Ford's focus on tariffs not enough to 'unsettle' NDP in Niagara, most of Hamilton: expert
Social Sharing
Doug Ford's Progressive Conservatives (PCs) won a third straight majority government Thursday night, but in the Hamilton and Niagara region, the NDP were able to hold onto all but one of their seats that were at risk of a switch.
Early poll projections and analysis showed that the NDP might be in some trouble in their three ridings in Niagara as well as three ridings in Hamilton.
But while the party lost Hamilton Mountain to the PCs, they were able to hold on to the other five.
Robin Lennox was victorious for the NDP in Hamilton Centre, the NPD's Sandy Shaw won the Hamilton West-Ancaster-Dundas riding, Niagara Centre saw Jeff Burch emerge as the winner, Niagara Falls was won by Wayne Gates and Jennie Stevens was re-elected in St. Catharines.
Premier Doug Ford triggered the snap election on Jan. 28 asking voters for an historic mandate to combat tariff threats from the U.S. President Donald Trump. By early Friday, the PCs were elected or leading in 80 of Ontario's 124 seats.
While Trump's tariff threat was the main focus of Ford's PC campaign, and is an issue that is top-of-mind for Canadians, it was not enough to "unsettle" the NDP in Hamilton and Niagara, says McMaster University politics Prof. Peter Graefe.
"The thought that Ford running on tariffs was likely to unsettle a number of NDP seats in more industrial centres like Welland, Niagara, St. Catharines and Hamilton didn't happen ultimately, despite [the NDP] going down in the share of popular vote across the province," Graefe said.
"The incumbents here were able to hold off against the strategy of the conservatives to try and grow their majority by taking those types of seats themselves," Graefe added.
Mountain result means more local cabinet options
With most of the Hamilton-area MPPs having "been there for a while now," Graefe believes it will be "business as usual" and they will just "probably fall back into an old pattern."
Not only did most NDP seats remain the same in the region, several PCs were also re-elected, including Donna Skelly in Flamborough-Glanbrook, Sam Oosterhoff in Niagara West, Will Bouma in Brantford-Brant, Neil Lumsden in Hamilton East-Stoney Creek and Effie Triantafilopoulos in Oakville North-Burlington.
But the election of candidate Monica Ciriello in Hamilton Mountain, a riding NDP's Monique Taylor held since 2011 until she decided not to seek re-election this year, gives the PCs a "credible" person in the region to be a cabinet minister, according to Graefe.
Ciriello, who was the city's bylaw director, is a lawyer and would provide a somewhat "different demographic face to a PC caucus, which is otherwise fairly older … and does not have a lot of strong women or younger women in their ranks."
Until the election, Lumsden was the only local PC MPP to hold a cabinet position, as minister of sport.
"There's a possibility that Hamilton will be much better represented at the cabinet table should [Ciriello] make her way into cabinet, maybe not right away, but in a year or two," Graefe said.
Repairing 'divisions' in Hamilton Centre
NDP newcomer Lennox, now the MMP-elect in Hamilton Centre, has her job cut out for her "repairing some of the conflicts" among people in her riding, Graefe said.
Citing "divisions" between the NDP's base and Independent Sarah Jama's campaign, Graefe said he believes this "would be a particular challenge" for Lennox.
Jama, who was the incumbent MPP, ran as an Independent candidate after the Ontario New Democrats rejected her attempt to rejoin the party.
In October 2023, Jama was ousted from the party after she made a statement in support of Palestinians following the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel that prompted Israel's retaliation in Gaza.
She represented the riding independently for more than a year, but told CBC Hamilton in January that she'd submitted a vetting package to the NDP to run as their candidate once again. The NDP rejected the submission.
Following her defeat Thursday night, Jama said people should not count her out of politics just yet.
"Even though the results are not what we wanted, I hold a lot of hope in this idea that we did something beautiful in Hamilton Centre," Jama told CBC Hamilton.
"We definitely paved a way, a pathway for people to consider doing politics differently. And even though the results were not what we expected, the work doesn't stop here. I'll be continuing to do what I can to make sure that we're challenging systems that are broken and making sure that we're building community here in Hamilton Centre."
PCs now have 'a comfortable four years'
Brock University politics Prof. Stefan Dolgert said the new MPPs must now focus on the things that are important to voters.
In addition to preparing Ontario for the effects of tariffs, Dolgert said there are several "really important" issues — cost of living, housing and health care.
"[There] are two and a half million Ontarians who don't have a doctor. So, I would say all of those should be priorities, and the PCs did say that those things were all important to them," Dolgert said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
15 minutes ago
- Montreal Gazette
Kheiriddin: Finally, Canada is making defence a priority
By Damn the torpedoes! The Liberal government is taking aim at defence — and it's about time. This week, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that Canada will hit the NATO benchmark of two per cent of GDP on defence spending this year, instead of waiting for 2032, deploying an additional $9 billion in 2025-2026. Ever the banker, he's also deploying some accounting manoeuvres, shifting $16 billion from the ledgers of other departments to the defence budget to bring it up to the required amount. But that is in line with the tabulations of other NATO countries — and is something predecessor Justin Trudeau should have done, so that Canada would have appeared to be less of a defence laggard for the last decade. But better late than never — and perhaps, just in time. Carney's announcement comes just ahead of next week's G7 summit he is hosting in Kananaskis, Alta., and a meeting of NATO leaders later this month in The Hague. The change sends a message to U.S. President Donald Trump and EU allies that Canada means business on defence. Together with the government's border security bill announced this week, Carney is paving the way for a trade deal, or at least some relief from tariffs, with the United States. His spending boost will sit well with his recent pledge to join ReArm Europe, in light of upcoming NATO demands that members spend five per cent of GDP in coming years, instead of two. Carney also gets a gold star for actual change. The government will beef up salaries, recruitment and retention of troops, finally acknowledging that new equipment is pointless without skilled personnel. Ottawa will also overhaul the procurement process, a boost for the Canadian defence industry which could offset some of the costs to taxpayers through job creation and revenue. That could also help sell future spending hikes: While polling shows two-thirds of Canadians support spending two per cent on defence, there's not much appetite for five. But as always, a landmine looms on the horizon: in this case, the infamous F-35 program. On Tuesday, Auditor-General Karen Hogan dropped a bombshell. Canada's planned fleet of 88 F-35 jets is now projected to cost nearly 50 per cent more — from $19 billion in 2022 to a staggering $27.7 billion in 2025. And that's before factoring in infrastructure upgrades, weapons and inflation. Hogan's audit was brutal: the Department of National Defence relied on outdated cost estimates, ignored improved data and has no coherent contingency plan in place. Infrastructure to house the jets is running three years behind schedule, with some bases not expected to open until 2031. The RCAF is also short on qualified pilots — something it knew back in 2018, but which for the previous government was presumably not a priority. Canada needs stealth fighters. We don't, however, need another lake of red ink. Instead of sticking with 88 F-35s at $27 billion-plus for the fleet, Canada should look at Sweden's Gripen, Boeing's Super Hornet or a mix of planes. If Carney approves the F-35 as-is, that failure will become the focus, instead of his ambitious plans to rearm. Defence Minister David McGuinty hasn't committed to a review of the project, saying only that he'd ensure that the auditor general's recommendations will be 'fully integrated' into his department. But he should, especially now that Canada is also building stronger ties with Europe, be considering where some of these planes could be sourced. The reality of modern warfare is also changing, pivoting from planes to drones and battlefields to cyberspace. While the proposed spending spree would drop money on both, the trend to smarter spending versus splashing out big shiny toys could help keep costs down. Ukraine has made significant use of $300 drones, recently taking out $100 million Russian bombers in a daring assault. That's the kind of smart thinking Canada's government should copy as it rebuilds our military for the future — one that looks increasingly grim.
Calgary Herald
20 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
Varcoe: New poll shows energy security, exports drive growing Canadian support for pipelines — as Smith pitches West Coast line
Article content Alberta is speaking to major pipeline operators that have successfully built projects in Canada, and 'we hope that we'll be able to have more to tell you in a few weeks,' Smith told reporters. Article content 'We know that it's a chicken-and-egg problem, that no one's going to come forward with a project without some guarantee that it's going to be approved,' she added. Article content 'What we're going to do is walk with that group, to test out the two-year timeline and see if we can get on the project list.' Article content Article content At last week's first ministers meeting, Smith talked about striking a grand bargain that would allow new pipelines to move ahead along with decarbonization initiatives, such as the carbon capture network proposed by the Pathways Alliance consortium of oilsands operators. Article content Federal Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson voiced support in Calgary last month for the group's $16.5-billion carbon capture development in northern Alberta. Article content Article content 'At the moment, that's 100 per cent cost,' Smith said of the capital expenses tied to the massive proposal. Article content 'If you couple it with a million barrel per day pipeline, well, that allows you $20 billion worth of revenue, year after year after year, for the lifetime of that project.' Article content Pathways is a consortium of the country's largest oilsands operators, including Cenovus Energy and Canadian Natural Resources, and it's been working on the carbon capture proposal for several years. Article content However, the group has said it needs more government assistance before giving the project the green light. Article content 'If we are going to undertake major projects like Pathways, there has to be clear and concrete financial support at both the federal and provincial levels. And we're hopeful we can eventually get there,' Cenovus Energy CEO Jon McKenzie said Tuesday. Article content Article content Canada's track record for getting major pipelines built is complicated, with only two of five major developments pitched in the past 15 years being built. Article content Article content However, the tariff war with the United States has demonstrated the need for Canada to be able to provide domestic energy security to all regions of the country and to diversify its customer base, as more than 90 per cent of Canadian oil and gas exports head south. Article content Several recent polls have shown a majority of Canadians back new oil and gas pipelines in the wake of the trade war with the U.S. Article content A new survey by Nanos Research, conducted last month for the University of Ottawa's Positive Energy research program, highlights the evolving attitudes around pipelines. Article content The Positive Energy poll found 42 per cent of respondents believe there is more agreement today between Canadians about building oil and gas pipelines than five years ago. That's up sharply from 16 per cent in 2021.
Vancouver Sun
an hour ago
- Vancouver Sun
From bear traps to camped-out soldiers, security measures in place for G7 in Kananaskis
Starting Sunday, seven of the most powerful people in the world will be at the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alta., where they will discuss economic instability and security issues, including Russia's war on Ukraine. Unsurprisingly, to bring the most powerful people in the world together, even at the best of times — and this is not the best of times — necessitates a massive security operation, with coordination across multiple Canadian agencies. '(Security) is both massive and essential,' said John Kirton, the director of the G7 Research Project at the University of Toronto. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. While Canadians are perhaps unlikely to have wildly strong views about French President Emmanuel Macron or Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, U.S. President Donald Trump has angered millions of Canadians with his aggressive rhetoric. Prime Minister Mark Carney has also angered many by inviting Saudia Arabia's Mohammed bin Salman and India's Narendra Modi. Already, unspecified security concerns have led to at least one ceremonial casualty: Calgary's White Hatter ceremony. Traditionally, the ceremony welcomes delegates to Alberta's largest city, and they're handed a white Smithbilt cowboy hat to celebrate Calgary's frontier spirit. In 2002, when the G8 Summit was also held in Kananaskis, leaders were given the ceremonial hats. U.S. president George W. Bush put it on his head, but Jacques Chirac, the late French president, reportedly turned up his nose at the gift and Russian President Vladimir Putin — not yet the international pariah he is today — examined the hat without putting it on his head. This time, however, there will be no ceremony. 'We have to respect that security considerations today are very different from the last time we hosted the summit in 2002 … there's been a lot of nostalgia about what we were able to do in 2002,' said Calgary Mayor Jyoti Gondek earlier this week. In 2002, a bear also died after falling from a tree as security officials were trying to scare it away from delegates. This year's security team has a bear trap, should a curious bear get too close to the humans in the region. The meeting, last held in Canada in Charlevoix, Quebec, in 2018, will happen against the backdrop of a global economic reorientation. Under Trump, the United States has initiated an international tariff war, breaking down decades of movement towards free trade. Meanwhile, Russia's invasion of Ukraine continues — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been invited to the conference — and Israel's war on Hamas continues to destabilize the Middle East. For the leaders at the G7, there are a number of security concerns, said Kirton: The first is that Trump survived an assassination attempt in July 2024, so there are general concerns about the safety of attendees. The second is that three leaders — France's Macron, the U.K.'s Keir Starmer and the U.S.'s Trump — need to have staff on hand with the nuclear football in case of nuclear war. (None of the other powers at the G7, unless Modi attends, head countries with nuclear weapons.) There's also the risk of violence or a terror attack or the possibility that a protest will get out of hand, such as in Genoa, Italy in 2001, when more than 200,000 demonstrators took to the streets. Additionally, unlike in Kananaskis in 2002 or Genoa in 2001, there are drones, which can be easily manipulated from afar. 'So that is a new and more complex threat to defend against,' said Kirton. He described the threat environment for the 2025 summit as 'more diffuse.' In Italy in 2001, for example, the fear was that al-Qaida would carry out an attack; in June 2001, Osama bin Laden told supporters of an intended attack on G8 leaders. 'That kind of threat is still on the playlist, but then you've got the new ones as well: wildfires and a great deal of anger against the president of the United States that you didn't have at Kananaskis one,' said Kirton. It remains to be seen if the specific tensions engendered by the attendees will lead to protest activities at designated zones in Calgary and Banff. The United States Secret Service, which came under heavy criticism in the U.S. after a failed assassination attempt against Trump while he was on the campaign trail last year, said it will continue to provide security for the president while he's in Canada. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police is the lead agency in security planning. But the Integrated Safety and Security Group (ISSG) managing G7 security also includes Calgary Police Service, Alberta Sheriffs, provincial conservation officers and members of the Canadian Armed Forces. 'The ISSG's focus remains on providing a secure environment for the Summit, ensuring it unfolds safely and respectfully for all participants and host communities,' wrote Fraser Logan, a spokesperson for the RCMP, in an email to National Post. Late last month, dozens of Canadian Armed Forces members streamed through outdoor retail outlets in Edmonton, stocking up on cold-weather gear and other necessities to keep them comfortable as they camp out in the bush for the duration of the summit. The Kananaskis region now resembles an armed camp, the Calgary Herald reported , with soldiers camped out and helicopters flying overhead. During the summit, police and the military will be deployed on ATVs and in armoured vehicles. Drones will fly overhead. There are airspace restrictions in effect and military jets could shoot down any planes that persistently violate the 30-nautical-mile no fly zone around Kananaskis. RCMP Chief Supt. David Hall, the ISSG security director, said hosting the G7 is a hugely complex project and is the 'largest domestic security operation' possible for any host nation. Kananaskis Village itself will be sealed off by metal fencing and cameras are mounted on poles around the hotel where delegates are staying, the Calgary Herald reported. The trailheads, campgrounds and parking lots are packed with military vehicles and personnel, the Herald reported, and one group was hiking through the area to get to know the terrain. The Nakiska ski area, built for the 1988 Olympic Games, is being used as the staging area for security. In 2002, 5,000 soldiers and 1,500 police were deployed, though the ISSG refused to discuss deployments for 2025. 'We don't confirm numbers, the breakdown or the origin of deployment of our security personnel,' wrote Logan. Throughout the region, including Calgary, the security procedures necessary to host such high-level dignitaries will be visible. Last month, Calgarians wondered at police moving through town. It turned out that it was members of the Calgary Police Service's traffic section practicing their motorcade-escort skills in advance of the arrival of G7 delegates. The summit has also led to numerous road closures — and not just in the immediate area of the summit — but also around the Calgary International Airport, the closest airport to the Kananaskis region. In the region itself, a 20-kilometre stretch of Highway 40 will be closed, cutting off access to many hikes and easy access to a favoured spring cycling route. However, travellers can take the Smith Dorrien Trail — a battered-but-scenic gravel backroad — from Canmore to access the southerly portions of Highway 40. The telephone line to reach Alberta Parks for information includes details on cancellations, suggesting that tourists with trips planned to the region should adjust their plans due to G7-related closures. Within the security zone, only accredited personnel, including journalists, and residents of Kananaskis Village, will be permitted to enter. 'The general public is asked to try their best to stay away from these areas as wait times are expected to cause delays in travel,' the RCMP said in a statement Wednesday. National Post, with additional reporting by the Calgary Herald Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
