U.S. Treasury extends debt ceiling measures until July 24
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday extended the department's authority to continue extraordinary cash management measures to keep from breaching the federal debt ceiling by nearly a month, until July 24.
Bessent said in a letter to congressional leaders that he had determined that the 'debt issuance suspension period' previously scheduled to expire on Friday needed to continue. The declaration allows the Treasury to suspend funding from government pension and retiree health care funds that are not needed to pay immediate benefits.
Bessent has estimated that the Treasury would no longer be able to pay all of its obligations without an increase or suspension of the debt limit some time during the mid-to-late summer.
Health care cuts stall progress on Trump's budget bill
His letter did not provide any specific updates to this timing, although he told reporters on Tuesday that the so-called debt ceiling 'X-date' could change if courts interfered with President Donald Trump's tariffs, which pulled in a record US$23-billion in customs revenue during May.
But his extension to July 24 appeared partly aimed at keeping pressure on Congress to raise the debt ceiling as part of a massive tax-and-spending package before its traditional August recess.
'Based on our current estimates, we continue to believe that Congress must act to increase or suspend the debt ceiling as soon as possible before its scheduled August recess to protect the full faith and credit of the United States,' Bessent said in the letter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
32 minutes ago
- CBC
Trump's 'revenge tax' on other countries could hit U.S.
Social Sharing A controversial tax being proposed by President Donald Trump's administration that could cost Canadians and Canadian businesses billions is also likely to cost the U.S. government, according to an assessment by a non-partisan U.S. congressional office. It is also likely to cost American companies by prompting investors from countries hit with the tax to move investments out of the U.S, according to the assessment. Dubbed the "revenge tax," Section 899 of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act calls for a new withholding tax to be imposed on investment income paid out by American companies to investors who live in countries the U.S. government considers to have unfair or discriminatory taxes. Canada's digital services tax, which hits companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb with a tax on revenue from Canadian users, is among the taxes the U.S. considers discriminatory. Top Canadian officials acknowledge privately that they are concerned by the prospect of Trump's new withholding tax and are closely watching what is happening in Washington — as are Canadian investors, companies, investment advisors and tax lawyers. Digital services tax in crosshairs Federal Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne says he's standing by the tax — which has its first big payment due June 30. "The DST is in force and it's going to be applied," he told reporters on Parliament Hill last week. Two different versions of Section 899 are currently before Congress, but both versions risk hitting Canadians and Canadian companies with a new withholding tax. The version adopted by the House of Representatives would take effect quickly and impose a five per cent withholding tax on things like dividends to Canadians from U.S. companies, adding another five per cent each year to a maximum of 20 per cent. An amendment to that section, currently before the Senate, would delay the tax until 2027 and would top it out at 15 per cent. The Senate has not yet voted on the bill, although it is being pressured by Trump to approve the legislation by July 4, the U.S. national holiday. A study of Section 899 by the U.S. Congress's non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), which performs a function similar to Canada's Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer, predicts that the new tax would initially bring billions into the U.S. Treasury. However, it also predicts those revenues would then start to decline — and that by 2033 or 2034 it would actually lead to a drop in revenue. The version of Section 899 adopted by the House of Representatives is expected to rake in an estimated $116.3 billion US between 2025 and 2034 for the U.S. Treasury, with $12.5 billion US in 2026 rising to $28.7 billion US in 2027 and $31.8 billion US in 2028. However, the analysis projects that revenues would then start to decline. By 2033, the withholding tax is projected to cost the U.S. Treasury $4.8 billion US in lost revenue and, by 2034, $8.1 billion US. The amended version of Section 899 is projected to bring in only $52.2 billion US between 2025 and 2034. But by 2034 it too would cost the U.S. government $2.5 billion US in lost revenue. A source familiar with the JCT's work said its analysis assumes that the U.S. gross national product will remain fixed and foreign laws, like the DST, will not change. What it assumes will change, however, is the behaviour of individuals and companies to avoid the withholding tax. The JCT projects that the reduction in demand for direct and portfolio investment on the part of foreign investors will reduce the value of U.S. assets. In turn, that drop in value will lead to a loss in tax revenue for the U.S. Treasury. David Macdonald, senior economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, said the JCT's analysis makes a very big assumption — that countries like Canada won't hit back at the U.S. with their own retaliatory taxes. He said the ongoing trade war has shown that Canada is willing to hit back. Should Canada retaliate, Macdonald said the U.S. is more exposed than Canada on the tax front because a lot of American companies operate here. "They make a lot more profits in Canada than Canadian companies make in profits operating in the U.S.," Macdonald said. Macdonald agreed with the JCT's assessment that the withholding tax could prompt an exodus of investment in U.S. securities, predicting that many companies are probably already figuring out ways to hedge their investments. He said this is bad for business and risks damaging the economies of both countries. "Nobody wins a trade war and nobody wins a tax war," said Macdonald.
Globe and Mail
38 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Titan Nvidia Has Scored a $4 Billion "Profit" in an Unexpected Way
For more than two years, no trend has been held in higher regard on Wall Street than the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI). With AI, software and systems are capable of making split-second decisions, overseeing generative AI solutions, and training large language models (LLMs), all without the need for human oversight. The long-term potential for this game-changing technology is truly jaw-dropping. If the analysts at PwC are correct, a combination of consumption-side effects and productivity improvements from AI will add $15.7 trillion to the global economy by the turn of the decade. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Although a long list of hardware and software/system application companies have benefited immensely from the AI revolution, none stands out more than tech titan Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA). But what you might be surprised to learn is that this highly influential AI company has scored a $4 billion "profit" in an uncharacteristic manner. Nvidia's hardware keeps AI data centers ticking It took less than two years for Nvidia to catapult from a $360 billion market cap to (briefly) the world's largest public company, with a valuation that handily surpassed $3.5 trillion. A $3 trillion-plus increase in valuation in such a short time frame had never been witnessed before. Nvidia's claim to fame is its Hopper (H100) and next-generation Blackwell graphics processing units (GPUs), which are the undisputed top options deployed in AI-accelerated data centers. Orders for both chips have been extensively backlogged, despite the efforts of world-leading chip fabrication company Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing to boost its chip-on-wafer-on-substrate monthly wafer capacity. When demand for a good or service outstrips its supply, the law of supply and-demand states that prices will climb until demand tapers. Whereas direct rival Advanced Micro Devices was netting anywhere from $10,000 to $15,000 for its Instinct MI300X AI-accelerating chip early last year, Nvidia's Hopper chips were commanding a price point that topped $40,000. The ability to charge a premium for its AI hardware, due to a combination of strong demand and persistent AI-GPU scarcity, helped push Nvidia's gross margin into the 70% range. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang is also intent on keeping his company at the forefront of the innovative curve. He's aiming to bring a new advanced chip to market each year, with Blackwell Ultra (2025), Vera Rubin (2026), and Vera Rubin Ultra (2027) set to follow in the path of Hopper and Blackwell. In other words, it doesn't appear as if Nvidia will cede its compute advantages anytime soon. The final piece of the puzzle for Nvidia has been its CUDA software platform. This is what assists developers in maximizing the compute abilities of their Nvidia GPUs, as well as aids with building/training LLMs. CUDA has played a pivotal role in keeping clients loyal to Nvidia's ecosystem of products and services. Collectively, Nvidia's data center segment has helped catapult sales by 383% between fiscal 2023 (ended in late January 2023) and fiscal 2025, and sent adjusted net income skyrocketing from $8.4 billion to $74.3 billion over the same timeline. Wall Street's AI darling just scored a $4 billion "windfall" As you can imagine, most of Nvidia's more than $74 billion in adjusted net income last year was derived from its operating activities -- and this is how it should be for a market-leading growth stock. But it's not the only way Wall Street's AI darling can put dollars in the profit column. What's often overlooked about Nvidia is that it's also an investor. Just as institutional money managers with more than $100 million in assets under management (AUM) are required to file Form 13F no later than 45 days following the end to a quarter -- a 13F lays out which stocks, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and select options were purchased and sold -- businesses with north of $100 million in AUM must do the same. This includes Nvidia. At the end of March, Nvidia had more than $1.1 billion invested across a half-dozen publicly traded companies. Accounting rules require Nvidia to recognize unrealized gains and losses each quarter, based on the change in value of the securities in its investment portfolio. Nvidia's largest investment holding is AI-data center infrastructure goliath CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV), which went public in late March. Nvidia made an initial investment in CoreWeave of $100 million in April 2023, and upped its stake by another $250 million in March 2025, prior to its initial public offering (IPO). On a combined basis, Nvidia has put $350 million of its capital to work in Wall Street's hottest IPO. As of the closing bell on Friday, June 20, the 24,182,460 shares of CoreWeave that Nvidia held, as of March 31, were worth (drumroll) close to $4.44 billion. On an unrealized basis, Wall Street's AI titan is sitting on a $4 billion-plus "profit" from its investment. If you're wondering why "profit" is in quotations, it's because Nvidia may have reduced its stake in CoreWeave since the second quarter began. We won't know for sure until 13Fs detailing second-quarter trading activity are filed in mid-August. Further, this $4 billion unrealized gain can fluctuate, depending on where CoreWeave stock closes out the June quarter. Nevertheless, it's been one heck of a windfall for Nvidia. Is Nvidia playing with fire? While Nvidia has a solid track record of making smart investments in up-and-coming tech companies -- many of which it's partnered with -- there's also the real possibility it's playing with fire when it comes to CoreWeave. Don't get me wrong, CoreWeave has been a fantastic client for Nvidia. It purchased 250,000 Hopper GPUs for its AI-data centers, which it leases out to businesses looking for compute capacity. It's in Nvidia's best interest that CoreWeave succeed and upgrade its AI chips roughly twice per decade. But there are a number of red flags with CoreWeave that suggest its $88 billion valuation isn't sustainable. One of the biggest concerns with Wall Street's hottest IPO is that Nvidia's aggressive innovation cycles could hinder, not help, its business. Bringing an advanced AI chip to market annually has the potential to quickly depreciate CoreWeave's Hopper GPUs, and might send customers to rival data centers that have newer chips. When CoreWeave looks to upgrade its infrastructure in the coming years, there's a very good chance it'll recoup far less from its assets than it expects. CoreWeave has also leaned on leverage to build out its AI-data center. Relying on debt to acquire GPUs can lead to burdensome debt-servicing costs. For the moment, these servicing costs are adding to the company's steep operating losses. Valuation is another clear concern with CoreWeave. Investors are paying roughly 8 times forecast sales in 2026 for a company that's not time-tested and hasn't generated a profit. While Nvidia, undoubtedly, wants to see CoreWeave succeed, locking in its gains at these levels would make a lot of sense. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $689,813!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $906,556!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is809% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to175%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025
Ottawa Citizen
an hour ago
- Ottawa Citizen
How will Canada reach its new defence spending commitments?
Article content The NATO summit wrapped up Wednesday with major concessions from alliance countries to U.S. demands to further hike military spending. Article content Here is a rundown of what happened and what it means. Article content Article content What did Canada agree to? Article content Canada has signed on to the NATO pledge to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of annual GDP by 2035. Article content That means that Canadians at that point will be spending $150 billion annually on defence and security. Article content Article content The NATO plan involves investing 3.5 per cent of GDP into core military needs, which includes armaments and equipment. Another 1.5 per cent will be spent on related infrastructure, cyber defence and security. Article content The spending hike is a direct result of ongoing pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump who floated the idea in January that alliance countries need to spend 5 per cent of their GDP on defence. Article content Trump has repeatedly focused his ire on a number of nations, including Canada, claiming they are taking advantage of the U.S. by not spending enough on their militaries. Article content The spending boost announced by NATO could also prove to be a big winner for the American economy. The U.S. is the world's largest arms manufacturer and such massive increases in spending on defence equipment could mean significantly more business and American jobs. Article content Article content Article content Prime Minister Mark Carney has said that Canada should have no problem reaching the 1.5 per cent infrastructure portion by concentrating on projects that are already under way or currently being planned. That would include the development of the mining and stockpiling of critical minerals, an initiative that could see Canada becoming a trusted supplier to western nations for such material. Article content 'A little less than a third of that overall number is spending on things that quite frankly we're already doing to build the resilience of our economy,' Carney told CNN. 'So, it would be domestic resilience, it would be defending the areas that are important to defend, but also supporting critical minerals development.'
