First Eagle Investments Appoints Justin Arabadjief as Head of High Grade Trading on Municipal Credit Team
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--First Eagle Investments ("First Eagle") today announced the appointment of Justin Arabadjief as Head of High Grade Trading on the firm's Municipal Credit team. Based in New York, he will report to David Blair, Head of the Municipal Core SMA Business, and Bryce Pickering, Head of Municipal Credit Trading.
Arabadjief has more than 20 years of experience in municipal bond trading, risk management and competitive underwriting. He joins First Eagle from JPMorgan, where he served as Executive Director of Secondary Trading and Competitive Underwriting, managing trading for high-grade municipals and pricing large-scale competitive transactions. He previously held senior roles at Barclays Capital and Lehman Brothers, where he was responsible for trading across the municipal curve and managing a range of short- and long-term municipal products.
'Justin brings more than two decades of consistent, high-level performance in the trading of investment grade municipal bonds, having delivered value across a wide range of market environments. His addition strengthens our capabilities as we expand into core plus and SMA strategies,' said John Miller, Head and Chief Investment Officer of the Municipal Credit team. 'We're excited to welcome him to the First Eagle municipal team—Justin not only has deep trading expertise but also the collaborative mindset and entrepreneurial spirit that have been foundational to our platform since day one.'
Arabadjief's hire is part of First Eagle's broader expansion into investment grade municipal strategies. This growth initiative is being led by David Blair, who oversees business development for the firm's Municipal Core SMA and upcoming core plus mutual fund.
First Eagle's municipal bond platform offers actively managed strategies focused on generating tax-exempt income across market environments, supported by rigorous credit research and a disciplined approach.
Led by John Miller, the Municipal Credit team includes Chief Operating Officer Carl Katerndahl; Head of Municipal Core SMA Business David Blair; credit analysts John Suh, Andrew Belsky, Bridget Young, Douglas Johnston, Ryan Rosberg and Ming Zhang; Senior Investment Specialist Purva Patel; and traders Bryce Pickering, Matthew Tanzer and Justin Arabadjief.
As of April 30, 2025, the First Eagle High Yield Municipal Fund (I Shares: FEHIX) had a distribution rate of 5.45 % and an unsubsidized 30-day SEC yield of 5.41%. The First Eagle Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (I Shares: FDUIX) had a distribution rate of 4.60% and an unsubsidized 30-day SEC yield of 4.87%.
First Eagle High Yield Municipal Fund 1 - NAV, Distribution Rate and 30-Day SEC Yield by Share Class
Data as of 31-March-2025
First Eagle High Yield Municipal Fund 1 - Average Annual Returns as of Quarter End
Data as of 31-March-2025
Class I (FEHIX)
0.72%
8.03%
7.37%
4.27%
0.91%
0.54%
Nov 19, 2007
Class A (FEHAX) w/o load
0.66%
7.89%
7.10%
3.99%
1.13%
0.76%
Jan 3, 2012
Class A (FEHAX) w/ load
-1.85%
5.24%
6.12%
3.51%
1.13%
0.76%
Jan 3, 2012
Class C (FEHCX)
-0.54%
5.94%
6.30%
3.22%
1.88%
1.51%
Jan 3, 2012
Class R6 (FEHRX)
0.65%
8.05%
7.43%
-
0.86%
0.49%
Mar 1, 2017
S&P Municipal Yield Index
0.17%
3.78%
3.54%
3.97%
-
-
--
Expand
First Eagle High Yield Municipal Fund 1 - Average Annual Returns as of Month End
Data as of 30-April-2025
YTD
1
Year
5
Years
10
Years
Gross Expense Ratio²
Adjusted
Expense
Ratio³
Fund Inception Date 4
Class I (FEHIX)
-0.84%
6.98%
6.08%
3.90%
0.91%
0.54%
Nov 19, 2007
Class A (FEHAX) w/o load
-1.04%
6.59%
5.79%
3.60%
1.13%
0.76%
Jan 3, 2012
Class A (FEHAX) w/ load
-3.51%
3.95%
4.81%
3.12%
1.13%
0.76%
Jan 3, 2012
Class C (FEHCX)
-2.16%
4.90%
5.03%
2.84%
1.88%
1.51%
Jan 3, 2012
Class R6 (FEHRX)
-0.89%
6.90%
6.15%
-
0.86%
0.49%
Mar 1, 2017
S&P Municipal Yield Index
-1.26%
3.60%
3.82%
3.86%
-
-
--
Expand
The performance data quoted herein represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Market volatility can dramatically impact the fund's short term performance. Current performance may be lower or higher than figures shown. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Past performance data through the most recent month end is available at www.firsteagle.com or by calling 800-334-2143. The average annual returns are historical and reflect changes in share price, reinvested dividends and are net of expenses. 'With sales charge' performance for class A shares gives effect to the deduction of the maximum sales charge of 2.50%. The average annual returns for Class C shares reflect a CDSC (contingent deferred sales charge) of 1.00% in the year-to-date and first year only. Class I shares require $1MM minimum investment and are offered without sales charge. Class R6 shares are offered without sales charge. Operating expenses reflect the Fund's total annual operating expenses for the share class of the Fund's most current prospectus, including management fees and other expenses.
1. Effective 27-Dec-2023, the First Eagle High Yield Municipal Fund changed its name and principal investment strategy. Performance for the periods prior to 27-Dec-2023 is based on the investment strategy utilized by the Fund at those times.
2. First Eagle Investment Management, LLC (the ''Adviser'') has contractually agreed to waive and/ or reimburse certain fees and expenses of Classes A, C, I, and R6 so that the total annual operating expenses (excluding interest charges on any borrowings, taxes, brokerage commissions and other expenses incurred in placing orders for the purchase and sale of securities and other investment instruments, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend and other expenses relating to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, if any) (''annual operating expenses'') of each class are limited to 0.85%, 1.60%, 0.60% and 0.60% of average net assets, respectively. Each of these undertakings lasts until 28-Feb-2026 and may not be terminated during its term without the consent of the Board of Trustees. The Fund has agreed that each of Classes A, C, I, and R6 will repay the Adviser for fees and expenses waived or reimbursed for the class provided that repayment does not cause annual operating expenses (after the repayment is taken into account) to exceed the lesser of: (1)0.85%, 1.60%, 0.60% and 0.60% of the class' average net assets, respectively; or (2) if applicable, the then-current expense limitations. Any such repayment must be made within three years after the year in which the Adviser incurred the expense.
3. The Adjusted Expense Ratio excludes certain fees and expenses, such as interest expense and fees paid on Fund borrowings and/or interest and related expenses from inverse floaters.
First Eagle Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund - NAV, Distribution Rate and 30-Day SEC Yield by Share Class
Data as of 31-March-2025
First Eagle Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund - Average Annual Returns as of Quarter End
Data as of 31-March-2025
Class I (FDUIX)
1.54%
7.17%
7.21%
1.58%
0.62%
0.60%
Jan 2, 2024
Class A (FDUAX) w/o load
1.38%
6.88%
6.91%
1.47%
0.87%
0.85%
Jan 2, 2024
Class A (FDUAX) w/ load
-1.12%
4.19%
4.72%
1.47%
0.87%
0.85%
Jan 2, 2024
Class R6 (FDURX)
1.45%
7.18%
7.21%
2.47%
0.62%
0.60%
Jan 2, 2024
S&P Short Duration Municipal Yield Index
0.82%
3.78%
4.06%
--
Expand
First Eagle Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund - Average Annual Returns as of Month End
Data as of 30-April-2025
YTD
1
Year
Since Inception
Gross Expense Ratio 4
Net
Expense
Ratio
Adjusted
Expense
Ratio 5
Fund Inception Date
Class I (FDUIX)
0.75%
6.03%
6.11%
1.58%
0.62%
0.60%
Jan 2, 2024
Class A (FDUAX) w/o load
0.57%
5.74%
5.82%
1.47%
0.87%
0.85%
Jan 2, 2024
Class A (FDUAX) w/ load
-1.91%
3.08%
3.79%
1.47%
0.87%
0.85%
Jan 2, 2024
Class R6 (FDURX)
0.66%
6.05%
6.12%
2.47%
0.62%
0.60%
Jan 2, 2024
S&P Short Duration Municipal Yield Index
0.29%
3.77%
3.39%
--
Expand
The performance data quoted herein represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Market volatility can dramatically impact the fund's short term performance. Current performance may be lower or higher than figures shown. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Past performance data through the most recent month end is available at www.firsteagle.com or by calling 800-334-2143. The average annual returns are historical and reflect changes in share price, reinvested dividends and are net of expenses. 'With sales charge' performance for class A shares gives effect to the deduction of the maximum sales charge of 2.50%. Class I shares require $1MM minimum investment and are offered without sales charge. Class R6 shares are offered without sales charge. Operating expenses reflect the Fund's total annual operating expenses for the share class of the Fund's most current prospectus, including management fees and other expenses.
4. First Eagle Investment Management, LLC (the 'Adviser') has contractually agreed to waive and/or reimburse certain fees and expenses of Classes A, I and R6 so that the total annual operating expenses (excluding interest charges on any borrowings, taxes, brokerage commissions and other expenses incurred in placing orders for the purchase and sale of securities and other investment instruments, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend and other expenses relating to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, if any) (''annual operating expenses'') of each class are limited to 0.85%, 0.60% and 0.60% of average net assets, respectively. Each of these undertakings lasts until 28-Feb-2026 and may not be terminated during its term without the consent of the Board of Trustees. The Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund has agreed that each of Classes A, I and R6 will repay the Adviser for fees and expenses waived or reimbursed for the class provided that repayment does not cause annual operating expenses (after the repayment is taken into account) to exceed the lesser of: (1) 0.85%, 0.60% and 0.60% of the class' average net assets, respectively; or (2) if applicable, the then-current expense limitations. Any such repayment must be made within three years after the year in which the Adviser incurred the expense.
5. The Adjusted Expense Ratio excludes certain fees and expenses, such as interest expense and fees paid on Fund borrowings and/or interest and related expenses from inverse floaters.
S&P Municipal Yield Index measures the performance of high yield and investment grade municipal bonds. Index constituents are market value-weighted and adjusted for credit rating and concentration limits.
S&P Short Duration Municipal Yield Index measures the performance of high yield and investment grade municipal bonds with duration range of one to 12 years maturity.
Indices are unmanaged and do not incur management fees or other operating expenses. One cannot invest directly in an index.
NAV (Net Asset Value) is the month ending price for the various share classes indicated.
30-day SEC Yield is a standard yield calculation developed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that allows for fairer comparisons of bond funds. It is based on the most recent 30-day period covered by the Fund's filings with the SEC. The yield figure reflects the dividends and interest earned during the period, after the deduction of the Fund's expenses. This is also referred to as the 'standardized yield.' The number is then annualized. This yield does not necessarily reflect income actually earned and distributed by the Fund, and therefore may not be correlated with dividends and distributions paid. Had fees not been waived and or/expenses reimbursed, the SEC Yield would have been lower.
The Subsidized 30-Day SEC Yield includes contractual expense reimbursements and it would be lower without those reimbursements
The Unsubsidized 30-Day SEC Yield excludes contractual expense reimbursements
The Fund intends to declare income dividends daily and distribute them monthly at rates intended to maintain a more stable level of distributions than would result from paying out amounts solely based on current net investment income by paying out less than all of its net investment income or paying out undistributed income from prior months (with any potential remaining deficiencies characterized as a return of capital at year end). The distributions might not be made in equal amounts, and one month's distribution may be larger than another. Distribution rate presented excludes any special dividends and indicates the annual rate received if the most recent monthly distribution paid (for each class) was the same for an entire year. The rate represents a distribution and does not represent the total return of the Fund. Because the distribution rate is annualized from a single month's distribution, investors would not necessarily receive this rate amount in a given year. The rate is calculated by annualizing the most recent monthly distribution paid for each class and dividing it by that class's NAV on the last day of the month.
Risk Disclosures:
First Eagle High Yield Municipal Fund
The Fund's investments in municipal securities rely on the opinion of the issuer's bond counsel and, in the case of derivative securities, sponsors' counsel, that the interest paid on those securities will not be subject to federal income tax. Tax opinions are generally provided at the time the municipal security is initially issued, and neither the Fund nor the Adviser will independently review the bases for those tax opinions. However, tax opinions are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service (the 'IRS'), and if any of those tax opinions are ultimately determined to be incorrect or if events occur after the security is acquired that impact the security's tax-exempt status, the Fund and its shareholders could be subject to substantial tax liability for the current or past years and shareholders may have to file amended tax returns and pay additional taxes, interest and penalties. In addition, an IRS assertion of taxability may impair the liquidity and the fair market value of the securities. If you redeem Fund shares or exchange them for shares of another Fund, you generally will be treated as having sold your shares and any gain on the transaction will be subject to tax.
Funds that invest in bonds are subject to interest-rate risk and can lose principal value when interest rates rise, while they typically increase their principal values when interest rates decline. Bonds are also subject to credit risk, in which the bond issuer may fail to pay interest and principal in a timely manner, or that negative perception of the issuer's ability to make such payments may cause the price of that bond to decline.
The Fund may invest in high yield, fixed income securities that, at the time of purchase, are non-investment grade. High yield, lower rated securities involve greater price volatility and present greater risks than high rated fixed income securities. High yield securities are rated lower than investment-grade securities because there is a greater possibility that the issuer may be unable to make interest and principal payments on those securities. High yield securities involve greater risk than higher rated securities and portfolios that invest in them may be subject to greater levels of credit and liquidity risk than portfolios that do not.
Municipal bonds are subject to credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and call risk. However, the obligations of some municipal issuers may not be enforceable through the exercise of traditional creditors' rights. The reorganization under federal bankruptcy laws of a municipal bond issuer may result in the bonds being cancelled without payment or repaid only in part, or in delays in collecting principal and interest.
All investments involve the risk of loss of principal.
Diversification does not guarantee investment returns and does not eliminate the risk of loss.
First Eagle Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund
The First Eagle Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund ('The Fund') is new and may not be successful under all future market conditions. The Fund may not attract sufficient assets to achieve investment, trading or other efficiencies.
The Fund's investments in municipal securities rely on the opinion of the issuer's bond counsel and, in the case of derivative securities, sponsors' counsel, that the interest paid on those securities will not be subject to federal income tax. Tax opinions are generally provided at the time the municipal security is initially issued, and neither the Fund nor the Adviser will independently review the bases for those tax opinions. However, tax opinions are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service (the 'IRS'), and if any of those tax opinions are ultimately determined to be incorrect or if events occur after the security is acquired that impact the security's tax-exempt status, the Fund and its shareholders could be subject to substantial tax liability for the current or past years and shareholders may have to file amended tax returns and pay additional taxes, interest and penalties. In addition, an IRS assertion of taxability may impair the liquidity and the fair market value of the securities. If you redeem Fund shares or exchange them for shares of another Fund, you generally will be treated as having sold your shares and any gain on the transaction will be subject to tax.
Funds that invest in bonds are subject to interest-rate risk and can lose principal value when interest rates rise, while they typically increase their principal values when interest rates decline. Bonds are also subject to credit risk, in which the bond issuer may fail to pay interest and principal in a timely manner, or that negative perception of the issuer's ability to make such payments may cause the price of that bond to decline.
The Fund may invest in high yield, fixed income securities that, at the time of purchase, are non-investment grade. High yield, lower rated securities involve greater price volatility and present greater risks than high rated fixed income securities. High yield securities are rated lower than investment-grade securities because there is a greater possibility that the issuer may be unable to make interest and principal payments on those securities. High yield securities involve greater risk than higher rated securities and portfolios that invest in them may be subject to greater levels of credit and liquidity risk than portfolios that do not.
Municipal bonds are subject to credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and call risk. However, the obligations of some municipal issuers may not be enforceable through the exercise of traditional creditors' rights. The reorganization under federal bankruptcy laws of a municipal bond issuer may result in the bonds being cancelled without payment or repaid only in part, or in delays in collecting principal and interest.
All investments involve the risk of loss of principal.
Diversification does not guarantee investment returns and does not eliminate the risk of loss.
Investors should consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The prospectus and summary prospectus contain this and other information about the Funds and may be viewed at www.firsteagle.com. You may also request printed copies by calling us at 800-747-2008. Please read our prospectus carefully before investing.
Investments are not FDIC insured or bank guaranteed and may lose value.
FEF Distributors, LLC ('FEFD') (SIPC), a limited purpose broker-dealer, distributes certain First Eagle products. FEFD does not provide services to any investor, but rather provides services to its First Eagle affiliates. As such, when FEFD presents a fund, strategy, or other product to a prospective investor, FEFD and its representatives do not determine whether an investment in the fund, strategy or other product is in the best interests of, or is otherwise beneficial or suitable for, the investor. No statement by FEFD should be construed as a recommendation. Investors should exercise their own judgment and/or consult with a financial professional to determine whether it is advisable for the investor to invest in any First Eagle fund, strategy, or product.
First Eagle Investments is the brand name for First Eagle Investment Management, LLC and its subsidiary investment advisers.
The First Eagle Funds are offered by FEF Distributors, LLC, a subsidiary of First Eagle Investment Management, LLC, which provides advisory services.
© 2025 First Eagle Investment Management, LLC. All rights reserved.
About First Eagle Investments
First Eagle Investments is an independent, privately owned investment management firm headquartered in New York with approximately $152 billion in assets under management as of March 31, 2025. * Dedicated to providing prudent stewardship of client assets, the firm focuses on active, fundamental and benchmark-agnostic investing, with a strong emphasis on downside mitigation. With a heritage dating back to 1864, First Eagle strives to help clients avoid permanent impairment of capital and earn attractive returns through widely varied economic cycles. The firm's investment capabilities include equities, fixed income and currencies, alternative credit and real assets. For more information, please visit www.firsteagle.com.
All figures related to assets under management (AUM) are preliminary figures based on management's estimates and as such are subject to change.
*The total AUM represents the combined AUM of (i) First Eagle Investment Management, LLC, (ii) its subsidiary investment advisers, First Eagle Separate Account Management, LLC, First Eagle Alternative Credit ('FEAC') and Napier Park Global Capital ('Napier Park'), and (iii) Regatta Loan Management LLC, an advisory affiliate of Napier Park as of March 31, 2025. It includes $0.6 billion of committed and other non-fee-paying capital from First Eagle Alternative Credit, LLC and $3.1 billion of committed and other non-fee-paying capital from Napier Park Global Capital, inclusive of assets managed by Regatta Loan Management LLC.
First Eagle Investments is the brand name for First Eagle Investment Management, LLC and its subsidiary investment advisers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
If Tennessee chooses state law over NIL pledge, it risks being kicked out of SEC
This story was updated to add new information. A new Tennessee law triggered the power conferences of college sports into demanding member schools like the University of Tennessee and Vanderbilt to sign a loyalty pledge over new player pay rules or face possible expulsion. Knox News confirmed the existence of the loyalty document through a source with direct knowledge of the situation. The source requested anonymity because those correspondence are between the conferences and member schools. The document is being circulated by the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten and the SEC. It demands that member schools agree to follow new rules involving paying players despite state laws giving the freedom to circumvent the rules. And the pledge also requires schools to waive their right to sue the NCAA or conferences if they disagree with the implementation of those rules. The document has not been finalized. But potential consequences of not signing it include expulsion from the conference or participation in playing games against other power conference schools. The new Tennessee law applies to all four-year universities in the state, public and private. UT and Vanderbilt are in the SEC, one of four power conferences. A clause in the law permits Vanderbilt and private universities to opt out of the protections of the state law in order to cooperate with the NCAA or the College Sports Commission, a newly proposed entity overseen by the four power conferences. Additionally, it appears that UT is guiding the approach of the law because of how it's utilized lawmakers against the NCAA in the past. University of Memphis (American Athletic Conference), Middle Tennessee State (Conference USA) and other state universities are in mid-major conferences that likely won't require a pledge to follow the new college sports player pay rules. For better or worse, this makes Tennessee the epicenter of another earthquake in college sports. Expulsion from the SEC seems inconceivable for UT, a charter member since 1932. But whether it's a legitimate threat or a negotiating tactic remains to be seen. In a statement to Knox News, UT pledged to comply with the pending House settlement, which will create the new system for player pay, while acknowledging the need for the state law. 'The University of Tennessee has committed to following the House settlement if it is approved,' UT said in a statement. "That commitment has not changed. We appreciate the Tennessee General Assembly's forethought in passing NIL legislation that provides future protections for student-athletes and institutions beyond the House settlement." Vanderbilt and the SEC did not immediately respond to a Knox News request for comment. Threatening a loyalty pledge is a bold move by the NCAA and power conferences and, most certainly, in response to the new Tennessee law, which was signed by Gov. Bill Lee on May 1 and surfaced about two weeks later. The law protects Tennessee universities from anticipated antitrust lawsuits by athletes and NIL collectives unhappy with the player-pay rules coming to college sports. The new college sports system will include a salary cap of direct school-to-player pay, roster limits, revenue sharing that challenges Title IX principles of publicly funded institutions and a clearinghouse that vets NIL contracts. It could help stabilize college sports, but lawsuits challenging those rules are expected. If athletes, boosters or collectives sue, the new state law allows Tennessee universities to opt out of those college sports rules and shift liability toward the NCAA and conferences. It also prevents the NCAA from penalizing schools that circumvent those rules for purposes of following the law. Only a federal law, a valid court order or antitrust exemption for college athletics can supersede Tennessee's new law. That escape hatch for Tennessee schools sounded alarms across the college sports landscape. TENNESSEE DILEMMA: Why Vols winning too much could be a problem in player-pay era Opinions about Tennessee's approach vary around college sports. About a dozen states have enacted similar laws in the everchanging arms race of paying college athletes with few restrictions. But Tennessee's law is believed to be the strongest and most evasive to NCAA rules and the conditions of the pending House settlement. The timing of Tennessee's new law is also problematic. A new college sports system for paying athletes could begin as early as July 1, pending the multi-billion-dollar House settlement, which resolves three federal antitrust lawsuits against the NCAA and four power conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC). That settlement could come any day now. There's growing skepticism that it will solve the legal and structural problems in college sports, although some are cautiously optimistic that it'll at least achieve some progress. Opponents of the new state law believe Tennessee is nixing an effective agreement days before it's signed by a federal judge. But proponents of the state law believe Tennessee is being proactive by keeping its legal options in anticipation of a system it believes will fail. The most straightforward take of the situation is that Tennessee is protecting its own interests ahead of the SEC or college sports. Whether that's a wise move or heavy handed is debatable, but it certainly got the attention of college sports leaders. Tennessee schools intend to comply with the system prescribed in the House settlement, but that plan remains hazy. UT, specifically, wants legal cover if the new rules violate antitrust law. Here are examples of what UT fears if it's not given liability protection by the state law. A new clearinghouse will determine if NIL deals are legitimate and of fair market value. Legally, that appears to be a difficult standard to define. If an athlete or collective sues because an NIL deal is declined, UT wants the flexibility to approve the contract independent of NCAA rules or at least opt out of the system to avoid a lawsuit. Lawsuits on numerous antitrust grounds are anticipated after the House settlement is approved. The NCAA, power conferences and schools could be sued. There's no indication whether those suits would be successful. But UT doesn't want to be among the defendants, and the state law says Tennessee schools don't have to follow anticompetitive NCAA rules. If damages are awarded in antitrust lawsuits, the state law says that Tennessee schools can't be held responsible for paying them. Instead, the NCAA would be liable. UT wants to avoid punishment from the NCAA if it opts out of rules that it finds to violate antitrust laws. If that occurs, the state law protects UT from NCAA sanctions. Notably, UT football is already on probation until July 13, 2028, as a result of the Jeremy Pruitt recruiting scandal. Some college sports stakeholders believe Tennessee isn't being a team player. But UT has reasons to distance itself from the NCAA in future lawsuits, and it has a good track record against the governing body. They faced off in federal court in 2024 after the state of Tennessee, on behalf of UT, sued the NCAA to loosen its stringent rules over NIL benefits. UT won that battle. On Jan. 31, 2025, the NCAA and a coalition of states led by Tennessee reached a settlement that protects student-athletes' NIL rights during the recruiting process and prohibits the NCAA from bringing back its NIL recruiting ban. And in 2023, Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti threatened to sue the NCAA if it gave the UT football team a postseason ban in the Pruitt recruiting scandal. UT also won that battle, as the NCAA relented from issuing a postseason ban. The bad blood between UT and the NCAA can't be ignored as a backdrop to this state law. And don't be surprised if Skrmetti or Tennessee lawmakers get involved again if this situation escalates. Adam Sparks is the Tennessee football beat reporter. Email X, formerly known as Twitter@AdamSparks. Support strong local journalism by subscribing at Get the latest news and insight on SEC football by subscribing to the SEC Unfiltered newsletter, delivered straight to your inbox. This article originally appeared on Knoxville News Sentinel: If Tennessee chooses state law over NIL pledge, it risks SEC expulsion
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aave, Uniswap, Sky Tokens Surge Over 20% as SEC Roundtable Spurs DeFi Optimism
Decentralized finance (DeFi) tokens UNI, AAVE and SKY all rose by more than 20% on optimistic comments from SEC Chair Paul Atkins at a Monday roundtable discussion about the sector. Atkins instructed the regulator to explore exemptions to let decentralized finance (DeFi) firms conduct operations without as many restrictions. "The right to have self-custody of one's private property is a foundational American value," he said. The comments are a stark contrast to those made by the previous commission led by Gary Gensler, which was criticized for stifling innovation by imposing restrictive guidance on crypto firms. "Can you imagine a starker contrast with the previous SEC's approach?," said Noelle Acheson, analyst and author of Crypto Is Macro Now newsletter. "We expected Atkins to say some nice words around the potential for innovation to unleash new financial efficiencies," she wrote. "We didn't expect his support to be quite so emphatic." Industry members heralded the event as a symbolic milestone the event , June 9th "will be remembered as DeFi day," Changpeng "CZ" Zhao, founder of Binance, the largest crypto exchange by trading volume posted on X. "The DeFi Renaissance continues," said Arthur Cheong, founder and CEO of crypto investment firm DeFiance Capital. DeFi-related tokens well outperformed an already upbeat crypto market with bitcoin BTC bouncing to near record prices. Ethereum's ether ETH, a key hub for DeFi applications, also jumped over 8%. The broad-market crypto benchmark CoinDesk 20 Index was 4.7% up over the past 24 hours, while BTC gained 1.5% in the same in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What's Driving Ethereum ETF Inflows for the 7th Straight Week?
Ethereum ETFs are making headlines once again, registering robust inflows as institutional and retail interest continues to climb. According to CoinShares, Ethereum products have recorded their seventh consecutive week of net inflows, raking in $296.4 million, signaling a strong resurgence of confidence in the second-largest cryptocurrency by market iShares Ethereum Trust ETHA accounted for the majority of the flows, bringing in $281.3 million and registering 15 consecutive days of inflows. This marks the strongest inflow streak since the U.S. presidential elections in November 2024 (read: 5 ETFs to Ride the Bullish Wave of Ethereum's Pectra Upgrade).The recent surge in inflows represents one of the most significant upward trends for digital asset funds this year. After a period of sluggish performance and regulatory uncertainty, Ethereum is benefiting from a shift in sentiment, particularly among institutional investors. We have highlighted several factors behind the sharp reversal: The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently showed a more receptive stance toward Ethereum-based ETFs. With spot Ethereum ETFs now approved for listing on major exchanges, investors are viewing the asset as more legitimate and accessible. These ETFs provide an easy entry point for institutions looking to gain exposure to cryptocurrency without holding the token directly, fueling broader adoption. The rapidly evolving story around stablecoins and tokenization is driving Ethereum inflows. With growing interest from major fintech players like Visa, Mastercard and Stripe, stablecoin-based payment systems are reshaping how public blockchains like Ethereum are viewed. Recent data shows record-high transaction volumes for stablecoins on Ethereum, highlighting its growing relevance in global payments, remittances and decentralized finance. Investor interest in Ethereum ETFs is gaining momentum amid growing speculation that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may soon permit staking within spot ETH ETFs. A pivotal development came on May 29, when the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance indicated that certain staking activities may not be classified as securities, a nuanced but meaningful shift in regulatory has filed for incorporation of staking in its Galaxy Ethereum ETF, joining major players like Fidelity, Grayscale and Bitwise in preparing for a potential green light. If approved, staking could introduce an additional yield component to Ethereum ETFs, significantly boosting their appeal to yield-seeking investors. The U.S. Senate is also playing a role in bolstering Ethereum's investment case. The upcoming GENIUS Act, which aims to regulate stablecoins, could provide the regulatory clarity needed for wider adoption. If passed, it may solidify Ethereum's role as the infrastructure for compliant stablecoin issuance and transactions, further driving ETF flows. With inflation data stabilizing and central banks showing signs of easing monetary policies, risk appetite is gradually returning to global markets. Cryptocurrencies, particularly Ethereum, are benefiting from this shift, with investors rotating back into digital assets amid hopes of a new bullish cycle (read: Ethereum ETFs Outperforming in May). iShares Ethereum Trust ETF seeks to reflect the performance of the price of Ethereum. It is managed by the world's largest asset manager and leverages a multi-year technology integration developed with Coinbase Prime, the world's largest institutional digital asset custodian. ETHA has AUM of $3.8 billion and trades in an average daily volume of 14.4 million shares. It charges 25 bps in annual fees. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
