johnny Adair's release in January could have on the UDA. 'They did not expect him to stay in Northern Ireland after his release, but they did expect him to try to 'make his mark' before departing the scene, or attempt to do so by proxy after his departure.' They also raised concerns about the LVF, an even more sectarian terror offshoot set up by former UDA and UVF members opposed to a ceasefire. Kirkham said their followers 'needed to have some early 'wins' if they were to be persuaded to take a course many would find uncomfortable,' the memo states. Perry wrote: 'McDonald stressed that part of the process was about equality of esteem. The awful things the UDA had done were no worse than those perpetrated by, for example, the last Executive's Education Minister [Martin McGuinness], and the loyalists deserved the same chance of rehabilitation that the republican movement had received. 'Shoukri in particular said that he would need time to wean people off their criminality (!); more genuinely, perhaps, McFarland said that leaving too many people behind could be dangerous.' He said McDonald was 'vehement in his condemnation of drugs'', which Perry noted clearly made Shoukri uncomfortable. Under the terms of their intended statement, the UDA would remain intact and continue to be a proscribed organisation but with a commitment to cease criminal activity. Paul Murphy said it would amount to 'return to barracks'. In a memo to Prime Minister Tony Blair, Mr Murphy was positive about the developments. He said he would be 'announcing my intention to despecify the UDA' in light of the Remembrance Day statement. 'This move is largely symbolic. The UDA will remain an illegal organisation, as, for example, the IRA and UVF still are. Specification relates specifically to the early release of prisoners' legislation, and will have little practical effect. Former UDA spokesman Tommy Kirkham 'But politically it is important, as it involves the Government recognising the UDA's ceasefire. I am taking this step partly because the UDA's behaviour has improved somewhat in recent months, but mainly because there are positive signs that some in the UDA leadership, and their political wing the UPRG, now want to pursue a political path.' He said the Remembrance Sunday pledge in 2004 would a 'very forward'' development. Another letter from Nick Perry, dated November 4, described a 'constructive meeting' with Tommy Kirkham and the UPRG's Frankie Gallagher who 'said that their key requirement remained a despecification announcement ahead of their statement on 14 November'. 'At the end they stressed again the seriousness of their initiative: they wanted 'a dignified end to their war' and some acknowledgement in return. Their statement was not dependent on a breakthrough with the Provisionals, nor on action by the UVF. Billy McFarland 'The proposed statement is very positive (indeed, almost too good, given the UDA's lack of credibility); Kirkham, however, seems confident he can deliver.' One of the conditions was that the UDA would re-engage with the International Commission for Decommissioning. Elsewhere in the newly released files is a report of a meeting between Tony Blair and Bertie Ahern with the UVF-linked PUP where David Ervine told them 'there was only one blockage in the pipe – the IRA's refusal to acknowledge the war was over'. The document said he continued: 'If the IRA ceased to exist there would be no need for loyalist paramilitaries. It had been a long time since the ceasefires but still these hadn't turned into full cessation of activity. Both Governments should hammer home to the IRA the need to declare an end to the war.' The document adds: 'The end of the conflict, Ervine continued, had weakened the loyalist leadership. In particular, many of the 'good guys' [his term] had now walked away, to return to normal life. This meant the proportion of 'bad guys' increased. Previous bad summers had made communities feel insecure, increasing the likelihood of people getting involved with paramilitaries.' More than two decades later the UDA has yet to publicly state their intention to transition away from paramilitary activity and criminality. Jackie McDonald and Andre Shoukri News in 90 Seconds - August 6th


The Irish Sun
5 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Ex-Army chief Lord Peter Inge famous for ‘putting the fear of God' into officers leaves staggering sum to family in will
Lord Inge's daughters also get their South London-born dad's vast collection of military memorabilia HUGE FORTUNE Ex-Army chief Lord Peter Inge famous for 'putting the fear of God' into officers leaves staggering sum to family in will FORMER Army chief Lord Peter Inge left £3million in his will. Lord Inge died in July 2022, aged 86, after a five-decade career in which he rose from National Service conscript to Field Marshal. Advertisement He was the last Field Marshal to actively serve in the Army, with those since elevated to the highest rank, including King Charles, only done so after their retirement. Lord Inge was famous for putting the fear of God into other senior officers with cutting remarks and incisive questions. He was appointed Chief of the General Staff in 1992, then Chief of the Defence Staff in 1994. Lord Inge later became a fierce critic of the British campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan and blasted the Ministry of Defence for failing to 'think strategically'. Advertisement The South London-born officer took the top Armed Forces job after his predecessor was caught having an affair with a Tory MPs wife, and while British forces were struggling in Bosnia. Sir John Major's Conservative government had also pledged to further slash the size of the Army – with Inge under pressure to accept fresh cuts. The no-nonsense officer led forces through the conflict and was reportedly 'delighted' to come under mortar fire during a ride around Saravejo in a French armoured SUV. After being elevated to the House of Lords, Lord Inge of Richmond, Yorks., became a vocal critic of further plans to cut the Army. Advertisement He left £3,167,854 in his estate, reduced by £150,000 after deductions. His wife Letitia died in 2020 so it was divided between daughters Antonia, 63, and Verity, 59. They also get their South London-born dad's vast collection of military memorabilia, farm estate in Leyburn, North Yorks, and central London flat. 1 Lord Peter Inge died in July 2022, aged 86, after a five-decade career in the army Credit: Alamy