logo
Consumer giants' growth no longer involves food

Consumer giants' growth no longer involves food

Reuters31-01-2025

LONDON, Jan 31 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Think of Unilever (ULVR.L), opens new tab, and the first products that come to mind are likely to be ones you eat - Marmite, Ben & Jerry's ice cream and Hellmann's mayonnaise. Yet the $143 billion company is increasingly investing in other parts of its business, like beauty and wellbeing, and not spending any of its M&A budget on growing its food empire. There's a strong valuation case for doing so.
Food was once an exciting revenue stream for the likes of Nestlé (NESN.S), opens new tab, Kraft Heinz (KHC.O), opens new tab and Unilever. The latter spent decades splurging on deals and expanding into new territories like Indonesia and India to gain market share. Shoppers, seduced by big marketing campaigns, were happy to pay over the odds for branded cereals like Cheerios and Heinz tomato ketchup. Yet ever since inflation soared in 2022, consumers have shopped around for the lowest prices, complicating the delivery of consistent revenue and stable margins.
In November, Nestlé's new CEO Laurent Freixe revealed how these forces have afflicted the world's largest food manufacturer. Over the medium term, he is only aiming to deliver 4% revenue growth, excluding the effects of M&A and currency swings. That's closer to the lower end of the $227 billion group's previous target of mid-single-digit growth. Freixe is only aiming to keep operating margins steady at 17% over the coming years.
Consumer goods more generally are under pressure. In October, Kraft Heinz trimmed its sales and profit outlook for the year. The $36 billion maker of Jell-O also posted a larger than expected hit to its third-quarter sales.
Compare that to the business of selling luxury beauty products. Swiss skincare firm Galderma (GALD.S), opens new tab expected to grow revenue between 8.8% and 9.5% in 2024, having delivered 9.2% in the first nine months of the year. And $204 billion French cosmetics giant L'Oréal (OREP.PA), opens new tab is expected to boost sales by around 5% annually over the next three years, more than double the rate of food giants like Nestlé and Kraft Heinz during the same period, as per LSEG estimates.
Investors have noticed. Kraft Heinz and Nestlé's enterprise values are roughly 10 times and 17 times the respective operating profit they're forecast to deliver in 2025, using LSEG Datastream figures, which represents a sharp decline from their equivalent 12-month forward multiples of 14 times and 20 times at the start of 2023. Galderma and L'Oréal trade at an average of 28 times 2025 operating profit. Two other food-heavy players, Danone (DANO.PA), opens new tab and Unilever, trade on multiples of 15 and 14 respectively.
These diverging fortunes are why Hein Schumacher is drawing a line in the sand. The Unilever boss has already committed to flogging the company's ice cream business, leaving a slimmed-down nutrition unit that includes brands like Knorr stock cubes and Hellmann's. He plans to spend a large share of the company's $9 billion marketing budget, equivalent to 15% of revenue, bulking up the beauty and wellness business, which delivered nearly $14 billion of sales in 2023. According to a person with knowledge of his plans, only two food brands, Hellmann's mayonnaise and Knorr stock cubes, will get a decent slab of this budget. The rest of the food business will be gradually pruned and trimmed.
As it stands, beauty and wellness will make up just over a quarter of the operating profit Unilever will deliver in 2025, using analyst estimates gathered by Visible Alpha and excluding the ice cream unit. Meanwhile, nutrition will make up another quarter, home care almost a fifth and personal care close to 30%. Imagine a hypothetical world where Schumacher could in one stroke boost the percentage coming from beauty and wellness to, say, 40% - perhaps via buying up some small brands and luring in more customers with a bigger marketing spend on the division. If the other divisions stayed the same, the nutrition business's contribution would shrink to 12%.
This could pay dividends in valuation terms. If Schumacher pulls it off, the enlarged beauty and wellness division would deliver 4.3 billion euros of operating profit. Value that at L'Oréal and Galderma's average 28 times operating profit multiple for 2025, and the division would alone be worth 119 billion euros including debt.
If the slimmer nutrition unit is valued on the 16 times average multiple of Nestlé and Danone, it would fetch 21 billion euros. Also putting personal care on 16 times, like Sensodyne toothpaste maker Haleon (HLN.L), opens new tab, would imply a valuation of 51 billion euros. Value Unilever's home care arm like Reckitt Benckiser (RKT.L), opens new tab, on 12 times, and it would be worth 24 billion euros. In total, Unilever would be worth 216 billion euros, before factoring in ice cream, a 25% uplift on the group's current enterprise value.
The catch for Nestlé and Kraft Heinz is that their path to redemption is much fuzzier. After all, with the lion's share of their sales stemming from edible brands, it's much harder to pivot to something else. Without a plan B, consumer giants will increasingly split into the haves and the have-nots.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More jets does not mean UK ‘at war' says Reeves, amid Israel-Iran conflict
More jets does not mean UK ‘at war' says Reeves, amid Israel-Iran conflict

Leader Live

time7 hours ago

  • Leader Live

More jets does not mean UK ‘at war' says Reeves, amid Israel-Iran conflict

The Chancellor also indicated that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel, but declined to comment on 'what might happen in the future'. The two nations continued to exchange fire overnight, as the region braced for a protracted conflict. Sir Keir Starmer confirmed on Saturday that more RAF planes are being deployed, amid the escalating hostilities between Israel and Iran. Additional refuelling aircraft have been deployed from UK bases and more fast Typhoon jets will be sent over, it is understood. Asked whether the announcement from the Prime Minister means the UK is at war, Ms Reeves told Sky News: 'No, it does not mean that we are at war. 'And we have not been involved in these strikes or this conflict, but we do have important assets in the region and it is right that we send jets to protect them and that's what we've done. 'It's a precautionary move.' Oil prices surged surged on Friday after Israel's initial strikes against Iran's nuclear programme, sparking fears of increasing prices in the UK. The Chancellor told the BBC that there is 'no complacency' from the Treasury on the issue and 'we're obviously, monitoring this very closely as a government'. Sir Keir has declined to rule out the possibility of intervening in the conflict entirely, and the Chancellor indicated on Sunday that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel in the future. Britain last announced it had deployed fighter jets in the region in last year, when the Government said British aircraft had played a part in efforts to prevent further escalation. Asked whether the UK would come to Israel's aid if asked, the Chancellor told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: 'We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. 'I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Pushed again on whether the UK would deploy assets in support of Israel if asked, she said: 'What we've done in the past (…) is help protect Israel from incoming strikes. 'So a defensive activity.' She added: 'I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage (…) it's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation.' It comes after Iranian state media said Tehran had warned it would target US, UK and French bases in the region if the countries help Israel thwart Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride has backed the Government's decision to send further RAF jets to the region, telling the BBC it is the 'right thing' to do. He told the BBC: 'We've got assets out there in the UAE, Oman, Cyprus, they need to be protected given that Iran has suggested they may be under threat.'

Government advises against all travel to Israel amid Iran conflict
Government advises against all travel to Israel amid Iran conflict

Glasgow Times

time8 hours ago

  • Glasgow Times

Government advises against all travel to Israel amid Iran conflict

The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office updated travel advice on Sunday to advise 'against all travel to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories'. Israel and Iran continued to exchange fire overnight, after Sir Keir Starmer said that the UK was sending more RAF jets to the region amid the increasing hostilities. The FCDO website warns that 'travel insurance could be invalidated' if people travel against the advice, and described the current status as a 'fast-moving situation that poses significant risks'. Earlier on Sunday, Rachel Reeves said that sending more jets to the region 'does not mean' the UK is at war. Additional refuelling aircraft have been deployed from UK bases and more fast Typhoon jets will be sent over, it is understood. The Chancellor also indicated that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel, but declined to comment on 'what might happen in the future'. Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves (Carl Court/PA) Asked whether the announcement from the Prime Minister means the UK is at war, Ms Reeves told Sky News: 'No, it does not mean that we are at war. 'And we have not been involved in these strikes or this conflict, but we do have important assets in the region and it is right that we send jets to protect them and that's what we've done. 'It's a precautionary move.' Oil prices surged surged on Friday after Israel's initial strikes against Iran's nuclear programme, sparking fears of increasing prices in the UK. The Chancellor told the BBC that there is 'no complacency' from the Treasury on the issue and 'we're obviously, monitoring this very closely as a government'. Sir Keir has declined to rule out the possibility of intervening in the conflict entirely, and the Chancellor indicated on Sunday that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel in the future. Britain last announced it had deployed fighter jets in the region in last year, when the Government said British aircraft had played a part in efforts to prevent further escalation. Asked whether the UK would come to Israel's aid if asked, the Chancellor told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: 'We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. 'I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Shadow chancellor of the Exchequer Mel Stride (James Manning/PA) Pushed again on whether the UK would deploy assets in support of Israel if asked, she said: 'What we've done in the past (…) is help protect Israel from incoming strikes. 'So a defensive activity.' She added: 'I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage (…) it's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation.' It comes after Iranian state media said Tehran had warned it would target US, UK and French bases in the region if the countries help Israel thwart Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride has backed the Government's decision to send further RAF jets to the region, telling the BBC it is the 'right thing' to do. He told the BBC: 'We've got assets out there in the UAE, Oman, Cyprus, they need to be protected given that Iran has suggested they may be under threat.'

Government advises against all travel to Israel amid Iran conflict
Government advises against all travel to Israel amid Iran conflict

The Herald Scotland

time8 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Government advises against all travel to Israel amid Iran conflict

Israel and Iran continued to exchange fire overnight, after Sir Keir Starmer said that the UK was sending more RAF jets to the region amid the increasing hostilities. The FCDO website warns that 'travel insurance could be invalidated' if people travel against the advice, and described the current status as a 'fast-moving situation that poses significant risks'. Earlier on Sunday, Rachel Reeves said that sending more jets to the region 'does not mean' the UK is at war. Additional refuelling aircraft have been deployed from UK bases and more fast Typhoon jets will be sent over, it is understood. The Chancellor also indicated that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel, but declined to comment on 'what might happen in the future'. Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves (Carl Court/PA) Asked whether the announcement from the Prime Minister means the UK is at war, Ms Reeves told Sky News: 'No, it does not mean that we are at war. 'And we have not been involved in these strikes or this conflict, but we do have important assets in the region and it is right that we send jets to protect them and that's what we've done. 'It's a precautionary move.' Oil prices surged surged on Friday after Israel's initial strikes against Iran's nuclear programme, sparking fears of increasing prices in the UK. The Chancellor told the BBC that there is 'no complacency' from the Treasury on the issue and 'we're obviously, monitoring this very closely as a government'. Sir Keir has declined to rule out the possibility of intervening in the conflict entirely, and the Chancellor indicated on Sunday that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel in the future. Britain last announced it had deployed fighter jets in the region in last year, when the Government said British aircraft had played a part in efforts to prevent further escalation. Asked whether the UK would come to Israel's aid if asked, the Chancellor told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: 'We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. 'I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Shadow chancellor of the Exchequer Mel Stride (James Manning/PA) Pushed again on whether the UK would deploy assets in support of Israel if asked, she said: 'What we've done in the past (…) is help protect Israel from incoming strikes. 'So a defensive activity.' She added: 'I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage (…) it's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation.' It comes after Iranian state media said Tehran had warned it would target US, UK and French bases in the region if the countries help Israel thwart Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride has backed the Government's decision to send further RAF jets to the region, telling the BBC it is the 'right thing' to do. He told the BBC: 'We've got assets out there in the UAE, Oman, Cyprus, they need to be protected given that Iran has suggested they may be under threat.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store