
Judge bars Trump administration from shutting peace institute that sought to end violent conflicts
FILE - The headquarters of the United States Institute of Peace is seen, March 18, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein, File)
By GARY FIELDS
A federal judge on Monday blocked the Trump administration from moving forward with its dismantling of the U.S. Institute of Peace, an organization taken over in March by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency.
U.S. District Court Judge Beryl Howell ruled that the think tank, which was created and funded by Congress to focus on resolving violent conflicts around the globe, was taken over illegally by DOGE through 'blunt force, backed up by law enforcement officers from three separate local and federal agencies.'
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit, filed by the organization's former board members and president, had maintained that the Institute of Peace was established by law as an independent, nonprofit organization. The plaintiffs also argue that the firing of the board members did not meet any of the steps required by the law that created the organization.
The moves also did not go before any of the four congressional committees that have oversight of the institute.
In her ruling, Howell cited the uniqueness of the organization, saying the president 'second-guessed' the judgment of Congress and President Ronald Reagan in creating the institute 40 years ago, and the judgment of every Congress since.
Trump issued the executive order in February that targeted the institute and three other agencies for closure in an effort to deliver on campaign promises to shrink the size of the federal government. The first attempt by DOGE to take over the headquarters led to a standoff. Members of Musk's DOGE group returned days later with the FBI and District of Columbia Metropolitan Police to help them gain entry.
The institute and many of its board members sued the Trump administration March 18, seeking to prevent their removal and to prevent DOGE from taking over its operations. The firing of the board was followed by a Friday night mass firing by email on March 28, which threw the workforce into turmoil.
At the same time, DOGE transferred the administrative oversight of the organization's headquarters and assets to the General Services Administration that weekend. Since then, employees were allowed to retrieve personal items but computers, office tools and supplies and furniture were left behind.
In reaching her opinion Howell concluded that the institute 'ultimately exercises no Executive branch power under the Constitution but operates, through research, educational teaching, and scholarship, in the sensitive area of global peace. In creating this organization, Congress struck a careful balance between political accountability, on the one hand, and partisan independence and stability, on the other.'
As such, 'the Constitution makes clear that the President's constitutional authority only extends as far as Article II, but even Article II does not grant him absolute removal authority over his subordinates, under current binding caselaw precedent.'
Howell said that because the removal of the board by the administration was illegal, all subsequent actions are null and void, including the firing of the staff and the transfer of the headquarters to the General Services Administration.
The White House was not immediately available for comment. The administration has 30 days to appeal.
The idea in creating the institute was for an organization that would operate outside normal channels to work to promote peace and prevent and end conflicts. At the time it was shuttered, the institute operated in more than two dozen conflict zones, including Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Howell had denied two requests by the plaintiffs for restraining orders — one to halt the firing of the board and another to stop the administration from taking over the institute's headquarters.
That ruling came after she held a status hearing and learned that DOGE-installed leadership had already initiated and completed the transfer of the headquarters before the plaintiffs could even get to court. Howell equated the quick action to a bull in a China shop.
Associated Press writers Michael Kunzelman and Thalia Beaty contributed to this story.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Kyodo News
an hour ago
- Kyodo News
BREAKING NEWS: Trump welcomes Chinese students, but says he wants them checked
KYODO NEWS - 11 minutes ago - 01:02 | Others BREAKING NEWS: Trump welcomes Chinese students, but says he wants them checked ==Kyodo


Kyodo News
3 hours ago
- Kyodo News
Xi, Trump hold phone talks amid new trade tensions
KYODO NEWS - 15 minutes ago - 23:30 | World, All Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump held phone talks Thursday, China's official Xinhua News Agency said, amid renewed trade tensions over alleged violations of a tariff accord. Trump suggested earlier this week that he would likely speak with Xi soon. The world's two largest economies agreed on a 90-day truce in their trade war in mid-May in Geneva to de-escalate tensions, but they have recently traded barbs over alleged violations of the temporary accord. The call was initiated by Trump, who had said in a social media post that Xi was "VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!" It was the first confirmed conversation between the two leaders since the U.S. president took office in January for a nonconsecutive second term. U.S. officials have noted that Beijing is withholding critical minerals such as rare earths used in high-tech products, which it had agreed to release under the Geneva agreement. China's Commerce Ministry has hit back at the U.S. claim that it had violated the agreement, saying Trump's accusation was "groundless" and "grossly distorts the facts." The ministry also criticized the Trump administration for introducing "discriminatory measures" against China, including issuing guidance on export controls of artificial intelligence chips and revoking visas for Chinese students studying in the United States. Under the agreement reached in high-level talks in the Swiss city, the two countries committed to backing away from their respective triple-digit tariffs. Beijing also said it will suspend or remove the nontariff countermeasures it has taken against the United States, including export controls on seven types of rare-earth minerals. Related coverage: Pentagon chief urges Asian allies to invest in defense to deter China Rubio says U.S. to "aggressively" revoke visas of Chinese students


The Mainichi
6 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Trump promised to welcome more foreign students. Now, they feel targeted on all fronts
(AP) -- To attract the brightest minds to America, President Donald Trump proposed a novel idea while campaigning: If elected, he would grant green cards to all foreign students who graduate from U.S. colleges. "It's so sad when we lose people from Harvard, MIT, from the greatest schools," Trump said during a podcast interview last June. "That is going to end on Day One." That promise never came to pass. Trump's stance on welcoming foreign students has shifted dramatically. International students have found themselves at the center of an escalating campaign to kick them out or keep them from coming as his administration merges a crackdown on immigration with an effort to reshape higher education. An avalanche of policies from the Trump administration -- such as terminating students' ability to study in the U.S., halting all new student visa interviews and moving to block foreign enrollment at Harvard -- have triggered lawsuits, countersuits and confusion. Foreign students say they feel targeted on multiple fronts. Late Wednesday, Trump himself took the latest action against international students, signing an executive order barring nearly all foreigners from entering the country to attend Harvard. In interviews, students from around the world described how it feels to be an international student today in America. Their accounts highlight pervasive feelings of fear, anxiety and insecurity that have made them more cautious in their daily lives, distracted them from schoolwork and prompted many to cancel trips home because they fear not being allowed to return. For many, the last few months have forced them to rethink their dreams of building a life in America. A standout student from Latvia feels 'expendable' Markuss Saule, a freshman at Brigham Young University-Idaho, took a recent trip home to Latvia and spent the entire flight back to the U.S. in a state of panic. For hours, he scrubbed his phone, uninstalling all social media, deleting anything that touched on politics or could be construed as anti-Trump. "That whole 10-hour flight, where I was debating, 'Will they let me in?' -- it definitely killed me a little bit," said Saule, a business analytics major. "It was terrifying." Saule is the type of international student the U.S. has coveted. As a high schooler in Latvia, he qualified for a competitive, merit-based exchange program funded by the U.S. State Department. He spent a year of high school in Minnesota, falling in love with America and a classmate who is now his fiancee. He just ended his freshman year in college with a 4.0 GPA. But the alarm he felt on that flight crushed what was left of his American dream. "If you had asked me at the end of 2024 what my plans were, it was to get married, find a great job here in the U.S. and start a family," said Saule, who hopes to work as a business data analyst. "Those plans are not applicable anymore. Ask me now, and the plan to leave this place as soon as possible." Saule and his fiancee plan to marry this summer, graduate a year early and move to Europe. This spring the Trump administration abruptly revoked permission to study in the U.S. for thousands of international students before reversing itself. A federal judge has blocked further status terminations, but for many, the damage is done. Saule has a constant fear he could be next. As a student in Minnesota just three years ago, he felt like a proud ambassador for his country. "Now I feel a sense of inferiority. I feel that I am expendable, that I am purely an appendage that is maybe getting cut off soon," he said. Trump's policies carry a clear subtext. "The policies, what they tell me is simple. It is one word: Leave." From dreaming of working at NASA to 'doomscrolling' job listings in India A concern for attracting the world's top students was raised in the interview Trump gave last June on the podcast "All-In." Can you promise, Trump was asked, to give companies more ability "to import the best and brightest" students? "I do promise," Trump answered. Green cards, he said, would be handed out with diplomas to any foreign student who gets a college or graduate degree. Trump said he knew stories of "brilliant" graduates who wanted to stay in the U.S. to work but couldn't. "They go back to India, they go back to China" and become multi-billionaires, employing thousands of people. "That is going to end on Day One." Had Trump followed through with that pledge, a 24-year-old Indian physics major named Avi would not be afraid of losing everything he has worked toward. After six years in Arizona, where Avi attended college and is now working as an engineer, the U.S. feels like a second home. He dreams of working at NASA or in a national lab and staying in America where he has several relatives. But now he is too afraid to fly to Chicago to see them, rattled by news of foreigners being harassed at immigration centers and airports. "Do I risk seeing my family or risk deportation?" said Avi, who asked to be identified by his first name, fearing retribution. Avi is one of about 240,000 people on student visas in the U.S. on Optional Practical Training -- a postgraduation period where students are authorized to work in fields related to their degrees for up to three years. A key Trump nominee has said he would like to see an end to postgraduate work authorization for international students. Avi's visa is valid until next year but he feels "a massive amount of uncertainty." He wonders if he can sign a lease on a new apartment. Even his daily commute feels different. "I drive to work every morning, 10 miles an hour under speed limit to avoid getting pulled over," said Avi, who hopes to stay in the U.S. but is casting a wider net. "I spend a lot of time doomscrolling job listings in India and other places." A Ukrainian chose college in America over joining the fight at home -- for now Vladyslav Plyaka came to the U.S. from Ukraine as an exchange student in high school. As war broke out at home, he stayed to attend the University of Wisconsin. He was planning to visit Poland to see his mother but if he leaves the U.S., he would need to reapply for a visa. He doesn't know when that will be possible now that visa appointments are suspended, and he doesn't feel safe leaving the country anyway. He feels grateful for the education, but without renewing his visa, he'll be stuck in the U.S. at least two more years while he finishes his degree. He sometimes wonders if he would be willing to risk leaving his education in the United States -- something he worked for years to achieve -- if something happened to his family. "It's hard because every day I have to think about my family, if everything is going to be all right," he said. It took him three tries to win a scholarship to study in the U.S. Having that cut short because of visa problems would undermine the sacrifice he made to be here. He sometimes feels guilty that he isn't at home fighting for his country, but he knows there's value in gaining an education in America. "I decided to stay here just because of how good the college education is," he said. "If it was not good, I probably would be on the front lines."