Strong geomagnetic storm underway with dazzling Northern Lights possible in these states Thursday
BOULDER, Colo. – An ongoing strong geomagnetic storm from the Sun created displays of Northern Lights across parts of the U.s. overnight into Thursday.
NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center said strong (G3) geomagnetic storm levels were reached early Thursday based on NOAA's five-level scale. The solar storm is happening in response to influences from a negative-polarity coronal hole high-speed stream (CH HSS).
A coronal hole appears like a dark void in the Sun because these areas contain cooler, less dense plasma. This allows the material to stream out at faster speeds and sometimes send impacts to Earth, which is what is happening this week.
Northern Lights Show Surprises Nasa Astronaut On Iss
NASA Solar Dynamics Observatory images of the Sun show a large coronal hole on the Sun.
These influences from the Sun create dazzling displays of Northern Lights as particles interact with Earth's atmosphere. Overnight into Thursday, skygazers in Alaska, Canada and parts of the northern U.S., including Michigan, were treated to a colorful show.
As these influences from the CH HSS continue, the SWPC has issued a Level-3-out-of-5 Geomagnetic Storm Warning through Thursday.
While the peak intensity of the aurora lights occurred between midnight and 3 a.m. ET on Thursday, there is still some opportunity for the Northern Lights on Thursday night and early Friday. Moderate geomagnetic storming is forecast to continue on Friday.
Under these conditions, aurora lights could be visible across the northern tier and Upper Midwest through early Friday morning in places such as Michigan and Maine.
Download The Free Fox Weather App
While the public does not need to be concerned about these space weather impacts, CH HSS and the more common coronal mass ejections (CME) from the Sun can negatively affect satellites in low-Earth orbit and the power grid. This week's conditions are expected to cause minor power grid fluctuations and a slight risk to satellite operations. Intermittent GPS degradation is also possible, according to the SWPC.Original article source: Strong geomagnetic storm underway with dazzling Northern Lights possible in these states Thursday
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bacteria and Beans Could Be the Secret Sauce for Moon Bricks
Bacteria can strengthen lunar soil for making bricks on the moon, cutting down on costs. Bacteria produce calcium carbonate to help fill cracks in building materials. Adding guar bean extract to lunar material drastically increases brick strength. Humanity has been reliant on bacteria for centuries. From fermentation and agriculture to making vaccines and genetic engineering, bacterial strains have found widespread industrial and lifestyle applications. In the near future, they could help make resilient bricks to build habitats on the Moon's surface. A team from India has developed a process reliant on bacteria to make stronger brick-like structures that can survive the harsh atmosphere of the moon. The approach is notable because it uses the lunar soil as the base material. Or in the words of NASA, In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU). One of the biggest challenges in the quest to build a settlement for humanity away from Earth is hauling all the material and equipment to an extraterrestrial body. According to Jennifer Edmunson, acting Program Manager for NASA's Centennial Challenges, flying from Earth to the Moon can cost $1-1.12 million per kilogram of cargo. To avoid that, NASA has actively explored in-situ ideas that can exploit the material locally available on the Moon, and even Mars. Building on that approach, a team of experts at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) and the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) has developed a method to create what they refer to as 'space bricks.' The fundamental material used to make these bricks is lunar soil, combined with urine (as the source of urea) and guar bean, which is commonly grown in India and used to produce a food thickening powder called guar gum. This plant extract is used in powdered form as an additive to boost the material's strength. This is where the bacteria, a species named Sporosarcina pasteurii, come into the picture. It combines the calcium and urea in the building material to create calcium carbonate crystals that fill the cracks developing in the brick over time. 'The final product obtained after a few days of incubation was found to possess significant strength and machinability,' says the team. Broadly, the process is called bio-cementation, while the repair process is known as Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (MICP). As per a paper published in the Frontiers journal, the bacterial repair can extend the functional lifespan of lunar bricks on the lunar surface. Interestingly, this won't be the first time that urine, or the aforementioned bacterial species, has appeared in space research. Experts at the University of Manchester created a material called AstroCrete that would essentially combine Martian soil with urine and astronaut blood. Interestingly, the biocomposite material turned out to be nearly as strong as concrete. As far as the bacterial species goes, it's a special one, and the strengthening properties of this bacterium have already been demonstrated with Earth-based projects. During a TED Talk, Magnus Larsson demonstrated an award-winning method of using bacteria to make solid dunes and prevent the expansion of the Sahara desert. Ginger Krieg Dosier, an assistant professor at the American University in Sharjah, has also developed a method to produce biobricks using the same bacterial species, urine, and sand. The core role of Sporosarcina pasteurii is to produce calcium carbonate, which is deemed extremely compatible with the constituents of concrete. When cracks appear in concrete, the bacterial material triggers the formation of calcium carbonate to fill the cracks and seal them. In a separate paper published in the PLOS Journal, the team tested another bacterial species named Bacillus velezensis. It is approximately ten times more affordable, and during lab tests, it produced twice the amount of the crack-filling material. Calcium supplements are recommended by doctors worldwide to boost the strength and growth of bones. In nature, calcium's role in minerals isn't too different. The teams at IISc and IIT began their work on space bricks with bacteria, urea, and calcium. The base material was lunar soil simulant (LSS), which is rich in silicon, carbon, oxygen, and aluminum. The guar gum, extracted from guar beans, plays a crucial role in making the construction material due to its role as a polymer additive. In fact, as per the research paper published in the Ceramics International journal, the organic gum increased the brick's strength by nearly six times. 'In independent experiments performed under flask conditions, it was observed that guar gum accelerated both bacterial growth and MICP related activity,' says the research paper. Another impressive aspect of these space bricks is that they are quite machinable and allow free-form shaping to suit the construction needs. A simple lathe is all that's needed to shape the material, which opens the doors for easily making interlocked designs and reducing the hassle of specialized molds. The team is now looking forward to making larger bricks and scaling up the manufacturing process beyond labs. The focus ahead will be on making the bricks stronger so that they can brush off seismic activity on the lunar surface. Yes, the moon is full of surprises, and 'moonquakes' are one of them. Interestingly, the same team is also working on a similar bacteria-driven strategy for making bricks using the Martian soil. The real challenge, of course, will be transporting the machinery that can harvest the lunar regolith and turn it into space bricks. Let's hope the Artemis mission brings back the glory days of mankind on the moon and opens the doors for long-term settlements.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Astronomers baffled by mystery object flashing signals at Earth every 44 minutes: ‘Like nothing we've ever seen'
The truth is out there. Astronomers say they're stunned by an unidentified object flashing strange signals from deep space. The object, named ASKAP J1832-0911, was detected by the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) and NASA'S Chandra X-ray observatory — the world's most powerful X-ray telescope. 'It is unlike anything we have seen before,' Andy Wang, an astronomer at Curtin University in Perth, Australia, declared in a statement published this week. ASKAP J1832-0911 emits pulses of radio waves and X-rays for two minutes every 44 minutes, according to the experts, who documented their findings in Nature journal. An image of the sky showing the region around ASKAP J1832-0911. Ziteng Wang, ICRAR ASKAP J1832-0911 has been classified as a 'long-period transient' or 'LPT' — a cosmic body that emits radio pulses separated by a few minutes or a few hours. Wang and has team theorize that the object could be a dead star, but they don't know why it 'switches on' and 'switches off' at 'long, regular and unusual intervals,' reports. 'ASKAP J1831-0911 could be a magnetar (the core of a dead star with powerful magnetic fields), or it could be a pair of stars in a binary system where one of the two is a highly magnetised white dwarf (a low-mass star at the end of its evolution),' Wang wrote. 'However, even those theories do not fully explain what we are observing,' he added. 'This discovery could indicate a new type of physics or new models of stellar evolution.' Wang and his team hope to detect similar another using radio waves and the Chandra X-ray observatory, saying a subsequent discovery will help them learn more about the nature of such LPTs. An artist's illustration of NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory in space. NASA/CXC & J. Vaughan, NASA/CXC & J. Vaughan It's not the only space discovery to hit headlines and spark conversation in recent weeks. Earlier this month, Cambridge University Press revealed that astronomers had detected a signal extracted from interstellar noise that could be a sign of active biology on another planet. 'Astronomers have detected the most promising signs yet of a possible biosignature outside the solar system, although they remain cautious,' a press release from the prestigious publisher read.
The Verge
2 hours ago
- The Verge
SpaceX rockets keep exploding. Is that normal?
With yet another failed Starship test this week, in which the ambitious heavy rocket exploded once again, you might reasonably suspect that luck has finally run out for SpaceX. But this degree of failure during a development process isn't actually unusual, according to Wendy Whitman Cobb, a space policy expert with the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, especially when you're testing new space technology as complex as a large rocket. However, the Starship tests are meaningfully different from the slow, steady pace of development that we've come to expect from the space sector. 'The reason a lot of people perceive this to be unusual is that this is not the typical way that we have historically tested rockets,' Whitman Cobb says. Historically speaking, space agencies like NASA or legacy aerospace companies like United Launch Alliance (ULA) have taken their time with rocket development and have not tested until they were confident in a successful outcome. That's still the case today with major NASA projects like the development of the Space Launch System (SLS), which has now dragged on for over a decade. 'They will take as long as they need to to make sure that the rocket is going to work and that a launch is going to be successful,' Whitman Cobb says. 'This is not the typical way that we have historically tested rockets.' SpaceX has chosen a different path, in which it tests, fails, and iterates frequently. That process has been at the heart of its success, allowing the company to make developments like the reusable Falcon 9 rocket at a rapid pace. However, it also means frequent and very public failures, which have generated complaints about environmental damage in the local area around the launch site and have caused the company to butt heads with regulatory agencies. There are also significant concerns about the political ties of CEO Elon Musk to the Trump administration and his undemocratic influence over federal regulation of SpaceX's work. Even within the context of SpaceX's move-fast-and-break-things approach, though, the development of the Starship has appeared chaotic. Compared to the development of the Falcon 9 rocket, which had plenty of failures but a generally clear forward path from failing often to failing less and less as time went on, Starship has a much more spotty record. Previous development was more incremental, first demonstrating that the rocket was sound before moving onto more complex issues like reusability of the booster or first stage. The company didn't even attempt to save the booster of a Falcon 9 and reuse it until several years into testing. Starship isn't like that. 'They are trying to do everything at once with Starship,' Whitman Cobb says, as the company is trying to debut an entirely new rocket with new engines and make it reusable all at once. 'It really is a very difficult engineering challenge.' 'They are trying to do everything at once with Starship.' The Raptor engines that power the Starship are a particularly tough engineering nut to crack, as there are a lot of them — 33 per Starship, all clustered together — and they need to be able to perform the tricky feat of reigniting in space. The relighting of engines has been successful on some of the previous Starship test flights, but it has also been a point of failure. Why, then, is SpaceX pushing for so much, so fast? It's because Musk is laser-focused on getting to Mars. And while it would theoretically be possible to send a mission to Mars using existing rockets like the Falcon 9, the sheer volume of equipment, supplies, and people needed for a Mars mission has a very large mass. To make Mars missions even remotely affordable, you need to be able to move a lot of mass in one launch — hence the need for a much larger rocket like the Starship or NASA's SLS. NASA has previously been hedging its bets by developing its own heavy launch rocket as well as supporting the development of Starship. But with recent funding cuts, it's looking more and more likely that the SLS will get axed — leaving SpaceX as the only player in town to facilitate NASA's Mars plans. But there's still an awful lot of work to do to get Starship to a place where serious plans for crewed missions can even be made. 'There's no way that they're putting people on that right now.' Will a Starship test to Mars happen by 2026, with a crewed test to follow as soon as 2028, as Musk said this week he's aiming for? 'I think it's completely delusional,' Whitman Cobb says, pointing out that SpaceX has not appeared to be seriously considering issues like adding life support to the Starship or making concrete plans for Mars habitats, launch and landing pads, or infrastructure. 'I don't see SpaceX as putting its money where its mouth is,' Whitman Cobb says. 'If they do make the launch window next year, it's going to be uncrewed. There's no way that they're putting people on that right now. And I seriously doubt whether they will make it.' That doesn't mean Starship will never make it to Mars, of course. 'I believe SpaceX will engineer their way out of it. I believe their engineering is good enough that they will make Starship work,' Whitman Cobb says. But getting an uncrewed rocket to Mars within the next decade is a lot more realistic than next year. Putting people on the rocket, though, is another matter entirely. 'If they're looking to build a large-scale human settlement? That's decades,' Whitman Cobb says. 'I don't know that I will live to see that.' Featured Videos From The Verge Microsoft Build event in 15 minutes Microsoft just wrapped its annual Build conference for 2025. The focus this year: AI agents. We got a look at the open agentic web, new CoPilot updates, Linux is now open-source, and the company also confirmed it's expanding its Azure AI Foundry models list to include Elon Musk's Grok 3 and Grok 3 mini from xAI. Plus, we hear from OpenAI's Sam Altman and Nvidia's Jensen Huang. Here's everything you missed
