U.S. Supreme Court to hear challenge to Colorado ban on conversion therapy for minors
Social Sharing
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear a case from Colorado to decide whether state and local governments can enforce laws banning conversion therapy for 2SLGBTQ+ children.
The conservative-led court is taking up the case amid actions by President Donald Trump targeting transgender people, including a ban on military service and an end to federal funding for gender-affirming care for transgender minors.
The justices also have heard arguments in a Tennessee case over whether state bans on treating transgender minors violate the Constitution. But they have yet to issue a decision.
Colorado is among roughly half the states that prohibit the practice of trying to change a person's sexual orientation or gender identity through counselling. The discredited practice has been denounced in the fields of psychology and counselling in Canada and the United States.
The issue is whether the law violates the speech rights of counsellors. Defenders of such laws argue that they regulate the conduct of professionals who are licensed by the state.
The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver upheld the state law. The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta has struck down local local bans in Florida.
In 2023, the court had turned away a similar challenge, despite a split among federal appeals courts that had weighed state bans and come to differing decisions.
At the time, three justices, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas, said they would have taken on the issue. It takes four justices to grant review. The nine-member court does not typically reveal how justices vote at this stage of a case so it's unclear who might have provided the fourth vote.
The case will be argued in the court's new term, which begins in October. The appeal on behalf of Kaley Chiles, a counsellor in Colorado Springs, was filed by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a conservative legal organization that has appeared frequently at the court in recent years in cases involving high-profile social issues.
Chiles has had to turn away clients because of the law, ADF lawyer Jim Campbell said Monday on a conference call for reporters, though he declined to say how many.
Chiles said the law, with potential fines of $5,000 US and licence suspension or even revocation, "interferes with my ability to serve my clients with integrity."
WATCH | MPs unanimously pass ban on conversion therapy in late 2021:
House unanimously passes ban on conversion therapy
3 years ago
Duration 2:02
One of ADF's earlier cases was a 5-4 decision in 2018 in which the justices ruled that California could not force state-licensed anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centres to provide information about abortion.
Chiles's lawyers leaned heavily on that decision in asking the court to take up her case. They wrote that Chiles doesn't "seek to 'cure' clients of same-sex attractions or to 'change' clients' sexual orientation."
In arguing for the court to reject the appeal, lawyers for Colorado wrote that lawmakers acted to regulate professional conduct, "based on overwhelming evidence that efforts to change a child's sexual orientation or gender identity are unsafe and ineffective."
WATCH | One man's fight against conversion therapy:
'Exhausting and heartbreaking': one man's fight against conversion therapy
5 years ago
Duration 5:41
Victor Szymanski looked like he had everything. But starting the summer after Grade 11, he was coerced into 'reparative therapy' sessions aimed at 'curing' his homosexuality. Now he's pushing for legislation that 'rightfully addresses conversion therapy as a form of emotional and psychological abuse.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
2 minutes ago
- Global News
World Bank lowers global growth forecast, citing trade war ‘turbulence'
U.S. President Donald Trump's trade wars are expected to slash economic growth this year in the United States and around the world, the World Bank forecast Tuesday. Citing 'a substantial rise in trade barriers'' but without mentioning Trump by name, the 189-country lender predicted that the U.S. economy – the world's largest – would grow half as fast (1.4 per cent) this year as it did in 2024 (2.8 per cent). That marked a downgrade from the 2.3 per cent U.S. growth it had forecast back for 2025 back in January. The bank also lopped 0.4 percentage points off its forecast for global growth this year. It now expects the world economy to expand just 2.3 per cent in 2025, down from 2.8 per cent in 2024. In a forward to the latest version of the twice-yearly Global Economic Prospects report, World Bank chief economist Indermit Gill wrote that the global economy has missed its chance for the 'soft landing'' — slowing enough to tame inflation without generating serious pain — it appeared headed for just six months ago. Story continues below advertisement 'The world economy today is once more running into turbulence,' Gill wrote. 'Without a swift course correction, the harm to living standards could be deep.'' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy America's economic prospects have been clouded by Trump's erratic and aggressive trade policies, including 10 per cent taxes — tariffs — on imports from almost every country in the world. These levies drive up costs in the U.S. and invite retaliation from other countries. 1:46 Can the Liberal government's trade bill unify Canada's economy? The Chinese economy is forecast to see growth slow from five per cent in 2024 to 4.5 per cent this year and four per cent next. The world's second-largest economy has been hobbled by the tariffs that Trump has imposed on its exports, by the collapse of its real estate market and by an aging workforce. The World Bank expects the 20 European countries that share the euro currency to collectively grow just 0.7 per cent this year, down from an already lackluster 0.9 per cent in 2024. Story continues below advertisement Trump's tariffs are expected to hurt European exports. And the unpredictable way he rolls them out — announcing them, suspending them, coming up with new ones — has created uncertainty that discourages business investment. India is once again expected to the be world's fastest-growing major economy, expanding at a 6.3 per cent clip this year. But that's down from 6.5 per cent in 2024 and from the 6.7 per cent the bank had forecast for 2025 in January. In Japan, economic growth is expected to accelerate this year – but only from 0.2 per cent in 2024 to a sluggish 0.7 per cent this year, well short of the 1.2 per cent the World Bank had forecast in January. The World Bank seeks to reduce poverty and boost living standards by providing grants and low-rate loans to poor economies. Another multinational organization that seeks to promote global prosperity — the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development — last week downgraded its forecast for the U.S. and global economies.
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
U.S. Marines deployed to L.A. have not responded to protests, officials say
The U.S. Marines that deployed to Los Angeles on orders from President Donald Trump have not yet been called to respond to the city's immigration protests and are there only to protect federal officials and property, the Marine Corps commandant said Tuesday. The 700 Marines and another 2,000 National Guard troops were sent to LA on Monday, escalating a military presence that local officials and Gov. Gavin Newsom do not want and that the police chief says makes it harder to handle the protests safely. Marine Corps Gen. Eric Smith told a budget hearing on Capitol Hill that the battalion has not yet been sent to any protests. The Marines were trained for crowd control but have no arrest authority and are there to protect government property and personnel, he said. Trump doubled the number of Guard troops being deployed soon after the first wave of 2,000 began arriving Sunday following days of protests driven by anger over the president's stepped-up enforcement of immigration laws that critics say are breaking apart migrant families. Story continues below advertisement 2:59 'They spit, we hit': Trump threatens anti-ICE protesters in LA The demonstrations continued Monday but were far less raucous, with thousands of people peacefully attending a rally at City Hall and hundreds more protesting outside a federal complex that includes a detention center where some immigrants are being held following workplace raids across the city. The protests in Los Angeles, a city of 4 million people, have largely been centered in several blocks of downtown and a few other spots. At daybreak Tuesday, guard troops were stationed outside the detention center, but there was no sign of the Marines. Obscene slogans directed at Trump and federal law enforcement remained scrawled across several buildings. At the Walt Disney Concert Hall, workers were busy washing away graffiti Tuesday morning. In nearby Santa Ana, armored vehicles blocked a road leading to federal immigration and government offices. Workers swept up plastic bottles and broken glass near buildings sprayed with graffiti. Story continues below advertisement View image in full screen Workers remove graffiti from the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and Courthouse in Santa Ana, Calif., Tuesday, June 10, 2025, after Monday's protests against President Trump's ICE raids resulted in violence. (Mindy Schauer/The Orange County Register via AP). Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Mayor Karen Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. They say he is putting public safety at risk by adding military personnel even though police say they don't need the help. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said in a statement that he was confident in the police department's ability to handle large-scale demonstrations and that the Marines' arrival without coordinating with the police department would present a 'significant logistical and operational challenge.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Newsom called the deployments reckless and 'disrespectful to our troops' in a post on the social platform X. 'This isn't about public safety,' the governor said. 'It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego.' Protests spread across the U.S. The protests began Friday after federal immigration authorities arrested more than 40 people across Los Angeles and continued over the weekend as crowds blocked a major freeway and set self-driving cars on fire. Police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades. Story continues below advertisement Demonstrations spread Monday to other cities nationwide, including San Francisco and Santa Ana, California, as well as Dallas and Austin, Texas. Authorities in Austin appeared to use chemical irritants to disperse a crowd that gathered near the state Capitol. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott posted on social media that more than a dozen protesters were arrested. Los Angeles response takes stage on Capitol Hill The Pentagon said deploying the National Guard and Marines costs $134 million. That figure came out Tuesday just after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth engaged in a testy back-and-forth about the costs during a congressional hearing. Hegseth said the department has a budget increase and the money to cover the costs, and he defended Trump's decision to send the troops, saying they are needed to protect federal agents doing their jobs. He said the Marines will only be deployed for a maximum of 60 days. 2:23 Trump's National Guard move 'excuse to escalate' situation, Newsom says Meanwhile, Democratic members of California's congressional delegation on Tuesday accused the president of creating a 'manufactured crisis' with his orders to send in troops. Story continues below advertisement Rep. Nancy Pelosi contrasted Trump's actions with his handling of the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol when law enforcement officers were beaten. 'We begged the president of the United States to send in the National Guard. He would not do it,' Pelosi said. California pushes back against sending troops California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit over the use of National Guard troops following the first deployment, telling reporters that Trump had 'trampled' the state's sovereignty. He sought a court order declaring Trump's use of the Guard unlawful and asking for a restraining order to halt the deployment. Trump said the city would have been 'completely obliterated' if he had not deployed the Guard. U.S. officials said the Marines were needed to protect federal buildings and personnel, including immigration agents. A convoy of buses with blacked-out windows and escorted by sheriff's vehicles arrived overnight at a Navy facility just south of LA. Story continues below advertisement Despite their presence, there has been limited engagement so far between the Guard and protesters while local law enforcement implements crowd control. Protests remained peaceful Monday Thousands flooded the streets around City Hall for a union rally Monday before labor leader David Huerta was freed on a bond after he was arrested Friday while protesting the immigration raids. The detention of Heurta, president of the Service Employees International Union California, became a rallying cry for people angry over the crackdown. 2:10 Trump deploys California National Guard to LA to quell protests despite governor's objections As the crowd thinned, police began pushing protesters away from the area, firing crowd-control munitions as people chanted, 'Peaceful protest.' At least a dozen people were surrounded by police and detained. Story continues below advertisement Several dozen people were arrested throughout the weekend. Authorities say one was detained Sunday for throwing a Molotov cocktail at police and another for ramming a motorcycle into a line of officers. Guard deployment is a nearly unprecedented escalation The deployment appeared to be the first time in decades that a state's National Guard was activated without a request from its governor, a significant escalation against those who have sought to hinder the administration's mass deportation efforts. The last time the National Guard was activated without a governor's permission was in 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to protect a civil rights march in Alabama, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. In a directive Saturday, Trump invoked a legal provision allowing him to deploy federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' Story continues below advertisement Sullivan reported from Minneapolis and Baldor reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Christopher Weber and Dorany Pineda in Los Angeles, Amy Taxin in Orange County, California, Hallie Golden in Seattle, Stefanie Dazio in Berlin, Jake Offenhartz in New York, and Greg Bull in Seal Beach, California, contributed to this report.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
U.S. defence secretary defends military deployment to L.A., expected to cost $134M
The deployment of National Guard troops and U.S. marines to Los Angeles will cost at least $134 million US and last at least the next 60 days, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and a senior defence official told lawmakers Tuesday. "We stated very publicly that it's 60 days because we want to ensure that those rioters, looters and thugs on the other side assaulting our police officers know that we're not going anywhere," Hegseth told members of the House appropriations defence subcommittee. After questioning from members of Congress, Hegseth turned to his acting comptroller, Bryn Woollacott MacDonnell, who provided the total estimated cost and said this "is largely just the cost of travel, housing and food." She said the money will come from operations and maintenance accounts. U.S. President Donald Trump has sent over 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 active duty marines to quell the protests despite the objections of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and local leaders, including L.A. Mayor Karen Bass, who was due to provide an update about the protests early Tuesday afternoon. "The governor of California has failed to protect his people, along with the mayor of Los Angeles, so President Trump has said he will protect our agents, and our Guard and Marines are proud to do it," said Hegseth. Newsom and Bass have said the federal response has escalated a situation that could have been kept under control by local police. Marine official says troops will protect buildings Los Angeles police Chief Jim McDonnell said in a statement that he was confident in the police department's ability to handle large-scale demonstrations and that the marines' arrival without co-ordinating with the police department would present a "significant logistical and operational challenge." Marine Corps Gen. Eric Smith told a budget hearing on Capitol Hill that the battalion has not yet been sent to any protests. The marines are trained for crowd control but have no arrest authority and are there to protect government property and federal personnel, Smith said. Requests for federal military deployment usually come at the request of a state governor, not in defiance of one. Newsom has said California will be suing the administration as a result. Trump's orders appear to be the first time it has happened without state approval since former U.S. president Lyndon Johnson deployed troops to Alabama in the mid-1960s. Under the Posse Comitatus Act, troops are prohibited from policing U.S. citizens on American soil. Invoking the Insurrection Act, which allows troops to do that, is incredibly rare, and it's not clear if Trump plans to do it. "If there was an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it," the president said Tuesday from the Oval Office. Tensions soared in Los Angeles after a series of sweeps starting late last week, including in the city's fashion district and at a Home Depot, pushed the tally of immigrant arrests in the city past 100. A prominent union leader was arrested while protesting and accused of impeding law enforcement. In nearby San Diego, officers in heavy tactical gear fired flash-bang explosives at a popular Italian restaurant on May 30, an operation that resulted in four immigration arrests. WATCH l California sues federal government over unsolicited troop deployment: California to sue Trump over National Guard deployment to L.A. protests 14 hours ago Duration 3:39 California is suing the U.S. president, accusing him of unlawful federal overreach by deploying the National Guard to Los Angeles protests over ICE immigration raids. The Pentagon also deployed about 700 U.S. Marines Monday to reinforce the federal response. Questions about deportations Hegseth said that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents are deporting "illegal criminals," but Democrats and immigration advocates have said it's not clear if that's always been the case, citing a lack of transparency from the Trump administration. A Washington Post report on Tuesday indicated that some individuals from the Southern California raids may have already been deported. Judges in a number of cases across the country have questioned whether the administration has given deportees the opportunity to challenge their removals, and court orders have led to the government facilitating the return of at least two people to the U.S. The U.S. has a significant issue with unauthorized persons within its borders, estimated at between 11 million and 12 million people by various immigration White House spokesperson said in January the administration considers any unauthorized person in the country a "criminal," even though illegal entry on its own is considered a civil offence. Some lawmakers at the subcommittee hearing, from both parties, made it clear they are unhappy that Hegseth has not provided details on the administration's first proposed defence budget, which Trump has said would total $1 trillion, a significant increase over the current spending level of more than $800 billion. The Tuesday hearing was Hegseth's first public appearance on Capitol Hill since he squeaked through his Senate confirmation with a tie-breaking vote from Vice-President JD Vance. Many of the controversies of Hegseth's early tenure were barely touched on, or not at all, though any number of those issues could come up at his planned appearance at the House's armed service committee hearing Thursday. These include plans to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on security upgrades to turn a Qatari jet into Air Force One, to pour as much as $45 million into a military parade planned for Saturday, and his use of an unsecured Signal messaging app about imminent military strikes targeting Houthi militants in Yemen, in which he appeared to reveal operational details. The Pentagon's watchdog is reviewing whether any of Hegseth's aides were asked to delete any Signal messages.
