logo
‘Make America Healthy Again' is winning young voters — Democrats should worry

‘Make America Healthy Again' is winning young voters — Democrats should worry

The Hill2 days ago
Could RFK Jr. prove to be the Trump administration's secret weapon?
Recent polling shows Americans trust Republicans over Democrats on nearly every major issue confronting our country: the economy, immigration, foreign policy and inflation. The two areas where Democrats hold the upper hand is health care and vaccines.
RFK Jr. has a shot of undermining that advantage, especially with young voters.
Although the Health and Human Services secretary has been relentlessly blasted by the liberal media for being 'anti-vaccine' (which Kennedy denies), a great many Americans like Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again agenda and agree that corporate interests are helping to make Americans sick and overly reliant on pharmaceuticals.
A poll conducted by NBC News last month (in which Trump earned only a 45 percent job approval) showed that a majority of the country (51 percent) liked what RFK is doing, whereas only 48 percent disapproved. Interestingly, when asked who was to blame for America's chronic health problems, including obesity and heart disease, a plurality of respondents blamed the food industry.
Much of RFK's agenda makes sense. A New York Times author last fall set out to debunk five of Kennedy's main claims about the nation's health, but ended up supporting three of them. For example, she concluded that 'many public health and nutrition experts agree' with his assertion that 'Ultraprocessed foods are driving the obesity epidemic, and they should be removed from school lunches.'
On the subject of food dyes, which the HHS secretary says 'cause cancer, and ADHD in children,' she wrote, 'some small clinical trials have suggested that certain synthetic food dyes may increase hyperactivity in children.' 'Many experts agree,' she continued, 'it wouldn't hurt to avoid them.'
How about his suggestion 'that consuming too many added sugars, especially from high fructose corn syrup, contributes to childhood obesity and cardiovascular disease?' Answer: 'Correct.'
RFK Jr. is shaking up the food industry. In April, the Food and Drug Administration announced it would move to eliminate several petroleum-based dyes, which Kennedy claims can cause cancer and ADHD in kids, by the end of next year. Already, a large number of top brands, including General Mills, Kraft Heinz, Nestlé, Hershey, J.M. Smucker, McCormick, Pepsico and Sam's Club, have taken steps to replace the artificial dyes used in candy, ice cream and other products with natural ingredients, despite the costs of doing so.
The changes are likely to be popular, despite the less alluring colors of mint chip ice cream or Froot Loops. In Canada and Europe, foods colored with artificial dyes are required to carry a warning label. Consequently, manufacturers generally use natural products instead.
Call me crazy, but the fact that so many food companies are making the switch, despite the expense and possibility of lost sales, suggests they know something they're not publicizing about these dyes and that Kennedy is on the right track.
In May, Kennedy and his 'Make America Healthy Again' commission targeted ultra-processed foods in a 69-page report. Ultraprocessed foods, which make up 70-plus percent of Americans' diet, are made with manufactured rather than natural ingredients and formulated to encourage people to eat more, which adds to our obesity problems.
A study last year of the dietary habits of nearly 10 million people published in the British Medical Journal revealed that exposure to ultra-processed food 'was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.' In particular, the study linked ultraprocessed foods to increased incidents of some 30 health conditions, including obesity, diabetes, heart disease, certain cancers and mental health disorders.
Is Kennedy right to take them on? Absolutely. The wonder is that no one has investigated the industry before this.
It is actually not a puzzle. According to Open Secrets, agribusiness PACs donated nearly $31 million to politicians last year, while food sales and processing firms threw in another $3 million. Moreover, the food industry spilled $16 million on lobbying. That buys a lot of protection.
Meanwhile, RFK Jr.'s concerns over widely prescribed vaccines has been harshly criticized by the medical establishment. The left has accused him of downplaying a measles outbreak in Texas, and talking up cures rather than advocating for increased vaccinations.
But Kennedy has acknowledged that public trust in U.S. vaccine mandates and indeed in our health industries need to be rebuilt. He is right.
That has led to a complete overhaul of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, citing 'persistent conflicts of interest' among members of the former board which, he wrote in a recent op-ed, 'has never recommended against a vaccine — even those later withdrawn for safety reasons.' Having new, independent researchers take a fresh look at Americans' vaccine regimen should be welcomed.
Kennedy's willingness to gore sacred cows and ask tough questions make him popular with young people, and is likely contributing to Republican gains with young male and female Gen-Zers.
A recent Fox News interviewer asked a young influencer why young voters are 'flocking to MAHA.' Lexi Vrachalus answered that she and others were alarmed by the rise chronic diseases in their peers — diseases that are preventable with diet and lifestyle choices. Asked about her focus on the gut, she explained, 'if we eat bad, we are going to feel bad mentally and physically, so I think it's crucial that we fuel our bodies with real, whole, single ingredient, unprocessed foods.'
In May, The New York Times published a piece about 'The Rise of the 'Crunchy Teen' Wellness Influencer' writing, 'High schoolers are appealing to other health-conscious kids online, sometimes by expressing views in line with the 'Make America Healthy Again' movement.' The skeptical Times writer found plenty of reason to find the trend concerning, as teens may, for instance, over-emphasize one diet component or another.
But Democrats should find the trend concerning as well, especially as Kennedy's MAHA program continues to win over young voters.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alyssa Farah Griffin on Harris's Colbert appearance: ‘Everything that's wrong with Democrats'
Alyssa Farah Griffin on Harris's Colbert appearance: ‘Everything that's wrong with Democrats'

The Hill

time41 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Alyssa Farah Griffin on Harris's Colbert appearance: ‘Everything that's wrong with Democrats'

Former White House aide and 'The View' co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin weighed in on former Vice President Kamala Harris's appearance on Stephen Colbert's 'The Late Show,' arguing the interview, her first since losing to President Trump in the 2024 election, represents everything that is 'wrong' with Democrats since the November presidential race. 'I was struck by, I'm going to try not be too harsh on this. This interview felt like a microcosm of everything that's wrong with Democrats post-election. I'm going to CBS and this sort of trying to make a point that they fired Stephen Colbert, which many on the left called an attack on democracy, a man who was making $20 million a year, someone I hold in high esteem, but the economics of his show were not working,' Farah Griffin said during her Saturday morning appearance on CNN. 'He was losing $40 million a year. He was in the Ed Sullivan Theater, which is expensive, to talk about the plight of democracy at CBS, a network that's having its own struggles right now, rather than talking about the economics of the situation and playing to something a shrinking audience that is network television, not realizing it's not where the American voters are,' 'The View' co-host said while on CNN's 'Table For Five.' CBS announced in mid-July that it is nixing 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,' ending its run in May 2026, arguing it was a 'financial decision.' Harris's appearance on the late-night show was her first interview since losing to Trump in the last Oval Office race, an appearance where she promoted her upcoming book '107 Days,' which will detail her short-lived presidential campaign. The former vice president, who announced on Wednesday that she will not jump into the 2026 California gubernatorial race, further elaborated on her decision. 'I don't want to go back into the system. I think it's broken. I want to travel the country. I want to listen to people, I want to talk with people. And I don't want it to be transactional, where I'm asking for their vote,' Harris told Colbert, who criticized CBS and its parent company, Paramount Global, for pulling the plug. When asked on the Thursday show who should be the leader of the Democratic Party, as it deals with plummeting approval numbers and looks to spark more enthusiasm, the vice president argued that it would be a mistake to put 'it on the shoulders of any one person.' 'It's really on all of our shoulders,' she said. Farah Griffin, who has been critical of Trump and said late last year that she voted for Harris during the 2024 election cycle, stated on CNN that 'It felt like if everyone who was advising her [Harris], told her this was a good idea, that is not where I would have made the grand come back … it's like announcing your exploratory committee on the sinking deck of The Titanic.'

Trump tells Schumer to 'GO TO HELL' over Senate nominee deal funding demands after negotiations collapse
Trump tells Schumer to 'GO TO HELL' over Senate nominee deal funding demands after negotiations collapse

Fox News

time42 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Trump tells Schumer to 'GO TO HELL' over Senate nominee deal funding demands after negotiations collapse

Hours of tense negotiations to strike a deal on President Donald Trump's nominees blew up Saturday night, and now lawmakers are headed home. Senate Republicans and Democrats were quick to point the finger at one another for the deal's demise, but it was ultimately Trump who nuked the talks. In a lengthy post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump accused Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., of "demanding over One Billion Dollars in order to approve a small number of our highly qualified nominees." "This demand is egregious and unprecedented, and would be embarrassing to the Republican Party if it were accepted. It is political extortion, by any other name," Trump said. "Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!" "Do not accept the offer," he continued. "Go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country. Have a great RECESS and, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!" Instead of finding a pathway to vote on as many as 60 of the president's nominees, all of which moved through committee with bipartisan support, lawmakers rapid-fire voted on seven before leaving Washington until September. But prior to the president's edict, both sides of the aisle believed they were on the verge of a breakthrough to both meet Trump's desire to see his nominees confirmed and leave Washington. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said that there were "lots of offers" made between him and Schumer over the course of negotiations. "There were several different times where I think either or both sides maybe thought there was a deal in the end," he said. Senate Democrats wanted the White House to unfreeze billions in National Institute of Health and foreign aid funding, in addition to a future agreement that no more clawback packages would come from the White House. In exchange, they would greenlight several of Trump's non-controversial nominees. Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., accused Schumer of going "too far" by upping the price tag on his demands. "We've had three different deals since last night," he said. "And every time it's been, every time it's 'I want more,'" Mullin said of Schumer's demands. He said that Republicans weren't caught off guard by Trump's call to halt talks, and noted that the White House had been heavily involved in negotiations. "You get to a realization that there was, it was never about making a deal," he continued. "They want to go out and say the President's being unrealistic, and because he can't answer to his base to make a deal like we have in every other president in history." Now, Republicans won't pursue recess appointments, but Mullin noted that moving ahead with a rule changes to the confirmation process when lawmakers return in September was going to happen in response. Senate Democrats, on the other hand, countered that their offer never changed, and that Republicans kept increasing the number of nominees they wanted across the line, and attempted to include in more controversial, partisan picks. "The ask evolved on both sides quite a bit over time," Thune said. "But in the end, we never got to a place where we had both sides agree to lock it in."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store